Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1191192194196197223

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭danfrancisco83


    Going to stay positive and revise my comment. RO approved hopefully any day now.

    Post edited by danfrancisco83 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭spillit67


    But this is gross hyperbole. The proposal is to increase services.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭Consonata


    The purpose is to get DMU's outside of the DART+ region. To increase and maintain good service patterns in the coastal core. This isn't hyperbole, its the justification that IÉ are coming forward with. Whether thats fair or not is up for debate but thats the purpose of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭spillit67


    But the point is that with an aspirational document, if they are recommending it (rather than some new lines), then you have to pause.

    The journey time posts are not great- 5 mins extra from Maynooth? Why not include the whole line? Have you factored in electrification of part of the line, new signalling…? If you are coming to as little as 5 minute without that then I’d say it isn’t as big an issue as you are suggesting.


    You keep saying a diminution of service - yet more frequency is not included in your definition of service.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭spillit67


    There would be an increased number of services and sweating of the assets available with this proposal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,972 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    You haven’t doubled capacity on the Bray-Connolly line tho.

    It won’t do anything to change demand north of Shankill in to the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,972 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I don’t think it’s about the size of the budget. What will it cost versus return?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,151 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Re the AIRR - it’s still only draft and there is absolutely no guarantee that it will be implemented. Years of reading reports that have ended up gathering dust tells me that much. I’ll take it with a degree of skepticism for now.

    Re-read my post on Sligo - I did factor in electrification.

    And my point is that it is not just 5 minutes, it’s 5 minutes added to the 9 minutes longer that the the Sligo trains are already taking between Connolly and Maynooth when compared with older timetables. The journey times on that route are just getting longer and longer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,678 ✭✭✭prunudo


    And that I don't know the equation to. At the end of the day, IR won't be taking anything I say on board, but if governments are serious about getting people away from private transport, then they need to be more ambitious. Because the contuined building going on around here is only going to cause further and further congestion on the n11.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,678 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I don't know why some people are excusing longer and longer jounery times. I would have thought it was something we should be striving to reduce and make it a selling point to get communters out of their cars. We're too quick to settle for mediocre in this country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭Consonata


    How much of the coastal line commuting northbound alights at Tara St./Pearse/GCD, probably a decent chunk right? Being conservative, call it 30% of Northbound commuters. over 3000 board at Bray and Greystones on a given day, this will be more if we are terminating Rosslare services there also, and more again if we are moving to an hourly schedule. If that is putting additional pressure on the core, those commuters can then instead opt for Metrolink instead. We are never going to be able to quad the coastal line but this is the next best thing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Bsharp


    I'd be concerned that trying to get the DMU Rosslare service through the dart+ system could have negative consequences for reliability across the board. Its meant to be a 5min frequency from Bray to the City Centre. Trying to ensure one of these Dart paths is seamlessly replaced by a DMU path coming from Rosslare every hour seems like a risky plan; based on where we are right now in terms of network reliability and train control. The likelihood is the DMU will regularly miss the slot, get terminated short, and passengers will be forced to switch. An unacceptable but realistic outcome.

    Getting much more frequent DMU services to Greystones, that don't have potential to disrupt DART+ Timetabling seems more reliable, and therefore prudent. If we got an DMU hourly shuttle integrating with Dart+ it would be a vast improvement. The simpler the network to operate the better until we build up expertise at operating a bigger and more complex network.

    Being on honest about it, we're going to struggle to operate Dart+ for the first few years given the step change in services involved. It's defeatist but I was here before in another jurisdiction and there were hard lessons to be learnt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,151 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The resignalling will allow for far more paths than will be needed across the DART network for years to come. There will be more resilience due to the far shorter signal sections.

    I note that no one is suggesting that the Sligo train should terminate at Maynooth. Yet that line will be even busier than the southeastern east of Clonsilla, and will face exactly the same issue with an hourly DMU path slotting in between DART services between Maynooth and Glasnevin Junction at the very least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 orb123


    Makes sense. Punctuality on the line this year so far ranged from 69.6%- 77.1%. A 5-minute DART frequency after DART+ would likely make things even worse if they tried to force direct services . Given our history with political fudges in this country, I think we will end up with a handful of direct services, with the rest requiring interchange with the DART.

    The existing infrastructure south of Greystones is significantly underutilised, so it makes sense to utilise that capacity through the use of a shuttle in the short to medium term. Some people have raised concerns about journey times, but in last year's timetable consultation, the top request nationally was to increase service levels on the line, while reducing journey times ranked much lower at #21. I think the main issue is making the shuttle as convenient as possible for passengers to use.

    Perhaps it's worth considering trialling an increased service using DART interchanges on weekends (currently there are only 3 or 4 services on weekends) to get passengers used to the idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,151 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Journey times are less of an issue on the Heuston side as there aren’t the same capacity constraints - it’s a Connolly side issue principally.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,186 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    DART+ will potentially have issues for long-distance services for all four radial heavy rail lines in Dublin.

    One is already sorted – Dart+ Southwest is already 4-tracked, and the AIRR proposes solutions for two more - the Belfast line is to be 3/4-tracked from Connolly to Clongriffin with a new build alignment from there to Drogheda and the Sligo line is to have a new build from Maynooth to somewhere near Hazelhatch. This would allow Sligo trains to use the 4-tracked alignment to terminate in Heuston.

    That just leaves the Wicklow line, but as suggested above the best plan will be to shuttle from Bray/Greystones to Wexford at rush hour with direct services at off-peak times when the DARTs are less frequent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,151 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I’m aware of the AIRR plans but DART+ West for example will already be in situ for some significant time before any new alignments see the light of day. We have to be realistic about this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,972 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    True, but the option is there. Not simple, but possible and not gonna cost an extortionate amount.

    Bray-Connolly just doesn’t have it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Bsharp


    Ah if there was a single line section between Maynooth and Leixlip, through tunnels around a cliff edge, I'm confident we'd be having a similar dicussion.

    The risks are less apparent for Maynooth corridor, the impact of any delays will be very much felt by passengers on the Sligo service though. Its good to see this recognised in the AI SRR so these issues can be addressed. The signalling might be fine but its the platform capacity that's in shorter supply



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Functionally it amounts to the same as the Bray/Wicklow line. Both are alignments we will likely be living with for at least 10 years after Dart+ is complete. Finding pathing for IC services on all of the heavy rail routes into Dublin is going to be extremely challenging.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 219 ✭✭Bsharp


    Can't agree with this enough. Someone needs to be given responsibility for the planning of nationwide conventional rail, so we assess commuter needs and intercity needs as one if they're to use the same track and platforms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    There are only 10 stations between Maynooth and Connolly versus 17 stations between Greystones and Connolly. The Sligo line has two additional tracks available (along the canal) from Glasnevin Junction, versus a section of single alignment between Greystones and Bray.

    It's not the same comparison.

    The proposal for Wexford is a medium term solution to allow higher Dart and Intercity capacity. Ultimately the plan is to send Wexford trains via Waterford directly into Heuston. Even with no speed improvements, and assuming Rosslare-Waterford is reopened, 2hrs 45mins would be possible between Wexford and Heuston. This is only 10mins slower than at present and that's assuming absolutely no speed improvements on the line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Ultimately the plan is to send Wexford trains via Waterford directly into Heuston.

    There is no plan though. Yes, it's in the AIRR but currently for all intents and purposes the Rosslare/Waterford railway does not exist, nor does the Maynooth/Hazelhatch link, nor does four tracking the Northern line etc. None of these proposals are costed, nor are we even sure they are happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Fine! The overall point (being made by multiple people) is that the proposal for Wexford trains is a medium term plan to improve capacity on Dart and Intercity.

    Terminating a commuter/intercity train 20km outside the city center is clearly not ideal. But it's not a long term plan. Look how quickly Foynes works have happened. It sets a very high precedent for the Rosslare-Waterford section.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭Consonata


    This is fine, I just don't love being under the illusion that this is a temporary solution and better things are coming down the line. Nothing more permanent than a temporary fix. Better to make practical decisions about railway infra thats currently in the pipeline and could get planning and funding.

    Terminating in Wicklow/Greystones rather than Bray is kicking the can very firmly down the road IMHO. They are going to need to figure out some way of fixing that bottle neck because otherwise one day the line will fall into the sea and that will be that. Also Foynes is a freight railway, a totally different spec of railway to a fully signalled for example Rosslare/Waterford re-establishment or Maynooth/Hazelhatch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,742 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Any more information on this Maynooth to Hazelhatch link?



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    The level of works underway on Foynes is very significant. It's being reinstated with passenger services in mind, so it's a very relevant comparison to Rosslare-Waterford. However, that's moving off topic for the Dart thread.

    I'd be quite optimistic that the current proposal for Wexford is truly a short to medium term one. But unfortunately the country has set a very poor precedent, so only time will tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,172 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its a line on a map in the AIRR document, nothing else has been set beyond that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,742 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,143 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    90% of the things "recommended" in the AISRR is mnimum 3 decades away. It isn't worth referencing in terms of actual rail investment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭IsaacWunder


    To suggest that the commuter/intercity train is being terminated 20 km shy of the city centre is nothing short of hyperbole. What is actually being proposed is a slight inconvenience: hopping from one train to another. The sweetener? A promise of trains coming and going with greater frequency. And the passengers still get to arrive at Connolly, or Pearse, or Grand Canal Dock.

    Take the Dublin to Limerick route: most trains require passengers to change at Limerick Junction. Yes, a few direct trains run from Heuston to Limerick (about 3 or 4 in both directions each day), but by and large, passengers are happy to change given the more frequent services. The notion that the rail services to Limerick terminate in the wilderness of Limerick Junction or that Limerick itself has vanished from the rail map is a fairy tale. Ditto for the services onto Killarney and Tralee.

    And let’s not delude ourselves regarding how central Heuston Station is. It is a spot that's only city centre if your day’s itinerary includes a trip to the Criminal Courts of Justice or the Phoenix Park. For the average John or Mary arriving into Heuston, their destination is invariably in Dublin 1 or 2. Whether it's a meeting in an office, retail on Grafton St, a night on the tiles, or a trip to Lansdowne or Croker, the last part of every journey invariably involves the Luas, a bus or a taxi.

    For example, someone planning to take a train from Limerick city center to O’Connell St in Dublin would typically change trains at Limerick Junction and then switch to the Luas. Based on some comments here, that journey would be impossible, or that the service would be unpopular. However, the train not only remains the fastest mode of transportation between Limerick and Dublin, but the more frequent and reliable service offered means that people can actually plan their days out a little looser so they have a meeting overrun by 15 minutes, it’s not the end of the world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 266 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    Not my letter, but this one in today's IT encapsulates the mistrust so many have about connecting services.

    'A chara, – Might I suggest some joined-up thinking on scheduling the proposed train and Dart switch somewhere in Co Wicklow? Have the connecting service waiting to pick up passengers from one to the other leaving within five minutes of arrival, including announcements of any delays on both beforehand. Unlike what currently often happens at bus terminuses at Luas and other transport destinations, where connecting buses gleefully sail away in view of arriving passengers. – Yours, etc,

    FRANK McMULLAN,

    Dublin 8.'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,852 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Bus and Luas are independent services, and it's not practical or desirable to delay buses if trams aren't running to time.

    DART and commuter trains, however should be possible to synchronise, given that they're part of the same network.

    Munich used to have a similar arrangement on its S2 S-Bahn line. Until the branch was electrified, service from Dachau to Altomünster was by diesel train. When you got to Dachau, that outbound diesel shuttle (The S-Bahn "A" service) was waiting on the platform opposite. The inbound S-Bahn trains in turn would dwell at Dachau to allow for delays in the incoming A service.

    That service is now a fully-fledged branch of S2, but I believe it's still a shuttle, abd and still runs on a fairly low 30 minute peak interval, dropping to 60 minutes off peak.

    What's being proposed here is not outlandish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,742 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    The issue northside is the delays around Connolly due to congestion. But Commuters do often delay slightly for Dart passengers that are transferring. Similarly for Luas passengers transferring at Broom Bridge, travelling west.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    this is quite simple really.

    a shuttle from the wexford line connecting into dart is convenient for nobody, not dart passengers or the full trains using the rosslare services who would be turfed onto already over-crowded or will be very quickly up the line over-crowded services.
    some stupid trial at weekends to get passengers used to something we aren't going to bother with and will not ever allow is a waste of everyone's time.
    there is plenty of room for a frequent dart and frequent rosslare services, the fact they are operating a 10 minute service dispite many of us saying it wasn't possible with the minimal infrastructure shows it and with future signalling as pointed out paths increase again.
    i mean it''s not as if the rosslare paths are going to be freed up anyway as the diesels are serviced at connolly and are swapped around and have big maintenence done at portlaoise and droghida, none of which is going to change, so they will just run empty to connolly anyway.

    the service pattern for rosslare services will be a direct service to dublin, not a political fudge but reality and it will be delivered as there is enough power now to insure it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    only for those not using either the wexford services or the darts they will be turfed on to.

    this is only the best plan for a couple of posters on boards.ie and a clueless unelected so-called transport authority.

    forget it, it's not going to happen.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,989 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The current service from Dublin to Wexford is not much use if you want to be there in the morning.

    Currently, turning one or two services around at Bray early in the morning would change that. Arriving at platform 3 would allow passengers to simply cross the platform onto a waiting Dart. That Dart could have the same stopping pattern as the service it replaces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    this was supposed to quote the post by IsaacWunder.

    it's not a slight inconvenience.
    it's throwing passengers off an intercity/regional service with all of the types of people traveling including with luggage etc, on to an already over-crowded or will be quite soon up the line over-crowded suburban service.
    the supposed sweetener for this **** service, something they could deliver direct to dublin today if the drivers and rolling stock were available wich once dart + is running it will.
    so we lose, a mostly comfortable direct service where we can work, sleep, whatever that brings us direct into the city centre.
    in exchange for a service where we are turfed off to the suburban service, with increased journey times, only have a much shorter time to use the benefits the train actually has and all else, for an increased frequency of the subpar service perhapse?
    nope, no thanks, you can shove it.
    the dublin to limerick route is not a valid comparison as they are not being chucked on to a suburban service, and in actual fact limerick only has that change as a rolling stock saving exercise as it could absolutely support a direct all day service of at least 2 hours or even an hour, the change is not to increase frequencies there.
    there is no evidence passengers are actually happy to change, they simply have no option because that is how it has been for decades, and chances are passenger numbers are being suppressed.

    i mean we are rehashing the same arguments that have been done to death for a discredited idea only supported by a couple of people on boards, and the NTA who haven't got the message.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    Anyone knows how much more frequency may increase in DART lines, under the proposals to axe direct services between Dublin and Co. Wexford? I understand that between Bray and Greystones it could increase to every 20 mins, haven’t seen any figures for Bray to City Centre tho.

    Furthermore, will these proposals affect Dart+ South to a significant degree? Given that all trains using this line will be commuters and will stop at the exact same stations, would it make any significant difference to remove those level crossings? I understand that there’s more to the project than simply removing these crossings, though that seems like the biggest goal for Dart+ South atm



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    but the service is not being upgraded, it's actually being downgraded.
    4 up and 5 down direct trains direct to the city which allows working and anything else, replaced with maybe, a more frequent service where passengers are turfed off to a suburban service, with increased journey times and losing the benefits the train offers.
    it looks like an upgrade to you because you don't have to use it.
    the whole point of this is to kill off services to wexford altogether, because if they were serious about increasing frequency and capacity, then they can do it without this discredited idea.
    the only way there would be no change to journey times is if everyone was expected to stampede over to the other train which is stupidity and unrealistic and is not going to happen, an extra 10 to 15 minutes will be added to the journey time for nothing.
    at least with longer journey times on direct services, people still get the benefits compared to the disbenefits they would be getting with this subpar service that is being proposed.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 orb123


    Not sure where you are getting this from. As I said, the #1 request nationally for IR's timetable consultation last year was for more frequent services on the Rosslare line, #21 was about increasing speed on the Rosslare line. Please refer to the link below.

    The entire purpose of trialling a shuttle on weekends is to see how it works, and based on the results changes can be based to make it more convienient for passengers.Even if is technically possible to fit an enhanced frequency for the Rosslare train into the post DART+ schedule, it would have to follow a DART at 20mph or less. Is that an efficient use of resources? I don't think so.

    Using shuttles is an easy way to address the #1 complaint that passengers have with the line. In the long term, perhaps there could be improvements south of Greystones to make the change time-neutral.

    I understand your concerns, but lets base our arguments on factual information rather than emotions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    there was only 217 on 1 day in 2019, irrelevant ultimately.

    the fact is the trains from rosslare are beyond full from very far down the line and all trains at that.

    that's the fact from a regular user.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,541 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Just because more people asked for additional services than asked for quicker services, you seem to be extrapolating that people would be happier with more services even if they were noticeably slower. It may or may not be true, but is definitely not something that can be safely read from that data.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,172 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The rail census figures are the figures everything is based on. It is selected to be a perfectly representative day. If there is significant disruption, they re do it to get accurate figures.

    The chances that there was an odd occurrence that caused a lines passenger numbers to collapse on that day is nil (there is a chance of a random occurrence causing them to be higher, e.g. a school trip). The figures are valid.

    The idea that said magic occurrence would happen on every rail census day, ever year, resulting in permanently low figures is laughable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    not at all, as a user of the line for nearly 40 years i can say he is correct with absolute certainty.

    you have to be a regular user to be aware of IE'S game and thinking in terms of the line and it's passengers.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it's not a sleepy rural anything, it's a long distance regional main line serving sizable towns and it has multiples of 500 passengers, more like multiple thousand now with full trains on the line all of the time.
    sligo is not a city either but its ultimately irrelevant as in ireland the regional product is to almost intercity standards so as to attract patronage.
    absolutely laughable that your answer to lx's legitimate points is so what, anyone who was serious about public transport would not hold the contempt you have for rail passengers.
    so desperate to have this discredited idea implemented which you will never use, on people who don't want it, that you will show the ultimate contempt for them while claiming to be a public transport advocate.
    yet dispite the buses being everything you state, rail is still being used and growing, funny that, it's almost as if the buses can't offer rail users what they are looking for, or at least at the time they are using the train, so your so what about killing off rail services is even more of a joke as you want them to then use a method of public transport they don't completely want to use just to get your way.
    a more frequent rail service that runs direct will lead to more passengers yes.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,371 ✭✭✭markpb


    You’re comparing apples and oranges. People transferring at Limerick Junction are switching to an ICR for the majority of their journey. They will get a proper seat, there will be space for their bags and even a bike if they have one. There might even be catering at some stage in the future. There will be a toilet. People transferring at Wicklow in future will be moving to a Dart which has none of those things. That’s not a very attractive proposition.

    It’s also not the same as someone transferring to a Luas at Heuston because that will hopefully be a short trip and because there’s no ICR to their destination today so their journey isn’t being downgraded.

    This is an engineering solution to a political investment problem. It might be the best solution for Dublin and it might be an acceptance solution for some people but it’s not a good solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,206 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    the increase to 20 minutes needs infrastructure works between Bray and Greystones to allow trains to pass going in opposite directions. Originally the plan was to double the line between Greystones and Bray Head but it's now rumoured they'll only be doubling a short section just before the tunnels.

    Currently there's a 30 minute frequency but there's an extra slot in each direction each hour available for Commuter/Intercity trains as 2 trains can use the line in the same direction on after the other provided they're with 10 or 15 minutes of each other

    e.g.

    12:00: Dart Bray→Greystones

    12:15: Intercity Bray→Greystones

    12:30 Dart Greystones→Bray

    IDK if they're planning a higher frequency from Bray, but from Dun Laoghaire seems possible if they run some of the new Drogheda darts to there. There was a document with suggested service patterns in it released early in the Dart+ process but I can't find a copy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Very simple fix to the toilet issue. They can add a sentence to the "this will be the final stop" announcement.... "If you need to take a leak, do it now."

    God forbid people couldn't learn to use the toilet on the first 1.5hr part of the journey.



  • Registered Users Posts: 655 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Talking about facts and hyperbole, while also claiming, with absolute certainty, that the real aim of Irish Rail is to "kill off services to wexford altogether".

    Christ Almighty!!



  • Advertisement
Advertisement