Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Who Watches the Watchmen (Our Chit Chat Thread)

Options
1187188190192193340

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Thank you Thirdfox, quick thinking, but unfortunately I wouldnt be into the two tone stuff at all. Especially gold tones are an absolute NoNo for me personally.

    Its the 2252.50.00 in classic steel/black I would consider.

    Will stay put for now cos I bought the Steinhart ocean 39 gmt. And while its like not buying the Mercedes but buying the Honda that looks a bit like it, the inner monkey will be happy (for now).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    The steinhart ocean one is a brilliant watch .I had one with the ceramic bezel and the quality is every bit as good as an omega and more comfortable on the wrist than the I find the seamaster

    The only negative and the reason I moved it on is the whole “homage “ watch issue .If that doesn’t bother you I don’t think you get a better watch for under €500



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Thanks, great to hear its a good quality watch since I bought one since.

    The homage thing is not an issue with me. What homage is it would you say? Rolex Submariner or Explorer 2 or so I guess? Is there something like that in 39mm?

    Anyway. Anyone I know, they might have heard of Rolex or Omega, but they wouldnt know one from the other never mind an 'homage'. So the only critic, the only one who knows, would be me and i can be quite forgiving on myself especially if the difference is 10k. :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,405 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Homages are just watches whose design is derived from some more expensive watch. I don't believe my Steinhart is as good as a Rolex Submariner but I'm not willing to pay the considerable difference in price so am quite content to wear a quality 'homage'.

    Lots of people wearing 'submariners' are actually wearing fakes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,387 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Im sure you’ll enjoy it.I haven’t had a higher quality watch for similar money. The bracelet is so far ahead of Seiko or Tag.

    i had the 42 mm ocean one and it’s near identical in appearance to a sub .pics below .

    I paid €9k for the sub and I think €400ish for the ocean 1 so the sub was roughly 20 times the price of the steinhart but it’s not 20 times the timepiece.

    9BA341DF-4CE7-415C-9F4F-2C8A79BEF767.jpeg E3443C7C-8E6B-4363-923A-75694E77670F.jpeg


    So the only critic, the only one who knows, would be me

    I'm exactly the same , I buy watches I like for my own reasons and only care if I like them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Nothing wrong with a homage once your happy with it and enjoy it.

    The fake watch wearers are usually easy enough to spot just by them being themselves.

    I never met a watch enthusiast who flashes his watch around and they’re usually as proud of their €100 oddball watch as they are their more expensive watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    It is near identical. wow. And the gmt I bought is near identical to the explorer 2.

    Is Rolex ok with that? I imagine if Toyota released a car that looks near identical to a Mercedes the latter wouldnt be impressed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,387 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    They have closer copies of the sub than that I think or they did . Not much Rolex can do about it, there are tonnes of submariner homages .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Have to agree with this. If you spot an expensive watch on someone you can usually tell from the overall picture whether the watch is genuine or not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,387 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Hulk homage

    https://www.steinhartwatches.de/en/ocean-one-39-double-green-ceramic-premium.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Inspecting these now especially the ocean one gmt vs explorer 2.

    Near identical but for one obvious and big difference. Black vs silver bezel. Think the black on the Steinhart is actually nicer. The Steinhart wouldnt have caught my eye at all with a silver bezel.

    Besides that, even though I thought homage or not doesnt bother me I'm actually kinda glad there is an obvious difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,387 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Is it not a copy of the Rolex GMT rather than the explorer 2?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Ye looks like it. Ah well, like I said, I'll be the only one who knows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,012 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    "The bracelet is so far ahead of Seiko or Tag."

    Is it?

    Seiko Ti bracelet 1.jpg Seiko Ti bracelet 2.jpg Seiko Ti bracelet 3.jpg Seiko Ti bracelet 3b.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Without a doubt . I can hear the rattle by just looking at those pics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,627 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I know very little about watches. I have a sentimental association to the Rolex Sub-Mariner as my dad had one for many years, and every time I see one, like in the photo above, I'm immediately reminded of my dad. We sailed and he dived, and always had his sub mariner on his wrist. He's long since passed away and if I remember correctly he either somehow lost the Rolex, or his 2nd wife kept it and said nothing - which is fine either way.

    I've often toyed with the idea of getting one myself, but then seeing the 'Rolex waiting list' thread here made me realise it wouldn't be worth the hassle, to even try to get involved....

    I did a few years ago buy a Tag Heuer Aqua Racer Calibre 5 (which at over €1,200 was for me a lot to pay simply for a wrist watch). I wanted a half decent watch that would hopefully last a lifetime, which I could eventually pass on to my son. However since owning it it's been a bit of a disaster. It was losing a few seconds every day, so I opened it up myself and adjusted the moment to get it down to less than half a second, which was fine (I'm aware I broke the factory seal and it would no longer be fully waterproof), but then about a year later I dinged it off a ceramic door handle on my kitchen door which cracked the glass face, so I sent it over to Tag in the U.K. to be repaired (which meant it also required a full service) to the tune of about £500. About a year or 2 later I was finding it harder and harder to close the crown after winding it up as the threads were simply not biting anymore, and eventually completely gave out and the crown now sits out meaning the watch is no longer sealed. Since then I was gifted a Fitbit which I'd wear daily for simple time telling duties, so had almost forgotten about the Tag, but lately I'm getting the itch to wear it again, particularly when sailing so would need the crown fixed.

    It's just that I'm reluctant to pump more money into it in case it goes bad again!! Are Tag's simply bad watches, or did I simply buy a dud?


    I haven't received any quotes for a repair but I'm guessing a few hundred euro at the minimum?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,041 ✭✭✭✭micks_address


    I dont know about them being bad watches per se but you're not the first person ive heard that have had issues with Tag... i suppose no matter what the product there will always be some troublesome samples



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    I'd have to say you had an unfortuante experience.

    I have Tag Heuer Formula 1 Professional chrono with a quartz ETA movement.

    I had it resealed once since I bought it new in late 2001. It got my through my PADI open water licence and then my advanced open water licence too. It is now a sort of holiday watch, as I know it will stand up to the rigours of beach and pool, while still being comfortable and unobtrusive.

    A mate services it (in so much as you can with quartz) and I got a spare movement when I heard they were getting rare. It was my first good watch and has deep emotional connections from watching F1 as a kid in the 80s. It still works as well today as it ever did and a battery lasts about 2-3 years, even with light chrono use. I even used it to time race laps in Mondello (not while riding).

    I'm not a Tag fan boy, and get laughed at for having a quartz F1 Pro by real 'officianados', but I like it and it is staying :)



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,388 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I'm not a Tag fan boy, and get laughed at for having a quartz F1 Pro by real 'officianados', but I like it and it is staying :)

    TAG Heuer tends to get dog's abuse from watch nerds and it's not warranted. They were very popular among "ordinary people" for a time and geeks really don't like that and they weren't "pure" Heuer, because TAG bought them out. Which is bollocks too. They had to be saved because they were fecked. Heuer were for the most part more a style brand than watchmakers anyway but they were very good at styling. I've had a few vintage Heuer in my time and they redifined the word delicate. When TAG took over they very much upped the quality standards within a few years.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    While not beyond the odd typo myself, it is not in any way confidence inspiring when someone is looking for 6 large for a luxury timepiece, and can't spell the damn thing correctly!

    Braitling_Bently.jpg

    Always liked a nice Baitling, me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,125 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    @AndyBoBandy - I'd forget about that TAG. You know you want the sub, they are incredibly robust. And if you lost it, you'd be covered by your home insurance if you add it as a specified all risk item. The only problem is finding the money to buy one. Forget about buying it new from a Rolex authorized dealer, you will need to buy from a second hand dealer or privately. They are a lot of money, but keep their value well (in fact they have gone up in value by about 10% per year for the last few years), are quickly turned back into cash should you ever need to.

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,388 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    IMHO Unkel that's really bad advice. Please do not get me wrong, this isn't some anti Rolex thing. Pretty much since this forum started and in "real life" when someone asked me as "someone into watches" what to buy as a "good watch", my advice was always along the lines of; avoid vintage, secondhand can get you bargains, look at Rolex Sub/Omega Speedmaster/Mid range Seiko Diver(I'd add a Sinn in here for a left field take)[delete as applicable for budget and taste], Cartier Tank for the ladies. Now some might suggest Tudor, but that would be for many people an "instead of" the Rolex version and leave people unsatisfied. They tend to have a high turnover of owners likely because of that. I'd still say the Speedie(though not the "special editions") for a generally non watch person. They don't seem to stay on actual watch fans wrists for long for some reason. I'd try one on first though.

    However if one were looking for the definition of a trend and bubble the madness around Rolex prices would be hard to beat. When it pops is anyone's guess* but it's a certain feature of one when those in it, dealers, investors and invested owners are guaranteed to exclaim it'll never happen, that the market will always remain stable and even go up, even when you point out the reality that ten years ago secondhand Rolex Subs were an ample saving on new and new could be had for discount. Or that they're not actually rare or hard to get, but the market and fashion has inflated the price, yet another sign of a bubble. On Chrono24(watch sales outlet) alone there are nearly five and a half thousand of the things over 90 pages. And that's just Subs on one outlet. And keep an eye over a few months. Bugger all are actually selling. Or people not being able to get/afford a Sub will "settle" for another in the range just to get on the fast moving train. Can't buy a gaff in Dublin in 06? Buy one in Meath and commute. Of course house prices will always rise you moron. You won't lose money anyway.

    General trends of bubbles:

    Awareness: when the market sees something which garners attention, often in times of economic uncertainty and low interest rates. Check.

    Boom: People rush to get on board this train as prices rise, regardless of the value or rarity of the item. Check

    Euphoria: People are invested now and horse trading and flippers and dealers keep pushing and making hay. Interest is at its highest. Check.

    Stagnation: People are happy that the values are stable, even climbing and some get into debt buying the item, but the actual movement of the item has slowed, or people can't get one, so look to something similar because they need to be on the train. Check.

    -This is the time for the sensible to get shot of the item in question, but generally those most invested, sellers and buyers are cocksure of the market, so don't and more often keep stoking the fire. This is NOT the time to be buying and IMHO this is now-

    Bust. Confidence changes for all sorts of reasons and it doesn't take much. The most invested try to offload their items, but this is contagious and supply outstrips demand and values fall off a cliff.

    Now this part remains to be seen and certainly the timeframe is up for grabs, but given Rolex prices have followed every single other criteria of a bubble/fad it's only a question of when. I can't see Rolexes being sold off for a hundred quid 😁 but I can see the market readjust back to ten years ago as the fashion shifts and "investors" leave. New more expensive than secondhand and discounts available on new from some quarters.


    Again this is IMHO but AndyBo is dead right when he said it wouldn't be worth the hassle, to even try to get involved.... If this were say 2013 I'd be right behind you Unkel, but it isn't and that's why I think it very bad advice for a newb watch buyer.






    *I have noticed an increase in some US and European based car collectors quietly selling off some of their collections and interest rates are rising. Collectables as investments tend to take a hit when that happens. There's also the fashion element of it too. Damn near everything in the watch world is revolving around Rolex at the moment and it's extremely saturated. Try and find a 'tube watch channel that doesn't feature them. That's another surefire sign of a trend nearing its passing and it doesn't take much for it to shift at that point. Over the years I've seen TAG peak and fall, IWC were huge and then weren't. You couldn't breathe for bumping into Panerai and they're now dead as dodos. In the vintage world where things are actually finite and can be actually rare the market is stagnated, even completely dead in some segments. Prices are high, even crazy but again bugger all is shifting. A recent editorial(AKA sales pitch) on Hodinkee was trying to pimp small gold dress watches as the new vintage trend because they're on thin ice everywhere else and they're one of the few outlets moving pieces, but they're a very rarified market and buyer base.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,012 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    For about the cost of servicing that TAG you could get this SEIKO titanium divers watch for sailing: https://buyee.jp/item/yahoo/auction/b1028353846?lang=en&rc=yaucb

    Seiko Orange Ti diver.jpg


    Accuracy mighn't be up to your standards, though, but corrosion resistance to seawater and robustness - if it's that type of sailing - would be exceptional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    I know it’s the norm for people to think of their watch as a store of cash but I think that’s a dangerous view for most of us .I assume that most us using this forum are regulars joes that get up every morning and do a days work and those of us that fit in that bracket could find better and safer investments than watches worth thousands.

    I think watches are toys for men and should be viewed as such . It’s nice for the man maths to show us we’re in profit but a watch purchase at our watch collection level should be treated as the money is spent and gone cause fire sales when cash is needed is always expensive



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,856 ✭✭✭✭893bet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,571 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    @Wibbs

    Heuer were for the most part more a style brand than watchmakers anyway but they were very good at styling.

    They certainly were. I came across this 1970's Heuer Daytona on r/watchexchange the other day and had to calm myself down to not buy one immediately. I mean look at this beauty!

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,360 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The 321 didn't stay dead for long. Had a look at the "new" steel on steel version...

    £12k sterling for a Speedie, that Omega have decided is "Heritage"...


    Madness!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 945 ✭✭✭njburke


    IMG-20220103-WA0000.jpg

    I have gifted a brother two watches over the years. A 1968 seikomatic P birth year for his 50th and a Seiko solar 200m diver for hooking him into scuba diving. Guess which one he showers with.

    I'm drying it out, and will get serviced asap.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,856 ✭✭✭✭893bet


    Did you see the price of the gold one.

    72k!!!!!



Advertisement
Advertisement