Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Almost every position the left has, is actually just an attack on Christian beliefs?

Options
1…1718192123

Comments

  • Options
    #602
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    I think the change has had its desired effect.


  • Options
    #603
    1800_Ladladlad
    Registered Users Posts: 3,358 ✭✭✭1800_Ladladlad


    The fact that a mod changed the thread title not only shows the height of petulance but the downward spiral of boards and that the value of a mods subjective opinion or ways takes precedent instead of valuing the objectivity. It may not be a big deal to some as it may be seen as a minor forum but this is childish. The mod who did this should dealt with accordingly, just like any user would be dealt with if they stepped out of place


  • Options
    #604
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    lol who tf actually cares. Why are you people so invested in this?


  • Options
    #605
    keith_sixteen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭keith_sixteen


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    lol who tf actually cares. Why are you people so invested in this?

    Why are you?

    Anyway, what a petty thing to do.


  • Options
    #606
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    keith_sixteen wrote: »
    Why are you?

    Anyway, what a petty thing to do.

    Im not. Literally wondering why these snowflakes are out for blood cause someone changed the title


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #607
    Grayson
    Registered Users Posts: 16,183 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    1800_Ladladlad wrote: »
    The fact that a mod changed the thread title not only shows the height of petulance but the downward spiral of boards and that the value of a mods subjective opinion or ways takes precedent instead of valuing the objectivity. It may not be a big deal to some as it may be seen as a minor forum but this is childish. The mod who did this should dealt with accordingly, just like any user would be dealt with if they stepped out of place

    This reminds me of when the trump thread was changed to Trump Elected: Heil to the chief. OR Trump Elected: It's unpresidented.

    And all the snowflakes went mad.

    I don't see you guys suddenly having a sh1t fit about the Louise O'Neill thread


  • Options
    #608
    Peter Denham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Peter Denham


    Unintelligent people use the word "snowflake" as an insult. I immediately decide that someone is not worth listening to when they use it.


  • Options
    #609
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Peter Denham wrote: »
    Unintelligent people use the work "snowflake" as an insult.

    The tried and trusted refuge of those with nothing substantive to bring to the table.


  • Options
    #610
    Grayson
    Registered Users Posts: 16,183 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Deleted User wrote: »
    The tried and trusted refuge of those with nothing substantive to bring to the table.

    You do realise it's a right wing phrase that I was using ironically?


  • Options
    #611
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Grayson wrote: »
    You do realise it's a right wing phrase that I was using ironically?

    Aye, I was responding to another post on its own merits.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #612
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    I was using it ironically too. Guess i bet too much on thinking the same ‘snowflakes’ who get offended by thread titles would understand irony too.

    Really makes you think huh?


  • Options
    #613
    Peter Denham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Peter Denham


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Aye, I was responding to another post on its own merits.

    I think anyone who uses it at all has nothing to bring it to the table. It's a right wing phrase that left wingers are trying to use against them, the outcome is the same - crap discussion.


  • Options
    #614
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    Peter Denham wrote: »
    I think anyone who uses it at all has nothing to bring it to the table. It's a right wing phrase that left wingers are trying to use against them, the outcome is the same - crap discussion.

    You get offended by thread titles AND random words?


  • Options
    #615
    Peter Denham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Peter Denham


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    You get offended by thread titles AND random words?

    Not offended, I think changing thread titles is silly. I don't agree with the OP, but the chance for discussion is wrecked now.

    There's a lot more to be gained by openly discussing something without name calling and editing thread titles.


  • Options
    #616
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    Peter Denham wrote: »
    Not offended, I think changing thread titles is silly. I don't agree with the OP, but the chance for discussion is wrecked now.

    There's a lot more to be gained by openly discussing something without name calling and editing thread titles.

    Oh. I didnt know afterhours was for serious political thesis. Are people vetted here for qualifications?


  • Options
    #617
    Franz Von Peppercorn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    You get offended by thread titles AND random words?

    And you get offended by people getting offended by thread titles and random words. We could be here all night.

    No thread title should be changed in my view. Mods should close it if they think it’s run it’s course.


  • Options
    #618
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »
    And you get offended by people getting offended by thread titles and random words. We could be here all night.

    No thread title should be changed in my view. Mods should close it if you think it’s run it’s course.

    Lol no, im laughing @ the triggered people.


  • Options
    #619
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Peter Denham wrote: »
    I think anyone who uses it at all has nothing to bring it to the table. It's a right wing phrase that left wingers are trying to use against them, the outcome is the same - crap discussion.

    Yep, debases any mature exchange of ideas. Whenever it's trotted out you might as well reach for the rattler. You could fit "triggered" in the sandbox also.


  • Options
    #620
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    CinemaGuy45 wrote: »
    As for the thread subject, it is meant to be tongue in cheek however I am sure the author I quoted was 100% serious.:)
    This is on page 1, posted by the OP. Just quoting it here as a reminder to those who seem so genuinely eager to get offended.


  • Options
    #621
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    ITT. People who call other people snowflakes get offended because someone made a joke thread in a joke forum in a casual chatting website


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #622
    Peter Denham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Peter Denham


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Lol no, im laughing @ the triggered people.

    I think you incorrectly assumed I was a right leaning individual based on my reaction to the changing of thread titles and the undermining of meaningful discussion.

    You're one of those people that thinks you can categorise someone's entire political stance based on a comment on an individual topic.


  • Options
    #623
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    Peter Denham wrote: »
    I think you incorrectly assumed I was a right leaning individual based on my reaction to the changing of thread titles and the undermining of meaningful discussion.

    You're on of those people that thinks you can categorise someone's entire political stance based on a comment on an individual topic.

    Nah. Im just pointing out peoples behavior


  • Options
    #624
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Started a feedback thread

    https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057941565/1/#post108994880


    See can we get some clarification on thread title changes.


  • Options
    #625
    Zorya
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Zorya


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Oh. I didnt know afterhours was for serious political thesis. Are people vetted here for qualifications?

    Obviously not. ;)


  • Options
    #626
    Odhinn
    Registered Users Posts: 8,080 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Oh. I didnt know afterhours was for serious political thesis. Are people vetted here for qualifications?




    No, nor mental illness or venerial disease. Otherwise the place would be empty.


  • Options
    #627
    DS86DS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 691 ✭✭✭DS86DS


    Danzy wrote: »
    What kind of dip**** changed the title.
    Drunken mod.?

    Someone with authoritah

    0203_authoritah1.jpg?quality=0.8


  • Options
    #628
    DS86DS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 691 ✭✭✭DS86DS


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Im not. Literally wondering why these snowflakes are out for blood cause someone changed the title

    A Leftist calling other people snowflakes. The height of pot, kettle, black.


  • Options
    #629
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    DS86DS wrote: »
    A Leftist calling other people snowflakes. The height of pot, kettle, black.

    Kinda like the 'rightists' getting offended by titles?


  • Options
    #630
    DS86DS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 691 ✭✭✭DS86DS


    sk8erboii wrote: »
    Kinda like the 'rightists' getting offended by titles?

    No, kinda like people getting annoyed at the attempted demolition of theads by trying to make the topic look stupid and unserious by butchering the thread title.

    You don't see that happening to Pro-Left and anti-Traditionalist threads do you?

    Or maybe like most Leftists you prefer a safe and boring echo chamber where your views aren't put under any scrutiny.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #631
    sk8erboii
    Site Banned Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭sk8erboii


    DS86DS wrote: »
    No, kinda like people getting annoyed at the attempted demolition of theads by trying to make the topic look stupid and unserious by butchering the thread title.

    You don't see that happening to Pro-Left and anti-Traditionalist threads do you?

    Or maybe like most Leftists you prefer a safe and boring echo chamber where your views aren't put under any scrutiny.

    Loooool mate cant believe you really typed that all out


Advertisement