Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part VI - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

1134135137139140324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,302 ✭✭✭Allinall


    This lockdown is the ultimate lazy option, toss all responsibility onto Joe Public.
    As quoted above, HSE get off the hook!

    Why are NEPHET allowed to run the show, surely this lack of contact tracing shows that an emergency planning group would be better at organising what we need to deal with the problem.

    Why shouldn't Joe Public take all the responsibility?

    They are the ones with the most to lose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭SAMTALK


    the kelt wrote: »
    But its never expected to be 100%

    I can pretty much guarantee the buy in will be less this time around

    Yes and I said anywhere near.

    Your right about this time round. I'd imagine that's why level 5, because they know they're losing the public


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 macrocycle_24


    Well we elect a government to act in the best interests of the people, it was OK to lockdown the first time as it was an exceptional situation, but 2nd time round it isn't unfair to ask that government put in place policy that acts in the interest of people to keep their jobs and be able to see their family.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 macrocycle_24


    Allinall wrote: »
    Why shouldn't Joe Public take all the responsibility?

    They are the ones with the most to lose.

    Sure we all have to take some responsibility, but a lockdown is the easy option and a blunt instrument. We elected a government to act in the interests of the people and that includes protecting their livelihoods and right to see their families, we should have expected to see better policy to balance between health and normality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,774 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    https://cor.europa.eu/en/our-work/Pages/EURegionalBarometer-EconomyStory.aspx?utm_source=SharedLink&utm_medium=ShortURL&utm_campaign=EURegionalBarometerEconomy

    An EU study into the lockdowns that happened and the effects.

    The conclusion at the end says:
    Policies to mitigate the effects of lockdowns, and to prevent future ones, should therefore be implemented at the local level.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,639 ✭✭✭completedit


    So Luke O Neill posted a tweet there that the death rate from covid has fallen significantly. My question is at what death rate is it now palpable for governments around Europe(because this isn't just a NPHET or Irish issue of OTT response) to back down and concede the reality of the situation. This is the flaw of the lockdown approach. When those of us say the virus isn't deadly, we aren't t stupid, we know people die, we mean deadly in the sense of corpses piling up on the streets and in homes. Hoolahan is hardly going to come out and say we have assessed the risk and established that while covid can be serious, it doesn't pose a threat to the majority of people or pretty much anyone. And because there's no grounds for nuance or recognition of changing nature of the virus, it makes Hoolahan's position untenable. I don't see a man who wants the facts to contravene his own set view. He has now found itself in a position of authority and won't want to have egg on his face.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭the kelt


    SAMTALK wrote: »
    Yes and I said anywhere near.

    Your right about this time round. I'd imagine that's why level 5, because they know they're losing the public

    Its done, its lost.

    The vast majority will do the right thing, will wear masks, sanitise, keep social distance, limit visitors etc.

    After that, nah it aint happening, the 5k limit is a waste of time, even the Guards dont want to police it.

    I even see it in my own job, sector is deemed essential but they did lock down people within that sector the last time in certain jobs. That aint happening this time.

    The last lock down was all about buying time to get our house in order, to increase capacity essentially to buy time which they the HSE and the Government completely squandered and of course deflected the entire blame on to joe public, and of course people lapped it up, no easier way to distract people than to have them blaming each other.

    Ill be going to the beach saturday morning with the wife and kids for a walk weather permitting, further than 5k, wont be in contact with anyone, out in the fresh air.

    If guards turn me back ill head elsewhere and so on.

    If my wife can stand in from of 30 plus kids for 6 hours a day and be told she is safe and not a risk im pretty sure the 4 of us driving 12k for a walk on the beach on our own is pretty safe!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    They are handing out fines like confetti to anyone they think is going to a house party.

    I was thinking of going to a house party next year, but I’m afraid to think about it now in case I get fined.

    It’s a police state.

    Not sure why you quoted my response to someone talking about the 'great reset' to post this unconnected irrelevance. I'm assuming it was just a roundabout way of getting your repetitive and innaccurate 'police state' comment shoehorned in by any means necessary. Yeah...you got me to bite again *applause*

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 macrocycle_24


    the kelt wrote: »
    Its done, its lost.

    The vast majority will do the right thing, will wear masks, sanitise, keep social distance, limit visitors etc.

    After that, nah it aint happening, the 5k limit is a waste of time, even the Guards dont want to police it.

    I even see it in my own job, sector is deemed essential but they did lock down people within that sector the last time in certain jobs. That aint happening this time.

    The last lock down was all about buying time to get our house in order, to increase capacity essentially to buy time which they the HSE and the Government completely squandered and of course deflected the entire blame on to joe public, and of course people lapped it up, no easier way to distract people than to have them blaming each other.

    Ill be going to the beach saturday morning with the wife and kids for a walk weather permitting, further than 5k, wont be in contact with anyone, out in the fresh air.

    If guards turn me back ill head elsewhere and so on.

    If my wife can stand in from of 30 plus kids for 6 hours a day and be told she is safe and not a risk im pretty sure the 4 of us driving 12k for a walk on the beach on our own is pretty safe!

    The 5k thing is laughable, if I live in Dublin there are probably 500,000 people living within that 5k, if I live in rural Co. Clare there might be 50 people living within 5k, what matters is what you do when you get to your destination not how far you go in fairness. Of course we have to be treated like cattle and penned in, although 90% of us will use our own judgement about what is safe and what is stupid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    lads let me give an example of the madness! Ok, we had a part time employee, doing an 1.5 hour a week, a side job to his main job. Covid hits, we cant offer him the 1.5 hour any more, the business revolves around classroom based face to face meeting. He can now get E350 a week, as he lost his job. Now look, I am delighted for him, one of those, up early, paying a fortune into the system, struggling with a family renting in dublin, fcuking delighted he can get it back out and if the likes of him dont get it, guaranteed it will be wasted on wasters, fund blackholes etc, the story of life in Ireland. But you lose E50 a week and can get E350? Then again, I am probably wrong to question FG and their prudent governance :rolleyes:

    If he has a main job, how is he getting €350??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,854 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Rrrrrr2 wrote: »
    It’s basically the public service and professional class once again dumping down on the working class and small business. Using them as an easy scapegoat. I’ve never seen such a wedge being driven in Irish society- the next few weeks are going to be interesting in terms of push back which is going to be massive

    I'm kinda surprised there hasn't been more kick-back from small business owners who've spent their lives building something and are now seeing it sacrificed on the later of hysteria and political cowardace.

    Perhaps they are worried they'd be labeled selfish, granny-killers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Rrrrrr2 wrote: »
    Yea the bury your head in the sand approach is much better

    Well hoping for a recession/austerity/job losses just to 'show them' isn't a good look. It's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,627 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Penfailed wrote: »
    Not sure why you quoted my response to someone talking about the 'great reset' to post this unconnected irrelevance. I'm assuming it was just a roundabout way of getting your repetitive and innaccurate 'police state' comment shoehorned in by any means necessary. Yeah...you got me to bite again *applause*

    A member of the force will have the power to hand out fines using powers of presumption.

    There is only one name for it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭TRANQUILLO


    No, there will be fines for groups larger than 12 not wearing masks outdoors also, this I would think is directly aimed at idiot anti-mask/Gemma fan club members etc.

    Ah the old Ad hominem ...

    Gemma fan club members eh. Simple as that. No nuance. No shades of grey. Just conceited smug smart arsery which is en vogue on here with yourself in the vanguard.


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    TRANQUILLO wrote: »
    Ah the old Ad hominem ...

    Gemma fan club members eh. Simple as that. No nuance. No shades of grey. Just conceited smug smart arsery which is en vogue on here with yourself in the vanguard.

    What shades of grey is there? There is almost zero reason for anyone to meet in any group at all outside never mind a group of 12, a funeral is about the only reason I can think of and most would have no issue wearing a mask.

    Other than that yeah anyone meeting in groups and not wearing masks are almost guaranteed to be anti mask idiots/Gemma supporters/thugs and the very least they should get is a fine (I’d personally like to see a lot more done with them but that’s a different story).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 982 ✭✭✭Rrrrrr2


    TRANQUILLO wrote: »
    Ah the old Ad hominem ...

