Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

18384868889102

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    [ deleted ]

    @Limerick74 Fair point, and apologies for contributing to the problem.

    I do think that perpetually delaying funding is how they’ll quietly can this project, but it’s a shame that this strategy will block and delay any other investment in fixing the problems that already exist around the N6.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I thought I saw that posted somewhere but couldn't remember which thread. Even looked before I posted regarding cycling from barna, Spiddal & Moycullen.

    I've started a thread on this board to carry on the discussion. Folks are free to wander over there and discuss whether this road is a colossal waste of money that won't fix a thing and instead make things worse or a necessity required to stop Galway dying under a blanket of cars




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Are you seriously saying people living in say Barna should now cycle to work in Ballybrit or the same with Moycullen?

    The problem with traffic in Galway is not frekaing tourists or people out for a jolly, but people trying to get places like work or for business.

    Sure it was such a pity that they hadn't the greenway in place so people could cycle across the city to get their covid vaccinations. 🙄

    I must tell a few people I know that have to traverse the city for work that they will get a greenway.

    FFS.

    Yes cycling is ok for short distances where there are roads set up for it.

    A lot of the people stuck in Galway traffic are not living in the environs of the city, but outside and have to cross the city.

    And no before the usual whining a lot of them are not living in one off houses in the middle of nowhere, but in towns and villages that offer cheaper property and accommodatuion than are available in Galway city and it's suburbs.

    Maybe they can really live the green dream and have one car in the village to share. 😯

    Besides that some people actually want to live in the area they grew up, persih the thought for them having such outlandish ideas.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Happy to continue to discuss it further in the thread linked above but I will just point out that Barna to Ballybrit is 12km, that's not a crazy cycle by any means. According to Google maps that's a 40 min cycle, I'd wager you'd do it in 30 mins or less on an ebike. Could you do it in that time during peak hours in a car, highly doubtful.

    As I said, happy to continue to discuss this in the other thread per mod request



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just to say DaCor is right to put this discussion into its own thread. Healthy thing to do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 969 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    Maybe we could spend the money on putting a canopy over the existing roads for cyclists for the winter months. This would work well with the green party one car in the village brainwave.



  • Registered Users Posts: 38 OpinionN


    Or we could take that discussion....to a new thread.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    As expected, a Judicial Review of this approval has been lodged.





  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not gonna lie, pretty happy about that :)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    A JR was inevitable given our dysfunctional planning appeal system but a shame nonetheless. It's a shame for the people of Galway, as this effectively freezes the Galway Transport Strategy for the coming years, and essentially eliminates any realistic chance of radical redistribution of Galway's road space. The ring road will remain just as necessary after the JR concludes, but it will only continue to increase in price, and will just be delivered instead by an SF/FF government at greater expense several years down the line.

    I guess the rest of us will benefit from increased road funding though in the meantime, so maybe Galway's loss is the rest of Ireland's gain. Is olc an ghaoth...



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,298 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    A planning system that allows people to submit observations to a development does not make it dysfunctional. A planning appeals body that approves developments that contravene existing legislation or government commitments is what makes it dysfunctional.

    This road will not do what it is being proclaimed to do and as such is a massive waste of money. At this stage building a road that ABP say is "likely to result in a significant negative impact on carbon emissions and climate that will not be fully mitigated" cannot be excused.

    It will have little to no impact on Galway's already congested roads. The only way to reduce the volume of traffic around gGalway is to reduce the number of people making the choice to drive. A new road will simply only encourage more people to drive. Every new road built around the world has shown that!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    The Galway Ring Road is a core government policy at local and national level, the lynchpin of the Galway Transport Strategy, and a key part of the National Development Strategy. A planning system that cannot give the final okay to such an important infrastructure project in reasonable time, and whose approval is then routinely suspended for years on end to allow NIMBYs to argue on points of law which are utterly irrelevant to the merits of the project is indeed dysfunctional, and denial of this simple fact is what is costing this country housing, business, and industrial development on a daily basis.

    The government's reforms to the planning system can't come fast enough.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Thankfully the courts disagree with you

    The government's reforms to the planning system can't come fast enough.

    I wouldn't hold my breath on that one. They've already had a fair few shots across their bow in terms of how limited any changes can be. Step outside those limits and they've already been told the EU will challenge them in court, as well as challenges from any number of local groups and people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Everyone,no matter their opinion on the need for this road, knew a JR was inevitable from the day the preferred scheme was announced. The Galway Transport Strategy relying entirely on this road being built was stupidity on the part of those who prepared the strategy. The JR only freezes the Galway Transport Strategy because the strategy is so reliant on one very wobbly project. Any half decent strategy isn't based around a single point of failure with a certainty of delay and high probability of failure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 574 ✭✭✭Aontachtoir


    Just like there is no realistic solution for Ireland's hospital waiting list problem that doesn't include building more hospitals, there is no realistic solution for Galway's transport problems that does not include building the ring road. It's a bit sad that some people seem so blinded by their beliefs that they cannot accept this simple fact, to the point that they are willing to condemn the people of Galway to years of pointless delays rather than admit that they are wrong and the road really is needed.

    Hand-waving claims about public transport magically solving these problems without any new roads are all well and good, but they simply aren't based in reality.

    Like I said, I don't live in Galway, and delays to investment in Galway are probably good for investments around me, but I still feel bad for them.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Disappointing also to see in a world of democratic backsliding that the Green Party seem to disagree with democracy. Candidates of parties supporting the Ring Road got over 50% of FPVs in the last election (I counted enough to get over 50 - O Cuiv, Naughten, Grealish, Kyne & Crowe). This is national and local Government policy with widespread support. I’d like to see the reaction if other TDs took judicial reviews against cycle lanes and called such projects “vandalism” in the Dail just because they don’t like them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This JR has been taken by FIE not O'Reilly. Also, there's been plenty of public representatives who have taken JR's.

    Also, we have to build a road because.....democracy, give me a break lol

    We'll have to wait and see what happens but this is very likely to go the way of the previous case (hopefully) given the strengthening of environmental requirements since the previous case.

    I actually recall posting in this thread back when that case was ongoing, I was furious at the outcome at the time.

    Since then I've learned a lot and have come to realise the astounding stupidity of this road and how it will have a colossal detrimental effect on Galway for decades if its built.

    People keep saying "build the road, then sort out the other modes". Problem with this option is it locks in car primacy.

    I say "sort out the other modes first, then see if we still need the road". My guess is it won't be needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The flaws of that hospital analogy have already been pointed out to you; more hospitals don't create more sisk/injured people and there are plenty of initiatives to reduce hospital waiting lists which don't involve building hospitals by improving the general health of the population.

    Some level of new road building will almost certainly have to be part of the solution for Galway. The fallacy is that the proposed road is designed entirely to accommodate commuters and with no consideration whatsoever for public/active transport. Hand-waving claims about a ring road magically solving these problems without any new public/active transport are all well and good, but they simply aren't based in reality.

    It has been obvious from the beginning that this approach was going to run into difficulties (not least around government policy in relation to transport and climate change and their direction of travel). To build a transport strategy around a single road (one with limited chance of being built) was stupid in the extreme. The inevitable has happened and the ring road won't be delivered until the end the decade, if ever, and Galway is condemned to enormous congestion for many more years because, as things stand, very little can happen in the meantime. Your whinging that "some people seem so blinded by their beliefs that they cannot accept this simple fact" is truly hilarious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    I would be more worried about your understanding of Democracy after reading this.

    The JR is been taken on a point of the GCRR been in line with National Policy.

    Why are you looking at candidates from the previous election?

    Why not count the current Galway West TD's, 2/5 are in the current Government who are responsible for this Policy been adopted ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭El Tarangu


    I'm sure you are a good fellow and that you work hard for your family, but I think that many people will find this insufficient justification for spending €1bn on a road project.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I have a perfectly good understanding of democracy. This seems to be a reasonably popular proposal in Galway, a majority of the votes in the last election went to candidates representing parties who were behind the scheme. If this was a deeply unpopular scheme in Galway, you can be sure that the candidates would have rowed in against it if they thought there was votes in it, like housing SHDs, or the M28 in Cork for example.

    You are right about the democratic right to object to such projects. The real solution here is adequate resourcing of the courts to deal with these matters in a quick manner. The M28 spent 2.5 years in the courts and in the end the project was found to have no faults.

    Is this the Climate Act you reference that 2/5 of the constituency’s TDs voted for?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    And its only a 18km road project at that. This to me is the bigger hurdle rather than the JR that is been taken here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Why were you listing the 2016 politicians that were elected rather than those who were elected in 2020 for Galway West?

    This project has been in the pipeline prior to 2016 so even that is also just a snapshot. The National Policy is changing as the years have gone by.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Apologies for the lack of clarity. I picked out the 2 FF candidates, 2 FG candidates and Grealish from 2020 who combined got 50%+ of the vote. They didn’t all get elected but they got more than 50% of the FPVs. All ran on a pro-Ring Road platform.

    I can’t find any definitive information on what Sinn Fein think of the project from a quick Google and I know Catherine Connolly isn’t a massive fan, which completes the set of TDs elected in 2020.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Ah ok going for First Pref vote based on the first count in 2020. Get ya. (Crowe actually never made it in 2016)

    SF are supporters of it, so you could have got your 4/5 if you just said elected reps in the 2020 election. Which probably looks better considering that 4/5 that you list are members of partys in the current Government who are responsible for this Climate Bill been adopted.

    Catherine Connolly TD has been consistent for decades on it and its previous version.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @marno21 Sorry, but I have to call out that reasoning. You’re employing the same logical fallacy as the supporters of Brexit did in the UK, although I’m pretty sure that you’re not doing so deliberately, in the way they did.

    Still, you cannot just derive support for the ring-road based on the first-preference votes given to election candidates. People have multiple reasons for voting, and candidates for major parties don’t stand on one single issue. Also, support for the project amongst those candidates ranged from “it’s better than doing nothing” to “it’s the best possible solution”.

    ... and on the other side of the ballot-box, voters are not so ideologically driven that they would boycott a candidate simply because of their stance on a road project. We have seen that people don’t boycott candidates even on much more emotive issues like abortion, where counties with sizeable objection to repeal still returned TDs who supported it.

    As far as I can tell, there has been no well-conducted poll of Galway residents about this scheme, so there’s no justification for saying that “people in Galway” are either in favour of, or against the road.

    My own, pure conjecture, opinion is that if you asked them, the majority of the people in Galway only want the traffic fixed, and don’t really care whether that would happen via M6 or via a greatly improved public-transport and cycling system that pulled more commuters off the existing roads, so long as it happened.

    I also think that Galway City making their transport plan heavily dependent on M6 being built was at best ill-judged, and a worst a cynical exercise in kicking the can down the road.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    That Brexit supporter point of view actually crossed my mind after I posted it so I was aware, but I think here that the Ring Road is an achievable outcome vs the unclear outcome of Brexit. I do take your point about people being in favour of fixing the traffic vs being specifically in favour of the road, but there’s a sizeable proportion of people who simply want a road based solution and aren’t particularly interested in PT/cycling (same as I am with Cork based road projects).

    An important point as well is that it’s a very small proportion of Galway’s population who are expressing opinions about this project online. Most people aren’t posting on boards or tweeting about it so we’ll never know, but from the limited sample of people on Twitter I see, most people against the project are either Green Party members, environmental or the very pro cycling people you’d find on Twitter. This is, I hypothesise, a small proportion of the general Galway population.



  • Registered Users Posts: 969 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    They should be boycotted this year and never get a cent of state funding again. Disgraceful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4 Gallowglas


    Always the rich snobby ones who hold it up for everyone else



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Wow. That throws a spanner in the works for sure, how many of the Racecourse Committee would be Galway Chamber members? Going back the ages they have been from Galway's Business Community.

    The CEO of Galway Chamber has said that the opponents of the Galway City Ring Road are “not connected with reality”.

    I think CEO Kenny Deery was formerly a banker in AIB so would certainly be mixing in the same circles as the Racecourse Committee.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,298 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Seriously? Anyone can take part in the planning process.

    However to take a JR can take a lot of money because that is what it costs given that it essentially is form of legal action - losing can mean having to pay the other sides costs. However as money is a factor when undertaking a JR, most people simply accept the project at this point i.e. give up. However, if they take a JR, they are not holding it up for everyone else because the process hasn't been finalised. They are engaging in a legitimate planning process which has some time based constraints. Would you prefer a system where planning applications were forced upon the people without a chance to voice concerns? A system where councillors and TDs have the final say? Or where private companies are allowed to build whatever they want wherever they wish?

    Most people simply don't. I don't think Friends of the Irish Environment would be referred to as rich or snobby. The owners of the racecourse presumably are rich but I've no idea if they are snobby.

    Take a look at Intel in Leixlip - one person who often objects to planning applications there is their neighbour Thomas Reid. He is neither rich nor snobby. Any observations and appeals he has put forwsards were based on their merit. If his observation was valid (which it often was) then the project needs to be reviewed. This is a good system that allows people a voice. Despite Mr. Reid's observations and appeals and contrary to what is often touted when he submits an appeal, nobody in Intel lost their job!

    Getting back to galway, what exactly in your view will the JR hold up for everyone else? Do you think Galway's commuters will be able to get to work quicker? Do you think traffic volumes will reduce?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @marno21

    An important point as well is that it’s a very small proportion of Galway’s population who are expressing opinions about this project online.

    Most people aren’t posting on boards or tweeting about it so we’ll never know, but from the limited sample of people on Twitter I see, most people against the project are either Green Party members, environmental or the very pro cycling people you’d find on Twitter. This is, I hypothesise, a small proportion of the general Galway population.

    I’d say it’s a vanishingly small proportion. People who care enough about something to post their opinion online are not representative of the general public, and that rule goes about a thousand times more for Twitter, which is overpopulated with self-appointed “activists” of all kinds. (Personally, my low tolerance for ill-informed hot-takes, vitriol and plain old bullshit, led me to delete Twitter around four years ago, and I never missed anything in my life less than Twitter)

    --

    It’s depressing to see that the Racecourse, whose lobbying against CPO added hundreds of millions to the construction costs of this project is now requesting a review of it. Cheeky f'kers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    True - very small % + or - would be online discussing it as can be seen here on Boards

    It is surprising that Racecourse had to take this action - after all one can see the ARUP project offices for this project right from the Grandstand. Practically next door neighbors, hey didnt even need to drive, one can walk across the track to the Ring Road Project office.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    Just on a point of information (because I remember you having a keen interest in administrative law) Galway Race Committee had their papers lodged 2 days before Friends of the Irish Environment CLG, pipping the expected favourite to the post, so to speak.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Perfect use of an obvious pun, I applaud you sir 👏



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    Planning judicial reviews operate on a different plane of reality to other comparable legal actions. As long as there's an environmental angle, you're within the scope of the Aarhus Convention and your costs exposure is limited. As an example, in Klohn v. An Bord Pleanála [2021] IESC 51, a costs order which was measured at €86,000 against the unsuccessful applicant was reduced to €1,250 by the Supreme Court.

    You'll find no shortage of expert solicitors who are willing to bring these cases on a no-foal, no-fee basis and a number of challenges to SHDs have even been crowdfunded (for the can of worms that opens up).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭barry181091


    How long do these reviews take on average?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,115 ✭✭✭timmyntc




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    How long is a piece of string? The most relevant comparator off the top of my head is the M28 case from Cork which was initiated in August 2018 and didn't finish in the High Court until 2018 before heading on to the Supreme Court, where leave to appeal was denied, in March 2021.

    Both sets of proceedings are most likely bound for the Strategic Infrastructure Development list which is supposed to be a fast track process but I wouldn't expect things to move at breakneck speed in this instance.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They take a silly amount of time due to the lack of resources assigned by govt at every stage of the process. This could all be done in a matter of weeks if all the relevant parties were staffed properly



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,282 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    If the road was constructed, it would free up space for Salthill cycleways, and a cycle way to link to try City Centre plus Oranmore. The inability for posters to engage in joined up thinking is ridiculous. Now the ‘Horse Racing Committee’ - is trying to get a judicial review. How do the environmentalists feel about horse racing? Hypocrisy stinks.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Its been said many times, but it needs repeating, there are no plans, anywhere, by any dept or council, to free up space once the GCRR is constructed.

    if there were you would have a point.

    A good example to look at, Limerick tunnel, nothing was done to free up space for other modes once it opened, nothing, nadda, zip, zilch. It was a €700 million project to remove traffic from the center of Limerick which did not result in any benefit for any other modes.

    Now, if there were plans to do the following as soon as the GCRR opened then maybe it would have more support

    • make all dual carriageways single lane to free up a lane for bus routes
    • a full network of connected, protected bike lanes on ALL arterial routes
    • restricted access for cars within the city center

    Thats a bare minimum list and there are no plans to do any of that.

    What does exist is the GTS, which was built around spending hundreds of million on a ring road and a few quid on a few other bits that are not enough to effect any real modal shift.

    So yeah, for joined up thinking you need a joined up plan



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,282 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    I agree. With all the delays to starting the road project, I think it's just ridiculous on all sides atm and so frustrating. Who's to say there wouldn't be judicial reviews of the proposals you're suggesting. At some point, the planning laws should be questioned as to their veracity.

    Personally I think Ireland needs to improve all their town and city centres and move away from facilitating cars only. But you need them to function and have the infrastructure in place to do so. Your suggestions are good as to how the City Centre should change from being a carpark of cars stuck in traffic once the road is built. It should also be a strategy in town centres with appropriate infrastructure right now in my opinion in towns like Oranmore and Athenry which are both bypassed and have good road networks and public transport options around them. There should be more pedestrianisation of their centres, with local walking and bike lanes to housing estates and train stations.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,864 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod: Troll posts deleted.

    Post edited by Sam Russell on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Friends of the Irish Environment granted a stay on any further works on the N6 Galway City Ring Road


    FIE GIVEN STAY ON FURTHER WORKS ON GALWAY N6 RING-ROAD 

    FIE GIVEN LEAVE TO JUDICIAL REVIEW GALWAY RING ROAD


    High Court Justice Humphreys this morning granted a stay on any further works on the N6 Galway City Ring Road as he allowed a Judicial Review of the project by Friends of the Irish Environment [FIE].


    Justice Humphreys also allowed FIE an additional Junior Counsel because of the ‘voluminous’ nature of the documentation.


    The Review comes nine years after the previous ring road was quashed by the European Court of Justice on the grounds that it would result in the lasting and irreparable damage to the integrity of the protected natural habitats. 


    The new scheme was applied for in 2018 and granted permission by An Bord Pleanála in December 2021. Galway County Council estimates the road will take three years to construct at a cost of at least €600 million and would involve a number of tunnels, as well as a viaduct over the River Corrib, a designated European nature conservation site.


    The challenge comes from the conservation charity Friends of the Irish Environment (FIE), the group behind Climate Case Ireland. It is based on the failure of An Bord Pleanála to comply with the very significantly enhanced emissions reduction ambition adopted by the government in climate change legislation last year as well as the Habitats Directive.


    FIE successfully had Ireland’s original National Mitigation Plan struck down by the Supreme Court in 2020 for being, according to the then Chief Justice Frank Clark, ‘excessively vague’.


    Grounds for the legal challenge:

    FIE has told the High Court that An Bord Pleanála failed to act consistent with Ireland’s commitment to reduce carbon emissions as set out in the Climate & Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Act 2021 and the Climate Action Plan 2021, and the clear commitments in national policy to invest heavily in modal shift away from roads and private cars, and towards public transport, walking and cycling infrastructure.


    ‘The answer to Galway traffic problems lie in proven measures, such as better public transport and the ongoing push for pedestrianisation and bicycles lanes – not in more and bigger roads,’ Helena Murphy if FIE said.


    ‘This project totally flies in the face of all of our environmental targets and undermines our compliance with the Habitats Directive as well as our efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Developing roads in a climate crisis is just irrational, no matter how much one seeks to greenwash it.


    'It is incredibly frustrating that groups like FIE have to resort to legal action to make bodies like An Bord Pleanála accountable to the law. These types of projects and developments divert investment away from the urgent investment we need to make in reducing our emissions and are self-evidently relics of the past fossil fuel era, and ones we should be urgently abandoning. The Welsh Government, for example, recently announced that it is to stop all new road building projects while it conducts a wide-ranging review in the face of our ever-deepening climate emergency.


    'We need to heavily invest in encouraging and enabling safe cycling, efficient public transport, not more roads bringing ever more traffic and more sprawl that will lock-in more emissions.”


    ‘This project, which is acknowledged by An Bord Pleanála to lead to an increase in emissions which cannot be fully mitigated, is contrary to Ireland’s climate commitments under Irish and European law, as well as the 2015 Paris Agreement. An Bord Pleanála hasn’t yet looked up to see the climate catastrophe hurtling towards us.”


    Other grounds in the challenge include Ireland’s failure to set site specific conservation objectives of European nature conservation sites, which meant that An Bord Pleanála could not have reached a valid determination that the proposed ring road would not have an adverse impact on sensitive habitats, and failure to comply with the European Union’s TEN-T Regulations in respect of climate change resilience.


    Delays

    Ms Murphy also criticised the delays in legal proceedings due to the insufficient number of Judges - ‘FIE is well aware of the impact of a legal challenge’s delay, but delays to large projects are not due to protestors, but to the failures by the Board and the lack of Judges in the High Court.’


    'An Bord Pleanála reported that in 2021 it spent €8.2 million in legal costs (including almost €4 million paid to successful parties. Yet it has won just two of the 36 Strategic Infrastructure Development cases finalised to date', according to FIE.


    FIE pointed out that in an interview with Parchment magazine, published by the Dublin Solicitors Bar Association in July 2021, Ms Justice Mary Irvine said the High Court was in “a desperate scenario” because of the shortages. Minister for Justice Heather Humphreys passed legislation last month which provided for five new High Court judges, and possibly six, and said it was “one of the largest increases in judges in recent memory”. However, this is eleven or twelve less than the seventeen Ms. Justice Mary Irvine said was required “to make a real difference.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭serfboard


    As predicted by many on here, it’s no surprise that we’re getting all these legal challenges - which is why we really need to be cracking on with all the other transport measures in the meantime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yes. The big mistake was placing this project on the critical path of the Galway transport plan, given how likely it was to be delayed (and not just by objections: tunnelling in urban areas is not without its own risks).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    What news on BusConnects Galway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I don't think that was by mistake, the intention was to have everything else predicated on the ring road; "you'll get a few quid towards public/active transport right after I get me billion euro bypass, shure the bypass frees up the space".



  • Advertisement
Advertisement