Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin Outer Orbital Route (DOOR)

  • 10-11-2008 1:38am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭


    Ok so I've got the crayons out again. There seems to be debate between two routes for the DOOR, which I'll call "Inner" and "Outer", as shown on the map below. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    So. what are the pros and cons for each route?

    Inner:
    Pros:
    - Shorter route; less road to build
    - Provides better access between the satellite towns west of Dublin (Naas, Clane, Maynooth, Kilcock, Dunshaughlin)
    - Shorter route to Bremore Port

    Outer:
    Pros:
    - Provides direct link between Navan and Drogheda

    m40bx6.jpg

    What do yous think are the pros and cons? Are there better routes than these? Should it even be built at all?
    Tagged:


«13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Aard wrote: »
    Ok so I've got the crayons out again. There seems to be debate between two routes for the DOOR, which I'll call "Inner" and "Outer", as shown on the map below. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    So. what are the pros and cons for each route?

    Inner:
    Pros:
    - Shorter route; less road to build
    - Provides better access between the satellite towns west of Dublin (Naas, Clane, Maynooth, Kilcock, Dunshaughlin)
    - Shorter route to Bremore Port

    Outer:
    Pros:
    - Provides direct link between Navan and Drogheda

    m40bx6.jpg

    What do yous think are the pros and cons? Are there better routes than these? Should it even be built at all?


    Well the inner orbital, acts more for a commuter type road. We have an upgraded M50, a Dublin outer ring road and R local roads feeding the towns of Clane, Maynooth and Naas etc.

    The outer road, will attract more long distance traffic that wishes to avoid the city and the commuter belt. And this should be enough to explain what DOOR is actually for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    Inner DOOR Cons -

    problem hitting Maynooth. Would need to relocate junction with the M4 between Enfield and Kilcock.
    Problem when getting to Naas/Sallins - would need to be relocated further south on the M7 between Naas and the M9 junction

    Outer Pros -

    Take traffic away from Slane and Navan

    Cons-
    It would almost definitely run into problems at Tara/Skyrne with the hippies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    If junction issues could be resolved, the inner route. It strikes a balance of being far enough outside the commuter belt, without being needlessly long and looping.

    All Dublin's commuter traffic would be headed to/from the city anyway, so that is a non issue. Dublin commuters would have no reason to use either option.

    But the outer route serves Navan and Trim, which is good also.

    One thing your map is missing is the M3. That changes things a bit. Its possible part of it could be incorporated into the DOOR as there is a section that goes roughly Northbound. But then you get into weaving issues etc.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭G_R


    i think the inner one looks good

    it will link the sattelite towns of naas maynooth etc, and its far enough out of town so that it wouldn't become overly congested and it isnt brining people who want to bypass dublin to far out of their way either


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    On a side note, I am guessing any DOOR will be heavily tolled with at least 3 tolls on it. The M1 toll at Drogheda, M3 toll between Dunshaughlin and Navan and the M4 at Enfield.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭The Swordsman


    The inner route for me. However, it should meet the M1 as near to the proposed Bremore port as possible (missing out Duleek, if necessary).

    That way, if Bremore goes ahead, it can be connected to the DOOR more easily.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    could ya link to your sources for that (text whatever)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭The Swordsman


    could ya link to your sources for that (text whatever)

    :confused: Sorry, don't get you. Sources for what?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 164 ✭✭Stupido


    you are forgetting about the world heritage site that is the bend in the boyne.....newgrange, knowth et al.


    The "outer" route will be north of navan & slane for this reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭LostinBlanch


    You're all forgetting the most important thing. Which developers with links to certain political parties have landbanks on which route?

    That will be the defining factor IMO.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    I don't mean to come across as a cynic, but this seems to be complete pie in the sky.

    When has the DOOR last been mentioned officially? Spongebob, you're the man with the info: what's the thinking in the corridors of the NRA and Finance about this scheme? When would they like to start construction? Do they have any money at all for this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,739 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Furet wrote: »
    what's the thinking in the corridors of the NRA and Finance about this scheme? When would they like to start construction? Do they have any money at all for this?

    And a parochial question. When the MIUs are done, what's the priority of this versus the ARC?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,192 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    TheNog wrote: »
    Inner DOOR Cons -

    problem hitting Maynooth. Would need to relocate junction with the M4 between Enfield and Kilcock.

    The Maynooth-M4 interchange needs re-engineering as it is, this wouldn't have to be a bad thing.