    Gemma fan club members eh. Simple as that. No nuance. No shades of grey. Just conceited smug smart arsery which is en vogue on here with yourself in the vanguard.

    There's clearly more than a little screw loose here- best off ignoring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    lets stay lockdown for 12 months , everyone stay at home , in ther room , glued to ther computer , ordering takeaways on our free money, curtain twitch to see if anyone is breaking the rules , report anyone (friends or family member) - dont excercise or go to a gym , get fat it doesn't seam to matter- we will definitly get the virus down to manageable numbers , but probably have forgotten how to live , run out of money - right now I'm beyond caring , the HSE/NPHET have full control and Martin is just shown up as another dreadful weak Fianna Fail leader , the last one bankrupt the country , never thought it could happen again, but I believe Martin is actually worse. Enjoy lockdown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭TRANQUILLO


    What shades of grey is there? There is almost zero reason for anyone to meet in any group at all outside never mind a group of 12, a funeral is about the only reason I can think of and most would have no issue wearing a mask.

    Other than that yeah anyone meeting in groups and not wearing masks are almost guaranteed to be anti mask idiots/Gemma supporters/thugs and the very least they should get is a fine (I’d personally like to see a lot more done with them but that’s a different story).

    Well I wont be wearing a mask and I disagree with the restrictions so we will leave it there. I have loved ones as well some in their 80's and this is how we as a family feel about it. No thugs, No idiots and no Gemma supporters(I don't actually know much about her but she gets referenced on this website a lot as some sort of deflection from debate).

    We shall leave it there Nox.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,470 ✭✭✭MOH


    SAMTALK wrote: »
    Have you forgotten during the last lockdown the videos of beaches / woods etc, the BBQ's , the GAA finals celebrations.
    Yes the majority of people stuck to the restrictions but no way was it anywhere near 100 %.

    Of course they got things wrong, the testing , the contact tracing but the attitude is F*** this I have enough and now I'm not doing anymore.

    Im no fan of NPHET or the Government but if we all just go about our business as we did in January where do you think this will leave us.

    I haven't forgotten any of that. Or the parties I could hear going on around me during the 6 weeks when I didn't see a single person I knew. I never said it was 100%.

    But despite all that, we came out of it with as close to zero as we're going to get. We were averaging 20 cases a day in June.

    All along the mantra was test and trace. But we didn't do that, despite the promises, and the numbers rose by a factor of 20, and now we are exactly back at square one. Except for those businesses already gone under and those that have taken enough of a hit that they'll go this time.

    Mary Lou is calling for a "a ‘gold standard’ contract-tracing system that tracked down every close associate within 24 hours.". 24 hours is a bit optimistic, but that's pretty much what we were promised last time around. I've no idea why anybody would think we'll get it this time.

    This lockdown won't make a blind bit of difference. If it ends before Christmas, people will go nuts, and I can't blame them. It if continues through Christmas, they'll go even more nuts whenever it does end. And then after a while numbers go back up, and we're back in another lockdown by March.

    If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting different results, we're being run by lunatics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭dalyboy


    MOH wrote: »
    I haven't forgotten any of that. Or the parties I could hear going on around me during the 6 weeks when I didn't see a single person I knew. I never said it was 100%.

    But despite all that, we came out of it with as close to zero as we're going to get. We were averaging 20 cases a day in June.

    All along the mantra was test and trace. But we didn't do that, despite the promises, and the numbers rose by a factor of 20, and now we are exactly back at square one. Except for those businesses already gone under and those that have taken enough of a hit that they'll go this time.

    Mary Lou is calling for a "a ‘gold standard’ contract-tracing system that tracked down every close associate within 24 hours.". 24 hours is a bit optimistic, but that's pretty much what we were promised last time around. I've no idea why anybody would think we'll get it this time.

    This lockdown won't make a blind bit of difference. If it ends before Christmas, people will go nuts, and I can't blame them. It if continues through Christmas, they'll go even more nuts whenever it does end. And then after a while numbers go back up, and we're back in another lockdown by March.

    If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting different results, we're being run by lunatics.

    Exactly , totally nuts.
    Only solution?
    Open everything up and scrap this level 5 rubbish


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Ironhead93 wrote: »
    Seeing they managed to open up the gyms in Liverpool and now a few Irish gyms are doing the same. The people have had enough, love it.

    Gym I use, which has been doing outdoor classes with us finished today.

    Instead they are going to be doing classes online at home like the previous lockdown. Watch and join in on your tablet or smart tv.

    For a very reasonable monthly fee you get sent the code to watch and participate in any one of three daily classes.. you can watch back if you need at any time.

    For an extra fee they send you a nice gym bag... containing resistance bands and a good bit of other kit, It’s quite reasonable , I forget what exactly as i already have that stuff but thinking outside the box and being sensible, people have the ability to overcome and get on even with restrictions while being safe, legal and sensible.

    Then again, I see in an article an owner of a private gym, complaining that gyms are being closed and fast food places are remaining open.. the tube head clawing at the walls claiming he can’t understand it, so unfair etc... .that’s the kind of knucklehead knuckle-dragging that you are up against... if my cooker goes tomorrow I need to eat some cooked food.... could be a while getting parts and an electrician.. or it’s not convenient to cook, my chipper takes phone orders, pay with card, he / she rings my doorbell, waits to see me open it, job done..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    dalyboy wrote: »
    Exactly , totally nuts.
    Only solution?
    Open everything up and scrap this level 5 rubbish
    Rubbish?

    I’d say doctors, nurses, carers, virologists, lab technicians, and so on would certainly appreciate you telling them that to their faces.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    A member of the force will have the power to hand out fines using powers of presumption.

    There is only one name for it

    There's loads of names for it. Police state isn't one of them. Seriously. Do yourself a favour and look up the definition of a police state. You're either misunderstanding the meaning or you're being obtuse. Which is it?

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,627 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Penfailed wrote: »
    There's loads of names for it. Police state isn't one of them. Seriously. Do yourself a favour and look up the definition of a police state. You're either misunderstanding the meaning or you're being obtuse. Which is it?

    “A police state is a government that exercises power through the power of the police force”


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    TRANQUILLO wrote: »
    Well I wont be wearing a mask and I disagree with the restrictions so we will leave it there. I have loved ones as well some in their 80's and this is how we as a family feel about it. No thugs, No idiots and no Gemma supporters(I don't actually know much about her but she gets referenced on this website a lot as some sort of deflection from debate).

    We shall leave it there Nox.

    Where won’t you be wearing a mask? In a group of 12 outdoors? Why will you be in a group of 12 outdoors?

    A mask isn’t currently required outdoors alone or in small groups (though I would agree with making it mandatory) but it is in groups of 12 or more (which shouldn’t be happening anyway bar a funeral).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Rrrrrr2 wrote: »
    There's clearly more than a little screw loose here- best off ignoring.

    Quoting someone that posted about Ad Hominem...by doing the same.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 903 ✭✭✭big syke


    Trying to settle argument here. Currently all the kids allowed out playing on the road. After tonight some are being kept in and not allowed go out due to the restrictions. What's the official rules now and after midnight regarding kids playing on the road/field outside?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,109 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    big syke wrote: »
    Trying to settle argument here. Currently all the kids allowed out playing on the road. After tonight some are being kept in and not allowed go out due to the restrictions. What's the official rules now and after midnight regarding kids playing on the road/field outside?

    We are all allowed to get exercise so they can go out and play.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,011 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Strumms wrote: »
    Rubbish?

    I’d say doctors, nurses, carers, virologists, lab technicians, and so on would certainly appreciate you telling them that to their faces.

    Most of these had never heard of lockdown before March - maybe some virologists had.

    If they now have an emotional investment in the theories about causality and locking down that's fine but it doesn't make them the final arbiters of all our lives.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 903 ✭✭✭big syke


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    We are all allowed to get exercise so they can go out and play.

    Byt with one other household right?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement