Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Schools closed until February? (part 3)

13637394142323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    Grandeeod wrote: »
    In the previous version of this thread, I was a proponent of reopening schools, but not with the feck em all back together approach. My child started first year at the end of August. From that very first morning we all gathered in the hall, protocols were being broken. Everyone all distanced for the little talk, but as soon as the students were lead away, BANG, all on top of each other. Her PP school are doing hourly classes with short mask breaks outdoors. On a wet day the mask breaks are in the corridor.:eek: These breaks are being stopped after the midterm and the school say that they were extra precautions and not in the guidance. Loads of teachers in just visors that we now know aren't worth a damn without a mask too. Very little SD in place. Kids hitting each other with masks at break time. Hand sanitizer being slapped on the back of kids heads. Filthy toilets. As for the school bus, a joke, despite it being able to handle SD. I've seen the footage for all I have described. Yeah some kids will be arseholes, but mine isn't along with many others.

    I'm all for my child getting an education. I don't want her stuck at home, but a combination of daft practices, dopey kids due to dopey parents and a Dept that is literally winging it, will not end well. The virus is out of control in the community. Schools are part of the community.

    i presume your saying kids are getting hand sanitizer in the cup of their hand and pushing it on another kids head? thats just discipline issue, sounds like a mad house school. I would imagine if Covid wasnt here the antics would be as bad with something else. hitting each other with masks? dunno how that even goes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,462 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Dickie10 wrote: »
    email today from school saying to be ready for online classes this week . must be expecting schools finish up early for midterm on wednesday

    Primary or secondary?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    Dickie10 wrote: »
    i presume your saying kids are getting hand sanitizer in the cup of their hand and pushing it on another kids head? thats just discipline issue, sounds like a mad house school. I would imagine if Covid wasnt here the antics would be as bad with something else. hitting each other with masks? dunno how that even goes

    To be fair every post primary has clowns, its normal, covid hasn't changed them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 880 ✭✭✭Scoondal


    TTLF wrote: »
    In my opinion: I'm not so sure we can fully understand or gage the situation in schools properly, whether they are safe or not safe, up to standard or not by both the schools side or the governments.

    I know in this form, a lot of people are either Parents, Teachers or neither. (As far as I know, I'm the only actual secondary level student in this form) and it seems that there's a lot of back and forth with the "Schools are clearly safe from X study" and "No they're not safe, this study shows different"

    But while everyone's entitled to their own opinions, making recommendations or criticisms on the state of the schools with the virus, I don't think it's going to help the grand scheme of things.

    I've learnt a lot over the last 2 months about the government, our schooling system, the unions and NPHET through some of the discussions on this forum and on other forums or news websites. This had led me to make my own sensible decision that, there's really not much we can do, nor can we assume because one study showed this, and another showed this, they're neither right or wrong.

    It's pretty naïve to assume that, since one country had a good reopening of schools, it means they spread low transmissions. But it's also naïve to assume that since another country had a bad effect in schools opening, that schools cause transmission.

    Take the UK for example, they created a recent figure on what parts of their society are causing the most transmission, it stated in the illustrated pie-chart, that "education" accounted for 36% of transmission (the highest total.) But we need to remember a few factors here about the schools in the UK schools who had a "bad" opening up compared to a "good" one, with the Irish. It is seen that, like us, they started schools roughly the same week, and most pupils were thrown into their schools again with little protection, actually, even less more so than the Irish. From a friend who lives in the UK, it is not compulsory to wear a mask in schools, at all. Now, I'm not sure if this is EVERY school or just his, but that can make a big difference to transmission rates. It's obvious masks do help in Lessing the spread of the Virus, which is why our Government has made it compulsory for Secondary Level Schools to wear masks (albeit after poking and prodding) which gives the Irish an advantage in helping stop community transmission within the school environment.

    Now, let's compare this to a school which has had a good opening to schools. I saw earlier in this forum, someone was talking about how the schools in Germany had lower transmission rates and that Covid doesn't spread highly within the schools premises. I would agree with her statement, however NOT from an Irish perspective. I put some time and research into this odd division of Irish schools having higher numbers, versus Germany's schools with low to non-existent transmission rates, and I think I came to understand my conclusion. Germany has better compliance from both the Government and public than Ireland does. I have seen this myself when I was in Germany. I found this article which shows how particular Germany is towards their safety from DW news, a popular German article.

    https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-germany-unveils-airing-plan-for-schools/a-55286311

    This gives an indication to me, how critique and precise the Germans are. Irish schools would never have this made out for them on air ventilation alone, they would sum it up in one sentence, "Keep them open and the door open, shure you'll be grand." Also, If people didn't know about Germany's government system, Germany is split up into 16 Bundesliga (or states) which have their own smaller government, education and holidays. Which means, unlike Ireland, They have 16 states managing schools inside their own districts, unlike in Ireland which has 1 government body overseeing the 1000+ schools in the country, and Hey, even Germany aren't perfect at this either. They reopened schools quite early in April-May after they thought they had a grasp on the Virus, however, this wasn't the case, as there were multiple outbreaks in Berlin schools come August after they reopened the new school year.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/over-40-berlin-schools-report-covid-19-cases-a-fortnight-after-reopening-1.4336773

    Also, currently Germany, unlike every other (or most) European country's actually has the virus under control with their low incidence rate because of their very compliant public body.

    So, what does this all mean? you may be asking yourself. Well, as I stated above, we just can't really fully understand the nature of Irish schools and if they spread the Virus or not. It's clear that schools have gotten cases, clusters here or there, or only 1. Hell, even my own school has had a case. But we shouldn't be bickering over if they're safe or not, we simply do not know. I've been in class now for about 2 months and I haven't gotten the virus (god forbid), however I do know of people around me that have had to be tested, or had to isolate because their older brothers or sisters were being tested. Even my own sister was tested for her chest infection because they thought it was Covid, (thankfully she's not in my household and didn't effect my education.) It makes me think, "with going to class, being with up to 90+ students daily and even more during break times and going out of the school during break for lunches, is it really safe for all students to be doing this?" and after time my decision was- "No, it most certainly isn't." I haven't gotten a case, but it could take one person in my year to get the whole of 6th year shut down, I mean I was already a close case with someone's brother who had tested positive, who's to say it won't happen again?

    As I am looking from a "less mature" student's perspective, I think it's actually scary going into school everyday with this virus, especially currently with the normal enough flu season and such, making people develop coughs, chest infections and more. I'm very happy to wear the masks and clean my desk during the lesson as it makes me feel safer, but as I learn and study for my Leaving Certificate in 2021, I have a fearful thought in the back of my mind, a doubt of "We're not going to make it to December with how things are going" and I think I'm correct in the context. Each and every school in Ireland is completely and utterly different, different buildings, groups per year, boys/girls or mixed, different localities, different counties. This makes it super hard to pinpoint any real evidence with how schools are actually doing in the Pandemic with regards to spreading it. I could go on and on, but you hopefully get my point by now- We just don't know.

    I fear for my own health in this situation, Since I am a venerable student compared to the majority, I know that if I catch this virus, I could get bad consequences from its effects, which is terrifying, no student should have to be in fear to go to school sometimes. We have over 1200 cases today, and it's quite clear that community transmission has caused the spike in cases as we already know, but it's awfully scary knowing that, with 1K+ daily cases a day, I'm submitting myself into an environment that isn't being monitored by the HSE closely and quite frankly, can be lazy in it's admission to student/teacher protection when rules are not strictly enforced. There's nothing I can even do about it either, Online Learning doesn't exist, there's no option for a "Blended" approach, it's a mess for some of us, but we manage anyway.

    With Norma Foley's ideas of keeping schools open for the wellbeing of students mental health and social lives seems important to her, I think a students person health wellbeing is better off than mental in times of crisis. I don't think schools should be open as they are currently with 1k+ daily cases, but I don't think a full closure is ideal either. I think a blended approach could work well for many, as it gives kids social interaction at least twice a week, while letting them be at home safer, which makes them less susceptible to the virus on a daily basis.

    Nobody wants this to happen, especially me, being shafted with a new "altered" Leaving Cert, possible lockdowns, doom and gloom on my own mental health, crazy assumptions on how schools should operate here, it's a full mess. But I am willing to endure it. As we know, Level 3 is "not working," and the government is going to reveal more restrictions tomorrow which will be on a nation-wide scale, but deep down I feel schools won't be altered in that regard, but I'm hoping they will consider something, even if only for Secondary schools. I am of the personal belief that the 2 week closure is a good idea, because you only miss a week of learning. That could even be changed, I don't mind doing a week of Online learning if needs be to help get this virus under control.

    I'm scared of what might lie ahead if nothing is changed on the schools front. This was just my own opinion piece and I thank you for reading. :D
    An excellent post. Well researched, with personal experience and opinions backed up with facts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    TTLF wrote: »
    In my opinion: I'm not so sure we can fully understand or gage the situation in schools properly, whether they are safe or not safe, up to standard or not by both the schools side or the governments.

    I know in this form, a lot of people are either Parents, Teachers or neither. (As far as I know, I'm the only actual secondary level student in this form) and it seems that there's a lot of back and forth with the "Schools are clearly safe from X study" and "No they're not safe, this study shows different"

    But while everyone's entitled to their own opinions, making recommendations or criticisms on the state of the schools with the virus, I don't think it's going to help the grand scheme of things.

    I've learnt a lot over the last 2 months about the government, our schooling system, the unions and NPHET through some of the discussions on this forum and on other forums or news websites. This had led me to make my own sensible decision that, there's really not much we can do, nor can we assume because one study showed this, and another showed this, they're neither right or wrong.

    It's pretty naïve to assume that, since one country had a good reopening of schools, it means they spread low transmissions. But it's also naïve to assume that since another country had a bad effect in schools opening, that schools cause transmission.

    Take the UK for example, they created a recent figure on what parts of their society are causing the most transmission, it stated in the illustrated pie-chart, that "education" accounted for 36% of transmission (the highest total.) But we need to remember a few factors here about the schools in the UK schools who had a "bad" opening up compared to a "good" one, with the Irish. It is seen that, like us, they started schools roughly the same week, and most pupils were thrown into their schools again with little protection, actually, even less more so than the Irish. From a friend who lives in the UK, it is not compulsory to wear a mask in schools, at all. Now, I'm not sure if this is EVERY school or just his, but that can make a big difference to transmission rates. It's obvious masks do help in Lessing the spread of the Virus, which is why our Government has made it compulsory for Secondary Level Schools to wear masks (albeit after poking and prodding) which gives the Irish an advantage in helping stop community transmission within the school environment.

    Now, let's compare this to a school which has had a good opening to schools. I saw earlier in this forum, someone was talking about how the schools in Germany had lower transmission rates and that Covid doesn't spread highly within the schools premises. I would agree with her statement, however NOT from an Irish perspective. I put some time and research into this odd division of Irish schools having higher numbers, versus Germany's schools with low to non-existent transmission rates, and I think I came to understand my conclusion. Germany has better compliance from both the Government and public than Ireland does. I have seen this myself when I was in Germany. I found this article which shows how particular Germany is towards their safety from DW news, a popular German article.

    https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-germany-unveils-airing-plan-for-schools/a-55286311

    This gives an indication to me, how critique and precise the Germans are. Irish schools would never have this made out for them on air ventilation alone, they would sum it up in one sentence, "Keep them open and the door open, shure you'll be grand." Also, If people didn't know about Germany's government system, Germany is split up into 16 Bundesliga (or states) which have their own smaller government, education and holidays. Which means, unlike Ireland, They have 16 states managing schools inside their own districts, unlike in Ireland which has 1 government body overseeing the 1000+ schools in the country, and Hey, even Germany aren't perfect at this either. They reopened schools quite early in April-May after they thought they had a grasp on the Virus, however, this wasn't the case, as there were multiple outbreaks in Berlin schools come August after they reopened the new school year.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/over-40-berlin-schools-report-covid-19-cases-a-fortnight-after-reopening-1.4336773

    Also, currently Germany, unlike every other (or most) European country's actually has the virus under control with their low incidence rate because of their very compliant public body.

    So, what does this all mean? you may be asking yourself. Well, as I stated above, we just can't really fully understand the nature of Irish schools and if they spread the Virus or not. It's clear that schools have gotten cases, clusters here or there, or only 1. Hell, even my own school has had a case. But we shouldn't be bickering over if they're safe or not, we simply do not know. I've been in class now for about 2 months and I haven't gotten the virus (god forbid), however I do know of people around me that have had to be tested, or had to isolate because their older brothers or sisters were being tested. Even my own sister was tested for her chest infection because they thought it was Covid, (thankfully she's not in my household and didn't effect my education.) It makes me think, "with going to class, being with up to 90+ students daily and even more during break times and going out of the school during break for lunches, is it really safe for all students to be doing this?" and after time my decision was- "No, it most certainly isn't." I haven't gotten a case, but it could take one person in my year to get the whole of 6th year shut down, I mean I was already a close case with someone's brother who had tested positive, who's to say it won't happen again?

    As I am looking from a "less mature" student's perspective, I think it's actually scary going into school everyday with this virus, especially currently with the normal enough flu season and such, making people develop coughs, chest infections and more. I'm very happy to wear the masks and clean my desk during the lesson as it makes me feel safer, but as I learn and study for my Leaving Certificate in 2021, I have a fearful thought in the back of my mind, a doubt of "We're not going to make it to December with how things are going" and I think I'm correct in the context. Each and every school in Ireland is completely and utterly different, different buildings, groups per year, boys/girls or mixed, different localities, different counties. This makes it super hard to pinpoint any real evidence with how schools are actually doing in the Pandemic with regards to spreading it. I could go on and on, but you hopefully get my point by now- We just don't know.

    I fear for my own health in this situation, Since I am a venerable student compared to the majority, I know that if I catch this virus, I could get bad consequences from its effects, which is terrifying, no student should have to be in fear to go to school sometimes. We have over 1200 cases today, and it's quite clear that community transmission has caused the spike in cases as we already know, but it's awfully scary knowing that, with 1K+ daily cases a day, I'm submitting myself into an environment that isn't being monitored by the HSE closely and quite frankly, can be lazy in it's admission to student/teacher protection when rules are not strictly enforced. There's nothing I can even do about it either, Online Learning doesn't exist, there's no option for a "Blended" approach, it's a mess for some of us, but we manage anyway.

    With Norma Foley's ideas of keeping schools open for the wellbeing of students mental health and social lives seems important to her, I think a students person health wellbeing is better off than mental in times of crisis. I don't think schools should be open as they are currently with 1k+ daily cases, but I don't think a full closure is ideal either. I think a blended approach could work well for many, as it gives kids social interaction at least twice a week, while letting them be at home safer, which makes them less susceptible to the virus on a daily basis.

    Nobody wants this to happen, especially me, being shafted with a new "altered" Leaving Cert, possible lockdowns, doom and gloom on my own mental health, crazy assumptions on how schools should operate here, it's a full mess. But I am willing to endure it. As we know, Level 3 is "not working," and the government is going to reveal more restrictions tomorrow which will be on a nation-wide scale, but deep down I feel schools won't be altered in that regard, but I'm hoping they will consider something, even if only for Secondary schools. I am of the personal belief that the 2 week closure is a good idea, because you only miss a week of learning. That could even be changed, I don't mind doing a week of Online learning if needs be to help get this virus under control.

    I'm scared of what might lie ahead if nothing is changed on the schools front. This was just my own opinion piece and I thank you for reading. :D

    Fantastic post, very logical and reasoned.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    Dickie10 wrote: »
    i presume your saying kids are getting hand sanitizer in the cup of their hand and pushing it on another kids head? thats just discipline issue, sounds like a mad house school. I would imagine if Covid wasnt here the antics would be as bad with something else. hitting each other with masks? dunno how that even goes

    Far from a mad house school. As for the mask hitting stunt, a kid takes it off and swipes it at another kids face.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 82 ✭✭Jucifer


    TTLF wrote: »
    In my opinion....:D

    Sorry cut out the text for brevity. Just wanted to say very hard to argue with any of your post. It seems cultural norms and public response is key in determining how the virus spreads. Ireland is not Germany, nor is it the UK. We can’t know how likely it is to spread in schools compared to other environments and we cannot directly compare to other countries.

    My opinion is that, rather than just assuming schools are safe we should prioritise testing where clusters do occur and spread a very wide net in terms of testing and tracing to fully understand the likelihood of spread. It seems that a narrower definition of a close contact used in schools inhibits a true understanding of the risk of transmission.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,462 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Just read elsewhere that there seems to have been further changes with regards to what constitutes a cloae contact in secondary schools. Now have to have spent minimum of 2hrs with the positive case. How many asymptomatic cases are they now going to miss as a result of this reclassification?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Just read elsewhere that there seems to have been further changes with regards to what constitutes a cloae contact in secondary schools. Now have to have spent minimum of 2hrs with the positive case. How many asymptomatic cases are they now going to miss as a result of this reclassification?

    Read that too, the other day on twitter but wasnt sure if it was real. If it is, it's ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,538 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    Just read elsewhere that there seems to have been further changes with regards to what constitutes a cloae contact in secondary schools. Now have to have spent minimum of 2hrs with the positive case. How many asymptomatic cases are they now going to miss as a result of this reclassification?

    Seems about right :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭JP100


    School in Ashbourne being closed from tomorrow because of a number of positive cases across the school.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,634 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Just read elsewhere that there seems to have been further changes with regards to what constitutes a cloae contact in secondary schools. Now have to have spent minimum of 2hrs with the positive case. How many asymptomatic cases are they now going to miss as a result of this reclassification?

    Yes, this has been the case for a couple of weeks. I put it in this thread a while back. Close contact for schools is within 1 meter of a positive case for more than 2 consecutive hours. Everywhere else is 2 meters for 15 minutes. They are basically ruling out teachers as close contacts.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,462 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Yes, this has been the case for a couple of weeks. I put it in this thread a while back. Close contact for schools is within 1 meter of a positive case for more than 2 consecutive hours. Everywhere else is 2 meters for 15 minutes. They are basically ruling out teachers as close contacts.

    They are actually ruling out nearly every student as well at secondary level with ordinary and higher level and then all the subject options. All the movement means pretty much zero close contacts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Yes, this has been the case for a couple of weeks. I put it in this thread a while back. Close contact for schools is within 1 meter of a positive case for more than 2 consecutive hours. Everywhere else is 2 meters for 15 minutes. They are basically ruling out teachers as close contacts.
    They are actually ruling out nearly every student as well at secondary level with ordinary and higher level and then all the subject options. All the movement means pretty much zero close contacts.

    You would wonder what they are trying to hide and why is it necessary? I suppose they think do it now apologise later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Mrsmum wrote: »
    I think parents are perfectly aware. Look at it this way, teachers are definitely aware and they are all sending their kids to school. Likewise sna's children. It's a balancing act, there are pros and cons but as long as schools are open the vast majority of parents,including teachers will send their children to school.

    Actually, I dont think the majority are aware of the realities behind the scen in school. I am sure that non teachers here are sick of the disparities between teaching and other sectors being discussed. However, reading on various social media sites, parents are only starting to realise and starting to question it as their child is involved and deemed a not a close contact despite sitting beside or across from a child who gets covid.

    Most parents are not aware that there is not mass testing if there is a case, as they are constantly told there is. Most parents do not realise that the parameters around what is a close contact in schools is different to the rest of society and is constantly changing as the situations evolve. Most parents don't know that a teacher is not considered a close contact even if they spend 5 hours with the child in question. Most parents dont realise about the covid glitch regarding 30 teachers in a secondary school in Louth, a while back.

    Regarding teachers, I can't speak for all but I am on the FB site watching for my own school and my children's school. The minute I hear of a case, they will be pullled out, because I will not put my children or parents at risk. My kids are dropped and collected by their grandparents, and they wear masks around their grandparents as one is immuncompromised, so I will not put them at further risk. I had hoped as a parent schools would be treated the same as other sectors but they are not, the meat factories and nursing homes were revealed as unsafe and the spotlight was on them. The curtain is slowly being pulled back on schools as articles are starting to appear in papers.

    I know my school have had one official case of covid so far, and the class were sent home by the principal as the HSE were on answer machine only and the principal acted in best interest, against protocol, for the school at that time. Will they do it again? I don't know, however I do know we have had a lot of teachers out and children absent since then, and no explanation given, only guesswork, rumour and conjecture, with the kids saying such and such is out because that child or member of their family got covid.

    I am sure like other teachers, I am waiting to see what the unions will say. I have contacted them expressing my concerns. I don't want to strike or schools closed. I just want proper testing and tracing. I want equality with other sectors and transparency. I want to know that if a case occurs and I am involved that I will be treated as a close contact and tested, which is not the case for the majority of teachers so far.

    I want the government to stop treating schools like the elephant in the room and describing them as safe. Nowhere is 100% safe, admit it and deal with it properly, with a working track and trace system.

    Meanwhile, I double mask in school, sd, wash hands very regularly, disinfect desks between each group, eat lunch alone, and keep room well ventilated. I know the risks for me and what I have to do to minimise them so that is what I do and carry on. Carrying on doesnt mean I agree with what is happening, but the show must go on and like most shows it is

    It will be interesting after all this, to see if education and health will be at the forefront of people's minds in the next election., when the politicians come knocking. I dont expect it to be as peoples memories are short. Education wasn't a consideration in the last one and we can see the shortcomings that the lack of investment results in. Even now the government reckon after 7 months, they can get away without developing an online platform or a reservoir of resources for online learning because they know the public don't care.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭kandr10


    I haven’t been on here in a while.

    There seems to be a lot of disparity between what schools are able to do in terms of implementing restrictions (no surprise there) sand some disparity in how the hse are ruling close contacts (I didn’t expect to see that)!

    In the interests of adding a positive voice, my kids school have handled it very well. Very clear in the week before opening as to what measures were being implemented and how. I was skeptical that they’d make it work but they’ve thought through every scenario. Only one case and the class self isolated for 10 days with all getting tested. A friend who’s a teacher had a similar experience with her own class (different school).

    I think it’s worth noting that nphet are saying schools are safer than home. I can think of a huge cohort for whom that would be true due to increased hand washing etc. They have acknowledged all along that they fully expected cases to increase when schools opened. They thought it would be in hand though. I think generally the community outside school have gotten lax with an attitude of ‘sure they’re mixing in school what does it matter?’

    Clearly not every school is equal though and this comes back to the lack of planning from the dos before schools reopened and the somewhat vague guidelines that were issued.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    khalessi wrote: »
    You would wonder what they are trying to hide and why is it necessary? I suppose they think do it now apologise later.

    They cant close the schools now without looking like idiots.
    The schools need to close though.
    So they are waiting for the unions to close the schools.
    And then they can say, look it was the unions, not us (the government).
    How many people is that going to kill while they wait for that to happen is my concern.

    My childs school had 2 positive cases last Monday. Teacher I know who works there told me that nobody has been considered a close contact for these two cases. Not the teacher, not anyone in the classroom. Not anyone in the pod. Not the SNA. Those 2 cases resulted in no further tests. Attempts by them to find out why have met with a brick wall.

    Then in the new they say general population positivity rate from testing is 7%. It is onoly 1.5% in schools. So they have proven schools arent a problem.

    Well of course the positivity rate is low if you arent testing anyone else in the room with the positive cases. What else would you expect with a testing regime like that.
    And then they will not give clear statements or stats which tell the general public what the real state of the virus in schools is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭lulublue22


    Dickie10 wrote: »
    email today from school saying to be ready for online classes this week . must be expecting schools finish up early for midterm on wednesday

    Not an expectation more so a just in case - our school is doing the same. Schools were badly caught in march - we had 3 hours to get two weeks work ready - we all know how that ended. Schools don’t want to be caught out again not that they are privy to what is going on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,329 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    khalessi wrote: »
    Actually, I dont think the majority are aware of the realities behind the scen in school. I am sure that non teachers here are sick of the disparities between teaching and other sectors being discussed. However, reading on various social media sites, parents are only starting to realise and starting to question it as their child is involved and deemed a not a close contact despite sitting beside or across from a child who gets covid.

    Most parents are not aware that there is not mass testing if there is a case, as they are constantly told there is. Most parents do not realise that the parameters around what is a close contact in schools is different to the rest of society and is constantly changing as the situations evolve. Most parents don't know that a teacher is not considered a close contact even if they spend 5 hours with the child in question. Most parents dont realise about the covid glitch regarding 30 teachers in a secondary school in Louth, a while back.

    Regarding teachers, I can't speak for all but I am on the FB site watching for my own school and my children's school. The minute I hear of a case, they will be pullled out, because I will not put my children or parents at risk. My kids are dropped and collected by their grandparents, and they wear masks around their grandparents as one is immuncompromised, so I will not put them at further risk. I had hoped as a parent schools would be treated the same as other sectors but they are not, the meat factories and nursing homes were revealed as unsafe and the spotlight was on them. The curtain is slowly being pulled back on schools as articles are starting to appear in papers.

    I know my school have had one official case of covid so far, and the class were sent home by the principal as the HSE were on answer machine only and the principal acted in best interest, against protocol, for the school at that time. Will they do it again? I don't know, however I do know we have had a lot of teachers out and children absent since then, and no explanation given, only guesswork, rumour and conjecture, with the kids saying such and such is out because that child or member of their family got covid.

    I am sure like other teachers, I am waiting to see what the unions will say. I have contacted them expressing my concerns. I don't want to strike or schools closed. I just want proper testing and tracing. I want equality with other sectors and transparency. I want to know that if a case occurs and I am involved that I will be treated as a close contact and tested, which is not the case for the majority of teachers so far.

    I want the government to stop treating schools like the elephant in the room and describing them as safe. Nowhere is 100% safe, admit it and deal with it properly, with a working track and trace system.

    Meanwhile, I double mask in school, sd, wash hands very regularly, disinfect desks between each group, eat lunch alone, and keep room well ventilated. I know the risks for me and what I have to do to minimise them so that is what I do and carry on. Carrying on doesnt mean I agree with what is happening, but the show must go on and like most shows it is

    It will be interesting after all this, to see if education and health will be at the forefront of people's minds in the next election., when the politicians come knocking. I dont expect it to be as peoples memories are short. Education wasn't a consideration in the last one and we can see the shortcomings that the lack of investment results in. Even now the government reckon after 7 months, they can get away without developing an online platform or a reservoir of resources for online learning because they know the public don't care.

    The positive rate of close contacts in schools is 2%

    The positive rate of close contacts in the community is 6%.

    That suggests that you are wrong, and that in fact the HSE is treating too many people in schools as close contacts. You are right that nowhere is safe, but schools are far safer than most places.

    The privileged attitude of teachers is quite an eye-opener at the moment. I was astonished at the head of the TUI on the radio this morning. He was talking as if teachers were the only ones who had high-risk people working or high-risk families at home. Retail workers, postmen, firemen, nurses, doctors, gardai, delivery men, construction workers, all of them equally have the same situation, yet their representatives are not on the radio demanding that they be let sit at home for months getting full pay while the job is not being done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,329 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    JimmyVik wrote: »
    They cant close the schools now without looking like idiots.
    The schools need to close though.
    So they are waiting for the unions to close the schools.
    And then they can say, look it was the unions, not us (the government).
    How many people is that going to kill while they wait for that to happen is my concern.

    My childs school had 2 positive cases last Monday. Teacher I know who works there told me that nobody has been considered a close contact for these two cases. Not the teacher, not anyone in the classroom. Not anyone in the pod. Not the SNA. Those 2 cases resulted in no further tests. Attempts by them to find out why have met with a brick wall.

    Then in the new they say general population positivity rate from testing is 7%. It is onoly 1.5% in schools. So they have proven schools arent a problem.

    Well of course the positivity rate is low if you arent testing anyone else in the room with the positive cases. What else would you expect with a testing regime like that.
    And then they will not give clear statements or stats which tell the general public what the real state of the virus in schools is.


    Wow, you just can't see the contradictions in your post.

    The only two cases that were tested were positive, so the positivity rate from testing is 100%. Yet you say the positivity rate is low because they aren't testing anyone else!!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,612 ✭✭✭✭meeeeh


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Wow, you just can't see the contradictions in your post.

    The only two cases that were tested were positive, so the positivity rate from testing is 100%. Yet you say the positivity rate is low because they aren't testing anyone else!!!!!

    I think that kind of maths is a bit too complex for this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    Just out of interest, have any of the teachers on here taken their own children out of school yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    If you aren't testing children or close contacts, you will get low positivity rate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,329 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    khalessi wrote: »
    If you aren't testing children or close contacts, you will get low positivity rate


    If you aren't testing children or close contacts, you will get very high positivity rates because you will only be testing those with obvious symptoms.

    Low positivity rates come from widespread testing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    blanch152 wrote: »
    If you aren't testing children or close contacts, you will get very high positivity rates because you will only be testing those with obvious symptoms.

    Low positivity rates come from widespread testing.

    Please explain.

    I would presume if one child is covid positive in a class and no one in class is considered a close contact, then low positivity rate in schools, as no one else being tested.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    khalessi wrote: »
    Please explain.

    I would presume if one child is covid positive in a class and no one in class is considered a close contact, then low positivity rate in schools, as no one else being tested.

    If only the child who is positive was tested, then what would the positivity rate be?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,218 ✭✭✭khalessi


    HerrKuehn wrote: »
    If only the child who is positive was tested, then what would the positivity rate be?

    1 out of 30


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    khalessi wrote: »
    1 out of 30

    it is the percentage of tests which are performed which come back positive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,161 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    khalessi wrote: »
    1 out of 30

    Nope, positivity is number of positive cases x number of tests /100.

    So if 1 child is tested out of 30 and the test is positive, its a 100% positivity rate.

    Managing who gets tested offers a means of controlling the reported rate, but if that is what is happening, the actual rate could be far higher.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,329 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    khalessi wrote: »
    Please explain.

    I would presume if one child is covid positive in a class and no one in class is considered a close contact, then low positivity rate in schools, as no one else being tested.

    If one child is tested, and there is one positive result, the positivity rate is 100%.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement