Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1107610771079108110821836

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Just saw this post.

    £50k is more than I was thinking, but I don't have enough knowledge to settle on an ideal figure (none of us do).

    Anyway, it's not penalising Leinster. It's redrawing how central contracts work.

    Each Leinster CC player would still be getting the great majority of his contract paid for by the IRFU. And the other provinces would each be paying for the first £50k of their own CC players. Not as much money, but fair in principle.

    If you're happy that the much greater number of CCs are held by Leinster, and that disparity doesn't bother you, why would the disparity that they're paying back more though my suggested system bother you? They're still getting a massive swathe off their wage bill.

    And what you don't then have is people arguing about who does or doesn't deserve a CC, and ridiculous notions about quotas of CCs across the province. And you're still getting incentivised to produce players good enough for a CC, because you're still getting most of their wages paid for.

    And the other three academies improve, bolstering the quality of the players available to Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I've wondered for a while now if that's why we stutter at RWCs. We've prioritised cohesion, which I completely understand and appreciate,and while that benefits us massively in the 6 Nations and autumn internationals, it's much less of a boost with the longer lead-in for all teams at the RWC. Other teams have time to improve their own cohesion and it's not the advantage it is in other competitions.

    Sorry -that was in relation to Fitzgea1's post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Didn't ye just win the league? While Leinster won nothing.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    Ya I've thought that myself, it's probably why we seem to peak too early. But to be fair, any of us in Andy Farrell's position would do the same thing. If 2 players of similar quality are going for the same spot and one them plays club rugby with half the team, then it makes the decision of who to pick a lot easier.

    I think the coaching set ups at the other provinces need to be looked at too. Munster seem to have a different game plan depending on what players are available. It's hard to see what the long term plan is there. That can't help with young players development.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Agreed. But we also talk bout different provinces having their own identity etc... it's difficult.

    And a lot of it is chance. Matt O'Connor was very highly regarded, and as I recall, the players loved him. If JvG hadn't left them in the lurch, Munster wouldn't have tasted success under Rowntree. And we thought McFarland Wlwas turning us around - in reality it was Payne and Peel. We (Ulster) just need a bit of luck again... (He said, in hope.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭TheSunIsShining


    There was a small murmur before of a fifth team....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Don't disagree with any of that. But I think it might be time to start putting more money into -and pressure on - the other academies. I'm distressed by a match day 23 with no Ulster players in it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭TheSunIsShining


    Well from a set-up point of view, Munster is easier to split. Already have the North and South split in the Branch and have Thomond and Musgrave Parks.

    In terms of player depth Leinster is obviously the obvious one.

    And in terms of history, you had the exiles in the interpros for a while as I recall...



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Split St Michael's college in two



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,615 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Get rid of CCs, increase bonuses to players for making the international squads, tournament squads, match day 23s. Would be fairer and reflective of player performance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,027 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I doubt the players would go for this at all. What happens if a first-choice international tears his cruciate in the first game of the season?

    You'd also then have to limit the size of training squads, thus making it harder for guys to get a break.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,484 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    A guy with a torn ligament is no longer first choice, unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The money will still be going to Leinster player and people will still moan and complain, it will be just a new version of the complaining

    Plus do you remove the CC from Ulster so they are now in a worse position?
    Or so it just remove CC from Leinster and let everyone else have them? 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Was the imbalance intended/expected? Yes and no.

    The whole set-up is geared to producing test-level player to populate the Irish team which drives the whole IRFU.

    What we've seen in the last ten years is one province do exactly what it's supposed to, so yes that bit was intended, even if we didn't expect it to be quite so successful.

    On the flip side, the other two bulk suppliers to the national team have fallen off a cliff, so no, that bit was not intended or expected.

    But the bit that is working as it should seems to be the problem?

    I know a certain poster will come along, call me disingenuous and say that Ulster/Munster can never match Leinster's output, or some other trite deflection, but next season, there will ONE centrally contracted product of the Ulster and Munster academies combined. One. And you'd struggle to point to anyone and say they're hard done by not to have one. Yeah POM could have got another year, what odds would that make in the bigger picture?

    The imbalance is not due to the favourable treatment of Leinster, which again, we've yet to hear an explanation for why the Aussie and English guy would do so, it's down to the collapse of the Ulster and Munster conveyor belts.

    But apparently Jordie Barrett going on a J1 is the issue.

    @Former Former Former

    I've never mentioned "favourable treatment of Leinster". I've literally said the opposite; that it like wasn't intended / expected.

    I've also never mentioned that "Jordie Barrett going on a J1" / central contracts are "the" issue. They are an issue.

    The points about player development are obviously fair. But if the purposes of central contracts was to keep the best players in Ireland, and also to reduce the financial burden of those players on the Provinces (plural), then we have some unintended consequences here.

    If this is an outlier in the distribution of central contracts across the Provinces since their inception (and it is, by an order of magnitude), then it seems perfectly reasonable for fans of other provinces to question the current setup.

    The fact the IRFU are conducting a review suggests, at least, there are a few questions worth asking here.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    I don't think the purpose of central contracts is to explicitly reduce the financial burden of those players on the provinces; I always thought it was more an acknowledgement that these players are of such significance to the national team that they have to be negotiated with centrally so as to ensure their retention for Ireland.

    The only solution that will remedy the imbalance in central contracts is when Ulster & Munster are producing players worthy of receiving them. There are already guys in the pipeline who look like this will apply to them - you could make a case for all of Jack Crowley (probably his next contract possibly), Craig Casey (further down the road), Brian Gleeson (obviously further away), David McCann (who knows?) and guys like that in time.



  • kingofnazareth was warned for this.
    This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Then why do you think the IRFU think a review is worthwhile?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    I have honestly no idea, but it could be for a multitude of reasons.

    I'd imagine they did not enjoy the public spectacle this year around POM's contract, for example, and how that all played out publicly, and realised they need to get more on the same page with the management team and the provinces around managing the 'final' contracts of certain players.

    Possibly a scenario where you've guys like JGP as a nailed on starter for years but not on a central contract, while his back up is is something that needs to be discussed?

    People can attach whatever label they want to the type of contract, but ultimately the players who are on central contracts at the moment are the ones who deserve them, and the IRFU are going to do what they can do to ensure the very best players are consistently retained and available for Ireland. That isn't going to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    All reports suggest JGP is getting a central contract at the end of this season, right? So that hardly seems to be like a something that would trigger a review. (There are plenty of examples over the years of provincially-contracted guys getting selected ahead of centrally-contracted guys; this often comes up when people incorrectly claim CC players have to start / be selected).

    I'd suggest the biggest imbalance in CC's, by an order of magnitude, since their inception is far higher up the agenda.

    (An aside, but I'm interested if you have data on which players were centrally contracted over the years?)

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    What do you think a review there is going to tell them?

    Q: Why do Leinster have the most central contracts at present?

    A: Leinster have the best players at the moment. They are the bulk supplier to the Irish team.

    Follow up Q: Why do Leinster have the best players at the moment?

    A: Because Leinster have by far the most productive academy system. 8 of the 10 proposed Leinster CC recipients are Leinster Academy products (plus the Munster CC recipient too).

    This is the line of thinking I can't seem to follow - people griping about Leinster's disparity in CCs seem to think the solution is to allow them (Munster & Ulster) to sign more NIQs? How will that improve the number of CC's ultimately awarded to Munster or Ulster?

    The only solution to that problem is Munster or Ulster need to produce players worthy of CCs.

    What you, and no one else so far, have managed to do is show any kind of link between Leinster's current huge collection of CCs and Leinster's ability to continue to produce players worthy of CCs. For that to have been the case, you'd think Leinster would have had a huge overweight allocation of CCs c. 10 years ago when this current crop were coming through, but that isn't the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,027 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The existing high performance director has been in charge for ten years, the central contract system has been in place for more than 20 years. Bringing in a new director would seem to be a logical point to do a review.

    I don't think it's an admission of failure of the system at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    That's all fair, but it does suggest there may be questions worth answering.

    That it coincides with the biggest imbalance in CC's, by an order of magnitude, since their inception (tm, at this point) I'd agree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,027 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    And this imbalance coincides with the most successful period in the national team's history, and success of the national team is absolutely paramount.

    I'm not sure the IRFU is going to see it quite the same way you do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    They may also ask questions like the following.

    Q: If the imbalance of central contracts means Leinster can afford Jordie Barrett as a squad player, could that money be better spent elsewhere in the eco-system towards helping other provinces produce more players good enough to receive central contracts, without materially impacting Leinster?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Which may be the case, and they may keep the status quo which is currently compounding Leinster's natural advantage.

    Here's the thing; do you think this will impact fans (and therefore the IRFU) in the long run? I think it's definitely an issue, and one the IRFU need to (and will) consider.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    One thing I find strange, at best the 4 Irish provinces have 3 trophies to go after each season. The URC, Challange Cup and Champions Cup.

    The last team to win the Challange Cup is Leinster over 10 years ago. I don't see why some of the other provinces haven't made a push to win it when you look at the list of teams who have won that trophy.

    Yet again this season Ireland had 2 teams in that competition after dropping down and both could of won it but didn't. Now that has nothing to do with Leinster and winning any trophy would of been a huge lift for the provinces.

    The extra revenue from winning that as well would also help in terms of investment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    "Disparity doesn't bother you" That's a beut and unnecessary. Unfortunately I think I'm just going to have to disagree.

    In simple terms I would have no problem if Ulster had the majority of all of the central contracts. None at all.

    I've already given an example of why the IRFU aren't going to ask Leinster to pay a portion of their CC. I could spend another hour or two explaining the damage this would do and why they wouldn't then use this "centrally saved money to bolster the Ulster, Connacht and Munster academies, and talent identification systems" - Using Ulster as a specific example and highlighting the shambles they have made from top to bottom.

    I've championed for Baloucone, Lowry and Hume all to be given their chance with Ireland. I could spend another hour listing the absolute hames Ulster have made of the player development of Baloucone, Lowry, Doak, Hume and Stockdale.

    Stockdale! The starting winger for Ireland in Feb 2020 when he signed his 3 year Central Contract. He wasn't offed a new central contract because his form has nosedived. That's the policy and it makes complete sense.

    I would not be surprised if Stockdale, McCloskey, Baloucone, Lowry, O'Toole and few more all have that €110k portion of their contracts paid by the IRFU in that 'Tier 1 scale'.

    Just because they aren't on CC's doesn't mean Ulster aren't already subsidised. We also don't know how many of these Tier 1 contracts Leinster have.

    Its impossible to be definitive without all the details been made available. None you us know the extent of what the IRFU have pumped into Ulster.

    "Interestingly, the IRFU are undertaking a review of their contractual system, which will be completed before Humphreys takes over from Nucifora."

    For all we know the basis of this review could be:

    -Should we continue subsidising so many of these Tier 1 (€110k) and Tier 2(€90k) contracts?

    -Should we reduce the amount of them because we aren't getting enough return on investment?

    -Should we let the likes of a Stockdale leave Ulster and call him up to the national squad if he improves/injuries?

    -Should we use those actual real savings to help further assist/expand clubs, academy's, coaching within those provinces?

    -Should we use these actual real saving for more Emerging Ireland tours and games?



Advertisement
Advertisement