Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Saorview Content Speculation

  • 09-06-2010 7:37pm
    #1
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,850 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Feel free to speculate on what content will be on the free-to-air digital terrestrial television platform, which the powers that be have stupidly decided to name "Saorview" (thus leaving anyone that doesn't speak Irish confused as to what "Saor" means and leaving those that DO speak Irish annoyed that it wasn't called "Saorfeach". But that's neither hear nor there).

    I'll start the ball rolling by predicting that there will be no additional TV channels other than RTÉ News Now, at least initially.


«13456747

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    icdg wrote: »
    Feel free to speculate on what content will be on the free-to-air digital terrestrial television platform, which the powers that be have stupidly decided to name "Saorview" (thus leaving anyone that doesn't speak Irish confused as to what "Saor" means and leaving those that DO speak Irish annoyed that it wasn't called "Saorfeach". But that's neither hear nor there).

    I'll start the ball rolling by predicting that there will be no additional TV channels other than RTÉ News Now, at least initially.

    Very good..I'm the guily one at wikipedia...lol put my hands up..guns out lol

    But I would say that Oireachtas TV will go ahead now. Children's channel probably will go ahead according to the SBP too freeing up RTÉ2. RTÉ3 a possibility. 5TV unlikely but should be considered by city channels, IFC/DCTV should be considered but may not be ready yet for that step financially.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭cc


    I think it should least have an international news channel, CNN or BBC world maybe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭Mr McBoatface


    Right so I've just looked in my crystal ball :D and I reckon in October they'll start with
    1. RTE 1 ( assuming it's possible to switch from SD to HD, then with odd HD program starting in 2011 )
    2. RTE 2
    3. TV3
    4. TG4
    5. OTV/RTE News Now - Shared Channel
    6. RTE Kids/RTE 3 - Shared Channel

    RTE Kids will be similar to Cbeebies and CBBC combined.
    RTE3 will have reruns of some of the better late night RTE1 & 2 programs at a more reasonable hour.

    When ASO is completed and the DTT service is launched in full I can see 3E & RTE Movies joining the line up and RTE1 will have all content broadcast/upscaled to HD.

    I've no factually basis for making these comments, it will be interesting to look back and see how wrong I was :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭Mayo Exile


    icdg wrote: »
    I'll start the ball rolling by predicting that there will be no additional TV channels other than RTÉ News Now, at least initially.

    3e maybe?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,130 ✭✭✭John mac


    jobyrne30 wrote: »

    When ASO is completed and the DTT service is launched in full I can see 3E & RTE Movies joining the line up and RTE1 will have all content broadcast/upscaled to HD.

    and the year. May 2013 :D:D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭Mr McBoatface


    John mac wrote: »
    and the year. May 2013 :D:D

    Well that's what my Crystal Ball predicts... ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,802 ✭✭✭Apogee


    icdg wrote: »
    Feel free to speculate on what content will be on the free-to-air digital terrestrial television platform, which the powers that be have stupidly decided to name "Saorview" (thus leaving anyone that doesn't speak Irish confused as to what "Saor" means and leaving those that DO speak Irish annoyed that it wasn't called "Saorfeach". But that's neither hear nor there).

    Sure God help us and save us and the Saints above preserve us, but the poor downtrodden, ignorant, misfortunate people of Ireland will be left in pitiful bewilderment, with only the flames of the open hearth for entertainment, when every TV in the country spontaneously explodes come the 31st of October.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    Apogee wrote: »
    Sure God help us and save us and the Saints above preserve us, but the poor downtrodden, ignorant, misfortunate people of Ireland will be left in pitiful bewilderment, with only the flames of the open hearth for entertainment, when every TV in the country spontaneously explodes come the 31st of October.
    :D

    lol..well at least we maintain our sense of humour anyhows...

    Good crystal ball there jobryne30. I think they'll make Quarter 4 2012.

    I think yere probably not far off on the 6 channels. Its possible that OTV and RTÉ News Now will timeshare. I mean they could have Oireachtas TV with RTÉ News Now ticker. But I think they'll have separate channels.
    RTE Kids and RTE3 may timeshare.

    I too would like to see news channels on Saorview. For that to happen RTÉ would need another mux. They could go for 2 muxes now and put News Channels on it and put off HD til 2014 and seek another mux for HD. However News channels could be part of the FTA element of Commercial DTT when that happens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    TV channels
    • RTE1
    • RTE2
    • TV3 (eventually)
    • TG4
    • Oireachtas TV / RTE News (not enough content for 2 full channels)
    (there are two Oireachtas TV feeds already for years and 2.3GHz spectrum tied up in part of Dublin).
    All RTE's Radio
    • RTÉ Radio 1
    • RTÉ 2fm
    • RTÉ lyric fm
    • RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta
    Including spectrum wasting DAB Stations :)
    • RTÉ 2 XM
    • RTÉ Choice
    • RTÉ Junior / Chill
    • RTÉ Gold
    • RTÉ Pulse
    • RTÉ Radio 1 Extra

    No HD once TV3 joins. HD needs another THREE Muxes if all 4 channels on HD as well as SD, or TWO addition Mux if no SD.
    In theory with Saorview spec boxes people without HD can use HD feed, so no need for wasteful simulcast.


  • Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 19,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭byte
    byte


    The DAB radio stations are hardly spectrum-wasting, if there's nothing else to use the available bandwidth! Also, DTT is considerably more national than DAB is.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    I did put a :) RTE has to put something DAB and DTT Radio.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭Charles Slane


    Yes, spectrum-wastage is a matter of opinion. I'd much rather the digital radio stations than Oireachtas TV. Or Tg4 for that matter. But that's my personal taste.

    HD apparently would be a waste of spectrum, since we're costantly being told that you need a massive TV to notice any real difference (although I haven't found that to be the case).

    So bring on 3e for Family Guy, The Office and the occasional great movie (La Haine was on recently).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    TV3 won't pay for 3e untill > 60% or more of people have DTT. After all they reach almost 80% with TV3e now on Sky + UPC.

    Actually by that logic, they may not even want to put TV3 on DTT till ASO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,673 ✭✭✭FREETV


    watty wrote: »
    TV3 won't pay for 3e untill > 60% or more of people have DTT. After all they reach almost 80% with TV3e now on Sky + UPC.

    Actually by that logic, they may not even want to put TV3 on DTT till ASO.
    I want and I know that my old Dad wants 3e along with TV3 to be shown from the beginning of the partial launch of Saorview on October 31. The picture is only brutal in Meath for TV3 in analogue and he does enjoy his Tonight with Vincent Browne, the odd documentary too. I know that he would love to see History Channel or National Geographic channels sometime on DTT but he may dream on as they are all premium pay per view channels. :D I don't want to see slapper channels or shopping channels ever on DTT. Such rubbish. They would be a complete waste of bandwidth. There are enough of them already on FTA satellite. Entertainment, film and sports channels are what the masses want. It should be made mandatory for all Irish tv stations to be FTA on Saorview from the very start. Maybe we should start a petition and send it to RTE, BAI, the Minister etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    All existing FTA Irish TV will be on DTT. TV3e is cable/satellite only pay channel with about 1% viewers. I can't see TV3 wanting to pay the x100 higher cost to have this on DTT for 0.1% more viewers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭kuro_man


    HD apparently would be a waste of spectrum, since we're costantly being told that you need a massive TV to notice any real difference (although I haven't found that to be the case)

    There is a strong argument about the merits of 1080 v 720 on screens below 50" but I think most people see a difference between SD and HD on any decent TV. Even beyond resolution, HD has a less compression artefacts and therefore, a cleaner, clearer image with better colours.

    64% (source: joinfreesat.co.uk) of freesat customers invested around £200 just to get 1.5 (now 2) HD channels.
    RTE should launch a HD channel from the start creating a unique selling point, especially for Sport. Magners league, GAA, Movies, US dramas etc. all in HD for free would encourage sales and guarantee an overlap between $ky/upc customers, extending the market beyond analogue-only customers. This could eventually make a commercial DTT service viable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    There is more than enough content for Oireachtas TV to be full time Watty because Europarl TV is intended to be on it when the Oireachtas isn't sitting. So a timeshare there so easily a 24hour channel.

    As regards RTÉ News Now, well that is a different story. It may lack content. It could partner with Euronews on international news for its channel. It has a stake in it.

    Oireachtas TV is not about being popular viewing. Its about the public being able to see what is being discussed when they so wish to. You'd be surprised how much you would learn from the committees. If you have a short attention span then of course you won't be interested. But I am in favour of it purely for transparency reasons.

    I reckon 3e will go on DTT if only to give it greater reach for the same reason TV3 will be on it.

    Children's Channel is likely to go ahead also together with reconfigured RTÉ2 as per the Sunday Business Post. It makes sense from a branding point of view in digital land rather than as RTÉ2.

    Line-up

    RTÉ1
    RTÉ2 (foreign & Sport)
    RTÉ News Now

    TV3
    3e
    TG4 (archive-reconfigured)

    Oireachtas TV-Europarl TV timeshare
    Culabula Den TV (RTÉ-TG4)-timeshare with Open Education TV at nightime.

    This is what's likely

    2 questions marks are:
    Irish Film Channel-DCTV
    RTÉ3
    5TV (City Channels)

    Personally I feel there isn't need for RTÉ3 when TG4 can do with the archive programming to fill hours left vacant by Cula4 and could also remove France24. So no need for RTÉ3.

    I would be in favour of Irish Film Channel, DCTV-P5TV, Cork CTV etc and to give regional/local TV a chance and also 5TV which would be its commercial equivalent.

    you could roll these 2 into 1 under 5TV and have advertising. That way the channel would be self financing with each partner earning the revenue during its programme breaks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Do they film/ stream the committee's? Could they not show that on Oireachtas TV, as per BBC Parliament?

    I actually don't think TV3 will be on at launch, never mind 3e, but I would like 3e on it.

    Wasn't there once a proposal for RTE Gold, which in my speculation would timeshare with the children's channel?

    And what no "+1" channels? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    watty wrote: »

    No HD once TV3 joins. HD needs another THREE Muxes if all 4 channels on HD as well as SD, or TWO addition Mux if no SD.
    In theory with Saorview spec boxes people without HD can use HD feed, so no need for wasteful simulcast.

    It would be madness for RTE to even contemplate HD and SD simulcast. It has always been in the spec that SAORview would have HD compatibility, and it would be insane for any non-SAORview equipment to be entertained, as lack of HD will become a de facto standard that will be hard to break from - NO SD/HD simulcast, it is unnecessary. Annalogue will continue long enough for replacement, compatible equipment to be purchased.

    There was a long period of 'accommodation' of 405 line TVs when RTE started broacasting 60 years ago. As a result, a lot of crap unreliable dual-standard sets were sold all over Ireland because of this requirement, even though it did not apply in the south and west of the country. We have more than enough incompatible MPEG2 TV sets (HD ready of course) that now need a STB for, courtesy of UK retail outlets. It is not even possible to find out for certain if current stock of TVs and STBs will receive the new service, due launch in 5 months! For example, Sony do not have it on their (UK based) website whether sets have MPEG4, and Panasonic have many entries on these threads talking about reception problems.

    By the way, TV3 are not even wide screen yet on their own productions, so I think it will be a while before they go wide screen, let alone HD. (Maybe if RTE go HD, they can sell their old studio stuff to TV3.)

    Madness.

    Rant over. :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 120 ✭✭In the old days


    OK. My tuppance worth! The more channels on Saorview the more RTE will canabalise its existing FTA viewership and market share i.e. comparing the new DTT service to existing analogue. More choice means more competition. To try and be innovative an RTE HD channel should be a priority. How about all the national radio stations on DTT as a small attraction. At least Today fm could be recorded (would love to timeshift a few programmes and annoying that it doesn't broadcast on astra/sky like newstalk!). I also think streaming the regional radio stations might be a hook for 'ex Pats' based in Dublin (e.g. Shannonside etc. for regional GAA and Death Notices)! TVwise BBC 1 + 2 NI and say Eurosport and CNBC wouldn't be a bad basic FTA package in my book. No idea about bandwith requirements for this 'package'!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    There isn't the space. Not for any decent FM comparable quality.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    watty wrote: »
    There isn't the space. Not for any decent FM comparable quality.

    There are FOUR muxes all MPEG4 FGS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Until there is a change of plan or a Commercial operator, there is only ONE mux.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    There are FOUR muxes all MPEG4 FGS.

    Yea, but at the moment those are ringfenced for the BAI. The local radio stations should also be on DTT. That's a good idea. The channels you mentioned In the Old days would be subscription channels so they will not happen. The most we can hope for is news channels and afew others. I have suggested to the Dept giving another Mux to RTÉ from the BAI. That would allow a decent FTA offering covering News channels, free music ones etc so then you would have 20 FTA channels, National and Local Radio.

    At the moment RTÉ NL haven't planned for 3 muxes, only for 2. The idea would be that the Commercial Operator would have FTA channels in return for higher carriage costs than the subscription channels carried and RTÉ would stick to Irish PSB programmes. Now the way the thing is I think that RTÉ should be given gifted a 3rd mux in order to beef up the FTA offering and give the platform a decent chance. That is one extra. That means they would get one post ASO for HD and would have to spend a little on equipment for an extra mux.

    The 3 BAI muxes can be available to Sky for example then for subscription then, 2 now and 1 at ASO. That would mean lower rental costs also and security bond requirements. I think such a model would work. Whether the figures will stack up for Sky is another question.

    I think that the BAI should waste no time following a research on the market, to re-tender. I suspect that Sky and Eircom would be interested. Others I would not expect to be interested so it would be straightforward enough. The fees RTÉ NL are looking for etc is probably the issue and I don't know how that would be got around.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    watty wrote: »
    Until there is a change of plan or a Commercial operator, there is only ONE mux.

    There are four muxes up and running. There is a change of plan, no-one wants the commercial contract, so no matter what, a new plan there will be. RTE will get a second mux later, but this is later. It makes emminent sense to allow RTE to operate the muxes as they wish, within the approval of the BAI, and presumably the minister.

    They can 'test' the comm muxes for them.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    The rest of the sites will only have one Mux.

    The extra 3 will be switched off to save massive electric bill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    You can get LG phones that do DTT. If you put all the Radio on DTT, then DAB would be a poorer quality duplication :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭✭Gerry Wicklow


    They can 'test' the comm muxes for them.:)

    Not if they insist on jamming Preseli:mad:. One mux is more than enough for them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 556 ✭✭✭mrdtv2010


    Not if they insist on jamming Preseli:mad:. One mux is more than enough for them.

    Exactly. This continues to be a technology trainwreck of the type which Ireland has uniquely and so beautifully specialised in since 1961. For Dxers with the relevant T2 equipment Caradon Hill HD has been brought forward by two months and is now, as of World Cup kickoff in a few minutes, live as of 0600GMT.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 120 ✭✭In the old days


    scath wrote: »
    The channels you mentioned In the Old days would be subscription channels so they will not happen. The most we can hope for is news channels and afew others.

    Probabally won't happen for CNBC or Eurosport I agree but I was thinking a sports channel and general business/entertainment channel would add to the PSB mix and the 2 BBCs *could possibly* come under the reciprocal agreement along with an expanded RTE news channel to make a reasonable MUX. Eurosport were always keen to be an analogue channel on Cablelink (still broadcasts free in English on analogue Sat!) and CNBC is broadcast FTA on many Satellites so I would have thought they would be happy to gain a good few thousand terrestrial views without charging, similarly CNN etc.. Obviously objections etc. could make this a non runner but we are only speculating!!!.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    Probabally won't happen for CNBC or Eurosport I agree but I was thinking a sports channel and general business/entertainment channel would add to the PSB mix and the 2 BBCs *could possibly* come under the reciprocal agreement along with an expanded RTE news channel to make a reasonable MUX. Eurosport were always keen to be an analogue channel on Cablelink (still broadcasts free in English on analogue Sat!) and CNBC is broadcast FTA on many Satellites so I would have thought they would be happy to gain a good few thousand terrestrial views without charging, similarly CNN etc.. Obviously objections etc. could make this a non runner but we are only speculating!!!.

    Absolutely In the old days. This is where an extra mux now taken from the BAI would be good. But from my enquiry to RTÉ an extra mux hasn't been considered beyond the 2 muxes, with the HD one from ASO for now. I do think it should be and as you suggest Eurosport, CNN, France24,AJÉ, BBC World, Vault (pop music), BBC NI1&2, UTV, C4.

    Problem is programme rights. BBC would be seeking royalty payments and would have to be instructed by the new DCMS Minister not to charge the ROI. Alternatively it could be taken out of the TV license with it increased. Forseeably then that would not apply only to UPC but to Saorview DTT also. ESB Networks could collect it via the bills from viewers. An extra mux would be needed. That would require an order to ComReg from the Minister I assume and a change to the relevant BAI section. But I think it would be a good idea to strengthen the Saorview offering.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    watty wrote: »
    You can get LG phones that do DTT. If you put all the Radio on DTT, then DAB would be a poorer quality duplication :)

    I have suggested to RTÉ to consider linking up with mobile operators for Radio DTT on mobiles. From talking to someone in 02 they would be cool with that too as it is done in Germany. However coming to an agreement as to charges for usage is another issue. But it is spectrum efficient. In that case then why DAB? Topology is the only issue also. Also DVB-H is foreseen. This is why serious consideration should be given to ComReg not bothering with DVB-H which the model is being questioned anyhow and linking up with Saorview.

    Presumably mobile operators could link up with Sky on a commercial DTT service and make that work. Currently its 3G Mobile TV but they did trials for DVB-H. 3G lets them get mobile TV off the ground but DTT access would allow them free up 3G for more interactive stuff and wouldn't have contention issues. I gather mobiles are able to cope now with DTT following improvements, probably even more so with DVB-T2 meaning DVB-H isn't probably needed.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    watty wrote: »
    The rest of the sites will only have one Mux.

    The extra 3 will be switched off to save massive electric bill.

    I am not suggesting that they use all four, but they are due a second one after ASO, so why not now? The second mux would allow RTE1+2 to be HD only, with about 10 or so other channels. That would guarantee the success of SAORview as a platform.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Makes sense to me but it's up to our Glorious Leader(s).

    Saorview's success is 100% assured, because it will be the ONLY way to get TG4, TV3, RTE1 and RTE2 without a subscription in 3 or 4 years time.

    BBC is a non-runner on free DTT. The royalties are not much. It's the extra transmission costs. I and most of the country certainly don't wish a tax or licence hike to pay for what anyone with a 50cm dish and sat box all costing under €70 can get for free. Or pay a bit more once off for BBC HD and a Freesat PVR.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    scath wrote: »
    I have suggested to RTÉ to consider linking up with mobile operators for Radio DTT on mobiles. From talking to someone in 02 they would be cool with that too as it is done in Germany.

    RTE wouldn't like it. That is what has killed DAB and DVB-h in Germany.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭frankymail


    icdg wrote: »
    Feel free to speculate on what content will be on the free-to-air digital terrestrial television platform, which the powers that be have stupidly decided to name "Saorview" (thus leaving anyone that doesn't speak Irish confused as to what "Saor" means and leaving those that DO speak Irish annoyed that it wasn't called "Saorfeach". But that's neither hear nor there).

    I'll start the ball rolling by predicting that there will be no additional TV channels other than RTÉ News Now, at least initially.

    I'd be more annoyed if they called is "Saorfeach".. that doesnt make sense. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    Wouldn't be Saorfeach as Saorfeach would translate to Freelook. Would be Saoramharc. I guess they reckoned its as near to Freeview without having to get a license from the UK. I mean they could have got a license as Freeview Ireland. But I guess the confusion of same would be a problem. Saorview strikes the balance I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭frankymail


    The Logo is cat too. Pure CAIC

    I think 3e will be added and nothing else for the time being. I could maybe possibly see a third channel somewhere along the line for RTE. The RTE Sport brand would work well but the market seems saturated with Setanta and Sky, maybe we could see an all entertainment station from RTE, branded as RTE Ten, like their new entertainment website division.

    It's a hard one to judge. I think a On Demand, TV version of the RTE Player would be a much better use of resources.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    frankymail wrote: »

    I think a On Demand, TV version of the RTE Player would be a much better use of resources.

    There is no return channel, and there are not enough spare channels. A red button service might be useful, but the demand for it escapes me. There is simply not enough content. As it is they pad out the schedule with rubbish like 'Murder She Wrote'.

    From RTE, we should get RTE1 HD, RTE2 HD, RTE NEWS NOW, and RTE SPORT. With TG4 providing some matching services, like the Film Channel, and OTV. Not all channels would be 24/7, for example. the Sport channel might only be active for actual sporting events, not relaying Australian Junior TiddlyWinks Regional SemiFinals in the wee small hours.

    Different parts of the schedule could be assigned channel/programme nos so, for example, childrens programmes would occupy their own space in the EPG, etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not if they insist on jamming Preseli:mad:. One mux is more than enough for them.
    Yup,the north korea RTENL are still broadcasting at high power on all 4 muxes from mt leinster.

    It's more obvious than ever that this is deliberate jamming given theres going to be no need for the extra 3 muxes.

    What is that farce costing and is there any regulation at all of this money wasting pettyness??:mad::mad:

    Testing my aunt fanny.


  • Subscribers Posts: 16,592 ✭✭✭✭copacetic


    scath wrote: »
    I have suggested to RTÉ to consider linking up with mobile operators for Radio DTT on mobiles. From talking to someone in 02 they would be cool with that too as it is done in Germany. However coming to an agreement as to charges for usage is another issue. But it is spectrum efficient. In that case then why DAB? Topology is the only issue also. Also DVB-H is foreseen. This is why serious consideration should be given to ComReg not bothering with DVB-H which the model is being questioned anyhow and linking up with Saorview.

    Presumably mobile operators could link up with Sky on a commercial DTT service and make that work. Currently its 3G Mobile TV but they did trials for DVB-H. 3G lets them get mobile TV off the ground but DTT access would allow them free up 3G for more interactive stuff and wouldn't have contention issues. I gather mobiles are able to cope now with DTT following improvements, probably even more so with DVB-T2 meaning DVB-H isn't probably needed.

    Are you suggesting that supporting portable DVB-T reception is spectrum efficient?:confused: Wouldn't his would require a move away from 64 QAM to 16QAM? That and would be not at all spectrum efficient. It would throw away nearly all the gains of mpeg4.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 956 ✭✭✭endakenny


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    I actually don't think TV3 will be on at launch...
    I believe that TV3 is obliged by its licence to have full terrestrial coverage but that it has got slack by saying that it is negotiating. Is the broadcasting commission going to take TV3 to task? I am also aware that TV3 would have to pay RTÉNL to be broadcast on the relays because RTÉNL has to pay to operate it. Who exactly owns the transmitters?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    RTENL owns the Transmitters and most of the sites.


    Mobile handsets work just as well as setboxes. Outside the signal is better. No need to change the QAM. DVB-h isn't needed anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    copacetic wrote: »
    Are you suggesting that supporting portable DVB-T reception is spectrum efficient?:confused: Wouldn't his would require a move away from 64 QAM to 16QAM? That and would be not at all spectrum efficient. It would throw away nearly all the gains of mpeg4.

    Eh, copacetic, i don't think ya read properly through all of my thread lol. That makes the QAM issue is irrelevant because use of DVB-T for radio means DAB is not then needed for radio. So spectrum is saved. Now it means then DVB-T portable radios have to be produced. But for mobiles it exists. Then ya don't need DAB spectrum at all. And as we know, there is no need for all this spare radio capacity with DAB, as the industry has issues with more saturation of the crowded market that DAB would bring so they are shying away from it at the moment. The gains of MPEG4 would not be thrown away with MPEG4. Furthermore with DVB-T2 it would be even more spectrum efficient for the dual use of TV and radio and still no DAB needed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭scath


    watty wrote: »
    RTENL owns the Transmitters and most of the sites.


    Mobile handsets work just as well as setboxes. Outside the signal is better. No need to change the QAM. DVB-h isn't needed anymore.

    Yip Watty, and not alone DVB-H isn't needed anymore, DAB isn't either, and that frees up quite abit of spectrum isn't it? As you pointed out why RTÉ wouldn't like it, they would I suppose prefer to have DAB, DVB-H because it means they can charge mobile operators for access of programmes as they have to pay programme rights. They could also charge them for access to the DAB network. So i guess they've RTÉ NL in mind, a business! I guess RTÉ pay extra rights to foreign programs on mobiles also. I mean the lad in 02 did say to me broadcasters charge to be on the mobile network's TV service and not the other way around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Radio

    If they used AAC (supported by Saorview) instead of MP2 (traditional DTT/Sat Radio), then 128k is about the same quality as 256k MP2 (or 192k MP3). UK Dab is using 128k often, which is terrible, worse than FM. 128K AAC is at least as good as FM and sometimes better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 956 ✭✭✭endakenny


    watty wrote: »
    RTENL owns the Transmitters and most of the sites.
    If RTÉNL owns the transmitters, then it could let TV3 onto the PSB mux for free. It goes against competition to force TV3 to pay to be on this mux. Surely the European Commission would have something to say about the state broadcaster denying TV3 free full terrestrial coverage.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    endakenny wrote: »

    If RTÉNL owns the transmitters, then it could let TV3 onto the PSB mux for free. It goes against competition to force TV3 to pay to be on this mux. Surely the European Commission would have something to say about the state broadcaster denying TV3 free full terrestrial coverage.

    No, RTE NL are governed by a regulator. They could no more let TV3 on for free, than Dublin Airport Authority could let Ryanair have free access. The Competition Authority would be down on both of them if they did. And the EU have a thing about state subsidies. They do not allow them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Sky, RTE, TG4, UPC and others would all complain bitterly if TV3 got free carriage. They are a commercial company funded by adverts. It would be massive distortion of competition if TV3 got free carriage.

    RTE don't have free carriage, even if they were not charge and RTENL was completely integrated to RTE. RTENL has to pay ESB (huge), staff, Microwave & Fibre feed costs and capital equipment etc.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement