Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Heavyweight Boxing

1160161163165166309

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Yea that is a relevant point. In the gym there would be numerous off days where even a very ordinary lad would get a lucky punch or time a worldie and at HW that would mean serious trauma even with the big gloves. I suppose I might have dismissed your point a bit at first glance re RJJ like the shots hed have taken over the years in training would have of course contributed to his decline or chin softening. He really was awesome though, probably my favourite that I’ve seen in real time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Yeah he went on far too long. He was my GOAT at the turn of the century but I thought after he fought Tarver the first time that he should have walked away as he had cemented his legacy. He had the gig with HBO at that time already and I felt he would go down as the greatest if he retired right then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,394 ✭✭✭megadodge


    Remarkable how being KO'd after 35 years of age and 15 years as a pro is somehow used as a barometer to judge one (and only one) great fighter's prime, but every excuse under the sun is used to explain Mike Tyson being past his prime when getting KTFO'd at TWENTY THREE years of age.

    Let's all play pretend.

    Double standards at it's very worst!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Knew I’d reel you in, angry man!

    btw, Tyson isn’t the GOAT either.

    It was Roy who claimed that Roy was the GOAT. No double standards at all.

    anyone, Tyson included who wants to claim that Tyson is the GOAT, will be judged/assessed no differently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭iebamm2580


    We can only go on what ex fighters say, what you are saying can not be proved, you are speculating about what they actually might think. I take them at face value. I just think if usyk beats joshua again, fury needs usyk, thats his legacy secured.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I don't remember anybody ignoring the whole career as regards any fighters legacy.

    I spoke about pre-prison Mike Tyson as one of the greatest, as in his prime years were pre-prison but as far as his legacy goes he fought on way past his prime and gets knocked for that. Very same as Roy Jones Jr. Roy had a much longer prime but he fought on for too many years after that. I spoke of Roy Jones Jr. as the GOAT in his prime years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 968 ✭✭✭AdrianG08


    In fairness Fury has taken dangerous fights (relative to his standing at the given time).

    I remember the first Chisora fight in 2011, thinking what was he doing here. At the time he'd had 13 or 14 fights. This was the Chisora who had yet to fight Vitali and Haye. Say what we want about Chisora but that's a risky fight.

    The Wilder I fight was the ultimate risk. Like some others on here I don't harp on about him being 28/30 stone like it's some kind of virtue. But it is what it is, a risky fight.

    You can throw a lot of stuff at Fury but he has taken risks and has consistently got the result on the big night.

    As for being unrealistic and demanding 50/50 with AJ? Feck that, I would aswell. The man in me would look for that, in his eyes he was still lineal champ, the man who beat the man. He didn't have a promoter to protect him from sanctioning bodies demanding mandatories be fulfilled (IBF belt was basically stripped right away) .

    No surprise Hearn couldn't agree with Wilder or Fury, considering the fella probably wanted lions share for his paper champ, rematch clauses and even the lions share in the rematch. That's how they operate. So it was great that Fury and Wilder made their own trilogy and in the mean time the "champ" Got found out all by himself against Ruiz and Usyk.

    I think this vindicated Fury if it is a case he wouldn't accept being the b-side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Littlehorny


    The move up to his one fight at heavyweight was the slow beginning of the end of Roy Jones, the effect of putting on muscle then losing it to come back down to light heavy meant he lost that split second zip, reflex, timing or whatever you like to call it was gone.

    He was 34 doing this and then he lost twice to Tarver at light heavy and never claimed a world title again. Before the Ruiz fight he only had one loss on his record and that was a disqualification against Montell Griffin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    He's not getting at you. He posts here once in a blue moon, and all to get a swipe at me for whatever beef he has...never direct quotes me, but subtly has a go in his posts/replies.

    Either that, or thanks any posters that disagree and debate me...

    Just on Roy and his prime and Mike and his prime...both excellent fighters at prime....

    Neither are GOAT for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes, this angle has been looked at alright.

    I personally think that Roy simply did not have a great chin, and in prime he didn't need to rely on it so much due to his speed and reflexes

    He rarely got tagged hard/clean pre Tarver KO.

    Take an Ali...when his reflexes slowed and he had to take flusher shots, his solid chin came to his rescue. Roy did not have a solid chin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Its very hard to tell you could be right & Roy done a great job of keeping that chin hidden but some fighters age worse than others & there chin's go ,

    Has Roy ever spoke about it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Don't believe he ever spoke of it

    Plus, it's not like he was an old/stale/beaten up 35 year old. The chap was still very fresh, athletic and talented. He had recently won a HW belt as well. He was a top class fighter aged 35. Plus, he beat Tarver after that HW belt win.

    In the Tarver 2 fight he just got caught with a flush shot and his chin/body did not take it. Not much more to it.

    He then was clean knocked out again not too long after from another clean shot.

    It's why I don't consider him greater than some others...

    The likes a my man, James Toney. Had both the chin and toughness and ring crafts/smarts to always stay on his feet..went up all the way to HW and fought and beat men far bigger, never getting stopped or even dropped: Fought Holyfield in 2003 who landed some very clean shots, and Jirov before that fight hit Toney with heaps of heavy shots. Fought a prime Lebedev (who knocked Roy clean out) aged 42/43 and still standing after 12 rds...

    Roy more had speed/reflexes, and when these depleted, he was clearly vulnerable

    Roy didn't have those elite survival skills of chin/defense when he lost some speed/reflexes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Yes I agree, but if Mike never fought again after prison and Jones retired after Tarver 1 or even Tarver 2 then they would be high up in the GOAT conversation for me. In fact Roy would be the GOAT in that circumstance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,394 ✭✭✭megadodge


    The reason I only post once in a blue moon anymore, is because this forum has degenerated massively from what it once was.

    And you are the main reason.

    Like a number of other good posters who used to post regularly on here, I got sick of you hijacking threads with your neverending, interfering, conatrarian bullsh*t. Newer posters fall for it and try arguing their case, but eventually learn the hard way. Well, I learned a long time ago.

    In the Simpsons there once was a 'No Homer club', I wish the boxing forum had a 'No Walshb thread'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,394 ✭✭✭megadodge



    I wasn't picking you out. And in fairness to you, you obviously appreciate Roy Jones' greatness.

    My gripe is how what Roy Jones did at 35+ is used to demean what he did in his actual prime years. Nobody gives Sugar Ray Robinson any grief for his 19 losses. Why? Because most of them occurred when he was well past his best. Same with Ali, Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, etc. Sadly, boxing is littered with similar examples of greats who just couldn't stay away. And in the main, reasonable people don't hold that against them. They remember them at their best. So why is it different for Roy Jones?

    The whole 'he had a bad chin all along' type thinking is so unrealistic it's hard to fathom. Hiding a bad chin for 15 years is simply not possible!

    People really need to think about that last sentence.

    For the record I believe Roy Jones was the greatest boxer to ever lace gloves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Safe to say hello yet? Jaysus lads it’s only a bit of discussion. I think you’re two good posters.

    WB if RJJ isn’t the GOAT for you who would be? Pound for pound in prime (which isn’t the only measurement of course) he’s right up there or thereabouts.

    I get your criticism of him being so beatable right after his prime. Some very ordinary lads KO’d him. A big argument for Ali over him has to be that ability to take shots and find a way of winning or winning fights where he was the underdog, beginning with Liston and right up to Foreman



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Littlehorny


    In my opinion its so hard to look past Sugar Ray Robinson, he was 40 and 0 by the time he was 21, he lost to Jake LaMotta then fought 87! more times before he lost again 😮

    By the time he lost again to Randolph Turpin he was 30 and his record up to then was 129 wins 1 loss and 2 draws.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    squinn2912,

    Personally the greatest fighting talent I have ever seen in action is James Toney

    He had everything. Chin, stamina, IQ, toughness, ring smarts, infighting, mid fighting, and all the intangibles. Skills you cannot teach..

    and utterly fearless. Didn’t give a fook. No airs or graces. Just a badass

    The most unstoppable/unknockoutable fighter ever..

    born fighter Toney: Jones was more an athletic marvel.

    Jones was not that fighter for me. He was clean knocked out by single type shots several times.

    as for other point. Not my gripe at all. A poster has beef with me, so much so he had to let it all out. You’d need to ask him. I’m fine n dandy!

    Next to no idea why anyone would get so would up or irritated on an Internet forum simply agreeing:disagreeing:debating. Pathetic!



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    I need to take a better look at Toney I really wouldn’t ever have had him nearly that high but I kow you love him. I’ll get a look at some fights and see where that takes me rather than disagree in ignorance.

    That did happen Jones late on in his career like no one could lay a glove on him up until then. But it was such a rapid decline.

    Hmm yea I’m not gonna say pathetic or anything like that. I like hearing megadodge’s opinion. I do think it was a peculiar reaction though



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes. Toney isn’t as known as many others, of course.

    But his skills and intangibles and iron will/toughness and resiliency are off the charts.

    and he fought anyone and everyone. Circa 90 fights and on the floor once. Never stopped or knocked out.

    Pathetic/peculiar…whatever.

    Completely out of the blue. I don’t know this poster. All I know is that he’s a longtime poster who rarely posts lately. Had plenty back and forth, plenty agreements/disagreements, but nothing really uncivil; much the same as me and you, or me and others.

    then for weeks/months the indirect posts aimed at me or thanks to posters dissing/disagreeing with me, and then the full on rant from yesterday..not my grievance/issue. I just post here because I love boxing and views and opinions on it. And I never take it personally when other opinions/views are not the same as mine. He obviously did, as well as speaking for other posters that used to post regularly, but now seem not to because of me. Absolute horseshit.

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,394 ✭✭✭megadodge



    Make sure the top of your list is his fight with Dave Tiberi.

    Don't worry if you never heard of Tiberi. Neither did anybody else before they fought.

    He wasn't even ordinary, but he beat the sh*t out of a prime James Toney for 12 rounds, so much so Toney couldn't stand up for the decision.

    Seriously. Watch the decision.

    Immediately after one of the worst decisions in boxing history, Toney states he'd never box at middleweight again. Except he did. Twice. So much for the weight-making bullsh*t Toney fanboys spout to excuse every one of his losses.

    And just to get this in before the neverending excuses come - Toney himself has openly admitted since then, that he "got a gift that night".

    He's more honest than his fans.



  • Registered Users Posts: 968 ✭✭✭AdrianG08


    Really depends on what you're into though.

    RJJ is one of my favourite fighters ever. Suspect chin yes, but to do what he did with a bad chin is magic too.

    Has the W over Toney in the mid 90s aswell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Contentious decisions happen all the time in boxing. Big deal. Toney/Tiberi was contentious. So what. Toney is still an ATG fighter.

    Norton/Ali 3 hugely contentious. Doesn’t at all take away from the greatness of Ali.

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Read up a bit about Toney. I’ll have to watch some more. Fighter of the year 12 years apart is impressive. But what sticks out for me is the Jones fight, it was a landslide and jones put him down too. Both young men at the time and Toney was favourite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    The KD was a nothing. Jones won. A step ahead. Boring fight.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Yea but he won at a landslide in an almost shutout that included a kd. I haven’t seen it now but that’s a chasm



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Had a look. Toney didn’t look great but I thought the rounds were almost all fairly close. Watched it there now in a hurry but that was my impression. Toney hurt his leg, would that have something to do with him not standing? Its not a good sign when a champion can\t stand to meet the decision. If he’s admitted that then fair play to him. Looked like a loss to me but not by a mile. Very awkward fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Many rds in Tiberi fight very close/competitive..anyway, big deal. One fight out of 90 or so..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes. Won well on the cards. As I said, Jones was a step ahead. It’s not like he beat Toney up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I was a huge Toney fan and expected him to best RJJ. I came away from that fight blown away by RJJ.

    Toney wasn't ever near the class of RJJ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Completely different styles and fighters.

    For me, Toney was the greater pugilist. I am basing it off his 20+ years career

    Best I have seen..

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Worth having a read at this, from the guys who fought RJJ, including Toney. Toney comes across as very genuine and modest himself I gotta say.

    https://www.ringtv.com/599435-roy-jones-jr-just-how-good-was-the-former-pound-for-pound-king/

    We talk a lot about prime vs prime but no one beats prime Roy. I can see reasons why someone would call Toney their favourite etc but I don’t think he belongs in a GOAT conversation. Waiting for the compelling argument for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Well, whatever about GOAT status..

    as regards talent/skills/toughness status, Toney is right up near the top.

    anyway, it’s all personal opinions really.

    huge factor in any GOAT debate is name recognition. Here, Toney suffers..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    On prime Roy at middleweight I reckon a Hearns is very dangerous. Stylistically very dangerous.

    Hagler I’d back to stop Roy late.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    I reckon Jones stops both at prime. A fraction the wrong side of prime and both stop jones



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    A MW McClellan also very dangerous for Jones!

    both him and Hearns could get to Roy clean. Big, rangy, tall and heavy hitters. G man also had a very solid chin..



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,878 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Lots of MW would’ve been dangerous for RJJ. One would’ve thought Hopkins or Toney would have been a real test for him but he comfortably won both, especially the latter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Style wise Hopkins was not near as dangerous as a Hearns or G man. Toney the same. Roy could outbox Toney and Hopkins. They are more boxers/tacticians..

    It’s the killers like Hearns and G man who would pose the more danger.

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    John Fury has advised Whyte to be praising and lovey dovey to Tyson, and this is his best chance at getting a title shot. Act the hard man and aggressive stance, and Fury might tell you where to go!!!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭iebamm2580


    Just had quick look back at first few pages of the tread, jeez the predictions for fury by some on here couldnt have been more wrong. Few predicting early kos of fury by both aj and wilder. Not trying to gloat, just bored at work and read first few pages. Been some turnaround.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    but there still was logic in those predictions. So, I wouldn't read into them too much.

    Wilder and Fury could fight another 10 times, and it wouldn't be odd, off or silly to think that Wilder gets a win(s).

    It's wee little things here and there that can change fights, and more so when you have a hitter like Wilder..

    I re-watched the fight again, and a very slight thing that Fury did when he was caught clean by Wilder in round 4 likely saved him being even more hurt, and possibly knocked out. Watch when the Wilder shot lands....Fury moves onto it, but slightly tucks the chin/head into neck/chest, and he allowed himself to absorb the punch better than had it caught him flush to face/jaw.

    These split second moments can make wins and losses...

    Also, AJ-Fury yet to happen.....Not at all odd to think AJ can win....Yes, Fury will start favorite, but hardly a huge upset should AJ beat him; same for Usyk. I think Fury beats Usyk, but Usyk could make it very competitive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭selectamatic


    But hadn't Chisora only about the same amount of pro fights under his belt? And it was for some sort of a British title so it made sense to take it.

    And from a tale of the tape perspective it definitely made sense to take it.

    I'll admit it was risky in the sense that Fury still had that habit if getting sucked into a brawl and fighting small at times thus coughing up rds and chisora was a step above who he'd been doing this with previously but it was definitely a shot worth taking and it paid off.

    "Paper champ" is pretty harsh on Joshua is it not? He beat an ageing wlad fair and square and took the belts just like Fury did. Tis no one else's fault that Tyson f#cked off for an extended holiday after getting his titles.

    And upon his return only one of the big 3 was seen as a big big draw and that was Joshua. And I say all this someone who has really fallen out of favour with how AJ has performed of late and was delighted with the Usyk win.

    Fury came back to fight a wilder who'd lost about 12 cumulative rds to ortiz before stopping him with straight right bombs in both fights. The fact he'd been so easily outboxed for large parts in both fights though was the carrot for Fury. The fight was a struggle to sell out/didnt sell out and it didn't do the numbers hoped.

    At the time the big big money was in a fury Aj fight or wilder Aj fight. It didnt happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,394 ✭✭✭megadodge


    For somebody supposedly so skilful Toney was regularly outboxed.

    Nunn couldn't be caught on the cards before the 11th round finish.

    Against the slick Reggie Johnson, Mr. Indestructable was put on his arse in round two form a single left hand. By no stretch of anybody's imagination was Reggie Johnson a big puncher. A lot of people (me included) thought Reggie won that fight.

    Both Mike McCallum fights were close tough fights, where there was a strongman v a slickster. Toney was NOT the slickster. His head was knocked back repeatedly by 35/36 year old McCallum's jabs and he was made look very, very amateurish by McCallum's pivoting. He did however, land the heavier punches, so it's a case of what you like. However, don't waste your time watching the commentary that includes Sean O'Grady's non-stop fawning over Toney; even as Toney was swiping at thin air, he was praising his 'skills'. O'Grady sounded like he had marked his scorecard before it even began.

    Roy Jones fight. 12-0. Different class!

    Montell Griffin beat him twice. Griffin was a very skilful operator, yet Toney is the one that gets praised for his 'skills'.

    Drake Thadzi wasn't quite the nobody that Dave Tiberi was, but he wasn't a whole lot better. He lost to any decent fighter he fought, but he beat Toney.

    Unlike others, I don't go on about fighter's losses when they are miles past their best, but I couldn't let go the fact that Samuel Peter actually outboxed Toney in their second fight. Peter was a strong, hard-hitting and tough heavy, but Toney was probably the only boxer he ever outboxed.


    Toney fans never shut up about his win over face-first sluggers Iran Barkley and Vassilly Jirov. I don't like being disrespectful to boxers but everybody those two fought was more skilful than them! They relied on toughness, workrate and good power. Three years before, Nigel Benn destroyed Barkley in one round. Four years before, an ancient, fat Roberto Duran beat Barkely. If you were to get a computer to create two boxers to suit James Toney's style perfectly and make him look way better than he was, it would have created Barkley and Jirov.

    Back in the 1980s certain people used the term 'media creation' to disparage the great Sugar Ray Leonard. Well, I use the term 'internet creation' to describe James Toney's skilset. Since the advent of the internet there has been a small cohort of dedicated, deluded, disciples of James Toney who go on and on and on and on about his talent and skills. His performances and results don't back it up.

    t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Im a huge fan of compromise! Roy greater athletic talent and James greater fighting talent!!! Happy days



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Fight fans need to watch Toney-Nunn closer. Nunn was an exceptional boxer: Tall, fast, rangy and a lovely mover. Top 3 P4P in 1991.

    The cards don't tell the story, and nor does compubox. Toney was not being clearly out-boxed. Hell of a lot of Nunn shots being counted were blocked and parried and slipped. Toney was the one landing the harder and cleaner shots all night, breaking Nunn down mid to late rounds. Score cards were not as wide as what was happening. It was a far closer fight.

    That win from Toney was far from a lucky punch. Nunn was being broken down, and it was Toney getting on top the last few rounds. It was an excellent display from Toney. In the pocket all night slipping, parrying and countering solidly the whole night. Pure innate skills.

    Great fight and show from both men. One best MW fights the last 30 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    I think Jones was better boxer than Toney & showed it when they fought,

    I guess it depends on what style you like ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yep...agreed....

    Two very different styles. Jones for me was more an athlete come boxer and Toney a born fighter.

    Both exceptional boxers/fighters/talents

    I have 0 issue with anyone saying RJJ is greater, or the GOAT. It's just a bit silly when some take it a bit oo serious when any analysis and assessment may appear to be negative.

    What I love about Toney was his fearlessness, calmness, coolness and balls in the ring. I don't think I have ever seen a more calm and composed boxer/fighter. Nothing phased him.

    And his actual skills were beautiful to watch. Cleanness, preciseness, smoothness. As well as one of the greatest inside fighters ever.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement