Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Will racism ever end?

123578

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I agree the clubs and uefa fifa can do so much more but they are corrupt or driven by greed.

    Which is why the taking of the knee is such an empty gesture. Since they're driven by greed, the organisations involved should be hit where it hurts, with a boycott of subscriptions, or match tickets, with the clear message of an expectation for change to occur.

    However, I doubt there would be much actual support from fans/supporters, and it would just fizzle. Easier to make empty gestures that lead nowhere.

    But knowing that and having to operate within that structure what can the players do?

    Players? Boycott teams that don't speak out against the behavior of their fans, and who won't police their behavior somewhat... but again, players will look to the money earned as opposed to committing themselves to changing anything. The players are enabling the teams, and the organisations to continue as they've always done... which is to ignore what's goes on in the stands, except when it costs them money, or someone dies (and even then, things revert to what they were before after a short amount of time)

    Do you believe in non violent protest as means to an end?

    Dunno where that came from. Weren't my suggestions non-violent?

    Yes, I do.. although sometimes action speaks louder than words, and those actions show a commitment that peaceful protest often doesn't represent.

    I suppose the difference between us, is that I like to see a reasonable chance of a positive outcome being produced from such protests. The taking of the knee goes nowhere, because it doesn't do anything or send any definite message to those who engage in racism. The taking of the knee appeals to those who aren't racist... and so, it's a wasted effort (although there's no actual effort involved, which is part of the problem). I'd prefer to see some initiatives that directly sought to deal with actual racists..



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Robbie, I think you're being a bit unreasonable here. Both I and @[Deleted User] answered your question, and you've simply come back with more questions... without committing yourself to your own question, or even dealing with what we've written. Instead, it's just another wave of questions.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I never understand this need of yours to misrepresent what was said by posters throughout a thread.

    "Basically" 🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,904 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    When did anyone say that?

    Why do you feel the constant need to twist words and put words in someone's mouth? Do you not feel that it's a bit unreasonable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    It isn't the Premier league clubs fans that are guilty of much racism inside the grounds. Pl grounds are very well policed and bans are handed out for racism and other anti social behaviour already.

    Fifa and uefa are corrupt and they will not go against the member organisations ie football clubs that elect the members of their organisations.

    So if PL clubs aren't the main issue with racism how would their players boycotting the games of the clubs that pay them help.

    They do however have some of the most media attention so by using the power of the media spotlight on them they can draw much more attention to the issue they see.

    Are they wrong to use their media presence to draw attention to such social issues. It takes less than 30 seconds at the start of a game and it highlights an issue of concern to them.

    All footballers are not forced to do this they can choose to participate or not. So what really is the issue?

    It is obviously drawing attention because neither you or I are big posters in the soccer forum but yet here we are talking about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    🤔

    Eh you just quoted my post where i said it. So someone did say it. It was me.


    Are you confusing things here and accusing me of saying someone else said it. Because where did I say anyone else said it?


    This is after hours after all are we not allowed a bit of craic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Huh.

    This thread was created by the op who's wife was racially abused.

    So I don't understand Dunnes waflly post about education. Who should be educated. Because educating the OP's wife won't help.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    By the same token, how does footballers kneeling stop the OPs wife being racially abused?? Enlighten us Robbie.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's having fun, and then.... there's sly digs. You should know the difference, and I suspect you do. However, you'll still go with the sly dig.

    It isn't the Premier league clubs fans that are guilty of much racism inside the grounds. Pl grounds are very well policed and bans are handed out for racism and other anti social behaviour already.

    haha... seriously? There's craptons of racist behavior at most of the premier league games.. within the fan areas. Never mind what happens directly outside the stadiums after certain games.

    So if PL clubs aren't the main issue with racism how would their players boycotting the games of the clubs that pay them help.

    Because it sends the same message that the other leagues/teams will understand, and perhaps provide some momentum to a movement within the soccer community.

    Are they wrong to use their media presence to draw attention to such social issues. It takes less than 30 seconds at the start of a game and it highlights an issue of concern to them. All footballers are not forced to do this they can choose to participate or not. So what really is the issue?

    You've just stepped backwards ignoring/dismissing what I'd said about taking the knee... and no, I'm not going to follow you there. I'm not terribly surprised though.. since you'd prefer to focus entirely on taking the knee, as opposed to a more general conversation about racism.

    It is obviously drawing attention because neither you or I are big posters in the soccer forum but yet here we are talking about it.

    The thread title is "Will racism ever end". Not "will racism end in soccer". So, we're talking about it because the thread is about racism. In any case, the point I made earlier about the taking of the knee still remain valid... the only people who care, are the people who already watch soccer... anyone else will give ten seconds of their attention, and move back to looking at whatever gossip is elsewhere.

    As for the soccer forum, I have no interest in discussing soccer with people on the internet. If we were in a pub, I might be interested, although probably I wouldn't.. because I just like to watch the games. Oddly enough, I know quite a few people similar to myself who enjoy the games and the competition, without everything else that comes with it. Oh... and I'm already interested in discussing racism, because I'm interested in social issues.. and have been discussing racism long before BLM or anything associated with it, came along.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He quoted you.. and answered your question.

    After 7 pages, it's pretty likely what someone posts, is not directly related to what the OP said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Ah klaz so no other posters have attempted sly digs or even direct insults at me in this thread. 🤣

    What's good for the goose is good for the gander and my post is humor at many of the replued in this thread just because you don't like the joke. You can't really stop me posting it.

    Just like I can't stop the other posters who post nonsense and childish attempts at insults directed at me. I can ignore them and carry on. Insult me enough and you get no right of reply from me.

    I won't be caught rising to that sort of bait again.


    I don't agree the Premier league is this hotbed of racism you claim inside the grounds. Have you any links to incidents of note this season.

    Anytime i have attended games i have not witnessed any obvious racism. So I do think with all their camera tech tyke big clubs in England are doing an OK job of policing it inside the ground.


    Outside the ground that's a policing matter and I agree the UK police could do much more in dealing with racist incidents. Not even just specifically at football matches but in general.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    There's one of those sly digs. What does this comment add exactly klaz?



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,904 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    Don't play dumb. You know right well what you were doing. Anyway, all you're doing is making yourself look bad.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You did. You said that anyone who agrees with booing of the knee is supporting racism.

    I can't stop anyone racially abusing someone. I can educate people (who will listen) about how racism is abhorrent. I have done in the past, will do in the future.

    I don't claim to be able to stop the OP's wife or anyone else being racially abused. I can't be responsible for other people's behaviour.

    So I ask again Robbie, what do you suggest is the best way to stop the OP's wife being racially abused?

    You asked me a question as to how I combat racism, I answered. What do you do, considering you think education isn't a valid answer?

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Shame on you for even insinuating that's what was said. Such an ugly dishonest post.

    When you need to resort to such vile tactics, perhaps you should step away from the keyboard.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And then you call out someone for making a "sly dig" and ask what it brings to the conversation?

    Just after admitting to purposely misrepresenting a post to make me look unsympathetic to the OP's wife's situation for "a bit of craic"?

    Lack of self awareness is astounding.

    I would say you jumped the shark but you'd probably accuse me of not checking my "great white" privilege



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Haha your being really silly now dunne.

    My sly dig comment was in direct response to klaz for having an off comment attempt at insulting me right after he made the sly dig comment to me.

    You have also tried the personal insults at me many times yourself. So it's funny you are now taking exception. I mean even your self awareness comment is an attempt to deflect rather than deal with racism issues of this thread.


    And 🤣🤣🤣


    I just checked self awareness there on the all Google. And I'm not sure it means what you think it means either.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-awareness

    So please explain your self awareness comment to me?


    Actually don't i don't need another waffly deflection post.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,904 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    It's disgusting behaviour and the sheer irony of posters like that trying to appear holier than thou is incredible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 467 ✭✭nj27


    Once we're finished with racism towards blacks I'm sure we'll jump right on to racism towards whites like Columbo figuring out the final clue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    You agreed that some of the people booing the knee are doing it for racist reasons.

    So if you are supporting booing the knee you are tacitly supporting those people who boo the knee for racist reasons. That is a fact of that support.

    I dont make that true it is undeniable fact.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jesus, your incoherent post about me rambling is the definition of not being self aware.

    It's about how you hold people to standards you don't live up to and are unaware that you are making yourself look foolish.

    I'm not taking exception to anything you say, but I admit it is tiresome that you refuse to answer questions that you expect others to respond to.

    And despite me answering every direct question, you accuse me of deflection....

    Check that on the "all Google" again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Yeah I agree klaz using the sly dig comment and then straight away insulting me is exactly as you said.

    At least I can rely on your support rothko.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    I don't expect you to answer. I don't care if you answer. I ask a question it gets answered or it doesn't get answered. I still go sleep at night just the same.


    As for the all Google 🤔.

    I'm typing on a phone and it auto corrected aul to all.

    There was me thinking being a grammar nazi wasnt allowed on after hours. Tut tut. Was that another attempt at a sly dig by you?

    Ps: that question mark doesn't mean I want your answer it's a rethorical question.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ah klaz so no other posters have attempted sly digs or even direct insults at me in this thread. 🤣

    That's hardly the point... it's your (and bubblypop's) dig that was noted. Forget it. I know you won't own up to it, and recognise that it was inappropriate when someone was answering your questions properly.

    Just like I can't stop the other posters who post nonsense and childish attempts at insults directed at me. I can ignore them and carry on. Insult me enough and you get no right of reply from me.

    I learned on the Multiculturalism thread where the baiting comes from... and it tends to be from the posters who make the digs, and the claim to be the victim.

    Let's move on, shall we? @[Deleted User] can handle his own problems, and while I said my initial piece, I have no intention of getting sidetracked away from the discussion on racism.

    I don't agree the Premier league is this hotbed of racism you claim inside the grounds. Have you any links to incidents of note this season.

    Nope. Oh, I could get some articles, but I doubt it will change your mind any. You see, I would previously have done so, but the way you've been tackling posts just removes any desire for me to do any legwork for you.

    Outside the ground that's a policing matter and I agree the UK police could do much more in dealing with racist incidents. Not even just specifically at football matches but in general.

    I would say that football organisations, and the clubs themselves have a responsibility for what/how their fans behave under the name of those teams (wearing the colours, shouting the slogans, etc) while engaging in such activities. As long as they don't take responsibility for it, little will change, because the Police are, in many ways, limited/restricted in what they can do to influence people's minds/beliefs. Oh, they can enforce the laws.. but that's not the problem with racism.. the inability to change perceptions is.

    And I'm going to leave the discussion on soccer, or taking the knee, there. This was discussed to death on the other thread, and I can easily see the same crap coming up again, with the same manner of dismissive/nasty posting styles.

    If you want to shift back to racism in general, I'm fine with continuing the discussion. Otherwise, I'll leave it to others to discuss BLM/Soccer/etc.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's patently false and ignorant to a childish level.

    People can be anti fascist and not support antifa. By your reckoning, if you don't like antifa, you are supporting fascists?

    But what if you also hate the proud boys? Surely by your logic, you are supporting antifa?

    Your stupid logic leaves no room for common sense.

    Ironically, it's not as black and white as that.

    So your undeniable fact is absolutely deniable.

    Consider it denied.

    But to echo klaz, this has been purposely sidetracked away from the op and have no intention of continuing a conversation off topic.

    There is a thread devoted to BLM and the knee. It's an oft use tactic to get a thread closed.

    So if you want to answer the question and actually discuss the topic, which has been asked many times, what do you do to combat racism and how would you prevent what happened to the OP's wife?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,800 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Disagreeing with the methodology or certain ideals of BLM doesn’t make you a racist..or a supporter of racism, sorry...that’s some fairly disingenuous shtick....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    I didn't bring BLM to this discussion. So don't try blaming that on me.

    I have said I don't really think the taking the knee goes far enough but I don't agree with booing an anti racism gesture either. Because as I said there are actual racists booing the knee gesture and support of that booing ends up as tacit support for the people booing it for racist reasons.

    What exactly do you want to discuss about racism in general. We agree it's bad.

    But you dont think there is anything that can be done. You don't believe people can change so what is there to discuss exactly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Implement legislation making racist hate speech illegal. At least that way the ops wife would have some recourse to report the incident to the Garda.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




    didn't bring BLM to this discussion. So don't try blaming that on me.

    Look back... I didn't blame that on you.

    I have said I don't really think the taking the knee goes far enough but I don't agree with booing an anti racism gesture either. Because as I said there are actual racists booing the knee gesture and support of that booing ends up as tacit support for the people booing it for racist reasons.

    And yet, you refuse the connection between BLM and the taking of the knee... Your logic doesn't extend beyond your application of it to others posts. You should consider applying it to your own statements. In any case, I didn't say anything about the booing on this thread, nor did I engage with you about it.

    What exactly do you want to discuss about racism in general. We agree it's bad.

    What can be done about it, and whether the current efforts are counter productive? I'd be interested in seeing your perception of anti-racism activists/advocates who push their views in a manner that tends to embrace bigotry and racism, while preaching against it. I'd be interested in your views on the double standards being applied, where standards are applied to others, but rarely are those same standards applied to the advocates/activists themselves. Also, the double standards with African Americans, where their own racism towards Asians and Hispanics is ignored, so that people can focus on the racism that is collectively assigned to White people.

    But you dont think there is anything that can be done. You don't believe people can change so what is there to discuss exactly.

    Once again, you're putting words in my mouth and disregarding what I've said previously. I said its a human condition, but we also have laws and social conditioning to minimize/reduce the expression of racism in society. I just don't believe it will ever be removed entirely. I wonder if you really read what people write, or simply scan their posts looking for something to confirm your own beliefs, or find something to argue against. And no, that's not a dig. It's an observation because you've done this multiple times on this thread alone.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Oh that's a great idea. How would you judge hate speech? Which words would you make illegal? Would it apply across all races? What defines hate? Would it be illegal to say the words or to offend people? What if identical words were said to two different people and only one took offense? Is it problematic to make a subjective term like "hate" illegal? Especially when it comes to speech? Should context be key? If that's the case, how can you police it? Is it open to massive misuse and used to simply be suppression of speech that is unpopular?

    What should be the punishment for calling someone a *insert colour* bastard? Should it be punished more severely than calling someone a bald bastard? If calling a someone a *insert colour* bastard is hate speech, is calling someone a bald bastard also hate speech? Does that mean that person "hates" bald people? Is it ok to hate something and just not speak about it? Can you speak about stuff you hate in private? Do you need to get consent to put forward an opinion that could possibly be deemed as hateful on the off chance the listener is offended?


    Absolutely great idea chief.

    Id have thought your solution was completely unworkable, but as soon as you answer these questions, I think we are on to a winner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Why do you care about my opinion on anti racism activists / advocates.

    I can guarantee you this much about my opinion on them I know less about them and read even less of them or by them than most of the people who post on boards disparaging them.

    So really to quickly sum up my opinion on them would be to say I don't know them or care much at all about them. You will notice I never seem to post anything by or about these people.

    Again I don't live in America and don't consume huge amounts of American media. So my focus on racism is more focused on its impacts on my family and then more generally on this country and our closest neighbour (whose media I consume in greater content than of the Americans) .

    I think all racism is bad wrong and stupid. No matter the colour of the skin perpetuating that hatred.

    And most of the racism perpetuated on my family and in this country is by the native population. So that takes my primary focus. But not once have I ever said racism can only done by white people. That would be a stupid thing to say.

    Your posts seem very antagonistic towards me. You don't know me so why you have taken a dislike to me is strange to me. And no that's not a dig thats just my observation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Oh your right because I haven't formally drafted the legislation and had it approved by the attorney General it's completly unworkable.

    I'm not going through all the work of thinking this fully through as if it was to implemented as legislation for you to go at the end and what about people with funny walks. You havent thought about people with funny walks. Ah see I told you it's completly unworkable.


    Legislation is not a complete panacea but it can go some way to reducing what is currently not prosecutable under our laws.

    Or you know maybe I should just answer.

    Well in that case I may as well go and racially abuse someone as I drive by them eh "chief".



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Why do you care about my opinion on anti racism activists / advocates.

    Good God man, do you even remember your own posts?

    What exactly do you want to discuss about racism in general. We agree it's bad.

    I even quoted it in bold before posting my own input.

    Your posts seem very antagonistic towards me. You don't know me so why you have taken a dislike to me is strange to me. And no that's not a dig thats just my observation.

    Robbie, your posts on the last two pages have supplied plenty of reasons for me to be frustrated with your style of deflections.

    I'm done. Look, I'll make it easier on both of us, and just ignore you. No need to continue this frustrating discussion that leads nowhere.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    As the night goes on, you get less coherent.

    What the hell are you talking about with your "funny walk" malarkey?

    I asked what you would do to stop racism. You said make hate speech illegal. I asked you questions to clarify what exactly that meant. (To make something against the law, you would want to be quite specific). You admit to have not thought it through. Then because of your frustration of being ignorant to your own interpretation of hate speech, you said you should just racially abuse someone, as if that is what I am advocating.

    Bizarre



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Do you think what happened to the ops wife should be punishable under irish law?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Fair question. I'd have to be honest and say, based on the information in the OP, then no. The OP is not specific (and understandably so) in what racist language was used so it's impossible to say. Is it right? No. Acceptable? No? Illegal? Also no.

    Do you think racist language should be punishable by Irish law, bearing in mind the fact that not everyone finds the same language racist?

    Also if someone refers to someone in their company as a racist slur, but a third party of the same ethnicity who happens to be in the vicinity and overhears, and is offended by the slur, is that hate speech?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    You see right there is the key difference you are ok for innocent women to be racially abused with no recompense as they walk down the street and I am not.

    Yes I think racist abuse should be punishable under Irish law.

    I happy for the intent to form a part of the justification in determining whether something is deserving of prosecution or not. So no two people using racist language with no intent to abuse another should not be a crime.

    As we agreed earlier in the thread context is key.

    But neither you or I are qualified to discuss the details or have presented any evidence we are qualified to determine the suitability for something to become legislation. So let's not pretend we are.

    I would like to see if it is possible and workable and you don't want legislation to protect people like the OP's wife from abuse.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There is a huge difference between me and you. Your posts are dishonest and you refuse to discuss in good faith and take every opportunity to misreprent in order to try and further some non existent points that nobody made.

    Where did I say I am ok for innocent women to be racially abused? I said EXPLICITLY that it was not acceptable or right.

    You are lying and misframing what I said for some righteous leverage.

    You are saying that intent should be a determination of whether it is illegal. There is zero possibility that on a prosecuting level, you can prove a random shout of an insult from a moving car was intentionally racist.

    Therefore your posturing that it should be illegal and anyone saying otherwise is a racist apologist is nothing more than an empty gesture of virtue signalling and pretty much consistent with your posting on this thread.

    You want hate speech illegal but you can't define it, but anyone who says that that it needs to be clearly defined before it's illegal, supports innocent women getting racially abused?

    You are the reason I don't want hate speech made illegal. People exactly like you. People who will perform extraordinary mental gymnastics in a vain attempt to grasp at any straw to frame anything you disagree with as racist or at the very least, a supporter of racism.

    It's unreal the levels of confidence you have in your opinions when you openly state you haven't thought them through.

    I think I will join klaz in refusing to engage. I thought you turned a corner with your last question which was somewhat thought provoking.

    But when your response to my answer was that i was "ok with innocent women being racially abused", you reverted to type and became a parody again.

    So off you pop Robbie. Go misrepresent someone else



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    You are OK with it. You don't want to try to stop.

    So someone in a car opening the window and shouting racist abuse at a stranger isn't racist. There is no racist intent there.

    What else could they possibly be doing, what other possible intent could they have?


    Canada has legislation without defining what hate speech is but you need me a lay person in regards to the law to define it on boards.




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    What is Hate Crime?

    Hate crimes are signal crimes. They send a message to the victim, and to other people like them, that they are not safe, not wanted, or somehow not a real member of Irish society who is entitled to the same protections or the same freedoms as other people.

    Victims of hate crime are made to feel afraid for the future, not just for themselves but for their friends, their loved ones and their children. This type of fear can lead to anger, and ultimately to a more divided society where whole communities can feel unsafe.


    The DOJ has summed up exactly how incidents like in the OP make people feel about their safety and wellbeing.

    Why would anyone be opposed to trying to protect innocent people like the OP's wife from being abused for the mere crime of leaving her house?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Such a nebulous and inefficient definition and completely open to interpretation of intent by the victim and the perpetrator.

    Would you open that type of crime to cover people who suffer abuse because of their appearance (fat, ugly, scarred, height, weight)?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm not ok with it. I specifically said I wasn't.

    Shouting abuse, racist or not, is wrong. I am unsure at how it could possibly be policed.

    Should comedians be banned from telling jokes which contain racist elements?

    Should films be banned for portraying stereotypes?

    The canadian legislation is absolutely grandstanding and posturing and does nothing to protect people from "hate" because hate is pretty much unprovable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    Let's deal with op. No more deflection from you.

    A stranger slowing their car opening their window and shouting racist obscenities at a stranger. Does that show racist intent to you?

    Because it clear as day showd racist intent to me. And if ireland had legislation similar to Canada that would mean the Gardaí could form an investigation using the OP's wife's statement and the license number of the vehicle.

    Would it necessarily lead to conviction. No I doubt it but it would at least provide an avenue for the victim of this crime to take. Right now there is no crime for the Gardaí to investigate as far as I am aware under existing Legislation.

    So the ops wife is a victim but there is no crime. Does that not seem wrong?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    You see this is why I won't engage with your defining hate speech. Because no matter what I say you will throw in something else.

    Hence my funny walks reference yesterday. So a single piece of legislation won't cover everything so we shouldn't try and protect victims from any racist abuse. Is that your stance?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ffs.

    Where is the name of God did I "defend" hate speech?

    Pointing out that your definition of hate speech is unworkable is not defending hate speech. It's purely showing up your inconsistencies.

    What would hate speech be? I cant defend it or support something unless you tell me what it is.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Is shouting any abuse from a car hate speech or is it purely racist abuse? If racist abuse is shouted from a car does it only become hate speech if the victim is offended by it? Can someone else report hate speech on behalf of someone else?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Ireland has the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989, which covers hate crimes. “Gardai could form an investigation using the OPs wife’s statement and the license number of the vehicle” already.

    Did she report it to the Gardai or get the reg plate? If she hasn’t, then following Robbie’s absolutely absurd and ridiculous “logic”, she must tacitly support racist abuse.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement