The Great Reset

Approved User Assesment

Dohnjoe wrote: »

I'll ask again, what's the conspiracy explanation?

I'll say again: Some say this card is a simple 'reminder card'.

Many more others say it's much more than this (see previous pages, in case you skipped them), there are many theories of what it should be called.

Dohnjoe

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

I'll say again: Some say this card is a simple 'reminder card'.

Many more others say it's much more than this (see previous pages, in case you skipped them), there are many theories of what it should be called.

Cool, detail some of these theories.. and no thanks, not comments from the Daily Mail

Third time asking

Approved User Assesment

Third time replying to the above poster:
Is the UK's vaccine card a simple 'reminder card'?

Or is it something else.
Many think it's something more than just a 'reminder card' see the previous page for a wide sample of views. Whatever it is, it does not appear to just be a simple reminder card, what that is exactly is open to interpretation (but not a simple reminder card).

Can this reply to a persistant poster be any clearer?

Dohnjoe

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

Third time replying to the above poster:
Is the UK's vaccine card a simple 'reminder card'?

Yes, it's a simple reminder card. Perfectly straightforward explanation here
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-vaccine-cards-are-reminder-2nd-shot-not-passport-n1249941

What is your alternative explanation? If you don't have one, nothing to discuss.

Can this reply to a persistant poster be any clearer?

Your reply isn't clear. You can't understand/believe something, so you suspect some conspiracy you can't detail is going on. That's a logical fallacy and faulty thinking.

Approved User Assesment

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Yes, it's a simple reminder card.

You're theory is that it is a simple reminder card, fair enough, very interesting.

Dohnjoe

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

You're theory is that it is a simple reminder card, fair enough, very interesting.

Yup.

King Mob

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

You're theory is that it is a simple reminder card, fair enough, very interesting.

And the alternative theory is...?

Fighting Tao

enno99 wrote: »

Nothing and No
will that do

So then you agree that forum of people discussing how to improve the world is not a bad thing? It is not like they can enforce anything.

Lex Luthor

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Amazing how no matter the subject you have a friend/cousin/family member or just so happen to "know" someone who works in that exact field.

did you actually think I was Lex Luthor from the Superman movies instead of an actual human being with a network of family, friends and colleagues in real jobs?

You do know Lex Luthor from those movies is a fictional character too?

Lex Luthor

Fighting Tao wrote: »

It is not like they can enforce anything.

I must be living in an alternate universe then and not the one where the whole world went into lockdown for almost 9 months, arresting people for socialising in public, fining people for not wearing a mask, closing down businesses that they deemed non-essential, I could go on

namloc1980

So we're at the "they'll be giving people pieces of card" part of the conspiracy now. As if vaccine records were something newly invented in the last few days.

What happened to them injecting us with micro chips and nano devices to control us? Kind of preferred that conspiracy theory to this one. Being controlled by a piece of paper is no where near as interesting as the nano devices etc

King Mob

Lex Luthor wrote: »

did you actually think I was Lex Luthor from the Superman movies instead of an actual human being with a network of family, friends and colleagues in real jobs?

You do know Lex Luthor from those movies is a fictional character too?

Sorry, you still seem to be deflecting.
Previously you claimed to have expertise in nanotechnology, at least enough to be concerned about the lipids present in the vaccine.

Could you explain this more fully?

Cause previously you kinda just said it and brushed past it and it makes it look like you didn't actually have any expertise or any valid concerns and were just scared of a scary sounding science word you don't understand.

You also still have not explained why you justify your conspiracy belief when you have to act so dishonestly and evasively.
Does this mean you don't have an answer for this either?

Timberrrrrrrr

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

Third time replying to the above poster:
Is the UK's vaccine card a simple 'reminder card'?

Yes

Or is it something else.

No

Many think it's something more than just a 'reminder card' see the previous page for a wide sample of views. Whatever it is, it does not appear to just be a simple reminder card, what that is exactly is open to interpretation (but not a simple reminder card).

Can this reply to a persistant poster be any clearer?

No, a tiny section who believe the idiotic conspiracy theories think its something else, they can't explain what, or why, or how but they believe it anyway.

You already have to show proof of vaccinations for certain diseases to enter some parts of the world. I've done it before. Hardly a novel concept.

enno99

Fighting Tao wrote: »

So then you agree that forum of people discussing how to improve the world is not a bad thing? It is not like they can enforce anything.

Hmm no
They are not as altruistic as you make out
In fact they represent companies and countries that have blood on their hands

Putting people in internment camps
Throwing young gay men from buildings
Using slave labour to make their products
War criminals
Russian mob
the list goes on

Just a bunch of globalists who want control of everything

For some, the gilded guest list seems at odds with the event’s focus on creating fairer economies and remaking the world of work. This year’s theme is “Stakeholders for a Cohesive and Sustainable World,” and panels include “Balancing Domestic and Global Inequality” and “Breaking Legal Barriers to Equality.” Last year, a panelist caused a sensation when he slammed attendees for ignoring tax avoidance by the rich.

“I hear people talking the language of participation, justice, equality and transparency but almost no one raises the real issue of tax avoidance,” Rutger Bregman, a Dutch historian, said at a talk on inequality.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-17/dalio-dimon-and-117-other-billionaires-set-to-descend-on-davos

Leopards dont change their spots

Oh yea he didnt get invited back this year LOL I wonder why

happyoutscan

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

That do not appear to be simple reminder cards?

They contain details about treatments including batches, and folks are told to carry them around in their wallets. Your Dentists reminder card contains only a date/time as a reminder to pin to a wall.

Sweet fictional Jesus on a bike.

namloc1980

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

So upon the 2nd dose (couple of weeks after the 1st), the treatment is complete, and the little card can be taken from the wallet and put in the bin?

Or... would folks be told to keep them in their wallets, in case a service, product or location was only offering it's goods to people who've been vaccinated as initial proof of a vaccine undertaken.

So you're making up this completely fictional scenario in your head and getting all riled up over it. That's weird.

enno99

Approved User Assesment wrote: »

I'll say again: Some say this card is a simple 'reminder card'.

Many more others say it's much more than this (see previous pages, in case you skipped them), there are many theories of what it should be called.

LOL check the ear

namloc1980

enno99 wrote: »

LOL check the ear

Where his evil card? I thought the "elites" were going to be injecting us with micro devices but they seem to be relying on us carrying around a piece of paper to control us. Those elites are one step ahead again!! :pac:

enno99

namloc1980 wrote: »

Where his evil card? I thought the "elites" were going to be injecting us with micro devices but they seem to be relying on us carrying around a piece of paper to control us. Those elites are one step ahead again!! :pac:

They are only for the ones they dont want to eat

Fighting Tao

enno99 wrote: »

Hmm no
They are not as altruistic as you make out
In fact they represent companies and countries that have blood on their hands

Putting people in internment camps
Throwing young gay men from buildings
Using slave labour to make their products
War criminals
Russian mob
the list goes on

Just a bunch of globalists who want control of everything

For some, the gilded guest list seems at odds with the event’s focus on creating fairer economies and remaking the world of work. This year’s theme is “Stakeholders for a Cohesive and Sustainable World,” and panels include “Balancing Domestic and Global Inequality” and “Breaking Legal Barriers to Equality.” Last year, a panelist caused a sensation when he slammed attendees for ignoring tax avoidance by the rich.

“I hear people talking the language of participation, justice, equality and transparency but almost no one raises the real issue of tax avoidance,” Rutger Bregman, a Dutch historian, said at a talk on inequality.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-17/dalio-dimon-and-117-other-billionaires-set-to-descend-on-davos

Leopards dont change their spots

Oh yea he didnt get invited back this year LOL I wonder why

Your mind is a scary place, and appears to be far away from reality. So’ how are they going to get 195 governments to force people to do their will when a Brexit deal can’t even be agreed?

enno99

Fighting Tao wrote: »

Your mind is a scary place, and appears to be far away from reality. So’ how are they going to get 195 governments to force people to do their will when a Brexit deal can’t even be agreed?

Ah no dispute of what I posted just a personal attack

Par for the course here

Fighting Tao

My children have one of these pieces of paper. Can anyone tell me how the government are controlling them please? I’d like a few tips for when they throw tantrums.

Fighting Tao

enno99 wrote: »

Ah no dispute of what I posted just a personal attack

Par for the course here

Sorry you misunderstood what I was saying. I did dispute what you said because it is posted from a position of fear that can’t be rationally explained. I can’t put logic to something where there is none.

enno99

Fighting Tao wrote: »

Sorry you misunderstood what I was saying. I did dispute what you said because it is posted from a position of fear that can’t be rationally explained. I can’t put logic to something where there is none.

Your sadly mistaken im not afraid
I dont worry when I attend a concert or other large gathering as you do

You could dispute anything I said
I can give you links to back up my claims

Lex Luthor

King Mob wrote: »

Sorry, you still seem to be deflecting.
Previously you claimed to have expertise in nanotechnology, at least enough to be concerned about the lipids present in the vaccine.

Could you explain this more fully?

Cause previously you kinda just said it and brushed past it and it makes it look like you didn't actually have any expertise or any valid concerns and were just scared of a scary sounding science word you don't understand.

You also still have not explained why you justify your conspiracy belief when you have to act so dishonestly and evasively.
Does this mean you don't have an answer for this either?

Can you show me where in this thread I claimed to have expertise in nanotechnology?

When you show me this I will certainly back up whatever I said

Lex Luthor

Fighting Tao wrote: »

So’ how are they going to get 195 governments to force people to do their will

must have been in a coma the last 9 months when the whole world was in a lockdown dictated by the WHO

King Mob

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Can you show me where in this thread I claimed to have expertise in nanotechnology?

When you show me this I will certainly back up whatever I said

You said that you had worked with "producing electronics at nanoscale" or some such. And you said that this work gave you some insight as to why lipids were a worrying thing to have in a vaccine.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

the ingredients for this Pfizer vaccine has some interesting items

Lipid nanoparticles that are used to carry & protect the mRNA from degredation - I've worked on systems that produce electronic devices at nano technology levels, just throwing it out there

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=115568551&postcount=521

So please elaborate on what you meant here.
How did your expertise apply and what has you so worried about the presence of lipids?

And you backing up something you've said would certainly be a first and a refreshing change of pace.

Lex Luthor

King Mob wrote: »

You said that you had worked with "producing electronics at nanoscale" or some such. And you said that this work gave you some insight as to why lipids were a worrying thing to have in a vaccine.


https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=115568551&postcount=521

So please elaborate on what you meant here.
How did your expertise apply and what has you so worried about the presence of lipids?

And you backing up something you've said would certainly be a first and a refreshing change of pace.

well for a start, that was posted on the Vaccine thread

Also I didnt say I had worked at "producing electronics at nanoscale"
I said "I've worked on systems that produce electronic devices at nano technology levels"
That makes me knowlegable enough to know what is capable of being of being produced at nano levels

I believe there was a comment in response to my post that I put one & one together because nano is mentioned and I compared the 2
Nanoparticles - nano technology

What of it?

Its nano size technology whatever way you look at it

Do I believe everything that pfizer ingredient is telling me?
Absolutely not
Do I trust the vaccine just because it says nano particles? Absolutley not, but 95% of the population will

Do I trust a vaccine that was developed by a company that got millions of dollars in donations from Bill Gates to develop the vaccine?
100% NO

Anything else you would like me to add?

ps. on the mention of lipids........its irrelevant. I was detailing the the contents of the vaccine ingredients
I wanted to be specific on what was written
I couldnt give a sh!t if they called it bananas, its new technology, I know whats capable at nano levels and if you want to state that is putting 1+1 together and getting 17, fire ahead

King Mob

Lex Luthor wrote: »

well for a start, that was posted on the Vaccine thread

Also I didnt say I had worked at "producing electronics at nanoscale"
I said "I've worked on systems that produce electronic devices at nano technology levels"
That makes me knowlegable enough to know what is capable of being of being produced at nano levels

I believe there was a comment in response to my post that I put one & one together because nano is mentioned and I compared the 2
Nanoparticles - nano technology

What of it?

Its nano size technology whatever way you look at it

So I was correct. The only connection was the word "Nano".

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Do I believe everything that pfizer ingredient is telling me?
Absolutely not
Do I trust the vaccine just because it says nano particles? Absolutley not, but

Ok. Why do you believe this nanotechnology is worrisome?

Lex Luthor wrote: »

ps. on the mention of lipids........its irrelevant. I was detailing the the contents of the vaccine ingredients
I wanted to be specific on what was written
I couldnt give a sh!t if they called it bananas, its new technology, I know whats capable at nano levels and if you want to state that is putting 1+1 together and getting 17, fire ahead

Ok. What do you believe the vaccine is capable of doing at nano levels?

Also, I'm not sure you know what lipids are since you describe them as "new technology."