    That said I don't think this is going to get built at all.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Firstly I would like to thank the OP for the map. Great idea to start a thread and I should make a habit of similar scribblings :)

    I think it will be a continuation of the N9 northwards, I always thought that funnily enough .

    It will follow the inner route between the N4 and N2 and will terminate at the proposed Bremore Port near Balbriggan ...ie Further In than the inner route .
    Furet wrote: »
    I don't mean to come across as a cynic, but this seems to be complete pie in the sky.

    Actually it is not . It could have 25-30k+ tolled vehicles a day over much of its length and if the Bremore port is built it also would have loads of trucks which would gladly avoid the M50 and its rather congested approaches .
    When has the DOOR last been mentioned officially? Spongebob, you're the man with the info: what's the thinking in the corridors of the NRA and Finance about this scheme? When would they like to start construction? Do they have any money at all for this?

    It was last mentioned by Dempsey in October 2008 when he chopped a load of road projects and said the DOOR would not get new funds during 2009 .
    serfboard wrote: »
    And a parochial question. When the MIUs are done, what's the priority of this versus the ARC?

    According to Fred Barry CEO of the NRA the DOOR IS the "priority" and Transport 21/ARC is not the priority

    Fred has basically given the ARC and Transport21 the finger , he is not interested in following government policy and probably wants his PPP mates to get a slice of the pie for the usual 35 years :(

    Various costs from €1bn-3bn are mooted. I can see why it is vague

    Do remember that the busy N4 TOLL section near Kinnegad cost €14m a KM under a PPP while the FREE section west of Kinnegad cost €8m a KM on a non PPP.

    The much less busy tolled Galway - Ballinasloe section was estimated by the NRA to cost €475m construction for 57km ( plus land costs) and they got it away for €130m on a PPP .

    Assuming land costs of about €100m on that stretch the PPP cost half the alternative but only based on about 10k car movements a day I should think.

    The Galway Ballinasloe PPP bid was for about €5m a km + €2m land costs or €7m a km total cost . Land would cost more to the east but as the terrain is easy I could see the DOOR costing as little as €400m to build on that basis .

    It would be nearer €0 with 30k cars a day and would probably make the state money if (as I heard ) a toll is added somewhere on the M9 as part of the 'concession' .

    It is because it may well cost the state very little if indeed nothing that Fred and the Dept of Finance consider it a priority.

    The ARC will average under 20k cars a day on its busier central section between (Tuam)Galway and Cork(Midleton) and about 10k a day on the rest of it save close to Waterford and Sligo

    See

    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/83642bn-navan-to-newbridge-orbital-road-a-top-priority-1375632.html
    THE National Roads Authority (NRA) plans to make construction of a motorway outside the M50 and linking Navan to Newbridge a "priority" within the next two years, a conference was told yesterday.NRA chief executive Fred Barry said once the inter-urban motorways linking Dublin with Cork, Limerick, and Galway were completed in 2010, planning would begin on the Leinster Outer Orbital, which would connect with most of the main routes out of the capital

    and

    http://www.roadsireland.com/index.php/?cat=4
    €1bn NAVAN TO NEWBRIDGE ROUTE A PRIORITY

    Construction of an outer orbital route for the M50 is to be made a priority by the National Roads Authority within the next two years, NRA Chief Executive, Fred Barry, has revealed.

    Once the major inter-urban motorways linking Dublin with the other main cities are completed in 2010, planning would begin on what is being called the Leinster Outer Orbital Route which will connect with most of the main routes out of the capital.

    The cost of the new 80km route is being put at €3bn. It would run outside the M50 and link the M1 near Drogheda, through the N2 at Slane, the N3 at Navan and the N4 at Kilkock, lining into the M7 at Kilcullen.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well I assume and hope that Newlands Cross is of higher priority then DOOR?

    Also I couldn't imagine there being three tolls on it, that would mean someone travelling Cork to Belfast would have to pay 6 tolls!!

    If they actually did this, I assume most people would bypass it and just use the M50.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    An interesting thread... ;)

    I posted my proposal for this route on another thread, so I may as well just post it here too. Nothing really that different from the OP, it's kinda inbetween both their inner and outer routes...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 466 ✭✭aquascrotum


    BluntGuy wrote: »
    An interesting thread... ;)

    I posted my proposal for this route on another thread, so I may as well just post it here too. Nothing really that different from the OP, it's kinda inbetween both their inner and outer routes...

    That route manages to mash Bru na Boinne and Tara....the hippie's would love you!!

    AFAIK there are quite a few archaelogical sites round Naul too which would be the approximate route into Bremore.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    IIRC the Blundelstown interchange on the M3 will intersect with the DOOR.

    On the different maps above, where will the tolls be?

    @aquascrotum - FYI not everyone who objects to the destruction within Tara/Skryne is a hippy!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    AFAIK there are quite a few archaelogical sites round Naul too which would be the approximate route into Bremore.
    ....and thats without pointing out that the proposed Bremore Port site is already a national monument, having tombs there which are dated older than Newgrange.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    kbannon wrote: »
    IIRC the Blundelstown interchange on the M3 will intersect with the DOOR.

    where'd you hear that?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    That I currently don't recall. I actually thought I heard it on here!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭vincenzolorenzo


    Don't like the inner one cos it basically goes straight through my house! :eek:(Just outside clane)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭The Swordsman


    Don't like the inner one cos it basically goes straight through my house! :eek:(Just outside clane)

    Just think of the compo :cool::D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,399 ✭✭✭Kashkai


    I don't like teh outer one as it runs through my house........... oh and you can keep the compo. It took 3 years to build the damn house and I'm not starting again.

    Now all I have to do is bury a few old ornaments and get the place listed as a heritage site:cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    many of the transport amateurs on this thread just DO NOT get it.:mad:



    This route is not for the benifet of you personally, or whether you live close to the inner or the outer proposed routes.



    THIS route was proposed,

    To keep long distance traffic away from Dublin, who wishes to avoid Dublin.
    It's main function is to connect and intergrate Ireland's motorway network. Which is currently not so, As all motorways end up at the M50.


    The outer route should start at the M9 and actually go North of Navan and Drogeheda. The majority of traffic using this road will be long distance inter city movements.

    I.e

    Cork, Galway, Limerick, Waterford and the south/west to connect to the East and North.


    THAT IS THE OBJECTIVE. less of this "but the inner looks lovely" "the outer looks a bit off the mark" that is BS.


    The outer route is whats needed to connect the country's road network. Not connect Dublin again purely. Dublin is already connected to the Motorway network as every motorway currently focuses towards Dublin. This country needs a motorway spine through the midlands. We don't want another "M25"

    London and Paris have outer orbitals, and they are failed examples. They have to keep widening them because much of the countries motorway are spilling onto them. In France for example they are trying to fix this, by building motorways away from Paris, who wishes to avoid Paris for example, not go through Paris.

    For Example people in Dijion who want to go Nantes have to go through some of Paris Ring roads to feed onto the Nantes routes. Now they are building cross country motorways that go direct to destinations of Principal cities, without Paris been enroute. Much of the traffic does not need to to Paris, yet all roads lead to Paris.

    about 90km west of Paris is a North south autoroute to Allow traffic from Lyon and Dijion to proceed to the North of France towards Lillies and the North coast, years before you would most likely have to travel near Paris's radial network.


    This inner route is f"""""" thick, and anyone who thinks that the inner route is best, is obviously clueless as to how Motorway transportation works.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    LOL @ that Mysterious.

    Mind you the original Paris M50 , the 1970s design Perepherique, is one scary mother of a road :( and I think there are two other rings outside that but neither was quite finished a few years back .

    Point taken about going north of Navan and Drogheda rather than south of them and possibly skirt Ardee and Collon to connect with the M1 around Dunleer .

    If it were a genuine Leinster Orbital not just another Dublin Orbital it should go from Drogheda ish , Mullingar ish , Portlaoise ...ish Kilkenny ish , Gorey ish . But no.

    Shall we name it the M51 and be done with it :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    Well I think both my route (and the author's Outer Route) would be the most effective (with modifications to avoid heritage sites etc.).

    If we were to move it any further out, the costs would become astronomical.

    I tried to create a route that was as far out from Dublin as feasibly possible, while still attracting an AADT that would attract a PPP consortium (seeing as that's the way the project may possibly proceed). The route is for long distance traffic, I agree, and it should start at the M9, that's a given, but it should still stray close to Drogheda and Navan so as to attract potential drivers who would otherwise use the M50.

    The M1, M3, M4 (and hence M6), M7 (and hence M8) and M9 will all be connected to this route, thus finally intergrating the motorway network.

    And it goes without saying that the M7/M9/MXX (whatever they call the DOOR) should be free-flow, and that the M1/MXX should be free-flow. The rest should be at LEAST be partial-free-flow, except for the one or two junctions that will only connect to local roads. I would almost argue that all motorway junctions should be freeflow, but I have doubts that the M3/MXX and M4/MXX would attract the necessary traffic to warrant such a junction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    mysterious wrote: »
    The outer route should start at the M9 and actually go North of Navan and Drogeheda. The majority of traffic using this road will be long distance inter city movements.

    Ireland is not big mysterious, and its cities are small. Hence traffic between these small cities is fairly low. Compared to France or England, anyway. Long distance inter-city movements make up a minor % of total traffic movements on the M50. Lets remove it yes, but lets not rashly build a hugely expensive highway that will have relatively low usage, when a shorter version will do much the same job. There's f*** all money left, and our public transport needs most of it.
    mysterious wrote: »
    The outer route should start at the M9 and actually go North of Navan and Drogeheda. The majority of traffic using this road will be long distance inter city movements.

    I.e

    Cork, Galway, Limerick, Waterford and the south/west to connect to the East and North.


    THAT IS THE OBJECTIVE. less of this "but the inner looks lovely" "the outer looks a bit off the mark" that is BS.

    The inner route appears to meet these objectives though.
    mysterious wrote: »
    The outer route is whats needed to connect the country's road network. Not connect Dublin again purely. Dublin is already connected to the Motorway network as every motorway currently focuses towards Dublin. This country needs a motorway spine through the midlands. We don't want another "M25"

    The inner isn't "connecting Dublin", its bypassing it with minimal radius. What journey could a Dubliner use it for? Please tell me. The M25 orbits a city of 10 million people, a planet's worth of difference. The midlands doesn't need a motorway spine (maybe in the future but not now). It just needs an improved N road network.
    mysterious wrote: »
    London and Paris have outer orbitals, and they are failed examples. They have to keep widening them because much of the countries motorway are spilling onto them. In France for example they are trying to fix this, by building motorways away from Paris, who wishes to avoid Paris for example, not go through Paris.

    Again, they are huge cities! And the DOOR isn't a true orbital at all, its a fairly linear bypass. Tell me, what unwanted traffic could potentially "spill onto" the inner route?
    mysterious wrote: »
    For Example people in Dijion who want to go Nantes have to go through some of Paris Ring roads to feed onto the Nantes routes. Now they are building cross country motorways that go direct to destinations of Principal cities, without Paris been enroute. Much of the traffic does not need to to Paris, yet all roads lead to Paris.

    No surprise there its the dominant city much like Dublin. But on a vastly larger scale. What's your point? Build a motorway from Galway to Belfast?
    mysterious wrote: »
    about 90km west of Paris is a North south autoroute to Allow traffic from Lyon and Dijion to proceed to the North of France towards Lillies and the North coast, years before you would most likely have to travel near Paris's radial network.

    I take it you mean east of Paris. Listen, Lyon is the size of Dublin and Dijon the size of Cork. Of course they get to have dedicated routes. Apart from Dublin, Cork and Belfast, there are no population centres here to justify that kind of network. For the Cork-Belfast trip, the inner would work perfectly well, and they are the two largest cities concerned here.
    mysterious wrote: »
    This inner route is f"""""" thick, and anyone who thinks that the inner route is best, is obviously clueless as to how Motorway transportation works.

    Well I guess I'm clueless mate, you'll have to enlighten me. (You haven't so far).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    According to this:

    http://www.m1.ie/location/

    ... the DOOR route will start at Naas. :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    BluntGuy wrote: »
    According to this:

    http://www.m1.ie/location/

    ... the DOOR route will start at Naas. :eek:

    That simply must be wrong. The route hasn't been decided yet anyway, so they're probably bluffing.

    By the way, that website epitomizes everything I loathe about these "business parks". Just look at the photo - a plain green area with 4 boulders just dropped there, presumably as some sort of 'decorative' feature. The people who design our buildings and roads, whoever they are, simply have no sense of the aesthetic. Our country is tending to look like shight. :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    Furet wrote: »
    That simply must be wrong. The route hasn't been decided yet anyway, so they're probably bluffing.

    By the way, that website epitomizes everything I loathe about these "business parks". Just look at the photo - a plain green area with 4 boulders just dropped there, presumably as some sort of 'decorative' feature. The people who design our buildings and roads, whoever they are, simply have no sense of the aesthetic. Our country is tending to look like shight. :(

    Yes, business parks tend to look like crap... this will be no exception to the rule I'm sure... I guess putting huge chunks of debris in the middle of a green is a new type of decorative "style" that I'm unawre of. Hopefully the MSAs will have some sort of aesthetic nicities, but my money's on them being huge concrete blocks with the odd attractive glazing...

    Anyway, I've just realised that the website contradicts its own map when it says this:
    OUTER ORBITAL MOTORWAY
    The proposed new orbital motorway will run outside the M50 and will extend to approximately 80 km, linking the M1 close to Drogheda, through the N2 at Slane, the N3 at Navan, the N4 at Kilcock and the M7 at Kilcullen, close to the M7/M9 interchange.

    That's no-where near where they had the DOOR leading to on their map...

    And it shouldn't be starting close to the M7/M9 interchange, it should be starting ON the M7/M9 interchange. Why dump Waterford/South-Belfast/North traffic unnecessarily onto the M7?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    D.L.R. wrote: »
    Ireland is not big mysterious, and its cities are small. Hence traffic between these small cities is fairly low. Compared to France or England, anyway. Long distance inter-city movements make up a minor % of total traffic movements on the M50. Lets remove it yes, but lets not rashly build a hugely expensive highway that will have relatively low usage, when a shorter version will do much the same job. There's f*** all money left, and our public transport needs most of it.
    These are not important facts, and just stupid wastful excuses for you to want an inner orbital of the commuter belt. We want to balance our motorway network and intergrate with the rest of the country. That is the purpose of Door.

    To Connect the Cork, Limerick, Galway and the rest of the country with the North and east without having to swing towards Dublin.


    That is the purpose of DOOR.

    End of f*** story. Inner route, would cause more concentration of traffic and urban sprawl on the pheriphal of Dublin. It would defenately create more urban sprawl with the surrounding commuter towns. The inner route is just not a good sensible route at all, in terms of the objectives DOOR was orignally planned for.


    So you say that not much traffic will use DOOR? Then why, do you want to have an inner route proposed, that will not reach the population catchements the outer door can provide.

    Your arguments are getting pathetic and really contradictory, if not biased for your needs of an inner route regardless. (rolls eyes)

    So instead lets build more roads around Dublin YAY, the inner route perfect, that actually is Dublin's commuter belt? When you said that, your whole arguement is stupid and flawed........................... Really you DO NOT understand how traffic works, especially when you, want DOOR to be the inner option.


    Seriously you don't have a clue.

    The inner route appears to meet these objectives though.

    Not half as good as what the outer can do! So the Outer is more logical. So less of the opinions.

    Not only will Dublin be bypassed with the outer route, but it will help connect the Midlands and the rest of the country much better. Navan, Mullingar and Dundalk would be better connected to each other. It's not just the Inter urban cities that will benifet as you keep only saying.
    Plus : We will not have to spend more money on building an upgraded N52 as expense of having a outer orbital connecting the midlands to the rest of the motorway network.
    If we opted for the inner route, we would still need an N52 2+2 aswell. Combining the Inner and upgraded N52 would be better fullfilled by allowing the outer route for DOOR. Makes more sense, and saves more money :) The outer route seems far more logical as the outer reaches large population catchments (a large percentage would touch the N52 catchment) and does two things, drive inter urban traffic away from Dublin and also connect the rest of the country. The inner cannot do both of these as effectively, FACT.

    The outer route, saves money in the long run!
    It also will help to drive hungry investment into the country, to help create more conterbalance towards Dublin. Which this country needs.
    The inner isn't "connecting Dublin", its bypassing it with minimal radius. What journey could a Dubliner use it for? Please tell me.
    The inner will create urban sprawl, and attract more traffic around Dublin. Where as the Outer route, will better connect the country, and attract more integratiion within the country, and not focus purely towards Dublin.

    Again to remind you EXACTLY what DOOR's purpose is for :)

    The M25 orbits a city of 10 million people, a planet's worth of difference. The midlands doesn't need a motorway spine (maybe in the future but not now). It just needs an improved N road network.
    Dublin already has a second outer ring road built,with the Northern sections already under construction. We need our motorway network integrated. There is enough Motorways around Dublin at present.

    Again, they are huge cities! And the DOOR isn't a true orbital at all, its a fairly linear bypass. Tell me, what unwanted traffic could potentially "spill onto" the inner route?
    Exactly Dublin doesn't need a second M50.

    The country needs a proper motorway network. Hense Outer route will solve more problems than a commuter inner motorway your calling for:) Like it or not.

    No surprise there its the dominant city much like Dublin. But on a vastly larger scale. What's your point? Build a motorway from Galway to Belfast?

    What's the point in telling you my points' when
    A. I've made my point's clear
    B It's self explanatory
    C. We need to have a proper motorway system. Outer route solves this more effectively.




    I take it you mean east of Paris. Listen, Lyon is the size of Dublin and Dijon the size of Cork. Of course they get to have dedicated routes. Apart from Dublin, Cork and Belfast, there are no population centres here to justify that kind of network. For the Cork-Belfast trip, the inner would work perfectly well, and they are the two largest cities concerned here.

    DOOR is vital, and even more so when the inter urban's finishes in 2010. Every single motorway will lead to Dublin. We need a spine motorway to intergrate the network properly and not solely towards Dublin, as not everyone wants to go to Dublin. Our motorway network is really really bad planned out LA.

    The outer would be far better, as Belfast - Cork/Limerick/Galway/Waterford/Athlone/Navan would be better connected with the North of Ireland and Leinster directly by an outer route, than steering towards Dublin by a second M50.... You argument, is very obvious, as you just personally want an inner by pass of the Pale, for your needs. The countries needs come first, and that is what DOOR is and will provided.
    Well I guess I'm clueless mate, you'll have to enlighten me. (You haven't so far).
    In seeing the bigger picture, yes. I believe you are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    BluntGuy wrote: »

    And it shouldn't be starting close to the M7/M9 interchange, it should be starting ON the M7/M9 interchange. Why dump Waterford/South-Belfast/North traffic unnecessarily onto the M7?


    Yes second level slips(M9) should be built going north over the M7, where the M9 diverges with the M7. Then the M7 should have slips going east to Northbound to join with the North slips of the M9. to then form the M40.

    The M7 slips should be easy enough to build, but the M9 is quite low, and the slips will have to be raised high over the M7 to join the new DOOR as with the M7 slips.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    I've got to say, I prefer the outer option.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    So, folks, we're speculating. But WHEN will the NRA unveil the route options? Spongebob, any idea? Are we looking at a 2018 opening date?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    It's 80 km which is quite a hell of a length considering that they'll have to build FOUR motorway-motorway interchanges, so I'd imagine, it'll take at least until 2020 to be done.

    As for the M7/M9/DOOR junction, well here's a crude sketch showing what it looks like now, and how they could integrate it into the DOOR...

    (In my proposed one, it's free-flow, but as a result, inevitably, there are some movements that are not possible)...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,082 ✭✭✭Chris_533976


    Dont worry, I'm sure the 'NRA JUNCTION MADNESS' will take over and all of those junctions will be 3 level stacks a la M6/18/17 or Cork NRR/M20.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    Oh yes, I'm sure as well. In fact I'm pretty sure if they get their hands on it, they'll design something like this (notice the token free-flow slip):


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    presumably there will be traffic lights at each T-junction there?!?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    Maybe, or we might have Ireland's first ramp meters, just to add to the nightmare... ;)

    In all seriousness, as idiotic as the design I drew might be, I would not put it past the NRA to plonk a roundabout in the middle of the M7/M9/DOOR interchange. They have zero-innovation.

    Look at the M6/M17/M18 and M22/M20 interchanges for previews of what they'll most likely to do here...


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Route Options are unlikely to be unveiled before the local elections in any eventuality , too controversial in certain cases .

    I would think maybe they will be unveiled any time between late 2009 and early 2011 with final route selection by end 2011 . This is a guess .

    I am more interested in the outer option seeing as the N80 N51 and N52 are dire and will need bypassing and expensive upgrades if the Inner route is followed. The objective is surely to negate the need for those upgrades and to provide network resilience against M50 congestion.

    I must confess that I am minded to go with a variant on what Mysterious said ,start it from the N33 in Dunleer ( with an upgrade to the M1-N33 to freeflow ) then south of Ardee then to Lobinstown then to Tankardstown NW of navan and then head south to East of Trim, East of Enfield and thence to the N7/N9 megajunction and spaceport :)

    I certainly hope it is the very first project that is done after the Atlantic Road Corridor and M4 past Longford and M11 to Rosslare have been completed as urgent national priorities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    Well clearly I don't feel as passionate as some about my preference of inner/outer route here, as both have pros and cons in my eyes.

    Mysterious, your arguement for me isn't convincing enough to warrant such an apparently angry tone, as if there is no correct opinion but your own. If there were one obvious route, then everyone would be in agreement already. So a bit more civility please, we're talking about a road here not the meaning of life.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    D.L.R. wrote: »
    Well clearly I don't feel as passionate as some about my preference of inner/outer route here, as both have pros and cons in my eyes.

    Mysterious, your arguement for me isn't convincing enough to warrant such an apparently angry tone, as if there is no correct opinion but your own. If there were one obvious route, then everyone would be in agreement already. So a bit more civility please, we're talking about a road here not the meaning of life.


    D.L.R.

    You see, this is probably my third time explaining my point too you. Other's here for the most part understand my logic and points towards having the outer route as the viable option for DOOR.

    I took the time to explain to you why, you just ranted nonsense for the most part. Second you stated your opinion for the inner option, but didn't back it up AT ALL. In fact it was really really farced.


    But on topic. This isn't my opinion. The majority of people seem to understand the outer route is the only real option. It's the most balanced, logical, cost saving, and the most likely route that will be suffiecient in doing what DOOR is for. The outer will reach far larger population catchment than the inner route will. It's proven fact that new roads stimulate investments to regions.

    And having an OUTER Door will open up the regions and not just the Pale. The inner route seems to open purely the Pale.





    It's not my problem you dont want to understand, the obvious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    mysterious wrote: »
    And having an OUTER Door will open up the regions and not just the Pale. The inner route seems to open purely the Pale.
    In fairness they both open a large area to the west and south west of Lexlip which is outside The Pale.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    The thread title is bollox anyway . We are discussing what was and still is OFFICIALLY called the

    LEINSTER OUTER ORBITAL

    even though it is geographically a Leinster Inner or Dublin Outer or Pale Central Orbital...take your picks I suppose :p
    Deputy Noel Dempsey: I propose to take Questions Nos. 71 and 123 together.
    As Minister for Transport, I have responsibility for overall policy and funding in respect of the national roads programme element of Transport 21. The implementation of individual national road projects is a matter for the National Roads Authority, NRA, under the Roads Act 1993 in conjunction with the relevant local authorities.
    In 2007, the NRA completed an updated feasibility study, which built on an earlier 2001 study, that considered, in particular, the costs and benefits of what has become known as the Leinster outer orbital route.
    The updated NRA study, which was forwarded to my Department in 2007, finds there is merit in an orbital route linking Drogheda, Navan, Trim and Naas. Neither Transport 21 nor the national development plan provides any funding for such a scheme to be brought to construction in the period to 2015. The Government has already made clear, under Transport 21, that priorities for the roads investment programme, after the completion of the major interurban network in 2010, will be the Atlantic road corridor as well as the improvement of other key national primary routes and the targeted improvement of certain national secondary routes.


    The Minister for Finance has indicated his determination to seek to avoid any diminution of the capital provisions already made in the period to 2015, notwithstanding the current economic difficulties. The Leinster orbital route proposal remains an important potential element of our longer-term infrastructural development. My Department will continue to liaise with the roads and planning authorities concerned to ensure that the route options are preserved free of impediment for this potential project.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    Any idea why that info is hosted on Cahill Printers website?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    AFAIK Cahills do a lot of XML & web related work for the Houses of the Oireachtas - that doesn't explain why its on their own site though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,192 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Must be a staging/testing server. The version on the official site has exactly the same URL structure but has a last updated date of a day later.

    Cahill have the contract for the 'live' debates site and the printed version so it makes sense they've a dev server. It doesn't make sense that its public!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    The thread title is bollox anyway . We are discussing what was and still is OFFICIALLY called the

    LEINSTER OUTER ORBITAL

    even though it is geographically a Leinster Inner or Dublin Outer or Pale Central Orbital...take your picks I suppose :p

    Leinster Outer Orbital makes no sense. First of all, where is "outer" Leinster? Second, an orbital is a full circle.

    Its the Dublin Outer Bypass, really.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Believe it or not I hear that 'an announcement' will be made on the Outer Orbital in the next few weeks. A new PPP scheme may well be created and this PPP will involve widening of the M1 M4 and M7 at selected locations as well as some or all of the outer orbital.

    It is but a political stunt by the usual suspect as we all know.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement