Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How long before Irish reunification? (Part 2) Threadbans in OP

1138139141143144146

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    You're in for an awful shock when you find out about JA being means tested and subject to income tax and VAT and excise duty as well.

    It's amazing how those that shout the loudest about taxes on multiple threads wrt the UI topic seem to have little understanding about our tax base, how its formed and how government expenditure manifests itself across multiple strata.

    It's bananas how they think they're forming a coherent argument at all.


    I think you will find that those who seem to think that people on the dole pay any significant tax, dont actually know what its like to pay tax. Now I get why you think the tax payer can afford it :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    JimmyVik wrote: »
    I think you will find that those who seem to think that people on the dole pay any significant tax, dont actually know what its like to pay tax. Now I get why you think the tax payer can afford it :)

    Right. I mean, there's not much one can do when the level of debate is "journal comments".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You can't buy loyalty to a state. You have to persuade people.

    This is the simple fact that Republican minded Nationalists avoid.

    Why? Because 'Nationalism' is based on defining and emphasising differences.

    I want a UI. You want a UI. Then work to persuade all citizens of the island that it's in the joint interests of everybody.

    That entails changes to a century old mindset down south.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Furze99 wrote: »
    You can't buy loyalty to a state. You have to persuade people.

    This is the simple fact that Republican minded Nationalists avoid.

    Why? Because 'Nationalism' is based on defining and emphasising differences.

    I want a UI. You want a UI. Then work to persuade all citizens of the island that it's in the joint interests of everybody.

    That entails changes to a century old mindset down south.

    Define those who don't want the process of persuasion to even begin? A first Border Poll campaign.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Furze99 wrote: »
    You can't buy loyalty to a state. You have to persuade people.

    This is the simple fact that Republican minded Nationalists avoid.

    Why? Because 'Nationalism' is based on defining and emphasising differences.

    I want a UI. You want a UI. Then work to persuade all citizens of the island that it's in the joint interests of everybody.

    That entails changes to a century old mindset down south.

    Cool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    I've posted before about Mr Hay:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/apr/14/irish-born-dup-peer-willie-hay-criticises-rules-for-obtaining-british-passport

    ---

    When the de Souza case was ongoing we were told that Mrs de Souza should just put up as she was "British".

    What do our resident belligerents think of Mr Hay's case?

    The British system is such an anachronistic mess that someone like him can be treated like a citizen (non-alien; like all Irish citizens) for their entire lives, sit in on top-level security meetings, be a fixture of their political class, even become a peer and yet, to regularise their citizenship, is an absolute hassle of epic proportions.

    Something needs to be done. I'm completely on his side.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,785 ✭✭✭eire4


    I've posted before about Mr Hay:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/apr/14/irish-born-dup-peer-willie-hay-criticises-rules-for-obtaining-british-passport

    ---

    When the de Souza case was ongoing we were told that Mrs de Souza should just put up as she was "British".

    What do our resident belligerents think of Mr Hay's case?

    The British system is such an anachronistic mess that someone like him can be treated like a citizen (non-alien; like all Irish citizens) for their entire lives, sit in on top-level security meetings, be a fixture of their political class, even become a peer and yet, to regularise their citizenship, is an absolute hassle of epic proportions.

    Something needs to be done. I'm completely on his side.

    I thought they were "subjects" not citizens anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Everybody's in a holding position to see what happens with Scotland. Will they be granted another independence referendum, and if so what way will it go?

    If Scotland votes to leave the UK then this may destabilise Northern Ireland's place within the UK with the possibility of NI hitching it's wagon to the new dynamic fledgling Scotland, or they may vote to stay as they are in the UK with Wales & England.

    ... or might they actually decide to join our Republic to form a United Ireland? God knows.


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,242 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Everybody's in a holding position to see what happens with Scotland. Will they be granted another independence referendum, and if so what way will it go?

    If Scotland votes to leave the UK then this may destabilise Northern Ireland's place within the UK with the possibility of NI hitching it's wagon to the new dynamic fledgling Scotland, or they may vote to stay as they are in the UK with Wales & England.

    ... or might they actually decide to join our Republic to form a United Ireland? God knows.

    If Scotland left the UK, it would remove the last vested interest most English politicians have in Northern Ireland - they'd probably call a border poll pretty shortly afterwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    schmittel wrote: »
    If Scotland left the UK, it would remove the last vested interest most English politicians have in Northern Ireland - they'd probably call a border poll pretty shortly afterwards.

    But they can't just call a border poll in NI unless it's showing signs that it might like to leave .....

    Currently NI is not showing any such sign.

    A succession of local NI polls would have to show a trend in the direction of a United Ireland before any English politicians would be involved.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,242 ✭✭✭hometruths


    But they can't just call a border poll in NI unless it's showing signs that it might like to leave .....

    Currently NI is not showing any such sign.

    A succession of local NI polls would have to show a trend in the direction of a United Ireland before any English politicians would be involved.

    Nothing in the GFA to say anything about a succession of polls showing a trend as far as I am aware.

    The only person qualified to decide what constitutes showing signs it might to like to leave is the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. He can call a poll whenever he wishes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    schmittel wrote: »
    Nothing in the GFA to say anything about a succession of polls showing a trend as far as I am aware.

    The only person qualified to decide what constitutes showing signs it might to like to leave is the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. He can call a poll whenever he wishes.

    Nothing in the GFA allows Scotland leaving the UK or the removal of the last vested interest most English politicians to be a factor in a poll


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    schmittel wrote: »
    Nothing in the GFA to say anything about a succession of polls showing a trend as far as I am aware.

    The only person qualified to decide what constitutes showing signs it might to like to leave is the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. He can call a poll whenever he wishes.

    Yes, but as has been said many times before, there's no point in him calling one unless there is some sign that the "tectonic plates" might have shifted, currently there is no such sign.

    If a succession of NI polls show a shift away from the UK in favour of a UI, then so be it, he may call for a border poll.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    schmittel wrote: »
    Nothing in the GFA to say anything about a succession of polls showing a trend as far as I am aware.

    The only person qualified to decide what constitutes showing signs it might to like to leave is the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. He can call a poll whenever he wishes.

    The SoS can decide on the basis of two fly's climbing a window pane. Tested in court already - he/she is not constrained nor has to offer evidence for their decision.

    It was and always will be when it is politically right...as I said before I think it will come when Dublin gives the nod that it is ready.


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,242 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The SoS can decide on the basis of two fly's climbing a window pane. Tested in court already - he/she is not constrained nor has to offer evidence for their decision.

    My point exactly.
    downcow wrote: »
    Nothing in the GFA allows Scotland leaving the UK or the removal of the last vested interest most English politicians to be a factor in a poll

    See above.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Everybody's in a holding position to see what happens with Scotland. Will they be granted another independence referendum, and if so what way will it go?

    If Scotland votes to leave the UK then this may destabilise Northern Ireland's place within the UK with the possibility of NI hitching it's wagon to the new dynamic fledgling Scotland, or they may vote to stay as they are in the UK with Wales & England.

    ... or might they actually decide to join our Republic to form a United Ireland? God knows.

    What are you on about?

    Seriously, what do you get out of posting such ignorant and uninformed nonsense every so often?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Arlene Foster departing from the DUP, does this impact the chance of a border poll coming sooner than if she'd stayed in place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Arlene Foster departing from the DUP, does this impact the chance of a border poll coming sooner than if she'd stayed in place?

    I think there are British spooks at work in NI tbh. and within Unionism in order to get rid of NI. Fantasy? I would have said yes a short while ago, not anymore though.
    Anything they do (Unionism) seems to be bringing the day closer tbh and at the same time Unionism itself is imploding.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I think there are British spooks at work in NI tbh. and within Unionism in order to get rid of NI. Fantasy? I would have said yes a short while ago, not anymore though.
    Anything they do (Unionism) seems to be bringing the day closer tbh and at the same time Unionism itself is imploding.

    It certainly seems that way at times.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I think there are British spooks at work in NI tbh. and within Unionism in order to get rid of NI. Fantasy? I would have said yes a short while ago, not anymore though.
    Anything they do (Unionism) seems to be bringing the day closer tbh and at the same time Unionism itself is imploding.
    I agree with the first bit of you statement We would be as naive as republicans seem to still be about the levels of infiltration of the ira, if we did not think the dup and sf are infiltrated.
    The dup destined to implode and they just seem to have pr disaster after pr disaster. Sooner the better in my view
    Some dup decisions seem as diametrically opposed you their main objectives as was the supporting of the gfa by sf.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    I'd tend to agree with Brian Rowan's take that the next time Stormont falls it closes for good. Rowan also says that if Stormont closes we'll likely be in a post GFA phase and looking at an Irish solution to the British Question.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So Foster is seen as too liberal from within the DUP..Yikes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I'd tend to agree with Brian Rowan's take that the next time Stormont falls it closes for good. Rowan also says that if Stormont closes we'll likely be in a post GFA phase and looking at an Irish solution to the British Question.

    Any link to that Tom?

    Strategically, it is like something the Unionists would allow happen out of stubbornness and inability to avoid flying into the flames.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Any link to that Tom?


    https://youtu.be/moqPgdKzjBI?t=717


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jh79 wrote: »

    Incredible results with no concrete proposal or plan on the table.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    Incredible results with no concrete proposal or plan on the table.

    Dunno about that. Any concrete proposal will just confirm the high cost and drive voters away.

    The Germans are still paying up to 5% in tax 30 years on.

    The results for NI are lower again i think.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jh79 wrote: »
    Dunno about that. Any concrete proposal will just confirm the high cost and drive voters away.

    The Germans are still paying up to 5% in tax 30 years on.

    The results for NI are lower again i think.

    44% in the north for a border poll 39% against and a 66% majority for a border poll in the south, tells me the train is approaching fast and we'll see a proposal taking shape soon.

    Couched as an investment I think those numbers will change too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    44% in the north for a border poll 39% against and a 66% majority for a border poll in the south, tells me the train is approaching fast and we'll see a proposal taking shape soon.

    Couched as an investment I think those numbers will change too.

    Only 35% in favour in the North. On a downward trend. Not even close to likely to pass.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jh79 wrote: »
    Only 35% in favour in the North. On a downward trend. Not even close to likely to pass.

    There is no proposal or plan in place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    There is no proposal or plan in place.

    Any proposal will have the opposite effect in each country. To convince the North, Ireland will have to pay and to convince the South NI will take the hit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,544 ✭✭✭droidman123


    jh79 wrote: »
    Dunno about that. Any concrete proposal will just confirm the high cost and drive voters away.

    The Germans are still paying up to 5% in tax 30 years on.

    The results for NI are lower again i think.

    You cannot really compare german reunification with irish reunification.theres a third party involved in ireland,namely britain.when the six occupied counties of my country are finally reunited with the rest of ireland i would expect britain to be footing some of the bill,as they were the agitators of partition.call it compensation or whatever,but when the day comes it will be time for them to pay the piper.there are still too many details,financial and many other things to be ironed out before people have full details of what they would be voting for.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    44% in the north for a border poll 39% against and a 66% majority for a border poll in the south, tells me the train is approaching fast and we'll see a proposal taking shape soon.

    Couched as an investment I think those numbers will change too.

    I am borderline thinking we should have a border poll to put this to bed for a while but I will 100% vote against a UI. So numbers wanting a border poll are completely irrelevant. They have no bearing on either the reason sos having a poll or the result.
    Just interesting that you cling unto an irrelevance. Mustn’t be much in it for you


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    You cannot really compare german reunification with irish reunification.theres a third party involved in ireland,namely britain.when the six occupied counties of my country are finally reunited with the rest of ireland i would expect britain to be footing some of the bill,as they were the agitators of partition.call it compensation or whatever,but when the day comes it will be time for them to pay the piper.there are still too many details,financial and many other things to be ironed out before people have full details of what they would be voting for.

    Did the countries that carved up Germany (even more recently) queue up to help pay?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    downcow wrote: »
    I am borderline thinking we should have a border poll to put this to bed for a while but I will 100% vote against a UI. So numbers wanting a border poll are completely irrelevant. They have no bearing on either the reason sos having a poll or the result.
    Just interesting that you cling unto an irrelevance. Mustn’t be much in it for you

    There won't be a border poll because it is irrelevant to you??? :)

    The numbers wanting a poll will spur on the formation of a plan or proposal. It would be criminal for our government not to heed those figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,544 ✭✭✭droidman123


    downcow wrote: »
    Did the countries that carved up Germany (even more recently) queue up to help pay?

    Hypotethical question,if there was a border poll and it passed for a ui, in your opinion would britain be liable to foot some of the.costs?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    There won't be a border poll because it is irrelevant to you??? :)

    The numbers wanting a poll will spur on the formation of a plan or proposal. It would be criminal for our government not to heed those figures.

    I didn’t say a border poll was irrelevant. I said the numbers wanting it are irrelevant. The reasons for a border poll are crystal clear and they have nothing to do with the numbers wanting it. But sure you cling on to that of plot helps you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    You cannot really compare german reunification with irish reunification.theres a third party involved in ireland,namely britain.when the six occupied counties of my country are finally reunited with the rest of ireland i would expect britain to be footing some of the bill,as they were the agitators of partition.call it compensation or whatever,but when the day comes it will be time for them to pay the piper.there are still too many details,financial and many other things to be ironed out before people have full details of what they would be voting for.

    The Hubner paper promoted by SF uses German unification as its basis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Hypotethical question,if there was a border poll and it passed for a ui, in your opinion would britain be liable to foot some of the.costs?

    No.
    U.K. has committed £billions annually. It would be Roi tax payers turn and of course ourselves


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    downcow wrote: »
    I didn’t say a border poll was irrelevant. I said the numbers wanting it are irrelevant. The reasons for a border poll are crystal clear and they have nothing to do with the numbers wanting it. But sure you cling on to that of plot helps you

    The SoS can call a poll for any reason he/she wants. Your courts decided that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jh79 wrote: »
    The Hubner paper promoted by SF uses German unification as its basis.

    The 'relevant' parts of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    The 'relevant' parts of it.

    The cost is very relevant given the polls


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jh79 wrote: »
    The cost is very relevant given the polls

    Undeniable. The benefits and how the cost will be met is also relevant. See the Scottish referendum, once it's White Paper was published the numbers changed dramatically.

    Question is for Dublin and the SoS, how long can they go on not putting this question to the test before they are blatantly breaking the spirit of the GFA.
    On those figures...not much longer in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    Undeniable. The benefits and how the cost will be met is also relevant. See the Scottish referendum, once it's White Paper was published the numbers changed dramatically.

    Question is for Dublin and the SoS, how long can they go on not putting this question to the test before they are blatantly breaking the spirit of the GFA.
    On those figures...not much longer in my opinion.

    The GFA says if likely to pass so not having one is adhering to the GFA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jh79 wrote: »
    The GFA says if likely to pass so not having one is adhering to the GFA.

    The SoS, according to British courts, can decide on the outcome of two flies racing up a window, if he/she wants. And is answerable to no-one in that he/she does not have to provide evidence for why they made the decision.

    He/she could think as I do, that a firm proposal is likely to get it over the line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    The SoS, according to British courts, can decide on the outcome of two flies racing up a window, if he/she wants. And is answerable to no-one in that he/she does not have to provide evidence for why they made the decision.

    He/she could think as I do, that a firm proposal is likely to get it over the line.

    Point is by not having one he is faithful to the terms of the GFA as there is no evidence it is likely to pass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,051 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    jh79 wrote: »
    Point is by not having one he is faithful to the terms of the GFA as there is no evidence it is likely to pass.

    Of course, undeniable.

    But the figures wanting this put to the test won't be ignored. It would be criminal to do that in light of Brexit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,653 ✭✭✭✭downcow




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,310 ✭✭✭jh79


    Of course, undeniable.

    But the figures wanting this put to the test won't be ignored. It would be criminal to do that in light of Brexit.

    But how vocal will people be given they don't actually want a change?


Advertisement