Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gameweek 26 DGW Transfer Thread

Options
1234568

Comments

  • Options
    #212
    dr.kenneth noisewater
    Registered Users Posts: 5,638 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    -8 done, Forester/Grealish/Ings to Martinez/Barnes/DCL. Playing BB with Mendy/Bamford/Cresswell/Holding.

    1.8 itb still and tempted to go to -12 to get Pereira for Holding


  • Options
    #213
    stephenl15
    Registered Users Posts: 5,885 ✭✭✭stephenl15


    stephenl15 wrote: »
    Going to go Ings and Cavani to Kane and Maja (-4) I think. Kane is a must and then I've 5.7 for a striker preferably with a game in 29

    Done, now do I start Maja or Bamford? :D


  • Options
    #214
    siblers
    Registered Users Posts: 12,364 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    Mourinho trolling again

    https://twitter.com/RobGuesty/status/1365301647526793219?s=20


  • Options
    #215
    Klonker
    Registered Users Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭Klonker


    SheldonC17 wrote: »
    -12

    Coufal, Lowton, Rashford, A Barnes out

    Reguilon, El Mohammedy, Barnes, Kane in

    Do you still have your wildcard? If you do and weren't playing to use any other chips this gameweek it might be worth using.


  • Options
    #216
    505_
    Registered Users Posts: 240 ✭✭505_


    Any thoughts on the best option out of Matheus Pereira, Lookman or Raphina? I think Raphina over the long term is probably the best but the other two have an extra game this week.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #217
    siblers
    Registered Users Posts: 12,364 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    505_ wrote: »
    Any thoughts on the best option out of Matheus Pereira, Lookman or Raphina? I think Raphina over the long term is probably the best but the other two have an extra game this week.

    Long term I'd definitely go with Raphinha. If fancy him to outscore the other 2 this gw


  • Options
    #218
    Newbie20
    Registered Users Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Newbie20


    Any thoughts on these potential transfers and team would be appreciated

    Have 2 FTs and thinking I’ll go
    Mee to Keane
    Raphina to Barnes ( will get Raphina back again soon )

    Martinez (McCarthy)
    Cancelo Stones Keane Targett (Dawson)
    Salah Gundogen Bruno Son Barnes
    DCL(c) (Bamford Antonio)


  • Options
    #219
    Rikand
    Registered Users Posts: 20,341 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    Klonker wrote: »
    Do you still have your wildcard? If you do and weren't playing to use any other chips this gameweek it might be worth using.

    -12 isnt enough of a hit for a wildcard. Only push that button if you're approaching -20


  • Options
    #220
    skippy15
    Registered Users Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭skippy15


    Newbie20 wrote: »
    Any thoughts on these potential transfers and team would be appreciated

    Have 2 FTs and thinking I’ll go
    Mee to Keane
    Raphina to Barnes ( will get Raphina back again soon )

    Martinez (McCarthy)
    Cancelo Stones Keane Targett (Dawson)
    Salah Gundogen Bruno Son Barnes
    DCL(c) (Bamford Antonio)
    Raphina for Barnes this week may pay of, but im keeping Raphina on my BB team
    Mee to Keane I have to say no, only Everton is Digne in def, why not go Shaw for that money?


  • Options
    #221
    Jim Gazebo
    Registered Users Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭Jim Gazebo


    Kane, M Pereira and Shaw for Ings, Grealish and Cresswell. -4 and BB being played!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #222
    SheldonC17
    Registered Users Posts: 528 ✭✭✭SheldonC17


    Klonker wrote: »
    Do you still have your wildcard? If you do and weren't playing to use any other chips this gameweek it might be worth using.

    It’s been used early new year unfortunately.

    Bench boost this week and also think all the new incomes are better long term options with fixtures they have coming up.


  • Options
    #223
    Benimar
    Registered Users Posts: 7,778 ✭✭✭Benimar


    Going to BB so would you do either or both of the following?

    Bamford to DCL for a -4

    Coufal to Targett/Shaw/anyone under 5.3 for a -4

    Can do both for -8. Leaning towards the DCL one, but as much as I don’t want a West Ham defender v Man City, will any of the options outscore him by 4 points?


  • Options
    #224
    ThunbergsAreGo
    Registered Users Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Benimar wrote: »
    Going to BB so would you do either or both of the following?

    Bamford to DCL for a -4

    Coufal to Targett/Shaw/anyone under 5.3 for a -4

    Can do both for -8. Leaning towards the DCL one, but as much as I don’t want a West Ham defender v Man City, will any of the options outscore him by 4 points?

    You lose a 29 player with the first move


  • Options
    #225
    CornettoQueen
    Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭CornettoQueen


    Is Son to Kane to sideways?


  • Options
    #226
    Shedite27
    Registered Users Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Have a late urge to start Watkins (lee, shu).

    Gundog is the person I'd probably drop for him. Not worth it is it? No BB


    Martínez LEE (A) SHU (A)

    Digne SOU (H) WBA (A)
    Cancelo WHU (H) WOL (H)
    Reguilón BUR (H) FUL (A)
    Pereira ARS (H) BUR (A)

    Barnes ARS (H) BUR (A)
    De Bruyne WHU (H) WOL (H)
    Fernandes CHE (A) CRY (A)
    Son BUR (H) FUL (A)
    Gündogan WHU (H) WOL (H)

    Calvert-Lewin SOU (H) WBA (A)


  • Options
    #227
    siblers
    Registered Users Posts: 12,364 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    CornettoQueen wrote: »
    Is Son to Kane to sideways?

    Depends who you are taking out for Kane and who you are bringing in to replace Son


  • Options
    #228
    CornettoQueen
    Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭CornettoQueen


    siblers wrote: »
    Depends who you are taking out for Kane and who you are bringing in to replace Son

    Was thinking
    Son to Gundo
    Antonio to Kane


  • Options
    #229
    Newbie20
    Registered Users Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Newbie20


    skippy15 wrote: »
    Raphina for Barnes this week may pay of, but im keeping Raphina on my BB team
    Mee to Keane I have to say no, only Everton is Digne in def, why not go Shaw for that money?

    Yeah Shaw is a good call alright. Thought he was more expensive. Fancy Everton’s fixtures was why I was thinking that way but Shaw does have a lot of attacking potential.


  • Options
    #230
    siblers
    Registered Users Posts: 12,364 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    CornettoQueen wrote: »
    Was thinking
    Son to Gundo
    Antonio to Kane

    Not bad moves to be fair. Gundo is pretty much essential to own and Kane looks more impressive than Son at the moment


  • Options
    #231
    callaway92
    Registered Users Posts: 14,341 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    callaway92 wrote: »
    Really annoyed but did Maddison to Barnes. Didn’t want to have to do a sideways transfer like that but I really feel the need for a piece of the Leicester attack.

    Honestly, even though I have Son I’ve a good feeling for Bale this week. Would like to have him.

    Double-sigh


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #232
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users Posts: 19,613 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    That Barnes injury is a pain in the hole, I only owned him for two weeks and had high hopes for him. Havent a clue where to go now for similar money


  • Options
    #233
    extra gravy
    Registered Users Posts: 22,474 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    That Barnes injury is a pain in the hole, I only owned him for two weeks and had high hopes for him. Havent a clue where to go now for similar money

    Same, I might get Lingard he could have a field day against Leeds. Pity their fixtures are bad but they proved yesterday they can score even against the best defence


  • Options
    #234
    F1ngers
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 10,249 Mod ✭✭✭✭F1ngers


    Cartman78 wrote: »
    The hit seems a little unnecessary maybe - selling Son before fairly decent DGW fixtures could be costly

    Glad I took your advice.
    Thought of bringing in Barnes for -4, but it looks like he's out for 6 weeks.


  • Options
    #235
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users Posts: 19,613 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Yeah Lingard an option at that price, his fixtures are tough but he will be raring to score against Man Utd. Jota another possibility if he returns later this evening too.

    Didnt expect that Arsenal result against Leicester today at all. I had brought in Schmichael as a playing keeper for bench boost and he goes and conceedes three :(


  • Options
    #236
    COH
    Registered Users Posts: 7,049 ✭✭✭COH


    Nick Pope is costing me so many points saving from Kane & Son


  • Options
    #237
    CSF
    Registered Users Posts: 32,855 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Yeah Lingard an option at that price, his fixtures are tough but he will be raring to score against Man Utd. Jota another possibility if he returns later this evening too.

    Didnt expect that Arsenal result against Leicester today at all. I had brought in Schmichael as a playing keeper for bench boost and he goes and conceedes three :(

    He can’t play against United


  • Options
    #238
    Bleating Lamb
    Registered Users Posts: 4,530 ✭✭✭Bleating Lamb


    CSF wrote: »
    He can’t play against United

    Could be totally wrong but I think the rule changed on that this Season.


  • Options
    #239
    CSF
    Registered Users Posts: 32,855 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Bleating Lamb wrote: »
    Could be totally wrong but I think the rule changed on that this Season.

    I don’t remember seeing anyone play against their club.


  • Options
    #240
    Shedite27
    Registered Users Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    It's not a rule but somethign that tends to be written into most loan agreements. Lingard was ineleigible when West Ham played Man U in the cup a few weeks back for this same reason.

    Loftus Cheek, Batshuai, Gallagher and Ampadu missed their games V Chelsea. Barkely was injured but assume the same would have happened. Walcott didn't play V Everton, or Harrison V City


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #241
    CSF
    Registered Users Posts: 32,855 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Shedite27 wrote: »
    It's not a rule but somethign that tends to be written into most loan agreements. Lingard was ineleigible when West Ham played Man U in the cup a few weeks back for this same reason.

    Loftus Cheek, Batshuai, Gallagher and Ampadu missed their games V Chelsea. Barkely was injured but assume the same would have happened. Walcott didn't play V Everton, or Harrison V City

    Oh how I wish Barkley was ineligible to play against everyone


Advertisement