Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXVIII- 71,942 ROI(2,050 deaths) 51,824 NI (983 deaths) (28/11) Read OP

1287288290292293328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    https://twitter.com/higginsdavidw/status/1332041083451285505?s=19


    All the numbers today suggest today's numbers were an anomaly. Tests down massively, around 1/3rd. Numbers up massively, again by about 1/3rd. Something ain't right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,086 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Yet blanket comments are made about the genuine posters who disagree with NPHETs advice.

    Like the blanket comments that are made about the genuine posters who agree with restrictions/NPHET?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,565 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    1000 per day by Christmas eve I swear some on here wear NPHET t-shirts. It’s alright lads, ye can disagree with Tony, he won’t hurt ya.
    Go through the numbers and he's right


  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Did you not say that level 3.5 had worked?

    Well, at the time that I said that, I thought the goal was to stabilise cases / hospitalisations and try to live with Covid as per the plan.

    But since Tony has returned, that 5 level plan appears to be scrapped. we seem to have regressed and now appear to be chasing 0 cases again.

    And after spending the necessary billions to give him his wish, it has failed after 6 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,591 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    MOR316 wrote: »
    If the restaurants opened, what's stopping you from not going to them?

    I'm confused here, genuinely!
    Are you saying you're waiting for Government and NPHET to tell you what to do?

    They're guidelines! You have a choice! It's up to you!

    I would like people with a knowledge of public health to give advice on to best protect public health,
    Yes.

    I don’t see how that can be a wild take.

    And following their advice, which if we’d done 2 weeks sooner, as advised, this wouldn’t even be an issue!


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    It’s highly contagious to people who don’t follow the basic protection measures.

    We are also told that schools are not the source of these outbreaks.

    So what led to outbreaks in care homes and hospitals recently? Over 200 staff in Limerick hospital sick? It can't always be the public's fault.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,565 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Hulk Hands wrote:
    Government's job has been done by NPHET there this evening. The leaking of plans was there to gauge public opinion. Well the outpouring of anger to this NPHET recommendation can leave the government in no doubt that opinion has swung firmly against NPHET and further strong lockdown.
    No, the loudmouth alcoholics and spoilt little children in the bodies of adults are shouting loud but there many more than them that just want to be safe and not lose a loved one to this virus. Most people I'm talking to are planning to stay at home for Christmas. My sister is one of those spoilt little children in an adults body, she's going to my parents house regularly with her children from crèche and school.
    The rest of my family intend to go to the house on Christmas day but stay outside and chat to my parents, myself included.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭boggerman1


    I don't see any reason to lift restrictions in the current circumstances a part from loosening the family visits for Christmas day itself.

    Open things up now and by Christmas eve we will be dealing with well in excess of 1,000 cases per day.

    More people get the disease, more people will die.

    The government should have a proper understanding that eaten bread is soon forgotten and the public won't be forgiving for a heath catastrophe in January.

    They need to follow scientific advice and not the whims of cranks.

    No one will care about a missed Christmas on December 27th. And the same people, failing to understand the gravity of the situation, for wholly selfish reasons will be the same ones shouting against the govt about the fallout afterward.

    Don't make stupid decisions you'll regret.

    Are u Sam mcdonkey or Tomás ryan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Like the blanket comments that are made about the genuine posters who agree with restrictions/NPHET?
    There are very little posters on here who provide genuine reasoning for agreeing with NPHET other than saying '10000000 cases per day if we don't' and how the hospitals will be doomed etc.
    On the other hand, we have decreasing positivity rates, stable hospital figures, record low community referrals, record low average contacts yet NPHET decide to recommend basically level 4.5


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    eagle eye wrote: »
    No, the loudmouth alcoholics and spoilt little children in the bodies of adults are shouting loud but there many more than them that just want to be safe and not lose a loved one to this virus. Most people I'm talking to are planning to stay at home for Christmas. My sister is one of those spoilt little children in an adults body, she's going to my parents house regularly with her children from crèche and school.
    The rest of my family intend to go to the house on Christmas day but stay outside and chat to my parents, myself included.

    I'm sure Tony will visit you on Christmas to tell you you're the best boy in the class and give you a gold star.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,086 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    There are very little posters on here who provide genuine reasoning for agreeing with NPHET other than saying '10,000,000 cases per day if we don't' and how the hospitals will be doomed etc.
    On the other hand, we have decreasing positivity rates, stable hospital figures, record low community referrals, record low average contacts yet NPHET decide to recommend basically level 4.5

    Who said 10,000,000 cases a day then?

    Seems like a generalisation. Kinda like the person calling Ireland a nation of alco's.....


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    eagle eye wrote: »
    No response from you as regards the link you requested input up again.
    Nothing to say about that?

    Did I miss your reply to my response?

    Repost your link if you don't mind, as I am not sure if I have read that particular article, as I have read much presenting many varying views


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭boggerman1


    lausp wrote: »
    Tipp had a big football win at the weekend. Not sure about Kilkenny but the castle park is rammed every weekend and the council have tables out to encourage people to get takeaway food etc, have to think this is encouraging people to meet.

    Nothing to do with the football win last Sunday.more bs from those who believe the hysteria.meat factory more likely in south tipp.but hey don’t let the truth hit u in the arse


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    I would like people with a knowledge of public health to give advice on to best protect public health,
    Yes.

    I don’t see how that can be a wild take.

    And following their advice, which if we’d done 2 weeks sooner, as advised, this wouldn’t even be an issue!


    Yeah, no offence meant but, don't care what you do, as long as you're happy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Who said 10,000,000 cases a day then?

    Seems like a generalisation. Kinda like the person calling Ireland a nation of alco's.....
    It's called sarcasm.

    Mr the Frog pulled the 1000 cases per day by Christmas eve card when posting earlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,565 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    boggerman1 wrote:
    Are u Sam mcdonkey or Tomás ryan
    That's how you see a post full of common sense?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    eagle eye wrote: »
    That's how you see a post full of an opinion of which everyone is entitled to
    Fixed your post for you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 89 ✭✭FinglasFollain


    When do we get to the point when it’s not considered an emergency any more? Does that mean NPHET can be wound down?

    Do we question NPHETs ability as an advisory group given their only solution seems to be a lockdown? Is advising a continuous lockdown evidence that their lockdown strategy has failed?

    Is there a clear conflict of interest in NPHET given the majority of its members are paid HSE staff? Should potentially the Minister or Taoiseach, or other government civil servants be part of a wider group? We’ve also seen recently that certain NPHET members have a particular personal/clinical issue with alcohol, especially in the case of Dr. Favier, does this cloud judgements and decisions?

    They’re all questions that I would like to see answered or teased out. That doesn’t make me a NPHET hater, someone who doesn’t care about the elderly, or someone downplaying the pandemic, or an alcoholic like posters have claimed pro-opening people are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭MOR316


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Who said 10,000,000 cases a day then?

    Seems like a generalisation. Kinda like the person calling Ireland a nation of alco's.....

    But there literally has been people saying there'll be thousands of cases a day.

    That's not a generalisation, that's a fact! Go through any of the Covid threads, you'll see them. Most are the same people, some were just WUMs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭D.Q


    I've been as guilty of it as anyone but there has been an incredible amount of energy expended between both sides bickering on here haha

    None of what we post matters a toss and it's been going on for 9 months straight haha.

    We won't affect any decision made and I don't think either side of the argument has conceded an inch. Brutal trench warfare.

    We'll need a Christmas day truce with a kickabout


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,178 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    D.Q wrote: »
    I've been as guilty of it as anyone but there has been an incredible amount of energy expended between both sides bickering on here haha

    None of what we post matters a toss and it's been going on for 9 months straight haha.

    We won't affect any decision made and I don't think either side of the argument has conceded an inch. Brutal trench warfare.

    We'll need a Christmas day truce with a kickabout

    I think the government is hoping covid gives is all a Christmas day truce tbh ha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,086 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    It's called sarcasm.

    Mr the Frog pulled the 1000 cases per day by Christmas eve card when posting earlier.

    Ah maybe you missed the explanation as to how 1000 cases is a possibility.

    You had your theory which is a bit hazy and certainly lacking any data or numbers.......but hey you do you.
    Blah blah blah exponential growth blah blah blah level 3 didnt work blah blah blah “end zone” blah blah

    But heres the mathematical explanation. You used to post some modified stats day by day so surely you could follow the below post helpfully explaining how its possible?

    Benimar wrote: »
    We first hit 1,000 cases on October 10th. 28 days earlier we had 196 cases.

    We have 300+ cases today. What’s 28 days time? Yep, Christmas Eve.

    It’s not impossible that if we open too much up we could hit 1,000 cases in a month.

    MOR316 wrote: »
    But there literally has been people saying there'll be thousands of cases a day.

    That's not a generalisation, that's a fact! Go through any of the Covid threads, you'll see them. Most are the same people, some were just WUMs
    Havent heard thousands for a few months but how it can reach a thousand is broken down by Benimar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,180 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    https://twitter.com/higginsdavidw/status/1332041083451285505?s=19


    All the numbers today suggest today's numbers were an anomaly. Tests down massively, around 1/3rd. Numbers up massively, again by about 1/3rd. Something ain't right.
    Numbers will regularly go above the respective daily 7 day rolling averages when cases are on a falling trajectory, no significant outliers/anomalies and NPHET/Tony Holohan aren't fiddling the numbers which will disappoint some on this forum

    Here's all the numbers since Level introduction on October 22nd, by my count 11 out of 36 days where daily numbers were above the 7 day rolling average

    Day Month Date Deaths Weekly 7 Day Av ROI Weekly 5 Day Av 5 Day % 7 Day Av 7 Day % 14 Day Av 14 Day %
    Thursday October 22nd 3 33 4.71 1,066 8,092 1,163.20 7.96% 1,156.00 26.85% 1,033.64 135.61%
    Friday October 23rd 7 37 5.29 777 7,869 1,062.00 -9.37% 1,124.14 16.37% 1,045.07 127.44%
    Saturday October 24th 4 33 4.71 859 7,452 1,027.60 -11.34% 1,064.57 6.06% 1,034.14 101.17%
    Sunday October 25th 0 30 4.29 1,025 7,194 978.80 -16.47% 1,027.71 -4.02% 1,049.21 93.76%
    Monday October 26th 3 33 4.71 939 7,102 933.20 -22.57% 1,014.57 -7.78% 1,057.36 84.67%
    Tuesday October 27th 5 25 3.57 720 6,553 864.00 -25.72% 936.14 -19.68% 1,050.86 73.82%
    Wednesday October 28th 6 28 4.00 675 6,061 843.60 -20.56% 865.86 -26.36% 1,020.86 56.54%
    Thursday October 29th 6 31 4.43 866 5,861 845.00 -17.77% 837.29 -27.57% 996.64 41.04%
    Friday October 30th 6 30 4.29 772 5,856 794.40 -18.84% 836.57 -25.58% 980.36 31.68%
    Saturday October 31st 5 31 4.43 416 5,413 689.80 -26.08% 773.29 -27.36% 918.93 16.05%
    Sunday November 1st 2 33 4.71 552 4,940 656.20 -24.05% 705.71 -31.33% 866.71 1.07%
    Monday November 2nd 2 32 4.57 767 4,768 674.60 -20.03% 681.14 -32.86% 847.86 -5.18%
    Tuesday November 3rd 5 32 4.57 322 4,370 565.80 -33.04% 624.29 -33.31% 780.21 -18.21%
    Wednesday November 4th 8 34 4.86 444 4,139 500.20 -37.03% 591.29 -31.71% 728.57 -26.68%
    Thursday November 5th 3 31 4.43 591 3,864 535.20 -22.41% 552.00 -34.07% 694.64 -32.80%
    Friday November 6th 8 33 4.71 499 3,591 524.60 -20.05% 513.00 -38.68% 674.79 -35.43%
    Saturday November 7th 5 33 4.71 355 3,530 442.20 -34.45% 504.29 -34.79% 638.79 -38.23%
    Sunday November 8th 2 33 4.71 542 3,520 486.20 -14.07% 502.86 -28.74% 604.29 -42.41%
    Monday November 9th 1 32 4.57 270 3,023 451.40 -9.76% 431.86 -36.60% 556.50 -47.37%
    Tuesday November 10th 16 43 6.14 270 2,971 387.20 -27.65% 424.43 -32.01% 524.36 -50.10%
    Wednesday November 11th 2 37 5.29 362 2,889 359.80 -31.41% 412.71 -30.20% 502.00 -50.83%
    Thursday November 12th 1 35 5.00 395 2,693 367.80 -16.82% 384.71 -30.31% 468.36 -53.01%
    Friday November 13th 7 34 4.86 482 2,676 355.80 -26.82% 382.29 -25.48% 447.64 -54.34%
    Saturday November 14th 6 35 5.00 456 2,777 393.00 -12.94% 396.71 -21.33% 450.50 -50.98%
    Sunday November 15th 1 34 4.86 378 2,613 414.60 7.08% 373.29 -25.77% 438.07 -49.46%
    Monday November 16th 5 38 5.43 456 2,799 433.40 20.46% 399.86 -7.41% 415.86 -50.95%
    Tuesday November 17th 11 33 4.71 366 2,895 427.60 16.26% 413.57 -2.56% 419.00 -46.30%
    Wednesday November 18th 12 43 6.14 379 2,912 407.00 14.39% 416.00 0.80% 414.36 -43.13%
    Thursday November 19th 4 46 6.57 429 2,946 401.60 2.19% 420.86 9.39% 402.79 -42.02%
    Friday November 20th 8 47 6.71 330 2,794 392.00 -5.45% 399.14 4.41% 390.71 -42.10%
    Saturday November 21st 4 45 6.43 344 2,682 369.60 -14.72% 383.14 -3.42% 389.93 -38.96%
    Sunday November 22nd 1 45 6.43 318 2,622 360.00 -15.81% 374.57 0.34% 373.93 -38.12%
    Monday November 23rd 0 40 5.71 252 2,418 334.60 -17.79% 345.43 -13.61% 372.64 -33.04%
    Tuesday November 24th 6 35 5.00 226 2,278 294.00 -26.79% 325.43 -21.31% 369.50 -29.53%
    Wednesday November 25th 6 29 4.14 269 2,168 281.80 -28.11% 309.71 -25.55% 362.86 -27.72%
    Thursday November 26th 3 28 4.00 335 2,074 280.00 -24.24% 296.29 -29.60% 358.57 -23.44%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭crossman47


    With the exception of healthcare workers and care homes, I would simply like to know how the f**k 100s of people are catching COVID-19 on a daily basis.

    Face-masks, hand sanitizer and social distancing. Are people really having difficulty with the basics?

    Yes they are. There are many, many people with no concept of social distancing happily meeting others in their house (and I don't mean parties, just social calls).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,454 ✭✭✭jobeenfitz


    The HSE are a shambles. They have been for decades, from memory. They have overpaid consultants, middle and top management. They know we have less capacity that most Euro members.

    They are covering their holes by laying the blame on the people. Overpaid cowards.

    They have being dragging sick people through courts for ever. People who are telling the truth.

    NPHET are the HSE. Tony is one of these cowards!

    Im not surprised.

    I can't see the government agreeing with their recommendations. If I'm wrong and they do the people won't take this crap, the majority IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,425 ✭✭✭almostover


    The biggest failure of the government's living with COVID plan is that it isnt reflective of human nature. People will not comply with an expectation where they must have no social interactions outside of their household, it's just not feasible over an extended period of time. We would get much more buy in if each of the 5 levels was associated with a number of cases per 100k and an R number of a certain value. Human nature loves targets and achieving them. There would be far more public buy in and adherence to the guidelines if people knew that getting cases number down would result in the reward of more businesses open and greater opportunity for social interactions. That for me has been the single biggest failure of government policy in relation to COVID, it's all stick and no carrot!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    almostover wrote: »
    The biggest failure of the government's living with COVID plan is that it isnt reflective of human nature. People will not comply with an expectation where they must have no social interactions outside of their household, it's just not feasible over an extended period of time. We would get much more buy in if each of the 5 levels was associated with a number of cases per 100k and an R number of a certain value. Human nature loves targets and achieving them. There would be far more public buy in and adherence to the guidelines if people knew that getting cases number down would result in the reward of more businesses open and greater opportunity for social interactions. That for me has been the single biggest failure of government policy in relation to COVID, it's all stick and no carrot!
    Agreed, in general, but can you imagine the accusations of number-manipulation that would bring?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    We all need to go out into our front gardens and sing Ireland’s Call.

    Ireland, Ireland Together standing tall
    Shoulder to shoulder
    We'll answer Ireland's call


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    I'd say NPHET saved and tacked on a couple hundred extra cases just for today. It's a running theme with them, usually do it whenever restrictions are to be lifted.

    Why would they do that? How could they or society benefit from that? The only theme is conspiracy theories because people can’t accept what’s going on around the world.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,309 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Well you've fellas on here claiming cases are being purposefully held back to further the lockdown
    Jog along.

    Tbh whether they're massaging those numbers or not is immaterial as those numbers are rubbish to begin with.

    The only yardstick that isn't totally flawed are hospitalisations and deaths. And both of those would have to be strictly "from" and not "with".

    The only thing we're actually excelling at is collecting useless case numbers and fogging up the only real hard numbers we could have in order to send 'the right message'.

    Its so bad and its so persistently bad that I can hardly blame people for jumping on the CT bandwagon any more.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement