Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Huge queues form at Capuchin food handout

13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    Jesus Christ is there no end to cynicism. Its Christmas ffs and people are queing up for food and people are moaning that they have shoes? They dont look poor enough, what do you want them to do? Be naked, you sound like something from a Dickens novel.

    These people are proper Christians and should be admired for what they do for the poor, just be glad you dont have to queue up like that for food. How many people, what percentage of them do you really think are scammers? I honestly dont believe this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Kernel wrote: »
    If you want to call me a prick, just come straight out with it Doc, I've been called a lot worse.

    No, I don't want to have any effect on donations. I made a point regarding freeloaders taking the piss, and was attacked by people with no knowledge or experience of what they were talking about. I've said from the start that there are genuine people partaking in the charity, and that the brothers do great work.
    Fair enough, I'm not one to mince words, but I'm also not a man to see good works undone by idle chatter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Fair enough, I'm not one to mince words, but I'm also not a man to see good works undone by idle chatter.

    Yeah, but my problem is that you know jack **** about it to be making such assertions. That's all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Kernel wrote: »
    Yeah, but my problem is that you know jack **** about it to be making such assertions. That's all.
    Your points are worthless when all they do is cause problems for the genuinely needy, even if you had a shred of evidence to back them up, which you don't, nor suggested solutions, making this idle chatter and cribbing on the internet which can only damage donations to good people.

    And we have had actual charity workers on the thread disagreeing with you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    Kernel wrote: »

    Yes, I understand the scripture behind such beliefs. Thanks for the reply, I was just hoping an independent might verify my 'wild claims' according to some. I'm not against the centre at all, and I would hope that I do not dissuade people from giving to the centre. It just annoys me that there are people who would take advantage of charity at the expense of the genuinely destitute.
    Unfortunately, in any such walk of life, there are always those that are only too ready to take advantage. It's everywhere. Social Welfare fraud is prime example.

    Those who take advantage annoy me too. The Capuchins are probably equally as annoyed but for them it's about no questions asked charity. It's what they are.

    Here's a simple example. When I worked there there was a guy who used to ask for some tea bags and bread every so often. He'd get about 20 tea bags and a small sliced pan. It came to the Day Centre's attention that he was selling a tea bag and a slice of bread for IR£1 back in his hostel. (this was in the 1980s). He called asking for the same thing after he was found out. Was he refused? No. Instead he got 2 tea bags and 2 slices of bread. In a religious outfit there is always room for forgiveness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Your points are worthless when all they do is cause problems for the genuinely needy, even if you had a shred of evidence to back them up, which you don't, nor suggested solutions, making this idle chatter and cribbing on the internet which can only damage donations to good people.

    What's all this rot about evidence?!? Direct evidence, my own observations, inside and outside the centre. Have you ever even seen the centre?
    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    And we have had actual charity workers on the thread disagreeing with you.

    Who, the lad from a soup kitchen on the southside??? The Capuchin centre is on the northside and is nothing to do with his soup kitchen.... *Bangs head on keyboard*


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Kernel wrote: »
    What's all this rot about evidence?!? Direct evidence, my own observations, inside and outside the centre. Have you ever even seen the centre?
    And the observation about clothes lasting longer than people makes no never mind to you eh?
    Kernel wrote: »
    Who, the lad from a soup kitchen on the southside??? The Capuchin centre is on the northside and is nothing to do with his soup kitchen.... *Bangs head on keyboard*
    Careful now.

    You'll hurt a perfectly good keyboard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    crosstownk wrote: »
    Here's a simple example. When I worked there there was a guy who used to ask for some tea bags and bread every so often. He'd get about 20 tea bags and a small sliced pan. It came to the Day Centre's attention that he was selling a tea bag and a slice of bread for IR£1 back in his hostel. (this was in the 1980s). He called asking for the same thing after he was found out. Was he refused? No. Instead he got 2 tea bags and 2 slices of bread. In a religious outfit there is always room for forgiveness.

    Some of them still sell the stuff from the hampers. Usually alcohol or drug addicts. Anyway, as I've said fair play to you for volunteering, and fair play to the Capuchin Centre. It's an awful shame that so many take advantage of it though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    And the observation about clothes lasting longer than people makes no never mind to you eh?

    Just. Go. Down. And. See. For. Yourself..........................................


