Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M6 - Galway City Ring Road [planning decision pending]

18283858788102

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,261 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    Yes, you've said all that numerous times before, we all know your personal circumstances. How big were you planning the family to be if there wasn't enough room in an entire county for it?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, that was on the “Galway Traffic” thread in Regional>Galway forum, which has also devolved into the usual edition of “alternative commuting manifesto & gazzete” that discussing the ringroads gets dragged into by green activists. We are in the Infrastructure forum where it is a more general matter.

    I bring my circumstances up A: to negate the tendency to think of this as a pencil pushing exercise beloved of politicos where no one gets hurt, and B: to underline that for the anti road lobby’s aims to be met, more drastic actions such as car ownership licencing & population control would be needed.

    My reply to this question of yours is not for polite conversation, nor would be any opinion of you I had for asking it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 38 OpinionN


    You're referring to me as a "MAGAist" for saying "many people in the Infrastructure forum are uncomfortable with this road" as though I'm proposing some wild theory and unwilling to back up what I'm saying.

    My proof that "many people in the Infrastructure forum are uncomfortable with this road" is the fact that they're posting about it. Loads of them. In this thread. You have even been arguing with them. Those people "against the road" all been saying variations of "sustainable transport first". I don't think I'm making some kind of dubious claims, in saying that?

    Apologies to all, nobody needs to read this rubbish, but I couldn't help myself in replying. I'll show more restraint in future.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Sources lad, sources. 

    You want sources? Sure, there's loads, many have been posted here in this very thread and others over the years. Feel free to go through any number of them. They've been done all over the world and the result is always the same i.e. there has never been an instance where more roads has fixed congestion with congestion always getting worse.

    There is also Reduced demand (the inverse effect also known as disappearing traffic, traffic evaporation, traffic suppression or dissuaded demand ) where if roads are removed, or private car access is restricted, congestion improves as it results in dissuaded demand where people turn to more efficient or convenient modes. There have also been numerous studies done on this too, again, feel free to have a look at any of then.

    All of these studies, from all over the world, all say the same thing, if you build more roads, you get more congestion.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well, if we're playing duelling google searches,

    https://www.google.ie/search?q=journal+article+the+effects+of+road+access+on+development&client=safari&hl=en-gb&sxsrf=AOaemvLncDIJIgYkNSMxBnTbaJyGjtsdZQ%3A1641827444653&ei=dEzcYYywJ42ttQam7o7IDQ&oq=journal+article+the+effects+of+road+access+on+development&gs_lcp=ChNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwEAMyBwgAEEcQsAMyBwgAEEcQsAMyBwgAEEcQsAMyBwgAEEcQsAMyBwgAEEcQsAMyBwgAEEcQsAMyBwgAEEcQsAMyBwgAEEcQsANKBAhBGABQAFgAYIG8AmgGcAB4AIABAIgBAJIBAJgBAMgBCMABAQ&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

    This should be my set of articles that say the same thing (more roads = more activity), but in different terms. Apologies for the lack if finnesse, I’m on a mobile.


    And to the user saying “you can see that many people are angry because you have been arguing with them.”, I could drop into a Fox News comment section and start dissing Trump. I can guarantee I will meet the same reaction. Do you think that changes whether they are right or wrong? Different flag, same red mist on the eyes. Politicos gonna politico.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Indeed, one of the major criticisms of the M6 is that its design is, in a large part, to allow for land further from the city to be opened up for development, further locking in car dependence



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And as a result of that land not being opened up, I am emigrating.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well whatever about me, what about anyone else? for who should this option be for? How many must we dissuade from polluting rural Ireland? How do we get them into the estates & apartments far from what they, in their wanton extravagance, consider to be their “home”?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,261 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    What others are out there who are putting off having families in Galway due to a ring road being built or not. I've certainly not heard of any.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭saabsaab




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,355 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Wherever you end up, keep an eye out for the far more stringent control on rural one-off housing, cos it'll be there.

    Did you ever take a drive through rural England? Ever notice what is missing? An almost total lack of individually built one-off housing fronting the road, any newer than c. 1900 and not connected to a farm or other on-site enterprise.

    It's an absolute mystery where England houses its 50 million people really.



  • Registered Users Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Dumb. How can you possibly dis-entangle the effect of economic and population growth from the effect of the road itself. If a motorway is built, it stimulates economic activity (a good thing) and therefore people move to the area and build homes (a good thing) thus meaning there is more demand for use of the road. All good things.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lads.

    You’re on about me, whatabouting about England, faffing about my question.

    I opened it out to ask about all the others in my position who’s prevented from building rural by Big Green. My own answer is to emigrate, but what about them? Are they doing the same? Are they doing the desired cookie cutter house in an estate or better, the shoebox apartment?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    The cost is going to be a big hurdle now, 600 million is a figure from many moons ago. What will be the projected cost in 2024 which is probably most likely date for works to start?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Even worse she was first elected to Galway City council in 2019 and finished 9th in GE of 2020.

    then she got elected to the highly competitive Seanad.

    Well when Enda did want to get rid of the Seanad the voters decided to go "screw you" rather than vote for it;s end and now we get such luminaries as this wan.

    Somehow I doubt Pualine spends a lot of her time stuck on Bothar na Traffic Jam, the Tuam Rd or around Terryland.

    You had gimp on radio yesterday (not sure was it her) talking about buses and bicycles.

    How the fook do they expect people to get from say Knocknacara to the likes of Ballybrit.

    Nevermind people trying to get from the likes of Spiddal or Moycullen to Oranmore.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Knocknacarra to Ballybrit is a very doable cycle. If there were better cycle lanes it would be much easier. At this stage the by pass I doubt it'll go ahead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,600 ✭✭✭veryangryman




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It has decent, segregated lanes for the majority of the route and is very doable. For those for whom the hill is a struggle, I would find it a slog too myself, there is always the ebike option.

    But coming back to the GCRR, I don't know, these things can go either way and until its all decided, nothing is decided. It has a fair few more hurdles to get over (legal, PSC review, funding etc) so we'll have to wait and see how it goes.

    Anyone know what the closing date is to lodge a JR against the approval?



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    No need to pick one of my posts and call it dumb. There were several exchanges on this point (induced demand) between a few of us and we had a constructive conversation.

    As was discussed, this road is specifically being designed and built as a distributor road. This will allow more development which is definitely a good thing. No question. But it's also making it easier for everyone to drive to work. Building roads with the specific aim of making it easier to drive to work, ultimately makes traffic as bad as it was to begin with.

    Building roads and infrastructure is good. Building the wrong type of road is bad long term planning. Anyway, I'm fully supportive of 'just building the damn thing'. The issues it creates can be solved later, like everything in this world..



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The issues it creates can be solved later, like everything in this world..

    True, but then that has always the case until very recently



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Anyway, I'm fully supportive of 'just building the damn thing'. The issues it creates can be solved later, like everything in this world..

    So before long you'll hear people saying how another road needs to be built because traffic somehow has gotten so bad.

    However, we'll have wasted the guts of a billion quid and Galway still won't be attractive place to take a bus or cycle within.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,867 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Who said it has to be either/or?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Because funding

    Did you happen to review the GTS documents by any chance?

    It's basically the GCRR and a handful of very basic bus, bike and walking measures. It works out to be about 600 mil for the GCRR and about 25 million for everything else. It should also be noted that not all of the "everything else" will be done either.

    Building the GCRR means crumbs from the table for everything else.

    Whereas spend 100 million on the everything else would free up far more capacity on the city roads than the GCRR ever will and see the city being a far better place to live in.

    What Galway got in the GTS is basically the absolute bare minimum they could feasibly get away with.....and a ring road.

    In a nutshell Galway will not see serious levels of investment in any form of sustainable transport for the next 10-20 years as long as the GCRR is on the table.

    The GTS is scheduled for review this year but as the GCRR was approved by ABP, any modifications to it will be minimal.

    Only when the ring road becomes a fustercluck with traffic jams will they look at resolving that by which time the population will be 50% larger and dispersed over a far larger area which will mean the likes of walking and cycling will not be a convenient option for a lot of people and it'll be a nightmare to try implement bus infrastructure.

    The next few weeks will see who is bringing JR's and what they will entail and personally I really hope they succeed in getting it canned as that's the best hope to transform Galway.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I’m seeing a lot of “because”es that are nothing more than prejudice. “Because funding”. “Because in 10 years time they’ll be calling for another road”


    ”We know it will…” no you don’t. No one “knows”. You believe.

    who’s asking for a second M50? I’m not, nor is anyone I’ve heard. And the majority would oppose.

    Why isn’t funding for able body powered transport tagged into the motorised funding? Fairly easy especially with Greens in power to anchor road funding into ablebody transport alongside. The cost is what it is, we do both. Just like the Children’s Hospital.


    and to those who say “do nothing, because we’ll only have to do another one later”. The answer to that is population number control. Which is what happens with road restriction. Why is population control never in the conversation?



  • Registered Users Posts: 969 ✭✭✭Green Peter


    It's needed, let's get on with it. If it had been built when first proposed it would have been a fraction of the cost. It's ironic that objectors are raising cost as an issue when it's their fault.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    If you haven't heard of the new M50, then you haven't been reading the news over the past 30 years. Once the M50 first became congested (very soon after it opened), people began complaining about the fact that its utility as a bypass was nullified by the amount of people using it for local trips, so they began calling for improvements, which took two forms: Road widening and the outer orbital road.

    The Leinster Outer Orbital Route, also known as the M45, the Dublin Outer ring road, and various others, was official government policy up until 2015 or so, when it was pushed back until "after 2035". Various Taoisigh, transport ministers, TDs from all around the country, Transport Infrastructure Ireland and hundreds of lobbying groups, along with most of the media commentators have all been calling for this for years. A cursory glance at google will show you all of this.

    The road widening of the M50 went ahead of course, and it's blown past the congestion projections years ahead of schedule. So of course, people are again calling for the new road. At least this time around, official Ireland don't really seem to be biting down on it, they're saying that there's no funding for it, and that it won't solve the problem. These were the same reasons that the M50 extension just got cancelled as well, the Eastern Bypass, so when you talk of people "believing", you're right, it's just a belief, but there's far more evidence on their side of the column than yours.

    Also, the greens got a massive yearly increase in funding for active transport projects, but the effects of this will take years to filter in. This is primarily a pipeline issue, as LAs and road authorities didn't have any projects ready to go. This has resulted in those authorities using that extra money to resurface and realign roads for cars, with them pointing to the fact that the cycle lane was also resurfaced as the "active travel" excuse for using those funds. The money has been used to recruit loads of extra active transport planers though, so as I said, those projects will come in future.

    Presumably, "population number control" doesn't enter the conversation because there's zero evidence for it? I mean, Galway doesn't have the ring road right now, and is still growing at a good rate. As are most cities and large towns Ireland, in fact. Even if roads do affect population numbers (again, zero evidence), wouldn't an increase in public transport and active travel have the same effect?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Where’s the M45 thread on here? Did I miss it?

    Also re the link between population & infrastructure: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0974930619879573

    literally the second Google result



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭markpb


    Here: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055416009/dublin-outer-orbital-route-door

    Presumably you also missed the M50 thread which mostly consists is people complaining about the levels of congestion. First it was the toll - that was removed at massive cost. Then it was the junctions and most of those were improved when the extra lane was added. A billion euro spent only a few years after the M50 was finished.

    At the same time, the city of LA spent a billion dollars adding an extra lane to the 101. And now they’re in the same position as us, the extra lane is congested and average speeds are back where they were. At least they spent extra money building mass transit at the same time.

    But go on, tell us how Galway is different.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,397 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Good article. Hopefully the government will take it on board and start paving our roads soon. I'm sick of all these dirt roads....

    They mention road density being a bigger factor. Easy way to improve that is to shift people from cars to buses. Road throughput will skyrocket.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Have you a link to research on population & congested infrastructure or a paper on how employment is affected by congestion or even something on population health and traffic congestion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭markpb


    Did you read the paper you shared: there’s a crucial line in the summary.

    ”we find positive effects of road density and road paved on total factor productivity (TFP) in countries with middle low and low income (using parametric and non-parametric estimations”

    Is Ireland a middle or low income country?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    As I said, it's gone under many names, Markpb has given you just one of the threads on here about it.

    Thanks for the study, it wasn't that long of a read, and while I don't claim to understand all of it, I do understand that it mainly relates to low income agrarian economies with unpaved roads, and the upgrades of those roads. Galway is far, far past the point at which this study would apply. It also only studies road density and percentage paved, as proxies, but has nothing on road usage, i.e. public transport, BRTs, etc. I'd also question what it has to do with "population number control", as it doesn't seem to say anything on population growth at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Citing the M50 as something “that wasn’t a problem” shows an incredible lack of memory. We are now about to enter the third iteration of the M50: first was 2x2 lanes each way with at-grade junctions; the second was an enormously expensive scheme to grade-separate those junctions and add additional running lanes; the third is a managed motorway with variable speed-limits and the potential for per-kilometre usage charging in future.

    It is demand for transportation that is linked to population, not demand for roads. Road space is only one mechanism for satisfying demand for transportation. It is, however, the cheapest in terms of capital spending. The alternatives (light rail, integrated bus network, etc) require ongoing operating expenditure, which is something that our government has always been very reluctant to approve. You would have thought that the lesson of Luas (which operates at a surplus) would have convinced the government that public transport can be something other than a drain on the exchequer, but old habits die very hard: fire-and-forget solutions like roadbuilding look like easy wins.

    (I am fully aware that not all who would use the M6 could use a light rail system instead, but the key is to take the very many who could go by public transport out of private cars, thus freeing space on the existing roads for commercial users and those who have no other option but to drive)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That thread started the same year as this one (2008), but has a total of 4 pages of replies, the last of which was in 2017. Not really a comprison to this one, current since 2008 and 144 pages in. We’re going to do one of two things. Demand the ring road or leave. I’m leaving.

    not a fan of wielding a stick to those who “can but won’t”. We “can but won’t” pay for healthcare. We “can but won’t” work. Bang of libertarian “f*ck those scum” off of it. No good politics comes from those that target those who “can but won’t”, because those who “can but won’t” are usually considered utter scum by the speaker.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    We’re going to do one of two things. Demand the ring road or leave. I’m leaving.

    Close the door on your way out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,261 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    You do you. But trying to back up your position by claiming, without any evidence, that there are many more in the same situation and there are people not starting families due to the lack of a road tells its own tale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    I notice you lads have no solution for those in say Barna, Spiddal, Moycullen, etc, etc or do you suggest they also get ebikes. 🙄

    And as someone who had to cycle across Galway city for a couple of years many moons ago, I can't say I enjoyed all those days of p***ing rain.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Uh, Housing Crisis where the options for homebuilding are severely limited even to those willing to live in a cookie cutter or shoebox?

    proving my point about people being driven out of their homelands like evicted tenants there….



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    proving my point about people being driven out of their homes like evicted tenants there….

    I haven't driven [sic] you anywhere nor have I done anything to drive other people out of their homes (you're being seriously melodramatic hre!). You made a decision to leave and I then posted a glib remark. Don't blame others for the decisions that you make!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭markpb


    Good grief. Why is it that whenever anyone suggests that -some- people could cycle, someone immediately responds with an example of where cycling is less viable/not viable? No-one is suggesting that we rip up the existing roads and replace them all with cycle lanes. We're just saying that there might not be a need to build a whole new road if some of the people have suitable alternatives. That leaves more road space for the people who do have to drive.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nobody ever asked about specific locations but here ya go.

    Barna is on the cards for a greenway/segregated lanes from there to the city. The first part of this is the trial bike lanes going into the prom this year.

    Moycullen is on the Clifden to Galway greenway route. Several sections are at various stages of design, planning, funding etc.

    Spiddal, I know they are looking to promote the WAW as a cycling tour but I've no idea if that includes segregated infrastructure or just paint or nothing at all. There's not a lot of detail on this yet as it's very early days.

    As for ebikes, that's an entirely personal choice. Personally I wouldn't get one for Barna - Galway but would for Spiddal - Galway. I did Spiddal hundreds of times when I was a young sprat (young love ahh) and I hated the stretch between Barna and Spiddal. It seemed like the wind was against you in both directions.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think that roundabout could be remove without building the GRR. For some reason the motorways always appear to end in a roundabout. M17 ends in Tuam in a roundabout - why?

    The Moneenageisha traffic lights were replaced with a roundabout and then the roundabout was replaced with traffic lights. Neither solved the traffic problems. Great bit of planning that.

    When they were working on the railway bridge on Lough Atalia Rd, they put in a one-way system that improved the traffic flow, and once the work finished they put back the poor traffic system. Great bit of planning that.

    I hope that if the GRR goes ahead, it does not turn out to be another example of Galway's great road planning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @Sam Russell I think this shows that the problems in Galway are not caused by road capacity: each change to Moneenageisha increased the capacity of that junction, but very quickly the traffic overcame it.

    I see Galway’s primary problem being that people have no option except to commute by car. Public transport provision in Galway is tiny, and the dispersed population west of the city makes it hard to service with buses (plus, buses have to fight with other traffic, making them less attractive than sitting in the same traffic in your own car). If you gave me the budget, I’d run an fast light-rail along the coast here, with P+R parks at every stop: drive to the station, park for free, get the tram into town. It’ll be a better option for enough people that it would free up road space for those for whom driving is still the best (or only) option.

    As for the roundabouts, TII design guidelines suggest using roundabout junctions where the road standard changes (it’s explicitly part of the design standard for going from 2+2 to single-carriageway): I imagine a simple merge or tapering would result in traffic where drivers who were not paying attention to the end-of-motorway markers, and so are still travelling at 120km/h, mixing with those who were, and have slowed down. Sometimes, like at M9, the roundabout is a relic of a plan that has not happened. (I believe that M9 was to have continued seamlessly onto an updgraded N24, with that roundabout being the exit for N25)


    @[Deleted User] I have no idea what part of my post you’re referring to with the below. Care to elaborate?

    not a fan of wielding a stick to those who “can but won’t”. We “can but won’t” pay for healthcare. We “can but won’t” work. Bang of libertarian “f*ck those scum” off of it. No good politics comes from those that target those who “can but won’t”, because those who “can but won’t” are usually considered utter scum by the speaker.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It’s the whole thing of focusing on those who “can but won’t” take a bus.


    When you focus on those who “can but won’t” work, you get “welfare cheats cheat us all”


    When you focus on those who “can but won’t” pay for their own healthcare, you get people denied healthcare who need it but can’t prove it to the accountant.


    What happens when we focus on those who “can but won’t” take public transport?


    Far better to have access to all, and then charge for the extravagances. Far easier to tell a car driver to pay for the privilege of driving a road than tell an ambulance to drive through a field & riverbed…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,114 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Building better PT will mean that those who can't do anything but drive will hit less traffic - while the rest who can take advantage of mass transit, will, because its quicker/easier.

    Building a 600million euro road around the city to distribute traffic will not make things better, it will be overcome with traffic within 5 years and then the car drivers will be begging for another road!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Like how the papers are filled to the brim with “drivers” screaming blue murder about the DOOR M45 to replace the M50? Pull the other one…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,114 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The papers were - how short is your memory?

    There was plenty of demand for an outer M50, but eventually it died off as more people realised the problem is distributor traffic. Exact same as Galway - problem is distributor traffic not bypass traffic. Its people trying to get into the city, or go from 1 part of the city to the other. Public transport should facilitate that, not more roads.



  • Registered Users Posts: 81 ✭✭TnxM17


    Great post - I think the difference between your view and @seaslacker is that you are for Park & Ride.

    While if the GRR is not built Sealacker is for Packing Up & Not Riding.



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Limerick74


    Don't see many recent posts since the above warning on this forum being: on the subject of the construction of the road as granted PP by ABP; or decisions on funding and contract aspects.

    Just the same old arguments going back and forth.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement