Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deposit return scheme (recycling)

Options
1135136138140141182

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,970 ✭✭✭Genghis


    I would be happy to accept contrary evidence to my own numbers, ideally actual data.

    I wonder why re-turn haven't released such data, I have no doubt that if they could say only 20% of items sold since 1 Feb had a deposit paid, they would. It would show that c.50% of items sold with deposit had been collected by them.

    Until we get actual data, the anecdote of an anonymous poster buying 6 un-named items at an undisclosed location on a date not shared is not something I will accept as reflecting the actual market either, even if the good poster claims to be 'not typical'.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Rigor Mortis


    Yep the mandate in directives so far was for returns. But no country has reached the mandate level without a DRS. The new EU regulations (PPWR) make it mandatory unless you have an 80% collection rate by 2026/27.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,131 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    What I would like to see is the euro amount that is total amount of the difference between deposits and returns.

    Someone is making a LOT of money from this and it isnt the victims who are making it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,986 ✭✭✭thesandeman


    It's coming up on Claire Byrne again today.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭TokTik


    Someone always makes money from these ridiculous ideas. It’s never the little guy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,970 ✭✭✭Genghis


    Indeed.

    The scheme is generating hundreds of thousands of Euros in excess deposits per day. Some of this cash is legitimately designed and is needed to fund the operation of the scheme. The remainder, what is done with it, and how decisions are being made should be of interest to us all.

    At some point we will find out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,677 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    It's industrial scale lunacy.

    70%+ of the machines I have passed in the past number of weeks have either been shuttered or out of order, with lines of people with bags of trash looking at them wondering what to do.

    It's nothing short of a sick control experiment, if you did it to a hamster you would be arrested for animal cruelty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭jj880


    Imagine if the French government tried to implement a scheme exactly the same as Re-Turn.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭sjb25




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,506 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    I am not against the idea behind the deposit return scheme. It works in many other countries and we had a version of it many years ago in terms of glass bottles.

    But, as is usual in many aspects of Irish life, the rollout seems to have been incredibly badly handled. Instead of going out to minimise any, relatively easy-to-foresee, issues by over servicing etc, they seem to have taken the approach that in effect it is a full-on beta test and things will simply work over time.

    Of course, that is true, as there is no other option. But it's going to lead to significant negative feelings about the scheme and that will lead to lower return rates and people will eventually opt to simply take charge of an additional price increase and simply throw out the cans/bottles in the green bin.

    Why are the machines breaking down so much?

    Why introduce bottle caps that stay fixed whilst asking for bottle caps to be removed?

    Why is there no take-back requirement for online delivery? When I buy a new fridge etc the delivery company is required to collect my old one (if I wish). The same should apply here.

    Why the need for a printed voucher? Surely the option for direct pay to Google Pay etc should have been designed from the start?

    Why are some shops allowed to be exempt from collection? Are they also exempt from the charge?

    Who is keeping the balance of the unclaimed amounts?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,514 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Macron would end up on an island before the year was done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,714 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    On Radio1, the breakdown of the cost for retailers is horrendous!

    Retailer says she needs 666 bottles/day in order to break even (@ 2.2c each), and then there is extra electricity atop that

    Re-turn CEO now on



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Rigor Mortis


    To answer a few questions

    The breakdown levels seem to be high and in particular in one retailer. Its strange cos with the exception of two of the manufacturers, these machines are around for years. But i do know from work that the down time has reduced consistently since week one and is now getting to where it needs to be.

    Attached caps have nothing to do with the scheme. Thats a separate EU law and it is mandatory across the Eu by July 1. The ask to keep them on appears to be with one retailer only and again is not in line with the scheme guidance.

    Takeback for online would be hugely expensive. you cant compare a fridge that you buy once to a requirement for a retailer to take back what is possibly the faastest moving consumer good. That said, i think that this may be somethign they end up addressing.

    The Google pay thing or some version will probably happen. I would imagine that the intention was to keep it simple from the start.

    Shop exemptions are the norm and were demanded by the retail sector. These schemes arent easy to implement and although the retailer gets a fee, for some they wont see the value at first. From what I'm hearing the UK scheme will have even greater exemption levels. Normal shops are not exempt from charging.

    Re-turn keeps the unclaimed deposits. It is part of what funds the scheme. Again, this is the norm across schemes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,334 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The exemption here is 250 square metres. What's the UK exemption?

    I read that Wales seem to be looking at a different solution retaining a role for kerbside collection:

    Education and engagement will therefore need to be a key intervention in
    the introduction of the DRS and communications will need to counter
    perceptions that the scheme unfairly places the burden for recycling on
    consumers and offers little benefit over existing recycling kerbside
    recycling.

    https://cyfarfodyddpwyllgor.siryfflint.gov.uk/documents/s500002742/Welsh%20Government%20Deposit%20Return%20Scheme.pdf?LLL=1#:~:text=The%20DRS%20in%20Wales%20is,covered%20by%20the%20DRS%20producers.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,677 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Why is there no take-back requirement for online delivery? When I buy a new fridge etc the delivery company is required to collect my old one (if I wish). The same should apply here.

    Do you want your food delivered in the same vehicle that collects trash? Bottles and cans left outside with rats and dogs píssing on them?

    Why the need for a printed voucher? Surely the option for direct pay to Google Pay etc should have been designed from the start?

    Because a voucher makes you consume more, not less. The voucher also locks you into that large retailer.

    It's to increase footfall to the larger retailers, it's no secret it's on the website.

    Why are some shops allowed to be exempt from collection? Are they also exempt from the charge?

    I wouldn't shop in a place that also sorted through trash. No one is exempt. The retailer gets charged the deposit.

    Manual processing has to be manual inspected one by one, the smaller retailers were asked for hand held scanners but were told no.

    Too much hassle.

    Who is keeping the balance of the unclaimed amounts?

    Re-Turn.

    Chit Ching. The harder they fail the richer they get and it's the consumers fault.

    You don't think this lunacy was designed for the benefit of the environment or the consumer, do you?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,318 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    The French government has postponed until fall its decision on introducing a bottle deposit scheme. Compliant with European goals, such a system would nonetheless clash with efforts by local authorities to collect and resell used plastic.

    https://www.lemonde.fr/en/environment/article/2023/07/17/bottle-deposits-a-crucial-factor-in-reducing-plastic-use_6056022_114.html#:~:text=The%20French%20government%20has%20postponed,collect%20and%20resell%20used%20plastic.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The fixed bottle caps is a seperate EU directive; and the shops asking for them to be removed are doing it of their own accord; possibly due to using flimsy heaps of crap as machines. Neither is part of the scheme. See also flimsy heaps of crap for breakdowns - it seems that Lidl machines are overwhelmingly the ones reported here as breaking down and they happen to be the ones asking you to take the caps off to reduce strain on the crushing/shredding components…

    Shops are exempt based on size, they are not exempt from charging

    The scheme operator is funded in part by unclaimed deposits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 159 ✭✭Ivor_Guddon


    Was a lad in glasnevin who printed off fake labels or the barcodes whatever is used for the machines and made over €200 in 3 days labelling old cans etc

    Not sure if he is still at it , if so fair play



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,936 ✭✭✭Daith


    There's talk of increasing the deposit rate to motivate people, but also I think if we do that, then if all machines are broken in a shop, you should be able to get a voucher from customer service and it should be double or triple the deposit fee.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,318 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    Re-turn would argue that they don't supply the machines .............



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,478 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    They've still got big sellers like Monster still without deposit. Going to probably be a lot of stuff flogged off cheap in June at this rate.

    I do my Tesco shopping online, and from the start of February, only the Re-turn/deposit version of Monster was available (and a very small range too!). I've also seen Monster on sale in Adli, also with the deposit.

    I don't go to Dunnes so maybe that's where you have seen the deposit-less version, but I definitely haven't.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It was a (very large) Centra

    The vast majority of products in that pack size are bought in non-supermarket retailers; supermarkets volume of soft drinks is done in 1L+ bottles (was going to say 2L but they're actually pretty rare now due to Coke shrinkflation) and multipacks. This is why a figure of what is and isn't logoed in a supermarket is really no use for figuring out the total in the market.

    Supervalu near me has the largest range of chilled 330-500ml soft drinks I've ever seen in a supermarket and even then, its a fraction of what a normal convenience store has.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Rigor Mortis


    Not published yet, but I work in the packaging industry and the last briefing we got was that they were looking at broader exemptions. This may be because other than politics, one of the main reasons the Scotish early launch got binned was retailer antipathy.

    Wales has been talking about digital kerbside options for a while but the trials have not stacked up in the way that would suggest a large scheme would work. I would imagine when the new uk regulations are published (possibly in the coming days) that they will leave the door open to a digital solution long term, although probably not a kerbside one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭bog master


    I was under the impression from the Minister that unclaimed deposits funds the scheme. If not, where is this other funding coming from?



  • Registered Users Posts: 159 ✭✭Ivor_Guddon


    i've actually stopped buying 24 box cans , can't be fecked tbh



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Rigor Mortis


    Other funding comes from producer fee, between 2 and 5c for every bottle put on the market and sale of plastic back to the producers when its collected.

    For anyone on here who was saying that the plastic would go in the incinerator, this is the reason it wont, its too valuable. Now its separate from all the other waste, it is even more valuable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,334 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Selling on the returned items, especially the cans.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Producers pay a fee per item. Re-turn get to sell the material, the aluminium has an appreciable value and the PET has some limited, highly fluctuating, value.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,970 ✭✭✭Genghis


    The issue of how much re-turn are cashing in from unclaimed deposits mentioned at start of Liveline. They are coming to it later in the show.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭jj880


    Very good article. After removing the pay wall some excellent (and familiar) points are raised:

    Charlotte Soulary, head of advocacy at Zero Waste, also lamented the confusion in the debates. "Behind the deposit, there's the issue of establishing a value for a container, but recycling and reuse have nothing to do with that. The aim is to put an end to plastic pollution, and the deposit could have a detrimental effect by further encouraging plastic consumption," she said.

    Minister for Ecological Transition and Territorial Cohesion Christophe Béchu doesn't intend to get bogged down in a narrow debate over deposits either, and he has broadened the issue to encompass plastic pollution. "If we don't reverse the curve," he said, "the plastics industry will account for 6% to 10% of greenhouse gas emissions by mid-century. By 2050, there will be as much plastic in the ocean as there are fish."

    Will a deposit for recycling plastic bottles see the light of day in France? "There's no question of simply saying, 'If you don't want the deposit, okay, we won't implement it'," said Béchu. "No more so than declaring, 'We need to make this system widespread'." According to the minister, the country must continue looking for alternatives that will enable it to meet its recycling goals.

    Repak made a superb submission here regarding concerns with Re-Turn.

    The question is will the French have a pantomime consultation process then ignore everything like our gombeens or will they actually listen before trying to ram a money grabbing shambles down everyone's throats?

    I know where my money would be on how the French will do it.

    Post edited by jj880 on


Advertisement