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 329 ✭✭samina


    Dudess wrote: »
    samina wrote: »
    Dudess wrote: »
    samina wrote: »
    It really makes my blood boil to see things like that. I won't give to St Vincent de Paul because they are taken advantage of so much. I used to see neighbours, who with live in partners who worked, get money from the every week and a holiday down in Wexford I think it was. This was after they returned from their holiday in Spain. Out drinking at least 2 nights a week and had all the best clothes. And these are far from isolated. The charities won't ask for proof of the family needing help for fear of scaring off people who really need it but imagine how much help they could give genuine people if they weeded out these bums
    So, punish the genuinely needy because of a handful of scammers? Nice.

    Well I refuse to pay for these people to go on holiday when I can't afford one myself. That's how I'll stay until the system changes. I've seen them been taken advantage of more times than I have seen anyone who truly needs it get it. And these people dont need to que for food because theyll have their free hamper delivered. If I have something to give I'll give it to somewhere I feel it goes to the right place there's no harm in that.
    Makes your blood boil to see a charity initiative? Meh, they wouldn't want the help of someone with an attitude like yours so you're off the hook.
    How are initiatives like this paying for holidays? And how have you seen it taken advantage of more than not? Seems like you just resent people getting something for free no matter how much they need it...


    I don't know where you live but where I live they do the rounds weekly handing out money, food and used to give a weeks holiday in a mobile somewhere don't know if they still do this. True they might not be paying for their bolidays in Spain maybe they are giving it the batman instead. Like I say they all work or collect the lone parents and live with their working partners. So he's I do begrudge people getting things for free when there are people who need it and could be getting more only for these people, not that I begrudge them getting it only because I don't because if I had the morals of a dog I could because they give to anyone who asks.

    Yes I'm no great loss to them but I'd rather give my money where I know it's going to good use


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭carfiosaoorl


    Kernel wrote: »
    Just. Go. Down. And. See. For. Yourself..........................................

    I dont understand what going down and looking is going to do. How can you judge a persons situation just by looking at them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    I dont understand what going down and looking is going to do. How can you judge a persons situation just by looking at them?

    Good judgement? Common sense? Asking a few questions? Ask them if they work, are they on the dole etc. how many do they provide for and how much money they receive, you'll be surprised. You'll be giving a christmas hamper to the pakistani lad who works in the garage or newsagents instead mate. ;) Or the poor pensioner. Or the starving black babies in Africa. Or India. Or a country where real poverty doesn't consist of not being able to afford the latest Nike Air Max and a slab of tinnies for Thurs, Fri, Sat, Sun and Monday nights. haha! :D

    If people did it, instead of talking nonsense through their keyboards, we would have a better discussion tbh. Other people offering opinions and questioning my judgement when they haven't ever laid eyes on the place, and know nothing of my experience.... typical boards tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭carfiosaoorl


    Kernel wrote: »
    Good judgement? Common sense? Asking a few questions? Ask them if they work, are they on the dole etc. how many do they provide for and how much money they receive, you'll be surprised. You'll be giving a christmas hamper to the pakistani lad who works in the garage or newsagents instead mate. ;) Or the poor pensioner. Or the starving black babies in Africa. Or India. Or a country where real poverty doesn't consist of not being able to afford the latest Nike Air Max and a slab of tinnies for Thurs, Fri, Sat, Sun and Monday nights. haha! :D

    If people did it, instead of talking nonsense through their keyboards, we would have a better discussion tbh. Other people offering opinions and questioning my judgement when they haven't ever laid eyes on the place, and know nothing of my experience.... typical boards tbh.

    So you're saying that you go down and question people in the queue about their situation and how they got there, seriously:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭Big Nasty


    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    I was thinking more of the time involved in travelling and queueing?

    On the dole, retired, alone, bored, hungry?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk



    So you're saying that you go down and question people in the queue about their situation and how they got there, seriously:confused:
    Exactly. Question someone who is in genuine need and you run a serious risk of embarrassing them into not returning for fear of further embarrassment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    So you're saying that you go down and question people in the queue about their situation and how they got there, seriously:confused:
    No no, this evidence nonsense has no place in a reasonable discussion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    So you're saying that you go down and question people in the queue about their situation and how they got there, seriously:confused:

    No volunteer and engage in conversation with them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    No no, this evidence nonsense has no place in a reasonable discussion.

    Sure what would you know, you refuse to state whether you ever even laid eyes on the place?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    samina wrote:
    I don't know where you live but where I live they do the rounds weekly handing out money, food and used to give a weeks holiday in a mobile somewhere don't know if they still do this. True they might not be paying for their bolidays in Spain maybe they are giving it the batman instead. Like I say they all work or collect the lone parents and live with their working partners. So he's I do begrudge people getting things for free when there are people who need it and could be getting more only for these people, not that I begrudge them getting it only because I don't because if I had the morals of a dog I could because they give to anyone who asks.

    Yes I'm no great loss to them but I'd rather give my money where I know it's going to good use
    it doesn't make sense that you feel for needy people, yet won't help them because of the scammers... :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Kernel wrote: »
    Sure what would you know, you refuse to state whether you ever even laid eyes on the place?
    You never asked, and yes I have. If you haven't learned not to judge a book by its cover by the stage of your life I don't know what more can be said to you. Away and beyond that, you still haven't clarified what it is you hope to achieve by coming on with evidence-free claims about droves of spongers draining charitable donations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    pollswwrdwhatwouldreaga.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    You never asked, and yes I have.

    Don't believe you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Kernel wrote: »
    Don't believe you.
    Well I don't believe you volunteered for the centre, so I guess what we have here is a situation of mutual disbelief. I don't particularly care about resolving it however since I'm not the one who might possibly injure future donations to the order with evidence-free claims of hordes of spongers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Well I don't believe you volunteered for the centre, so I guess what we have here is a situation of mutual disbelief. I don't particularly care about resolving it however since I'm not the one who might possibly injure future donations to the order with evidence-free claims of hordes of spongers.

    Climb down off your high horse there lad. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Dudess wrote: »
    Roma.
    .

    If they have Romanian passports they are Romanian.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 329 ✭✭samina


    Dudess wrote: »
    samina wrote:
    I don't know where you live but where I live they do the rounds weekly handing out money, food and used to give a weeks holiday in a mobile somewhere don't know if they still do this. True they might not be paying for their bolidays in Spain maybe they are giving it the batman instead. Like I say they all work or collect the lone parents and live with their working partners. So he's I do begrudge people getting things for free when there are people who need it and could be getting more only for these people, not that I begrudge them getting it only because I don't because if I had the morals of a dog I could because they give to anyone who asks.

    Yes I'm no great loss to them but I'd rather give my money where I know it's going to good use
    it doesn't make sense that you feel for needy people, yet won't help them because of the scanners... :confused:
    Who wouldn't feel for the needy? What's confusing is the fact that you don't understand that I won't give to an organisation that I know is being taken advantage of by so many. I would have no problem buying a homeless person a cuppa and a sandwich or donating to the charities I feel are giving to those who TRULY need it. If you feel ok about giving to a charity that I've seen give their (could have been yours) money to people who probably have more money than you that's your choice. The sad part is many people who lost jobs in recent years would be too proud and go hungry rather than see their kids go without for Christmas and the same old scroungers get everything.

    I even remember my parents struggling when I was growing up in the last recession, they were scraping by on what they had and they watched our neighbours get handouts they didn't need. It's not a recent occurrence this has been going on for years. The people who work for them are so sincere its just unfortunate that not all the people are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    OK. So some bloke needs to get free food so he has the cash for his slab of beer. So what. Live and let live. Maybe not having his beer may lead to domestic abuse/violence.

    I'm not making excuses but sometimes there's more to it than meets the eye.

    Judgement is dangerous as nobody knows what goes on behind closed doors or behind the front that any individual is putting up.

    We are all constantly judging others (for better or worse) but usually it's based on our own experiences without taking the experiences and circumstances of others into account - circumstances that we often have no understanding or even the remotest comprehension of.

    The Capuchins have long standing experience in this regard so leave them to it and donate if you can. The cause is a more than worthy one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Dudess wrote: »
    If it's hard to spot, how do you know it's happening?

    An emphatic YES D. Several examples. Much as you prefer to deny it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Dudess wrote: »
    Roma.

    And unless you have the actual stats, you don't know that it's only a few who need it.

    Are these the Romas that are picking up €1800 a week begging? That enough facts for you D?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Originally Posted by samina
    I don't know where you live but where I live they do the rounds weekly handing out money, food and used to give a weeks holiday in a mobile somewhere don't know if they still do this. True they might not be paying for their bolidays in Spain maybe they are giving it the batman instead. Like I say they all work or collect the lone parents and live with their working partners. So he's I do begrudge people getting things for free when there are people who need it and could be getting more only for these people, not that I begrudge them getting it only because I don't because if I had the morals of a dog



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    samina wrote: »
    Who wouldn't feel for the needy? What's confusing is the fact that you don't understand that I won't give to an organisation that I know is being taken advantage of by so many. I would have no problem buying a homeless person a cuppa and a sandwich or donating to the charities I feel are giving to those who TRULY need it. If you feel ok about giving to a charity that I've seen give their (could have been yours) money to people who probably have more money than you that's your choice. The sad part is many people who lost jobs in recent years would be too proud and go hungry rather than see their kids go without for Christmas and the same old scroungers get everything.

    I even remember my parents struggling when I was growing up in the last recession, they were scraping by on what they had and they watched our neighbours get handouts they didn't need. It's not a recent occurrence this has been going on for years. The people who work for them are so sincere its just unfortunate that not all the people are.

    Well said. Speaks volumes really, much as others would try to tut-tut it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    You never asked, and yes I have. If you haven't learned not to judge a book by its cover by the stage of your life I don't know what more can be said to you. Away and beyond that, you still haven't clarified what it is you hope to achieve by coming on with evidence-free claims about droves of spongers draining charitable donations.

    Even worse than the spongers are the CEOs.

    Three times more than Cameron. FFS.:mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    Kernel wrote: »
    pollswwrdwhatwouldreaga.jpg

    Send an extra brigade of Tanks to West Germany? Call on the Senate to fund Stinger missiles for Afghan rebels? What is the relevance here?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Kernel wrote: »
    Of course, I believe that the State should not yet impose any restrictions on people's right to have children, however, I also believe that our current system of Social Welfare is creating an artificial situation in which the underclasses are thriving at the expense of the productive members of the State.

    From what I can see, people (even generations of people) who sit on their arses spawning children which they are not fit to look after are creating huge problems both financially and sociologically (crime). This choice should not be supported by the tax payers as represented by the Government. I think Social Welfare should exist as a temporary measure for those who find themselves out of work, or for our pensioners or disabled people (drug addiction is not a disability), and I think that the Government should look at restructuring Social Welfare as such, whilst promoting contraception in order to engineer a more structured and productive society in the future.

    In it's simplest form it's a numbers game, and the decent honest hard working people are having less children later in life, whereas the underclasses are having more children earlier, and expecting the State to pay for this. In short, they're out-breeding us, and if such a trend continues the problem will increase exponentially in the future.

    Eugenicist.
    Kernel wrote: »
    Another part in the globalist NWO agenda is falling into place. Gaddafi takes over as head of the African Union and wants to remove sovereignty of nations (nations are out, NWO global citizens are in) and create a United States of Africa. This man has changed his tune in recent years, I'll give him that.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7864604.stm

    Conspiracy Theorist.

    Advocate of slavery
    Kernel wrote: »
    Myers speculated that famines are a natural process to control population and harmonise a region by lowering the population to such an extent as to be self-supporting. I agree with this, after much thought. Certainly there are other factors including natural disasters and political leadership.

    Now, onto the conspiracy. If one is to believe an agenda of the NWO, according to the Georgia Guidestones (which btw, I amnot convinced as to the authenticity of) is to reduce the global population to around 800 million, this would involve the culling of billions of people. Let's face it, there are only so many resources on this planet of ours, and once they're gone, we're pretty much donald ducked. In a way population control makes sense. The logic being, why allow 50 children to be born into abject poverty and suffering when you could have 1 child born into a world in which they can live in harmony, receiving a proper amount of resources and assistance. Hitler used sterilisation to achieve this social modelling, believing that by sterilising the 'impure' using the popular concept of Eugenics at the time, that he would be saving countless future generations of suffering and social problems. Obviously, he then decided to also focus on races which he disliked, and went to a concentration camp model to achieve his goals faster (and more inhumanely).

    I have posted a thread here before stating my belief that there is evidence to suggest that AIDS was engineered and spread in Africa as a method of population control. I also believe that, despite market interests in increased availability of labour and consumers, that the population problem is coming to a head, and will be addressed in the future. I would like to know your opinions on this. Do you agree it is a problem? Do you think something should be done? If so, what? And what form do you believe the NWO (remember that decades ago, Henry Kissinger, a person who is believed to have strong NWO links, put forward a memo asking for solutions to the population problem) will take to address this issue?

    Me? I think H5N1 could be one possibility, as a flu virus is an excellent way to spread death through the weaker people of the world. A huge war could be another, although I don't see that likely at this moment in time. Anyway, I hope this might encourage some speculation here rather than the usual arguments.

    Erm...

    False Dichotomy Fascist

    More Eugenics and Paranoia

    Misogynist

    That's just from the first two pages of threads.

    I would advocate that you be ignored.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Eugenicist.



    Conspiracy Theorist.

    Advocate of slavery



    Erm...

    False Dichotomy Fascist

    More Eugenics and Paranoia

    Misogynist

    That's just from the first two pages of threads.

    I would advocate that you be ignored.
    Wew.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Wew.

    Wew?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭LighterGuy


    WindSock wrote: »
    You're only allowed to avail of the service if you are almost starved to death, dressed in rags and are Irish...

    wtf, do you expect the queue to look like this?

    In fairness, I wouldnt be surprised if parts of the que looked like this


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Wew?
    Like a metrosexual "wow", us bushcrafters are all big Ben Affleck fans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    That's just from the first two pages of threads.

    I would advocate that you be ignored.

    Fascist. That's just from your reply to me. Such irony when an anti-fascist calls on censorship and for others to ignore someone. It always amuses me.

    And hehe, yeah I'm proud of those contributions over the years. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Kernel wrote: »
    Fascist. That's just from your reply to me. Such irony when an anti-fascist calls on censorship and for others to ignore someone. It always amuses me.

    And hehe, yeah I'm proud of those contributions over the years. :D

    I didn't say you should be censored. I think people like you should be allowed to soap box your utter crap.

    In fact I'd actually fight for your freedom to spout such paranoid pseudo-scientific nonsense.

    I still think you should be ignored though. You're so far outside the spectrum of people I'd be interested in spending my time on replying to that it's not even funny.

    I will not respond to your nonsense but reserve the option of directing people to the above post so as to save them the trouble of taking you seriously.

    Proud liberal.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    Proud liberal.

    Yeah, liberals have done well for this country, and the West in general haven't they? I used to be a liberal, until I matured.

    I'd rather give my money to these people:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭charlemont


    A lot of wasters just there because they can get something for free.. not because they actually need the food packages.

    There was some fella on the radio a few weeks ago saying about how he travels up from the country every week or so for the free meal. Pissed me off big time

    Another post another day I will tell ye about a man whom we shall know only as Mister P, Its an unbelievable story, He is living like a lord on free stuff..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    charlemont wrote: »
    Another post another day I will tell ye about a man whom we shall know only as Mister P, Its an unbelievable story, He is living like a lord on free stuff..

    There is little doubt that there are these pricks who think getting free stuff from the charitable is cute or smart.

    You know what though? If it makes up a reasonably small % of what's given out to help people who really need it then let the ****ers have it.

    The cost of putting the microscope on everyone because of these filth is too high for the dignity of people who are suffering enough as it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,388 ✭✭✭Kernel


    The cost of putting the microscope on everyone because of these filth is too high for the dignity of people who are suffering enough as it is.

    Whoah whoah, calm down there Adolf. :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭billybudd


    Just in relation to the new white nike, ugg boots etc, you can buy these in charity shops for as little as 2 euro.

    if they where in torn bare feet would it be more acceptable?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Freddie59 wrote: »
    Dudess wrote: »
    Roma.

    And unless you have the actual stats, you don't know that it's only a few who need it.

    Are these the Romas that are picking up €1800 a week begging? That enough facts for you D?
    Please stop referring to me as D as if we're buddies. And lol at anyone who believes all Roma earn 1800 a week. How Christian...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Kernel wrote: »
    Proud liberal.

    Yeah, liberals have done well for this country, and the West in general haven't they? I used to be a liberal, until I matured.

    I'd rather give my money to these people:
    What is your definition of a liberal? Without insults.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,951 ✭✭✭dixiefly


    Id queue up to be served by a monkey too, that would be awesome!

    Even considering that this is After Hours the above is a disgraceful comment. I sometimes work nearby and the Capuchins provide a much needed service all year. This is now highlighted because its Christmas but they will be taking care of the homeless & needy in January just like they did last January and using this thread to have a swipe at the persons organising the service is pathetic. In fact as far as I am aware those serving are civilians.

    Lets hope life stays nice and good for you and you dont have to lower yourself to be served by a "monkey" as you say.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Oh ffs it was a bit of good-natured wordplay. There is a type of monkey called a capuchin. Not once did he even vaguely appear to be having a go at the organisation and the work it does.

    There are actual nasty posts here - bizarre one to pick on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Dudess wrote: »
    Please stop referring to me as D as if we're buddies. And lol at anyone who believes all Roma earn 1800 a week. How Christian...

    Ah you never fail D.:) So now that evidence is produced - as you demanded - it's only "some"?:rolleyes:


Advertisement