Is Dave Chappelle's new special "The Closer" really transphobic?

Trans people always want people to be tolerant yet show no tolerance themselves.

It's a tough call. I'm not sure how to score this. Chapelle's a black yank which gives him something like +5 in historical oppression points but, he's also a man which carries +4 in privilege points and +2 in historical blame points although the historical blame has a -50% modifier due to the blackness nerf. He's also cis and straight which adds +4 privilege points although this buff doesn't fully stack due to his blackness which is currently at around 70% and is subject to change. His humour increases his rhetoric by 10 flat points which directly defends and sometimes nullifies outrage points from opponents. How these scores play out, I have no idea. In fact, I'm more confused now than when I started posting.

I think the intolerance is in the way they went after his friend Dapne and others like JK Rowling the whole cancel culture but that's not just a trans thing, the point I took form the show was people are people and there's plenty of C**ts right now in the trans movement, that's not because they are trans but because they are c**ts. It's like people can't joke about trans? why? I've had 2 family members murdered and know 3 people that have been raped! I still laugh at jokes.

Why should the trans community be any different to anyone else? most of us have chips on our shoulder but at times it's like some carry a whole field and think they're the 1st to do so.

People are allowed views & you don't have to friggin agree with them but basic facts like biology hold no matter what, go deal with it.

What does it matter if someone is a billionaire? how does that affect anything? why is it shite? because you don't agree? shall we talk how stupid it was Maya Forstater lost her job?

So is biology shite now? ffs

"Dress however you please.

Call yourself whatever you like.

Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you.

Live your best life in peace and security.

But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? "

The twatter mafia tried to cancel her as far as I can see, if not what were "they " attempting?

I asked you to provide an example as you are claiming that she has been cancelled. Im not going to do the work for you.

JK Rowling is a transphobe and is arguing for taking away the rights of transwomen.

It is, of course, ironic that JK Rowling previously talked about freedom of speech in an article she posted with comments turned off, and tweeted with replies turned off, days after silencing someone with a legal threat but you do you.

We were talking about Jk and she argues against transwomen but I guess you're highfiving yourself thinking you somehow "got me".

The entire judgement:

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e15e7f8e5274a06b555b8b0/Maya_Forstater__vs_CGD_Europe__Centre_for_Global_Development_and_Masood_Ahmed_-_Judgment.pdf

the judges conclusion in the Forstater case:

"I conclude from this, and the totality of the evidence, that the Claimant is

absolutist in her view of sex and it is a core component of her belief that she

will refer to a person by the sex she considered appropriate even if it violates

their dignity and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or

offensive environment. The approach is not worthy of respect in a democratic

society."

sex and gender are not the same thing.

plus you still havent provided any evidence of JK being cancelled...sweetie

That's from the original case that went against her? so there's a reason she won the appeal

 "Forstater said: “I struggle to express the shock and disbelief I feel at reading this judgment, which I think will be shared by the vast majority of people who are familiar with my case.

“My belief … is that sex is a biological fact, and is immutable. There are two sexes, male and female. Men and boys are male. Women and girls are female. It is impossible to change sex. These were until very recently understood as basic facts of life by almost everyone.

“… This judgment removes women’s rights and the right to freedom of belief and speech. It gives judicial licence for women and men who speak up for objective truth and clear debate to be subject to aggression, bullying, no-platforming and economic punishment.

“I will consider the judgment closely with my legal team to determine what can be done to challenge it.”"

and then from the appeal:-

He concluded that Ms Forstater was "absolutist" in her view and said she was not entitled to ignore the rights of a transgender person and the "enormous pain that can be caused by misgendering".

But the Honourable Mr Justice Choudhury said her "gender-critical beliefs" did fall under the Equalities Act as they "did not seek to destroy the rights of trans persons".