Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

No right wing alternative= No alternative

1272830323336

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    'Immigrants', of course, being a term you like to use as way to conceal, at least as much as reveal.

    Immigrants are the non-Irish living here that the poster referenced. Glad to clarify.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    Immigrants are the non-Irish living here that the poster referenced. Glad to clarify.

    And some are beneficial to the host, and some are parasitic to the host.

    Glad to clarify.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,682 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    alastair wrote: »
    And yet - immigrants are more likely to be supporting this rent supplement payments, along with every other income tax supported social provision, than Irish nationals are. It’s been established for many years that immigrants are net contributors to the Irish economy.

    So you think cultural diversity is worth it because poor (incapable) people will be better off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    And some are beneficial to the host, and some are parasitic to the host.

    Glad to clarify.

    And once again - immigrants are net contributors to the Irish economy. Which was the point being made.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    AllForIt wrote: »
    So you think cultural diversity is worth it because poor (incapable) people will be better off.

    Cultural diversity seems like a good thing on it’s own merits. As to the rest - no idea what you’re trying to say.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 214 ✭✭Capra


    alastair wrote: »
    And once again - immigrants are net contributors to the Irish economy. Which was the point being made.

    Well how far do you take these calculations? Apparently, xenophobia is one of the driving forces behind Brexit. Brexit is apparently the most economically destructive thing that Britain has partaken in since WW2.

    So has immigration not caused Brexit? How far do you take these sweeping statements, such as immigrants are net contributors? How far do we have to dig until we find a situation that supports your own view? And then if we keep digging and did your view is undermined do we stop?

    Try approaching this conversation with an open mind and realise you berating people for a different view isn't going to get anyone anywhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Capra wrote: »
    Well how far do you take these calculations? Apparently, xenophobia is one of the driving forces behind Brexit. Brexit is apparently the most economically destructive thing that Britain has partaken in since WW2.

    So has immigration not caused Brexit? How far do you take these sweeping statements, such as immigrants are net contributors? How far do we have to dig until we find a situation that supports your own view? And then if we keep digging and did your view is undermined do we stop?

    Try approaching this conversation with an open mind and realise you berating people for a different view isn't going to get anyone anywhere.

    Brexit was caused by ignorance, not immigrants. Glad to help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Capra wrote: »
    Well how far do you take these calculations? Apparently, xenophobia is one of the driving forces behind Brexit. Brexit is apparently the most economically destructive thing that Britain has partaken in since WW2.

    So has immigration not caused Brexit? How far do you take these sweeping statements, such as immigrants are net contributors? How far do we have to dig until we find a situation that supports your own view? And then if we keep digging and did your view is undermined do we stop?

    Try approaching this conversation with an open mind and realise you berating people for a different view isn't going to get anyone anywhere.

    No - that's like blaming the car when the driver was pissed at the wheel.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 214 ✭✭Capra


    alastair wrote: »
    Brexit was caused by ignorance, not immigrants. Glad to help.

    Ah, you are one of those one line posters. Cool.

    However if a certain proportion of voters are, through no fault of their own ignorant, is it not problematic to keep importing immigrants? Particularly when we live in a one man, one vote system. The vote of the "ignorant" counts just as much as that of the enlightened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Capra wrote: »
    Ah, you are one of those one line posters. Cool.

    However if a certain proportion of voters are, through no fault of their own ignorant, is it not problematic to keep importing immigrants? Particularly when we live in a one man, one vote system. The vote of the "ignorant" counts just as much as that of the enlightened.

    Ignorance isn’t the fault of immigrants either. The most immigrant heavy regions in the U.K. voted to remain. And an opinion based on ignorance never counts as much as an enlightened one - even where it’s applied to a vote.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭Morgans


    So the problem isn't that immigration causes damage to society, something that is evidenced by those most likely to interact with them, it's just that the ignorant who are too easy to rile up and perceive them as damaging society.

    It does say a lot about those peddling the nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,682 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    alastair wrote: »
    Cultural diversity seems like a good thing on it’s own merits. As to the rest - no idea what you’re trying to say.

    Culture derived over thousands of years. Culture is the culture. It doesn't make sense to have 2 cultures side by side. Over time both cultures would meld to one culture. Like hundreds of years more. Then a lefty would hate it because it's considered one culture and would endeavor to split it once again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    And once again - immigrants are net contributors to the Irish economy. Which was the point being made.

    And once again - not all immigrants are net contributors to the Irish economy.

    Which is a more important point to be made.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    Brexit was caused by ignorance, not immigrants. Glad to help.

    Ignorance of what ?

    Not ignorance of the 'benefits' of close proximity to mass immigration, that's for sure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    And once again - not all immigrants are net contributors to the Irish economy.

    The post related to ‘non-Irish’ residents. Which means all immigrants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Morgans wrote: »
    So the problem isn't that immigration causes damage to society, something that is evidenced by those most likely to interact with them, it's just that the ignorant who are too easy to rile up and perceive them as damaging society.

    It does say a lot about those peddling the nonsense.

    It’s evidenced by nothing more than your personal bias. Which is entirely unconvincing. Once again - those most likely to be interacting with larger numbers of immigrants voted remain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    AllForIt wrote: »
    Culture derived over thousands of years. Culture is the culture. It doesn't make sense to have 2 cultures side by side. Over time both cultures would meld to one culture. Like hundreds of years more. Then a lefty would hate it because it's considered one culture and would endeavor to split it once again.

    Are you claiming any critical consideration for this remarkable theory? Culture is the culture?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    The post related to ‘non-Irish’ residents. Which means all immigrants.

    Indeed. And the link you provided highlights those within that, whose contribution is negative.

    Happy to help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Indeed. And the link you provided highlights those within that, whose contribution is negative.

    Happy to help.

    It’s actually no help whatsoever, but thanks for your input. I can cherrypick from the Irish populace too. It still wouldn’t change the fact that it was incorrect to state that immigrants are a drain on resources here. They’re net contributors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    It’s actually no help whatsoever, but thanks for your input. I can cherrypick from the Irish populace too. It still wouldn’t change the fact that it was incorrect to state that immigrants are a drain on resources here. They’re net contributors.

    No, in this context you can not cherrypick from the Irish populace.

    Irish people have an intrinsic right to live in this country. Not everyone else does.

    Fewer parasitic draws on the system would mean less drain on resources. A desirable thing.

    Your source is more informative than you are.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    It’s evidenced by nothing more than your personal bias. Which is entirely unconvincing. Once again - those most likely to be interacting with larger numbers of immigrants voted remain.

    That is so demonstrably untrue in so many places, that you should withdraw it for it's total uselessness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,682 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    alastair wrote: »
    Are you claiming any critical consideration for this remarkable theory? Culture is the culture?

    Yeah, what's wrong with that. What's wrong with culture? Have you got a problem with it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    No, in this context you can not cherrypick from the Irish populace.

    Irish people have an intrinsic right to live in this country. Not everyone else does.

    Fewer parasitic draws on the system would mean less drain on resources. A desirable thing.

    Your source is more informative than you are.

    I can cherrypick all I like in response to any cherry picking I encounter. But thanks for your thoughts. Immigrants still net contributors, as stated earlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    AllForIt wrote: »
    Yeah, what's wrong with that. What's wrong with culture? Have you got a problem with it?

    I’m a big fan of comprehensible arguments, but maybe it’s just me?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    That is so demonstrably untrue in so many places, that you should withdraw it for it's total uselessness.

    Nope. I’m happy enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    I can cherrypick all I like in response to any cherry picking I encounter. But thanks for your thoughts. Immigrants still net contributors, as stated earlier.

    I didn't contradict your facile observation.

    I just used your source to freshen up that extremely jejeune way in which you present the matter.

    You're welcome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    I didn't contradict your facile observation.

    I just used your source to freshen up that extremely jejeune way in which you present the matter.

    You're welcome.

    You really didn’t. Because I was present the facts in a specifically defined context. Q: Are the non-Irish a draw on resources in Ireland? A: Nope they’re not. They’re net contributors.

    Now, if you want to get into strands of people that are not net contributors from either non-Irish, or Irish, you can find ample, but that doesn’t remove from the reality of the issue above. Sorry you feel so sensitive about this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    You really didn’t. Because I was present the facts in a specifically defined context. Q: Are the non-Irish a draw on resources in Ireland? A: Nope they’re not. They’re net contributors.

    Once again - I took the source you provided, and without contradicting in any way what you had said, highlighted a very apposite and informative insight of the article's.

    You don't get to confine the debate strictly to your terms.

    Sorry that you're so sensitive about that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Once again - I took the source you provided, and without contradicting in any way what you had said, highlighted a very apposite and informative insight of the article's.

    You don't get to confine the debate strictly to your terms.

    Sorry that you're so sensitive about that.

    Not my terms - the terms set by the original claim. Glad to help.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭Lefty Bicek


    alastair wrote: »
    Not my terms - the terms set by the original claim. Glad to help.

    You don't get to confine the debate to anyone else's terms either. Especially via your sources.

    Once again, you're welcome.


Advertisement