Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXX-113,332 ROI(2,282 deaths) 81,251 NI (1,384 deaths) (05/01) Read OP

1308309311313314330

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,118 ✭✭✭prunudo


    They're outdoors. Construction should absolutely stay open. It's low risk as regards Covid, and keeps 100,000 people off PUP. Also keeps some vital infrastructure projects afloat and has a big knock on effect on the economy. Not worth it to close it in my opinion.

    I've seen that 100k figure mentioned a few times, seems quite low. Definitely wouldn't be including all the ancillary industries that support construction either. People have this idea of a few lads in a van and huddled in a site hut, its supports far more people than some give credit to. Closing sites will also mean the closure of builders providers, manufacturing, transport and many more jobs that rely on building industry.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Aw, diddums. I called out his bs plenty of times when he was on thread. The screenshot was for the benefit of those who thanked it.

    No at all ,just amused at the double standards of those that sit on high horses.




  • Ficheall wrote: »
    Aw, diddums. I called out his bs plenty of times when he was on thread. The screenshot was for the benefit of those who thanked it.

    Nicely done :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    quokula wrote: »
    Yeah this is very true, a lot of people just don't give a crap about spreading it as long as it's only other people that die. If it was more lethal there would be way more compliance and it would be easier to control.

    Reminds me of that old Twilight Zone episode, would you press a button that gives you a million dollars but kills a random stranger? Covid has shown there's a significant cohort of people who'll happily hammer that button all day long, and for a lot less too.

    Not to derail thread but when you look at WW2 and psychological experiments in general on people who wear uniforms, people will do horrible things and sort of absolve themselves of blame when its an accepted norm. "I was doing my job" or some sort of self justification is usually applied.

    But you put uniforms on people and tell them they have the authority to do x, y and Z, then it becomes acceptable. The same thing applies in society, when society deems something acceptable (Church covering up crimes), then nobody addresses it. Its remarkable how quickly we as a species can forget the atrocities and issues we dish out on our fellow man. I think this is where the disconnection comes from, "the people doing bad things are not like me, I wouldnt do that". People are people and in different environments alot of us do not know how we would react.

    What will people in 100 years be looking back on now as our great sin ? Ignorance ? Hubris ? Have we enjoyed such a relatively quiet period (war wise) that we are complacent to our own flaws ? Look at some of the big headlines before COVID and ask ourselves are the things that were getting big news really pathetic in comparison to a truly global issue such as this ? Have we become too soft and self centered where shaming people into rigid political correctness has been one of "the great issues" of our generation ? People's feelings getting hurt is forcing far more policing of speech, where will that end up ?

    One thing I have learned from decades of therapy and trying out meditation and plenty of other methods of trying to sort myself out, is that when I am blaming others (which I still do) I am not looking at my role in an issue. I am human and suffer all the defects that I speak about, so I am not judging everybody else on a level I do not judge myself. If everybody was able to honestly appraise their own motives and actions then the world would be a much better place. But we lie to ourselves all the time, what we intrepret in our lives is through our own bias eyes that filters information to suit ourselves and is often flawed. But you see it in here. Its the governments fault. Its NEPHETs fault. Its young peoples fault.

    Its human behavior driving the speed of the spread as much as anything else that can be singled out. If young people are driving the spread, what have they learned from their parents that makes them think its ok to act so irresponsibly ? We are all responsible for the mess we are in and what is worse is if we do not learn anything from this situation. Unfortunately a lot of people do not want to learn anything, they know what they know and particularly if a point of view suits them, they will refuse to amend their opinions. Then what usually happens is people attack posters who are posting information that people do not like. Its a chronic failing to objectively assess information and an instinct to lash out to avoid productive debate.

    In summary, I didnt see that Twilight Zone episode, how did it end ? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    No at all ,just amused at the double standards of those that sit on high horses.
    Presumably you'll be able to give some example of this alleged double standard?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭poppers


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    The numbers of tests dropping is the thing.

    We should be testing more and then pos % changes with that..

    circa 20k symtomatic tested. 22.5% pos rateabout 4500 cases

    if you 10k close contacts and with a pos rate of 15% you get 1500 cases

    30000 tests give 6000 caes gives an overall pos rate of 20%

    this pos decrease as we test more close contacts with out sympomtons


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    Elements of the goverment are still trying to pull the wool over are eyes with comments that they could never foresee this.

    Absolute rubbish. I spoke to a head nurse during the summer as well as my own gp back in april and they both highlighted January/February as the time they were most fearful about. This seemed to be the general consensus throughout the medical field and beyond.

    The lack of real leadership is literally killing us now.

    They were fearful because that's when hospitals are full with flu patients and other general winter illnesses in a normal year, and they knew we would have no additional capacity if we had even a moderate outbreak of covid.

    Come October, the news from Australia and South America was that there were virtually no flu cases because of social distancing and masks and WFH.

    And the same panned out here - virtually no flu cases in hospitals in December. So you can see why the government thought that they could absorb a steady rise in cases - the likes of which happened in September/October - and would have time to get the case numbers back down again.

    I don't think anyone, even in the medical community, would have predicted that case numbers would rise at the exponential rate that they are now, with masks, traditional pubs closed and a large proportion of the workforce WFH. NPHET themselves say that the cases are rising at a faster rate that even their worst case scenario modelling had predicted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,651 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    Hospitals have another week at least of rising admissions, ICU probably more, hopefully though the tide is starting to turn.

    Have a weather station?, why not join the Ireland Weather Network - http://irelandweather.eu/



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Presumably you'll be able to give some example of this alleged double standard?

    Already did. Highlighting was the point of my post. I’ll leave it there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 466 ✭✭Probes


    I don't know how to put this any other way, but 135,000 vaccinated by the end of Feb is really, really disappointing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    igCorcaigh wrote: »
    Yes, good news?

    I still don't know if the Christmas wave of cases has passed the testing stage or yet to be processed.
    What we're processing now are the people who caught it off people who were postive around Xmas day.

    Any dip is to be welcomed, especially in positivity rate. Dr. Holohan today remarked that average close contacts were down to around 4 now, which is also good.

    Today's numbers though reflect swabs taken on Sunday. Tomorrow's numbers are a better bellweather as these include a lot of people who put off ringing the GP with symptoms until Monday morning.

    IF (big if) people adjusted their behaviour after Xmas and before NYE, then this could be the start of a better trend. Some of today's data is encouraging. But it's too early to be hopeful.
    There is also a surge of ICU admissions and deaths to be expected over the coming weeks.
    Probes wrote: »
    I don't know how to put this any other way, but 135,000 vaccinated by the end of Feb is really, really disappointing.
    They're sandbagging. Their figures are always an low estimate to avoid looking stupid. We've just got a "surprise" shipment of vaccines this week brining us from 20,000 to 35,000.
    Whatever figure the government give between now and June is a minimum. 135,000 is the minimum that will be done. They don't want to commit to numbers they might not achieve.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭ax530


    Lets hope we have past the peak of infection now, lets pray for rapid decline over next 2 weeks so schools can reopen on 1 February
    I really hope so.
    Thinking about it most people should not have any 'close contacts' outside home since the 29th of Dec.
    Obviously with numbers so so high recently will take a long time to reverse it to managable numbers for health service & contract tracing.
    But I expect the bulk of those exposed over Christmas week will now know and be isolated. No doubt some people did not pay heed and have met up over NY so perhaps it will not be all downwards for the next week.
    Lesson for the stories of spread over Christmas may be if we can meet people for lunch, dinner ect again in Feb, March always ask them - are you waiting on test restuls or have you been tested positive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    Already did. Highlighting was the point of my post. I’ll leave it there.
    You did not. How about you give an example instead of worming away?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 872 ✭✭✭Sofa King Great


    Everyone knows of Typhoid Mary and she became somewhat of a household name. Its mad that 100 years later there are lots of people still doing the same thing by socialising while waiting for tests / after a positive case.

    ...albeit they probably won't be put in quarantine for 30 years


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    Probes wrote: »
    I don't know how to put this any other way, but 135,000 vaccinated by the end of Feb is really, really disappointing.

    Agreed. If its purely a supply issue nothing we can do. But I'm fairly sure it isnt.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,658 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The tide is turning lads. Most close contacts I know of have fibbed to their GP about having symptoms to get tested. There is nothing stopping you getting a test if you want one

    The conditions that led to the surge a week ago are gone. No one is having dinner with family this week. The pubs are closed and most opportunities for community transmission are gone.

    I have driven 700km across 2 counties in the year 2021 so far. A total of 0 checkpoints but the roads are busy. Perhaps it may be an idea to enforce the existing rules rather than bringing in new ones. Closing all construction at this stage may not be worth the benefits


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Eivor


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    The numbers of tests dropping is the thing.

    We should be testing more and then pos % changes with that..

    Are the numbers of tests dropping?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    seamus wrote: »

    They're sandbagging. Their figures are always an low estimate to avoid looking stupid. We've just got a "surprise" shipment of vaccines this week brining us from 20,000 to 35,000.
    Whatever figure the government give between now and June is a minimum. 135,000 is the minimum that will be done. They don't want to commit to numbers they might not achieve.

    That's quite an amount of sandbagging. Say they are saying 135,000 but in fact expect to do double that, or 270,000 - which would be quite a jump -it will take 18 months to vaccinate everyone, or more pertinently, six months to vaccinate all over 70's.

    Do you think that they are saying 135,000 but actually expect to do 500,000? Because that's how much we need to be doing in order to have all over 70's and health care workers vaccinated by the start of May.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 12,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    froog wrote: »
    Agreed. If its purely a supply issue nothing we can do. But I'm fairly sure it isnt.

    Was watching Sky News earlier, a report of why are Israel doing so well on the vaccination progress.
    There was drive in vaccinations; if any vaccine was left over after the scheduled appts, message given out, first come first served.

    Basically, seems like shortage is not an issue. They have doses to spare.

    Yet I don't know how they managed to get so much doses.
    That question was not really addressed.

    Israel has a population of around 9 million.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Eivor wrote: »
    Are the numbers of tests dropping?

    Yes down 5-7 thousand today


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭RebelButtMunch


    Will Yam wrote: »
    Between Christmas and new year?

    +1 over christmas and new year and that was my dad. I met my sisters and friends at the end of their and mine driveways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Eivor wrote: »
    Are the numbers of tests dropping?

    Yes. Today is the first time we are under 20k tests in a while. Yesterday was just over 20k and the day before was 28k.

    I think it's due to the end of close contact testing.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 12,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    Eivor wrote: »
    Are the numbers of tests dropping?

    Tests.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭lukas8888


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Presumably you'll be able to give some example of this alleged double standard?

    Presumably you'll indulge us with a few examples of you calling out his bs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    igCorcaigh wrote: »
    Was watching Sky News earlier, a report of why are Israel doing so well on the vaccination progress.
    There was drive in vaccinations; if any vaccine was left over after the scheduled appts, message given out, first come first served.

    Basically, seems like shortage is not an issue. They have doses to spare.

    Yet I don't know how they managed to get so much doses.
    That question was not really addressed.

    Israel has a population of around 9 million.

    Hey Pfizer you know xxx. They were supposed to get 10k doses in December but they haven't approved yet. Give us their doses and they can catch up later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Eivor


    Stheno wrote: »
    Yes down 5-7 thousand today

    I wonder why that is? Are we running out of them? Surely they should’ve never stopped increasing the testing capacity from the start


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Hey Pfizer you know xxx. They were supposed to get 10k doses in December but they haven't approved yet. Give us their doses and they can catch up later.

    And we'll pay four times the going rate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    Yes. Today is the first time we are under 20k tests in a while. Yesterday was just over 20k and the day before was 28k.

    I think it's due to the end of close contact testing.

    I wonder how they'll balance the test capacity. Assuming those with symptoms doesnt reach 25-28,000 per day, hopefully, and with a blanket "no contacts" rule, we may not reach capacity. Wonder could they limit contacts? As in, tell us the 3 people you were most in contact with? Not ideal but better than nothing, I guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Eivor wrote: »
    I wonder why that is? Are we running out of them? Surely they should’ve never stopped increasing the testing capacity from the start

    They announced a policy to stop testing close contacts 4 days ago. They didn't cancel tests that's for close contacts that were already booked.

    The effect of close contact testing stopping only hit the system between today and yesterday.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,793 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    Just back from having the test in swords, huge respect to the irish army getting stuck in with the testing. The place was so busy, an endless supply of people going through the doors.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement