Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin - Metrolink (Swords to Charlemont only)

14344464849123

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Given how badly they’re doing in the polls, ASAP I’d say!! 😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭MyLove4Satan


    I had no idea - the news seemed so bleak a few weeks back. I must say I am surprised and pleased if this pans out.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    If I had to guess, I'd say January. Maybe BusConnects before Christmas. I could be wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭Heartbreak Hank


    What are they meeting with an Italian construction firm for? To assess proposed methodologies?



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    RINA were appointed as Independent Engineering Experts some time back.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    As Marno said, RINA are the independent experts. They're needed on a project like this, because people can't be required to have an in-depth engineering knowledge to participate in the planning process. They'll be able to help people form an opinion on it, frame any objections or recommendations, explain anything that might not be obvious, etc.


    GADRA, for example, are objecting to the ventilation shaft in their park, and are looking to get it turned into a station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Quick question, folks, can anyone tell me where exactly the entrances/exits are for the station at Griffith Park?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    As of the preferred route consultation, it's got one entrance, which is on the road into the Whitehall College.

    So, right around here:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,402 ✭✭✭plodder


    A useful companion to that would be one showing the year that each country built their last metro. Which would show that many are still building more of them. It would help to counter the impression that we missed the boat and costs are just too high now to get started.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I don't see how "costs are just too high now". The actual number may be much higher now but in relative terms, were they inflated to today, the costs of those projectsat the time are probably not much different to now. In many of those countries, labour costs are low but the state resources would be low too so they were probably similar undertakings for those countries at the time to what Metrolink would be for us now.

    I'd say the cost of Metrolink including operation over say 50 years will actually be lower (in relative terms) than many of those projects. Metrolink will be packed with latest technology and will be driverless. The benefits of Metrolink will almost certainly be relatively much higher too given the functioning of modern economies, bigger population, etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 829 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette




  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Some mildly interesting stuff from Gadra's chat with RINA available on their website. Nothing that someone following the project wouldn't have known or suspected already, but it is interesting to see it coming from an independent engineering perspective.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭zom


    "I don't see how "costs are just too high now".(....)I'd say the cost of Metrolink including operation over say 50 years will actually be lower (in relative terms) than many of those projects. Metrolink will be packed with latest technology and will be driverless."

    I love this logic. Build driveless train so instead of drivers we can pay millions to con-sultans ;)



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    It is a long time since I have seen a lift (elevator) being operated by a human.

    Automation is coming to where it is not already here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 989 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    GADRA's questions are a fair bit more reasonable than the propaganda posters they have put up. Prior knowledge of MN shafts, active/passive ventilation yet the sign in the park states the shaft is 'useless' and urge people to demand a station in the park.

    Don't know what I'm missing a shaft will have far less impact on a park than a station surely?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yes, some of the questions are from people that have clearly been researching it and learning about it, and then there's people that are asking questions that have been ruled out since they switched to a single bore. The pros and cons of having a large group of people interested in it, I guess.

    I think that they're resigned to having a shaft there, and would prefer it to be station so at least there's some benefit to them. There's actually a surprising undercurrent of resentment at Na Fianna in the questions, some clearly feel that they're getting "shafted" because Na Fianna ruled out a station under their land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,796 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    2 lines of the Paris metro are fully automated. It’s not that modern a concept. A third is under conversion.

    but let’s just get the metro built and rolled out as planned here… sick of it being talked about, being tweaked, being debated….the absolute shît show of hesitation….line 14 of the Paris metro was built fully automated 24 years ago…it’s not future or new tech.

    but let’s build a fûcking working metro and stop pissing about… in X years with staff attrition which can influence when or if automated metro is viable… unions will resist but driver or driverless…. ? It’s a moot point as we haven’t got a fûckin metro to be driver or driverless… we have a metroless metro…

    let’s prioritize putting wheels on the tracks, people on platforms and in seats and let’s go…. Joke-shop of a selfish country with every special interest group pandered to…the interest of the general population, the people paying to build it ? Wanting a metro, needing it ? What about them / us ? Build the fûcking thing !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    I was in Lille a few years back, fully automated system. Work perfectly fine



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Just been reading that.

    Thank you for your contribution, Mr Ambassador.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭MyLove4Satan


    "Mr Serpi, a native of Rome, arranged the event to share his thoughts on transport and planning in Ireland after four years living here.

    He was shocked by the hours people spent commuting here and said an underground metro was essential."


    Ah but Rome never had pathological professional contrarians like Sean Barrett and Colm McCarty to deal with. Let alone RTE reporters on the opening of every successful rail service for the last 40 years going 'But will you actually use it?" to some random passenger following terms such as 'profitable' being constantly mentioned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,528 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    It all hinges really as to what the Government will do with the business case for the project. If they approve it for people who live in Swords; it would be a big step forward to get to that RO stage.

    But I don't know what the naysayers will say about it if the business case was approved by the Government. All of these economists who are against the project are really not that experienced in going into the underground areas of the city in seeing the extent of it's design and day to day functions of how it works for it's inhabitants.

    Most people living here in the capital who are either not involved or qualified with the complexities of how their own home patch works day to day when underground don't have that luxury to complain about it either.

    They could probably show an interest in how it works. But complaining about it with no realistic argument coming into support it must feel a painfully hard slog on your senses to experience every single day.

    If the Government gives the project merit to let it go ahead to planning for the RO with ABP. That would be pretty good news for the city. Although I do understand that it won't be an easy job to get it done if the RO gets approval.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    MetroNorth had RO, an approved business case and was even put out to tender. Until the cheque is signed and there a tbm in the ground, I'm not buying it myself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    Agree, tbms in the ground before I believe this country is actually capable of building a metro. Jury's still out.

    But Metro North was a daft design, more like a rough draft than a serious proposal.

    What it did was expose the level of cluelessness in the Irish govt about building underground rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,538 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No, it was a fully functional design with planning permission (excepting some required changes on the overground section north of Swords)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    It really is embarrassing but I don't blame the Italian ambassador one bit. We like to give the image of a modern well-run country but the reality is different.

    Remember when the German ambassador had some home truths for us just before the crash and we in our hubris basically told him to f*ck off?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    I said it was a daft design, not thought through properly at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,538 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You also said it was a draft which it clearly wasn't.

    I'd rather have it operational and be looking at improvements and expansions than where we are now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    No I said it was like a draft, because it was so bad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,538 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There was very little wrong with it. Compared to having absolutely nothing, I'll take your idea of bad (that few will agree with) thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,294 ✭✭✭D.L.R.


    There was a lot wrong with it, was never going to get built even without the crash.



  • Registered Users Posts: 577 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    Five metro lines had been built in Rome, he said, despite the difficulties of construction in the historic city. “Try to imagine what it means to have done four, no, five lines in Rome. In a city like Rome, to dig 100m down in Rome, what does that mean? But we have done it!”

    What classical heritage is to Rome, front gardens are to Dublin.

    Anne Graham is quoted as saying at that event, ‘The impression MetroLink is postponed is something I’m surprised to hear because that is certainly not the case.’ A bit disingenuous given that the southern section was scrapped and no sensible person thinks NTA doesn’t still expect to make the Green Line conversion in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    It's been postponed. I wish they'd stop lying, they're not fooling anyone.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    The more people keep saying it's been postponed, the easier it becomes to postpone it.

    It hasn't been postponed. It hasn't even been brought to government where a decision to postpone it could be made. The last time it was brought to government was years ago. It's been horribly managed and is now very delayed both at design phase and construction phase. I've already posted their timeline for the next 12 years showing the extended construction phase. They're still working on the railway order application and the DoT and DPER are still reviewing the business case. Only then will it be brought to government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    "The more people keep saying it's been postponed, the easier it becomes to postpone it".

    What else can people think? Project was announced 4 years ago (this version of it) and not even a planning application has been made. Human lifespans are limited and all. And there's been multiple versions of this project for the last 50 years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    To be fair every capital project (be it transport or whatever) now has to be brought to government twice - once prior to planning application and second time (and more importantly) after planning permission is granted.

    But I have to again question the NTA's management of the process - no deadline has been met. They really are appalling at this.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    The entire process has also been rejigged thanks to the EU, we've now got to have public participation on major projects like this, way earlier in the process, and far more extensive too.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is facing some delays, it has not been postponed. They are very different things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40 jumpinsheep



    Thanks for those screenshots; it seems they were probably made end of July 2021 (I guess that's what the blu vertical line there indicates).

    In Nov 2021, newspapers articles started mentioning a possible 10 yrs delay, then the Taoiseach told the Dáil that MetroLink "has not been postponed for another decade", then NTA's CEO Anne Graham comments, etc. etc. - who knows how much the timeline has changed, from when those screenshots were taken...

    Now that covid19 restrictions are being lifted, all the relevant parties will hopefully move swiftly with whatever needs to be done.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Not sure if I/anyone else posted this here yet. There was an article in the Sunday Times in October saying that Level 5 restrictions had interrupted work at the Land Registry and this had caused lengthy delays in getting ready documents for the proposed CPO.

    I've heard of other people having similar issues with Departments being shut from January 2021 for several months so this wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    TII have tendered for MetroLink Client Partner Support Services

    13 year contract with a €200m contract value



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The Nov '21 articles were, bluntly, completely wrong and based on a pretty basic comprehension error of the latest NTA plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I'll start to believe it when there's a TBM in the ground.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yeah, whether your an optimist or a pessimist regarding this project, I think that's a view we all hold.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    According to Peter Walsh, 13.5 years from now is a best case scenario.

    2 years at An Bord Pleanala, 2.5 years of procurement and 8-9 years of construction.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40799475.html



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    That.. doesn't make any sense. They've been talking about parallel procurement for years now. A bizarre statement from the CEO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    3 years further slippage in the 6 months since the most recent plan - impressive even by TII standards.

    How could this be done quicker - surely other countries are capable of building a single metro line from conception to opening without it taking literally 20 years (and that's ignoring any previous work borrowed from Metro North).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭xper


    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/dublin-metrolink-to-be-delayed-until-2035-at-the-earliest-1.4792827

    “You can imagine how people are alarmed after €88 million [sic], we don’t have a MetroLink. Can you understand that frustration Mr Walsh?” he said.

    “Not really,” Mr Walsh responded. “I take your word for you if you are frustrated.”

    Sickening stuff in front of the PAC this morning from the TII CEO. For that level of incompetence and indifference, he should not be in the role.

    The NTA and TII seem to be trying to outdo each other in bad news this week.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I don't understand that frustration either, like the TII CEO. This is a multibillion euro project. There is absolutely no reason for frustration that MetroLink hasn't been built after €88m spent. It's a tiny proportion of the overall budget.

    The 2021 construction start date and the 2027 completion date should have been revised years ago. They are wildly inaccurate.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I mean, its a terribly phrased question though the response leaves something to be desired. The expenditure so far doesn't strike me as particularly out of the ordinary for a planning process of this scale. The focus should have been on the timeline slippage.

    Peter Walsh, the chief executive of the agency that has primary responsibility for the project, told the Public Accounts Committee that the best-case scenario would see the project take 13.5 years until completion from the current date.

    That allows two years for a railway order to be processed by An Bord Pleanala, 2.5 years for a procurement process for a contractor — which is likely to be a Public-Private Partnership — and between eight and nine years for construction and commissioning.

    I would like to see his actual wording on this as it wouldn't be the first time the media got things confused. The 2 years for railway order and 2.5 years for procurement are not necessarily consecutive.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement