Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Remote working - the future?

1121315171831

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    This, exactly this. In the one week we were dragged back in last summer, this is essentially what happened. Calls were still taking place over teams as the most of the folks were not in the office due to department being split into WFH/office at any given time. Nonsensical. We were told today that 'everyone' is going back next week, albeit for 2/5 days. For my particular job this makes absolutely no sense as I'll be scrambling to try find a quiet space (instead of an open plan floor) to deliver online training.



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I was struggling with stuff like that long before the pandemic. The open plan office was the worst idea in the history of bad ideas, and anytime I hear the various arguments against fulltime WFH, whereby many homes are not suitable, I think of the various open plan offices I've worked in and think "And that was a suitable working environment?". Noisy, hard to focus, soulless environments.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    I would even settle for the hellscape that is portrayed in the movie office space (cubicles), over our over open plan lay out. It is impossible to concentrate with the commotion going on at the best of times.



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The Matrix trailer came out last week, which prompted me to watch the original. Neo was in a nice, chest high cubicle, as were all his colleagues. Open plan office but with cubicles. I've worked in one like that. The cubicle partitions were covered in felt which absorbed sound. Meaning the office was quieter.

    Someone, somewhere decided to get rid of them, and it became a fashion. Easy knowing the people who make such decisions, don't have to work in that environment.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The reason behind why they were removed was largely driven by tech startup. Its was far, far cheaper to buy a big table and a load of chairs to sit 10-16 people around it, than to provide cubicles for each person.

    It became "cool" to not have cubicles until people started to realize how much distraction there is without them.

    My own place is moving towards removing them too, but is laying out a new style of desk all higildy-pigildy with tall plants, artwork etc dotted around the place as a way to absorb voices, noise, visual distractions etc

    Theres a good video about this


    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As you say, thats fine between 10-12 techs in a startup. I was in Vodafone on a consulting gig a while back. The entire floor I was on was one big office space. The floor was nearly the size of a football field. Just flat desks as far as the eye could see. A horrible, soulless place. I also hate working beside people I don't know or work with. You're sat there in a sea of strangers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 77 ✭✭CalisGirl


    Tech and Accounting firms seem onboard with the hybrid working. But I've heard from friends/family that the Public service and lots of smaller firms are determined to get their employees back to the office 5 days a week. It'll be interesting to see what way the country goes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    On the one hand you say people should live closer to work, yet also say permanent jobs are hard to get.



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The jobs market for anyone in Tech is booming at the moment. Any senior manager forcing their tech staff back into the office will quickly find themselves without any tech staff.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In the short term, when an equilibrium is reached and the wfh jobs are filled, what then?

    I asked this earlier, will those who attend offices be more likely to be promoted because they are seen?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭Turkish1


    Given your strongly held opinion on the WFH topic, I would assume that you know that you can reduce your income tax liability based on the number of days worked from home in the year and this includes costs related to light, heat & broadband (which for most there is no incremental cost). So all those incremental costs you referring to are either reduced or eliminated totally.


    What would be your estimate of incremental costs incurred due to working from home for someone working full time from home. I would expect them to be so small as to be completely immaterial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,302 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Found out today, we won't be going back in my place til jan-march and then it will likely be 2 or 3 days a week.

    There are some people going in on a trial basis Oct to Dec (they volunteered).

    Happy with that tbh.

    I have heard other departments are going back 4 days a week for all staff (including my old one where I know lots of people)...seemingly lots of staff requesting transfers/mobility already!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,796 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I’m on the planet where I’ve worked for excellent employers, and one average to poor one and one terrible one...

    Of the first 10 people off the top of my head now, friends and family....9 have home phones... one I’m not sure about...

    if you check the Dublin phone directory you will find tens of thousands of residences still have landlines, that’s just Dublin..



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In the short term, when an equilibrium is reached and the wfh jobs are filled, what then?

    Bit of a bizarre question. It's not like there's a limit of how many people in the country can work from home.


    I asked this earlier, will those who attend offices be more likely to be promoted because they are seen?

    The people who contribute the most, who do the best work, are generally the ones who get promoted. Thats how it works in most places.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Why is it bizarre? Surely there will be a limited number of wfh jobs rather than a limit on the numbers who want to wfh.

    The second sentence is naive. I have heard a few employer/employee representative contributors being interviewed in Newstalk/The Last Word about hybrid working arrangements, one of the more obvious, and indeed repeated viewpoints was that managers will be tempted to rely more on those that are present in the office, these people also have more opportunity to form relationships with managers/owners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,599 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They'll use Nepotism so it won't matter if the person is working remotely or not.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ah yes newstalk


    That most unbiased of platforms



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,083 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble



    There's certainly a limit to the number of employers who will offer or require WFH.

    And if you think that the best people get promoted... haaaa! I've got a bridge for sale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,436 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    How can you have no incremental costs for light and heat? Does your laptop run off solar power? How you heat your house for the extra eight hours a day? I've no option but to stick with Virgin Broadband now, as the only decent quality supplier in my area. The other cheaper suppliers, that would meet my home requirements but not my work requirements are not an option for me.

    I claimed all available costs for 2020. From memory, I got a tax credit of around €140, so I'll save tax of about €50. I spent €400 on furniture, and about €250 more on gas and electricity than 2019.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭ghoulfinger


    Doesn’t some of the factor of WFH depend on whether the employee has access to transport/able to drive? Im big on downsizing emissions, deliberately own a particularly frugal hybrid myself. Now are the WFH folk genuinely able to commute to their employer whatever, once a week or fortnightly or monthly, whatever, or have they resolutely stuck themselves up some beautiful mountain because the scenery is agreeable. I know there’s no ideal solution to this, and once folk have been afforded the easy solution it’s extremely hard to row back



  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭ghoulfinger


    Regretted post unable to delete



  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭ghoulfinger


    Regretted post unable to delete



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 77 ✭✭CalisGirl


    Not sure your point is clear. I'm sure if people were able to commute to a role pre-pandemic, they can physically commute to the role post-pandemic. The issue is should they commute at all and if so, how much.

    Also, a bank won't give you a mortgage for a property that's not within commutting distance of your job unless you have a letter from the employer explicitly giving permission to WFH long-term so it's unlikely anyone has stuck themselves up a mountain.

    As to hybrid working being an easy solution, I'd say it's more a pragmatic solution for a lot of people. Most office jobs only need face to face contact at most 3 days/week, so why not cut down on commuting, office space and emissions while allowing employees the flexibility desired.



  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭ghoulfinger


    The other day I heard somebody on the radio speak of how they had relocated to a remote area of Donegal, because of lifestyle, the children, “scenery” etc. Working remotely, and it was mentioned that he wouldn’t be in a position to do hybrid working if asked, eg one day a week in the capital. The discussion referred to people’s availability to work in the hybrid model, and how workable or not it is becoming. There was no mention of mortgage or anything, maybe he’s continuing to rent or maybe he’s living in a family home that maybe had been the summer home, who knows.

    It will be interesting to see how it all pans out in a broader sense. Employers’ buildings and infrastructure will be under-utilised and there could be a lot of degenerating empty buildings in the cities. There’s broader implications re strategic planning, insurance, and awful lot for companies to consider for the future. Their decision making re facilitating WFH may be informed by such implications.

    Post edited by ghoulfinger on


  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It will be interesting to see how it all pans out in a broader sense. Employers’ buildings and infrastructure will be under-utilised and there could be a lot of degenerating empty buildings in the cities. There’s broader implications re strategic planning, insurance, and awful lot for companies to consider for the future. Their decision making re facilitating WFH may be informed by such implications.

    "Infrastructure will be under-utilsed". Last time I was on Public Transport in Dublin was in March 2020, and it was bursting at the seams. A few less people in the capital would do it some good while the capacity issues get improved. Looking at daft.ie this morning, in all of Dublin there are currently 635 properties for rent with a rent of 2000 or less. Thats ridiculous.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭ghoulfinger


    Transport in the capital has always been grossly under-resourced. There ought to have been an underground metro in place in the capital at least by the time I started working. It’s more about the buildings where companies have located themselves and the money invested in them. Maybe some of that could be converted into housing, but I think an architect might have nightmares at this suggestion. The housing situation is farcical and tenants are being exploited.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭Patsy167


    Some interesting reading in today's BBC article - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58574621



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    You have 2 scenarios:


    WFO:

    at 6pm you turn off your phone

    when boss calls your home phone you tell him not to

    you go meet your friends at 7

    Wfh:

    at 6pm you turn off your phone

    when boss calls your home phone you tell him not to

    you go meet your friends at 7


    the only difference is that in WFH there is no chance your boss calls by your desk to ask you to do something.

    I really don't see the difficulty here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭oceanman


    judging by the amount of rush hour traffic on the roads now i would say few enough are still working from home..



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yes, I don’t understand the traffic situation. My office and most of the MNCs that I know are not in yet. Still a lot of people WFH. When they all go back the roads will be nightmarish



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,083 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Lots are now using private vehicles instead of public transport, due to disease fears.

    I know if one company that still has the "no shared transport outside of your household " policy that they introduced last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,599 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Even before the pandemic I was all for hybrid working. It just suits me.

    Makes no difference to the company. They aren't doing anything different, in terms, of communication, meetings, planning, project management. We are literally doing the exact same work, we always did just in a different location.



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yep, as I said before, when I was in the office I'd message a colleague on MS Teams or Slack or whatever even if they were 6 feet away. It's common courtesy. As you say, we're not doing anything differently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,796 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    The difference is when your home is your office your employer has the mindset as a lot will that if a tricky problem or question is requiring your assistance they already as part of their mindset... of your home = your workplace that they can attempt to contact you..getting the kids ready for bed, taxi just pulled up to take you to a gig say or other social event ..

    when home is work it’s different, the lines have been blurred, you don’t get that with office work.

    my personal phone I don’t want to have to turn off, mobile or house phone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,797 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Why would you answer the phone to your boss as you are putting your kids to bed? Maybe for you it blurs the lines, for most people if they turned off the phone leaving the office, then they turn off their phone when they shut off their laptop and leave their home office.

    If your boss now thinks your available 24 hours because you work from home, and you don't tell them that isn't true, then that's completely on you. My boss has my work number and no other way to contact me.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This is not an actual problem for @Strumms , its just something he made up to stir controversy, see here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,599 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Well its a forum. Its reason to exist is for discussion. It doesn't have to be from personal experience.

    But if its complete nonsense, expect to be called out on it.



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We've all been working from home for the past 18 months. Has this theoretical situation actually arisen for anyone?

    It hasn't for me. If anything, the two bosses I've had while working from home, have been more flexible, not more rigid.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm trying to wrap my head around this to make sense of it but I can't.

    If your boss tried to ring you at 9PM or 2AM why would it matter if you were working from home or in the office?

    Why would you also give the company your working for your house phone number or your personal mobile phone number?

    That is none of their business.

    I don't have a house phone but if I did and if anyone got hold of my personal mobile number they would instantly be blocked.

    I I'm on a on call rota where I get paid an extra 25% for the week and only have to do it one week every two months.

    If the week doesn't suit I just swap with someone else .

    Its just a job folks, stop taking it so seriously.





  • Not everyone is afforded a separate mobile phone for their work, even in the private sector. I can tell you as a public servant your private phone is the phone you are contacted by for your work but during agreed times and on agreed terms which the unions duly keep an eye on. Yes I have known it to happen for individual bosses to inappropriately intrude immensely into private lives, up to and including one manager turning up to spy on someone who was on certified sick leave and whose husband had to show the door.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How many chats like this are happening across Ireland these days. Quite a few I'd imagine, with a lot more to come




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The more I see you post, the more it becomes clear to me you've 0 control over your work/life situation. I don't know if you've a fear of losing your job or what but you need to nip this way of thinking in the bud. Who the **** has a house phone? And what sort of company do you work for where your boss rings your personal phone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,083 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Great cartoon and all.

    In real life, how many people do you know who have been offered a new job in the last three months which has 100% work from home as the plan going forward?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,599 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I know a few actually.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Me and my wife for a start, 2 different companies.

    As for everyone else, its none of my business.

    I will say though, that there are a boatload of WFH roles out there

    Granted there's likely to be some overlap between those sites, but the roles are there for anyone interested in WFH and there is a lot of variety in the levels and sectors too



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Out of interest, how does that compare to the total number of office jobs that could be done wfh? It seems a minute number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,083 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    The boat has holes in it.

    It took me 5 mins eyeballing the Jobs.ie list to see that a number which are flagged WFH also have "Work from home until current restrictions are lifted" in the comments. One is even a field service engineer which says that 60% of the time will be traveling or on site at clients premises.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yup, there's a few like that there, but the majority are remote roles



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭Electric Sheep




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




Advertisement