Lunchtime Live with Ciara Kelly [Mod warning post #1]

Newstalk are unreal for that.


Yesterday evening Off the Ball had a Champions League Final look-ahead but it was just an ad for some bookie.

Mr Social Justice Molloy then playing along with it knowing the gambling problems we have in this country. "Just for your listeners Joe, we have 2/1 on Salah to score any time!!". Sick.

diomed

I don't listen to the radio much, but today I was driving and heard her.
She was "men this", "men that".
All men are the same to her and it seems all men are guilty of any crime by a man.

Roger_007

diomed wrote: »

I don't listen to the radio much, but today I was driving and heard her.
She was "men this", "men that".
All men are the same to her and it seems all men are guilty of any crime by a man.

If Ciara Kelly ruled the world, all male babies would be strangled at birth, (except for maybe a few who would be reared as sperm donors).
Unfortunately Newstalk give her free reign to spout, uncontested, her anti-male agenda.

YFlyer

Drifter50 wrote: »

How absolutely dare she, 15 minutes at the start of her show of pontificating about men and how we should report anyone whose behaviour we think is mildly over the top. Stop preaching at people, its your job to present a lunchtime current affairs show.

Same as that bint that rang in saying that all men should stand up to other men that are derogatory to women. Otherwise those men are just as bad.

bloodless_coup

Roger_007 wrote: »

Unfortunately Newstalk give her free reign to spout, uncontested, her anti-male agenda.

And yet Hook was thrown under the bus for a misunderstood throw away remark perceived to be anti-female.

Funny the warning at the start of this thread says the gender of the presenter is off limits yet gender is the cornerstone of her show! Specifically men terrible, women great.

meeeeh

doylefe wrote: »

And yet Hook was thrown under the bus for a misunderstood throw away remark perceived to be anti-female.

Funny the warning at the start of this thread says the gender of the presenter is off limits yet gender is the cornerstone of her show! Specifically men terrible, women great.

Not this shot again. Hook was thrown under a bus because he went on a ramble that the victim was partly responsible for her rape. I don't think he should be fired but his comments were wrong. Ciara Kelly never said all men are terrible but last 12 months is proving to be great example how prevalent the violence against women is and how often men doing it are not stopped. Nobody said to Weinstein that is not ok , they just paid off the victims.

ButtersSuki

meeeeh wrote: »

Not this shot again. Hook was thrown under a bus because he went on a ramble that the victim was partly responsible for her rape. I don't think he should be fired but his comments were wrong. Ciara Kelly never said all men are terrible but last 12 months is proving to be great example how prevalent the violence against women is and how often men doing it are not stopped. Nobody said to Weinstein that is not ok , they just paid off the victims.

Did you hear her today?

Uncharted

meeeeh wrote: »

Not this shot again. Hook was thrown under a bus because he went on a ramble that the victim was partly responsible for her rape. I don't think he should be fired but his comments were wrong. Ciara Kelly never said all men are terrible but last 12 months is proving to be great example how prevalent the violence against women is and how often men doing it are not stopped. Nobody said to Weinstein that is not ok , they just paid off the victims.

Hook was thrown under the bus just as "Pontius" Kelly buried the dagger in his back to get into the radio hotseat.

Talk about biting the hand that fed ya 'n' all that good stuff!

#Hooklivesmatter

meeeeh

ButtersSuki wrote: »

Did you hear her today?

I did, did you? I thought you heard only 10 minutes of today's programme.

I8A4RE

The show has become tabloid like and reactionary to get reactions from twitter and text as they are now used as measurement as to how successful a show is.

Uncharted

Coming up on Lunchtime live with me,
CIARA (I'm a doctor you know)KELLY.....

We'll be discussing......
Vaccinations
Oppression of women
Medical school fees
Cervical smears
Anger issues in men
G.P. fees
Equal rights for women in Nepal
Domestic abuse by husbands
Our weekly medical slot
And parents.....TEACH YOUR BOYS TO RESPECT GIRLS

....and all that good stuff

YAWWWNN.

ButtersSuki

meeeeh wrote: »

I did, did you? I thought you heard only 10 minutes of today's programme.

As I said when I posted at 13:17 I had heard 10minutes or thereabouts of her misandristic monologue. Since that time I had time to listen to the whole show on the Listen Back feature available on the NewsTalk App, primarily to avoid your predicted accusation (given our previous interactions) that I was commenting without having heard the show (ignoring the fact of course that my comment was on a post and not the show itself, but how and ever). My earlier comment at 13:17 was based on what I had heard at the time, and I stand by that. Now that I've heard the full show, I equally stand by it.

I understand you're a fan, but surely you can be honest enough and admit when she goes too far (like today)?

Now that I've answered your question, perhaps you would be so kind as to answer mine:

Are you going to defend her opening to today's show?
Do you feel that every word she spoke today was accurate?
Do you feel she was fair?
Do you feel she exaggerated?
Do you feel she was "playing to the gallery"?
Do you feel she engaged in scaremongering?
Do you feel she engaged in self-promotion?


I could go on but I've just found out my father is in ICU in Galway (which is on the other side of the country to where I live) so I can't ,but I'd be interested in your thoughts on the above. If you could avoid personal comments and insults (as I have in my dealings with you) I would appreciate that.

anthonyjmaher

tbh, all the media have been shameful when covering the two murders. Marion Finucane had already concluded by the weekend that Internet porn was at fault for the murder of the fourteen year old girl. Amazing that a woman who brings so little knowledge to most topics these days can offer such concrete advice on anything. And on Monday morning, Pat Kenny was speaking to Nicola Tallant. Both of them salivating about the prospect of him having murdered some of the other women who went missing. They went through the missing women one by one, saying "well he was too young for that, but he could have done that that and that". Ridiculous and irresponsible.

I didn't expect Kelly to handle it any better. Her agenda is to portray women as oppressed and all men as bast*rds, in spite of all of the things that this supposed oppressing Irish society has afforded her (funding her education as a doctor, and offering her the opportunity to become a radio presenter with no experience or talent). But it's not just her. If you look at the contrast of the handling of how Paddy Jackson was treated in the media after he was found innocent, as opposed to the eulogy that Liveline gave for Catherine Nevin even though she was found guilty of murdering her husband.

Tell me how

^^^
Everything you've just said is a subjective opinion which, A, I don't see much evidence of and B, is what you're accusing Ciara of.

Ciara started out as a guest contributor, then occasional just before being offered the funky time show. That's called gaining experience. If Irish society allowed her to become a Dr, isn't that opportunity open to everyone else?

Why was it ridiculous for Pat Kenny to consider if Hennessy was potentially responsible for other missing women? It was relevant and everyone else was wondering the same thing.

RTE's eulogy to Catherine Nevin? Have you a link please. You seem very angry. At everything.

Uncharted

anthonyjmaher wrote: »

tbh, all the media have been shameful when covering the two murders. Marion Finucane had already concluded by the weekend that Internet porn was at fault for the murder of the fourteen year old girl. Amazing that a woman who brings so little knowledge to most topics these days can offer such concrete advice on anything. And on Monday morning, Pat Kenny was speaking to Nicola Tallant. Both of them salivating about the prospect of him having murdered some of the other women who went missing. They went through the missing women one by one, saying "well he was too young for that, but he could have done that that and that". Ridiculous and irresponsible.

I didn't expect Kelly to handle it any better. Her agenda is to portray women as oppressed and all men as bast*rds, in spite of all of the things that this supposed oppressing Irish society has afforded her (funding her education as a doctor, and offering her the opportunity to become a radio presenter with no experience or talent). But it's not just her. If you look at the contrast of the handling of how Paddy Jackson was treated in the media after he was found innocent, as opposed to the eulogy that Liveline gave for Catherine Nevin even though she was found guilty of murdering her husband.

+1 to this. Well said and eloquently put....

ButtersSuki

Tell me how wrote: »

^^^
Everything you've just said is a subjective opinion which, A, I don't see much evidence of and B, is what you're accusing Ciara of.

Ciara started out as a guest contributor, then occasional just before being offered the funky time show. That's called gaining experience. If Irish society allowed her to become a Dr, isn't that opportunity open to everyone else?

Why was it ridiculous for Pat Kenny to consider if Hennessy was potentially responsible for other missing women? It was relevant and everyone else was wondering the same thing.

RTE's eulogy to Catherine Nevin? Have you a link please. You seem very angry. At everything.

I’m not sure how you can suggest the poster is angry from his post to be fair.

The eulogy referred to was by Joe Duffy on Liveline. It was widely criticised in the radio thread and questioned re. its appropriateness in some media outlets at the time. For various reasons I can’t post a link now, but if you google the date of her death and then check the podcast section of the show on that day (or perhaps the following day) on the show’s page on the RTÉ website it’s there.

As for your suggestion that the opportunity to become a doctor is open to everyone, that is idealistic and naive and just not true. As someone involved in 3rd level education there are many, many obstacles to entry - this is hardly a new topic and has been discussed frequently on the airwaves. Access to third level education has never been equal in this country, and the gap is according to some academics, widening. Again, google will help you source information on this.

Or perhaps you meant as a radio host? Even in that sphere there are many journalism graduates in Newstalk alone who were not given the opportunities she was given.

I’m on my phone and in a hospital right now so I can’t give more time to answering this at the moment but if you look the answers are there.

Tell me how

ButtersSuki wrote:

I’m not sure how you can suggest the poster is angry from his post to be fair.

Complaining about 3 different shows in one post doesn't imply a joie de vivre.

ButtersSuki wrote:

As for your suggestion that the opportunity to become a doctor is open to everyone, that is idealistic and naive and just not true. As someone involved in 3rd level education there are many, many obstacles to entry - this is hardly a new topic and has been discussed frequently on the airwaves. Access to third level education has never been equal in this country, and the gap is according to some academics, widening. Again, google will help you source information on this.

The posters implication was that it is thanks to society that Ciara is a Dr. If so, then she is not the only one who can avail of avail of this. I think your implication is that is solely because of society that she is a Dr. Like she didn't have to get enough points or pass exams.
I know you have an opinion on Dr's, particularly GP's so forgive me if I think you're a bit biased on this matter.

ButtersSuki wrote:

Or perhaps you meant as a radio host? Even in that sphere there are many journalism graduates in Newstalk alone who were not given the opportunities she was given.

Such as? All media is heavily influenced by market forces and a perception as to how much people will tune in to them as it drives ad revenue.
Nicky Byrne, Lottie Ryan etc. Ciara served a greater apprenticeship than many in this respect.
There's more to hosting a talk show than just a journalism degree. Pat Kenny, Sean Moncrieff, Ivan Yates and Tom Dunne are probably Newstalks heavyweights. None of them have a journalism degree.

ButtersSuki wrote:

I’m on my phone and in a hospital right now so I can’t give more time to answering this at the moment but if you look the answers are there.

You've said enough. Your position is quite clear.

meeeeh

ButtersSuki wrote: »

As I said when I posted at 13:17 I had heard 10minutes or thereabouts of her misandristic monologue. Since that time I had time to listen to the whole show on the Listen Back feature available on the NewsTalk App, primarily to avoid your predicted accusation (given our previous interactions) that I was commenting without having heard the show (ignoring the fact of course that my comment was on a post and not the show itself, but how and ever). My earlier comment at 13:17 was based on what I had heard at the time, and I stand by that. Now that I've heard the full show, I equally stand by it.

Well all I can say is I truly admire the dedication. To listen the whole show just so you are able rebuff my accusations.

ButtersSuki wrote: »

I understand you're a fan, but surely you can be honest enough and admit when she goes too far (like today)?

Now that I've answered your question, perhaps you would be so kind as to answer mine:

Are you going to defend her opening to today's show?
Do you feel that every word she spoke today was accurate?
Do you feel she was fair?
Do you feel she exaggerated?
Do you feel she was "playing to the gallery"?
Do you feel she engaged in scaremongering?
Do you feel she engaged in self-promotion?

Well I actually gave my opinion about her show and where I disagree with her in a post I think you thanked so I must assume you read it. Re-read it and let me know if you still need answers to those questions. My criticism was about hysterics that continued here, I might not agree with her opinion but she doesn't have some man hating agenda. But agenda or no agenda it is absolutely ridiculous to pretend the violence against women is not an issue and that it is not perpetrated mostly by men. It is often enabled because others, men and women, say nothing and that will have to change.



I must say I find it amusing that Ivan Yates made similar points to Ciara Kelly about safety and there is not one post about him playing to the gallery or scaremongering. Of course there is a chance that contributors in this thread are all just Ciara Kelly fans and would not listen to Ivan Yates or maybe Ivan Yates is wrong gender to offend sensibilities of some posters in this thread.

ButtersSuki wrote: »

I could go on but I've just found out my father is in ICU in Galway (which is on the other side of the country to where I live) so I can't ,but I'd be interested in your thoughts on the above. If you could avoid personal comments and insults (as I have in my dealings with you) I would appreciate that.

I'm sorry for your father but my posting style is what it is and I don't intend to change it.

ButtersSuki

meeeeh wrote: »

Well all I can say is I truly admire the dedication. To listen the whole show just so you are able rebuff my accusations.






Well I actually gave my opinion about her show and where I disagree with her in a post I think you thanked so I must assume you read it. Re-read it and let me know if you still need answers to those questions. My criticism was about hysterics that continued here, I might not agree with her opinion but she doesn't have some man hating agenda. But agenda or no agenda it is absolutely ridiculous to pretend the violence against women is not an issue and that it is not perpetrated mostly by men. It is often enabled because others, men and women, say nothing and that will have to change.



I must say I find it amusing that Ivan Yates made similar points to Ciara Kelly about safety and there is not one post about him playing to the gallery or scaremongering. Of course there is a chance that contributors in this thread are all just Ciara Kelly fans and would not listen to Ivan Yates or maybe Ivan Yates is wrong gender to offend sensibilities of some posters in this thread.






I'm sorry for your father but my posting style is what it is and I don't intend to change it.

Well, thanks for your post, but you have not answered the specific questions I asked re. yesterday’s show. Could you possibly do that and I’ll reply in full later? I’m genuinely interested in hearing a different perspective on what she said yesterday.

meeeeh

Do you feel that every word she spoke today was accurate? -I haven't got a clue. It's her opinion or an opinion she was putting forward and to rebuff or confirm it would require some proper research. For example. I stated before I don't think stranger danger is particular problem in Ireland. But then again I know Pat Kenny had an interview with another woman who was victim of just that. (I didn't listen to the interview)
Do you feel she was fair? I don't think she was fair about smoking in the beer gardens.
Do you feel she exaggerated? Again I think she exaggerated about smoking in the beer gardens.
Do you feel she was "playing to the gallery"? Playing to what gallery?
Do you feel she engaged in scaremongering? About what?
Do you feel she engaged in self-promotion? I don't think so but I don't know what you are on about.

I can't answer your questions because firstly they are loaded and secondly not specific enough for me to answer them. If you want specific answers ask specific questions.

ButtersSuki

Tell me how wrote: »

Complaining about 3 different shows in one post doesn't imply a joie de vivre.



The posters implication was that it is thanks to society that Ciara is a Dr. If so, then she is not the only one who can avail of avail of this. I think your implication is that is solely because of society that she is a Dr. Like she didn't have to get enough points or pass exams.
I know you have an opinion on Dr's, particularly GP's so forgive me if I think you're a bit biased on this matter.



Such as? All media is heavily influenced by market forces and a perception as to how much people will tune in to them as it drives ad revenue.
Nicky Byrne, Lottie Ryan etc. Ciara served a greater apprenticeship than many in this respect.
There's more to hosting a talk show than just a journalism degree. Pat Kenny, Sean Moncrieff, Ivan Yates and Tom Dunne are probably Newstalks heavyweights. None of them have a journalism degree.



You've said enough. Your position is quite clear.

Interesting that you ignore the comments on where to look for the information you ask.

Anyway, I didn’t imply anything re. medical degree. You’re really stretching there. I’m not saying she didn’t have to do the work or study for it - of course she did. I’m really strugggling to see how you can say I was implying what you said, as I said nothing of the sort.

As for the “Newstalk heavyweights” as you dub then, all (bar Yates) had been on tv and/or radio as presenters/hosts (rather than experts or contributors) for years or indeed decades I’m some cases before they got their Newstalk gig. Even Yates did years with Chris Donoghue before being given a show on his own.

Re. Ryan and Byrne - I’ve been criticising the cronyism and nepotism within RTÉ for years, with specific reference to Ryan. If you look in my post history you’ll see this for yourself.

I have frequently posted that the worst presenter on Newstalk is Paul Williams, not Kelly. But that’s ignored. Yates, while good on breakfast with a grounded anchor in the past, has become a buffoon since been given the desk on his own. Now if I say the 3 worst presenters on Newstalk are Williams, Yates, and Kelly for the reasons that they are all tabloid in style and substance, will you still (as is the norm it appears in this thread) refuse to hear any criticism of Kelly because as she so eloquently told us on day 1 of her show she is a woman?

The person I’ve been most critical of on Irish Radio and for years has been Joe Duffy, is a man. And I’ve gone so far as to write numeeous complaints to the BAI and RTÉ about him, his presenting style, his “advice”, his handling of topics that are far outside his area of expertise, his rudeness, his lack of professionalism etc.
At least 95% of my posts on the radio thread (over 20,000) are about Duffy. It’s likely closer to 99% tbh.

The defence for Kelly can’t always be a cry of sexism. If I were just criticising her, you may have a point. But I don’t do that.

ButtersSuki

meeeeh wrote: »

Do you feel that every word she spoke today was accurate? -I haven't got a clue. It's her opinion or an opinion she was putting forward and to rebuff or confirm it would require some proper research. For example. I stated before I don't think stranger danger is particular problem in Ireland. But then again I know Pat Kenny had an interview with another woman who was victim of just that. (I didn't listen to the interview)
Do you feel she was fair? I don't think she was fair about smoking in the beer gardens.
Do you feel she exaggerated? Again I think she exaggerated about smoking in the beer gardens.
Do you feel she was "playing to the gallery"? Playing to what gallery?
Do you feel she engaged in scaremongering? About what?
Do you feel she engaged in self-promotion? I don't think so but I don't know what you are on about.

I can't answer your questions because firstly they are loaded and secondly not specific enough for me to answer them. If you want specific answers ask specific questions.

The questions were very specific and they were specifically about the opening part of her show yesterday - as I suspect you well know.

Please explain to me how they are loaded questions?

I won’t be able to reply for a few hours st least btw, I am not running away from this in case you think a lack of reply indicates such.

meeeeh

ButtersSuki wrote: »

The questions were very specific and they were specifically about the opening part of her show yesterday - as I suspect you well know.

Please explain to me how they are loaded questions?

I won’t be able to reply for a few hours st least btw, I am not running away from this in case you think a lack of reply indicates such.

I answered about the opening before. But if you want specific answers you can't later on post exactly with what statement she was 'playing to the gallery', where she was self promoting and so on. If you want specific answers ask specific questions. But you can't demand specific answers and not offer what precisely I have to answer to.

Kelly is useless at radio because sexism.

Fair enough.

Tell me how

ButtersSuki wrote:

The defence for Kelly can’t always be a cry of sexism. If I were just criticising her, you may have a point. But I don’t do that.

I didn't' mention sexism. Bitterness is the term I would apply to a lot of serial complainers across all threads. I don't know the source of this bitterness, I don't know who in particular it is aimed at but it's my opinion that it's a source of a lot of the complaints.

ButtersSuki wrote:

The person I’ve been most critical of on Irish Radio and for years has been Joe Duffy, is a man. And I’ve gone so far as to write numeeous complaints to the BAI and RTÉ about him, his presenting style, his “adviceâ€, his handling of topics that are far outside his area of expertise, his rudeness, his lack of professionalism etc. At least 95% of my posts on the radio thread (over 20,000) are about Duffy. It’s likely closer to 99% tbh.

Seriously. Either phone the Gardai to make a complaint against the people tying you down and forcing you to listen to shows you obviously don't like or phone a therapist to discuss why you choose to listen to something you hate.

You seem to be fighting a fight (on several fronts), asking me to go to google to investigate "barriers" to entering the medical profession as an aside to the discussion here is strawman territory.

meeeeh

In fairness it was me who mentioned sexist component to C. Kelly criticism. I actually didn't mean ButtersSukki who I think just likes listening to shows that make his/hers blood boil regardless of the gender of presenter.

But half of complaints in this thread will start with she shafted Hook and continue with she hates men. Some other presenter making the same point and there won't be a peep.

ButtersSuki

Tell me how wrote: »

I didn't' mention sexism. Bitterness is the term I would apply to a lot of serial complainers across all threads. I don't know the source of this bitterness, I don't know who in particular it is aimed at but it's my opinion that it's a source of a lot of the complaints.



Seriously. Either phone the Gardai to make a complaint against the people tying you down and forcing you to listen to shows you obviously don't like or phone a therapist to discuss why you choose to listen to something you hate.

You seem to be fighting a fight (on several fronts), asking me to go to google to investigate "barriers" to entering the medical profession as an aside to the discussion here is strawman territory.

That’s absolutely not what I said (again).

I never said I hate Liveline. I listen as the host unintentionally provides comedy gold. It’s Alan Partridge-esque.

I don’t listen to shows I don’t like (Williams, Yates, Kelly). I caught a few minutes of yesterday’s show and then listened back to the entire show so that I could be prepared to engage in a debate on the contents of said show.

And I said barriers to entry about 3rd level education in general, not specifically the medical profession. These are largely socio-economic, but there are other factors. But if that’s strawman territory for you, I really don’t know what to say to you. It’s well established, but feel free to debunk it. As you’re so keen on asking for links yourself, perhaps you could show me evidence of your opinion?

CatFromHue

Did the Pro Life guy on today answer what he would do if a 12-14 year old became pregnant via rape?

I was in and out of the car so didn't hear him answer it.

DickSwiveller

CatFromHue wrote: »

Did the Pro Life guy on today answer what he would do if a 12-14 year old became pregnant via rape?

I was in and out of the car so didn't hear him answer it.

I hope he didn't. I'm sick of this being used to divert from the discussion of on demand abortion up to 12 weeks. Every presenter has done it. It's a joke.

Uncharted

DickSwiveller wrote: »

I hope he didn't. I'm sick of this being used to divert from the discussion of on demand abortion up to 12 weeks. Every presenter has done it. It's a joke.

I presume you don't have young daughter's.