Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

131323436371111

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV


    Lucas Hood wrote: »
    You reference Denmark is the way forward but they use a covid pass.
    Either have to vaccinated, had covid recently or a negative pcr or antigen test within last 72 hours.

    This is why I mentioned antigen testing. We need this in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 214 ✭✭Ballynally


    They fully intend on delaying digital cert, reason cited will be that we are still restricted nationally with no indoor dining & more - therefore we can’t allow foreign visitors without making entry heavily restricted, which will ultimately make it not worth the bother for tourists and outgoing holidaymakers.

    Well, tourists can still come, stay in a hotel, eat and drink there, visit places.
    Many have booked flights.
    But i might add another thing. Inbound passengers will have their own country's DCC that HAS to be accepted by Ireland.
    The whole thing is more targeted at Irish people going abroad.
    No, you cant eat and drink indoors and no, you cant leave the country either without proof and we wont provide it. Your wee paper card wont do.But they are just my darker thoughts, hoping they wont come true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,445 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Which is a sensible system. If we have to implement something like this, why not use that system instead of the discriminatory bullshít being suggested here?

    We know why. Tony and Philip Nolan have an ideological aversion to antigen tests that is not based on science or logic. Unless they have a 180 degree turn around then government wont go against NPHETs view that antigen tests are nothing but "snake oil" as Nolan called them. Yet another area (like indoor hospitality) where we are international outliers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,445 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Ballynally wrote: »
    Well, tourists can still come, stay in a hotel, eat and drink there, visit places.
    Many have booked flights.
    But i might add another thing. Inbound passengers will have their own country's DCC that HAS to be accepted by Ireland.
    The whole thing is more targeted at Irish people going abroad.
    No, you cant eat and drink indoors and no, you cant leave the country either without proof and we wont provide it. Your wee paper card wont do.But they are just my darker thoughts, hoping they wont come true.

    Where do you get that from? The actual Regulation says otherwise. Individual Member States can impose additional restrictions because Health Policy is a Member State competence. The Green Cert relies on each Member State acting in good faith and mutual recognition. EU actually has no power to implement it because Health is not covered under the treaties.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,900 ✭✭✭✭bear1




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV


    The fact that NPHET still won't recommend the use of antigen testing on a national level is an absolute embarrassment.

    Denmark and many other EU nations must be wrong. And only Lord Tony is the grand master of the truth.

    We are the backwater of Europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 567 ✭✭✭Avon8


    As much as i'd love Antigen testing to become prevalent, as it should, it simply won't work for something as wide scale as mass admission into bars. Denmark has pop up shops all over where people get their test on say a Friday morning for free, and are covered then for the weekend. We saw how slow these numpties were with the initial vaccine rollout. How slow would they be in setting up hundreds of these pop up centres, staffed with the professionals they'd surely demand? Everyone would be jabbed by the time they got enough of them up and running. The few they would provide would have a 5 hour queue on a Friday.

    The other option would be bars administering it on the way in, which would take them extra staff, huge queues, waiting for the result. It wouldn't be workable or adhered to and the government wouldn't allow it because apparently non medical professionals can't be trusted to do it right.

    Just open indoor dining to all and stop this nonsense. Use testing to open up semi full stadiums and arena's if that's the only way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,445 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    bear1 wrote: »

    HAHAHAHA. 500 fans in the Gaelic Grounds in Limerick that can hold 44,000. We're a joke.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yet Tony, of House NPHET, believes that now is the ideal time to lock-up hospitality.

    https://twitter.com/FergalBowers/status/1410172635686789120


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    HAHAHAHA. 500 fans in the Gaelic Grounds in Limerick that can hold 44,000. We're a joke.

    8,000 in Croke Park for the Leinster Semi-finals on Saturday.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,445 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    charlie14 wrote: »
    8,000 in Croke Park for the Leinster Semi-finals on Saturday.

    That's a "test event" along with one or two others. The other championship games is as per the actual limit of 500. It's an absolute joke. 500 people in a 44,000 capacity stadium. It's mind boggling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    Leo said on newstalk it's government policy to use antigen testing
    Harris has also been touting it for campuses in September and there has been talk of it for bigger sports events.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV


    LOL

    Tubridy is attempting to cover his ass before the future backlash arrives

    https://twitter.com/EwanMacKenna/status/1410161949044883464


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,185 ✭✭✭Tchaikovsky


    It's fair to say the government have made a serious balls of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 214 ✭✭Ballynally


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Where do you get that from? The actual Regulation says otherwise. Individual Member States can impose additional restrictions because Health Policy is a Member State competence. The Green Cert relies on each Member State acting in good faith and mutual recognition. EU actually has no power to implement it because Health is not covered under the treaties.

    Yes, individual countries can impose restrictions but i dont think that means they wont accept other country's DCC. That is what i think 'mutual recognition' means. Restrictions are implemented on a country level, depending on where you are flying from, so people fr a 'red' country w a DCC can be prohibited to enter. They cant stop people travelling from a low risk country w their own DCC.
    But you seem to suggest that.
    Is it open to interpretation, then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    charlie14 wrote: »
    8,000 in Croke Park for the Leinster Semi-finals on Saturday.
    That's only because they switched them from somewhere that would allow 200.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,949 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    RobitTV wrote: »
    LOL

    Tubridy is hoping to cover his ass before the future backlash arrives

    https://twitter.com/EwanMacKenna/status/1410161949044883464

    Its like a 15 month long episode of Black Mirror


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    That's a "test event". The other championship games is as per the actual limit of 500. It's an absolute joke.

    Far as I recall the U.K. did much the same. Unless I`m greatly mistaken their first test event was not 45,000 supporters in Wembley.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It's fair to say the government have made a serious balls of this.
    More that they were walked into this. While they won't go against NPHET, these scenarios are likely to arise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,788 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    That's a "test event" along with one or two others. The other championship games is as per the actual limit of 500. It's an absolute joke. 500 people in a 44,000 capacity stadium. It's mind boggling.

    The reasoning behind it is they don't want people congregating at bars in the stadium or too many people in the crowds going in/out of the turnstiles or in the roads leading to/from the grounds

    What they should be doing is only allowing certain seats/sections to come and go at certain times on the clock and stagger the fans coming and leaving the stadium - based on seat if needs be

    A bit of hassle but it would increase capacities


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV


    We are all in this together. #Holdfirm

    https://twitter.com/irishexaminer/status/1410002817687883786


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,949 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    charlie14 wrote: »
    Far as I recall the U.K. did much the same. Unless I`m greatly mistaken their first test event was not 45,000 supporters in Wembley.

    Why didnt we just use their data on test events?

    Or do we only sit back and use their data when it suits ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,445 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Ballynally wrote: »
    Yes, individual countries can impose restrictions but i dont think that means they wont accept other country's DCC. That is what i think 'mutual recognition' means. Restrictions are implemented on a country level, depending on where you are flying from, so people fr a 'red' country w a DCC can be prohibited to enter. They cant stop people travelling from a low risk country w their own DCC.
    But you seem to suggest that.
    Is it open to interpretation, then?

    Yes they can put additional restrictions at will.

    55. To ensure coordination, the Commission and the other Member States should be informed when a Member State requires holders of certificates to undergo, after entry into its territory, quarantine or self-isolation or to be tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection, or if it imposes other restrictions on holders of such certificates.

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R0953&qid=1625042455003&from=EN


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    is_that_so wrote: »
    That's only because they switched them from somewhere that would allow 200.

    Bigger venue, bigger crowd. Same as most others countries who held these test events as far as I know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,445 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    charlie14 wrote: »
    Far as I recall the U.K. did much the same. Unless I`m greatly mistaken their first test event was not 45,000 supporters in Wembley.

    Months ago. Why are we testing again and not learning? The UK and other EU countries would be more than happy to share their data and learnings. Or are we special?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Why didnt we just use their data on test events?

    Or do we only sit back and use their data when it suits ?

    Sorry, I`m not sure what your point is .Use the test events data for what exactly ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,030 ✭✭✭daheff


    Quags wrote: »
    But people do not want the vaccine and to be basically bullied into it so you can enjoy indoor dining sounds very Nazism to me. This thing isnt going anyway soon and while it will kill people so will the flu and numerous other things so why cant people just get on with their lives and if you feel personally your not comfortable eating indoors with the non vaccination ppl then Im sure some places will accept the golden vac card

    If thats how people feel, then maybe we can keep the database of people vaccinated vs not vaccinated. When hospitals fill up to capacity maybe we can then use the said database to kick those who wouldn't get a vaccine to the back of the queue for the ICU beds??


    Jesus wept. the selfishness of some people to think that they don't need to be vaccinated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,949 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    charlie14 wrote: »
    Sorry, I`m not sure what your point is .Use the test events data for what exactly ?

    Eh . They have already proved they are safe . Why are we doing the same thing at the same starting point ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    RobitTV wrote: »

    "No interest/ambition" sums up our entire response to this pandemic.
    Done nothing, tried nothing and on it goes......


Advertisement