Stupid decisions (when drunk) that ruin your life[Mega merge]

Daveysil15

All the dirty usernames have been drawn to this thread. :pac:

Alternating Current

Where's registered sex offender gone?

whupdedo

Nobody comes out of this looking well, but, she really comes out of it badly, I mean the guys were stupid to get involved in that, but I mean what kind of a tramp does that in a full public bar where everyone has access to camera phones, and she doesn't seem to be drunk, I can't comprehend what the **** was going through her mind or how she even came to the point where it seemed like a good idea to stick 20 plus cocks in her mouth for a cheap ****in drink

Alternating Current

on_my_oe wrote: »

Different sites seem to have different moderating policies - one site blurred the guys genitals, perhaps to save the blushes of those less endowed.

Can you PM me the link please.

Ficheall

mickydoomsux wrote: »

Have you ever been in a room with a guy ever?

It's that kind of guy. 99.9% of men would gladly except a free blowjob from some tanked up young one.

You would accept a "blowjob" from a drunk girl in public, in a queue with 20 other guys? :-/

Daveysil15

Joe Duffy.. wrote: »

I'd hardly call it performing sex acts on 24 men, a couple of seconds on each that's all.

Yeah I'd feel a bit hard done by, (excuse the pun) if I was one of those guys.

Alternating Current

Melany Squeaking Desktop wrote: »

Oh shut up you know what I mean.

I don't think anyone knows what you mean after that waffle babble you inflicted on us all.

Egass13

Muise... wrote: »

If I wanted to suck 20+ cocks, I'd make damn sure it was at a discreet orgy with no cameras.

PM sent

eviltwin

A group of people got drunk and did something dumb, it is not that big a deal, yeah it's gross and pathetic for all concerned but it's not like they killed anyone. Everyone consented. Get over it people.

Legs.Eleven

ArtyM wrote: »

I do feel sorry for today's young generation that can't make their mistakes in Life without some f**kwit posting it on the World Wide Web for Likes and Thanks without so much as a single thought given for the effect it will have on that person's future.

mike_ie wrote: »

Hmm, not so sure it's that simple. I personally never felt the need to service 24 guys in a bar to win a holiday, and this was back in the era before interwebs/facebook/electricity.....

A bit from column a, a bit from column b.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Alternating Current wrote: »

I don't think anyone knows what you mean after that waffle babble you inflicted on us all.

Aw babez, were the words too long? I'll try again.

There are differences between humans and other primates.

Still too hard?

People not monkeys.

Crann na Beatha

This post has been deleted.

Sponge25

Joe Duffy.. wrote: »

I'd hardly call it performing sex acts on 24 men, a couple of seconds on each that's all.

Regardless; If you put a guy's penis in your mouth for two seconds. It's a sex act!

Muise...

Sponge25 wrote: »

Regardless; If you put a guy's penis in your mouth for two seconds. It's a sex act!

I thought the rule was three seconds if it fell on the floor.

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Muise... wrote: »

I thought the rule was three seconds if it fell on the floor.

If it's hitting the floor you'd want to spend more than a few seconds to do it justice in fairness

mickydoomsux

mickydoomsux wrote: »

Have you ever been in a room with a guy ever?

It's that kind of guy. 99.9% of men would gladly except a free blowjob from some tanked up young one.

I wouldn't go judging all men by your own personal standards.

Buzz Killington the third

Joe Duffy.. wrote: »

I'd hardly call it performing sex acts on 24 men, a couple of seconds on each that's all.

If you licked 24 girls in a row for a few seconds each would it be a sex act?

Maphisto

whupdedo wrote: »

Has anyone the ****in link to put up, i want to see, i want to see

NSFW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCu-mRwpYj0

whupdedo

Buzz Killington the third wrote: »

If you licked 24 girls in a row for a few seconds each would it be a sex act?

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

Muise...

whupdedo wrote: »

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

No, no, Buzz said "girls".

Daveysil15

whupdedo wrote: »

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

Would their boobs feel like a bag of sand?

Maphisto

whupdedo wrote: »

Jaysus it would be like lickin sandpaper

You mean after a day on the beach?

whupdedo

Muise... wrote: »

No, no, Buzz said "girls".

But surely every girl shaves now...don't they, please don't tell me some girls still leave it natural :eek:

Muise...

whupdedo wrote: »

But surely every girl shaves now...don't they, please don't tell me some girls still leave it natural :eek:

You know the bits that have, or had, the hair on them?

That's not exactly where the focus should be...

Renegade Mechanic

whupdedo wrote: »

But surely every girl shaves now...don't they, please don't tell me some girls still leave it natural :eek:

Nothing wrong with an aul bush to rest your head on! Though the "velcro effect" after sexy time can be a bit disadvantageous, truth be told..

conorhal

Lucifer MorningStar wrote: »

Poor girl, camera phones are curse

I put it you that camera phones are a fine invention, I have some lovey pic and great memories on mine.
The 'problem' here is a deficit of common sense, to total lack of dignity, a pretty rapey hyper-sexualized culture that objectifies women (I don't see any blokes having to gob some cock for a bottle of beer) and a complete lack of self respect on the part of all parties involved.
If I had raised any of those kids I'd feel utterly ashamed of them.

Shakespeare's Sister

mickydoomsux wrote: »

Have you ever been in a room with a guy ever?

It's that kind of guy. 99.9% of men would gladly except a free blowjob from some tanked up young one.

This "99%" or "99.9%" or "99.99%" thing gets used quite a bit. It's meaningless... unless in reference to an ice-cream.
You must try not to mix up yourself with most guys.

eviltwin wrote: »

A group of people got drunk and did something dumb, it is not that big a deal, yeah it's gross and pathetic for all concerned but it's not like they killed anyone. Everyone consented. Get over it people.

That's just your opinion and I'm not sure why you're forcing it on others. It isn't the end of the world, but it's not no big deal IMO either. It's fairly horrible stuff and I hate the idea of kids feeling this is the way to carry on, and would be gutted if I had a teenager who resorted to it (whether the girl or guys).
Whoever filmed and uploaded it is a crap person, but she is a fecking dope too. Even if it wasn't filmed.
But those who call her a slut... well the guys enabled her slutdom; it's a two-way street (crap pun intended).

Daveysil15

conorhal wrote: »

I put it you that camera phones are a fine invention, I have some lovey pic and great memories on mine.
The 'problem' here is a deficit of common sense, to total lack of dignity, a pretty rapey hyper-sexualized culture that objectifies women (I don't see any blokes having to gob some cock for a bottle of beer) and a complete lack of self respect on the part of all parties involved.
If I had raised any of those kids I'd feel utterly ashamed of them.

With good reason. However if a bloke sucked 20 tits it'd be grand.

Buzz Killington the third

conorhal wrote: »

a pretty rapey hyper-sexualized culture that objectifies women

Only a matter of time before this crap was to emerge :rolleyes:

conorhal wrote: »

(I don't see any blokes having to gob some cock for a bottle of beer)

Na, they just have to expose themselves so she can get one.

gctest50

919 in a day by this woman seems to be the record

Lisa Sparxxx

• She’s married.
  
• The rules say that each sexual contact has to take more then 30 and the most 60 seconds.
• Each sexual contact was carefully watched, rated and counted by referees.
• 6 cameras were used to record the event..