Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How long before Irish reunification?

Options
16791112335

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    15-20 years
    markodaly wrote: »
    Are you Brois Johnson by any chance?

    You can literally compare any debate to Brexit by replacing words. What's the point of it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,062 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Well actually yes, over a long time it will. Problem is that Brexit has no benefits at all, even from a nationalistic point of view, so the short term pain will be for nothing at all.

    In fairness, you are taking the ultra contrarian view.
    Reminds of this quote from Mao Zedong on the impact of the French revolution.
    It's too early to tell

    Cute and all, but we all know Western democracies with 4-5 year election cycles are different and voters won't be interested in airy-fairy fantasy 'it will be grand' talking points.

    However, you have proved the point without a doubt that at UI and Brexit share many many similarities.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,176 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Hopefully never tbh, the north is a cultural and economic backwater that doesn't appear to have the capacity to pay it's own way and I wouldn't want their politicians having any influence in the running of our state. Fundamentalist nut jobs on both sides!

    The north costs Britain in the region of £9bn a year. Now, to to be fair, we'd be cutting a lot of that since most of the public servants in the north would be redundant and paying them dole would be cheaper than assuming their wage bill. Why that 30% of the North would ever vote for unification is beyond me - turkeys don't tend to vote for Christmas...

    Lets imagine that through reduced public expenditure, some assistance from the EU and some economic growth we could approximately half the North's deficit between it's tax take and public expenditure and get it down to approx 5 billion euro a year. Optimistic, I know (and involving serious hardship for the public servants of Norther Ireland) but that becomes an interesting number: it matches the cost of servicing the national debt of the Republic of Ireland. So when Britain try to foist the North on us that should be our price for taking it: pay off our entire national debt of approx €220bn.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,317 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    cgcsb wrote: »
    You can literally compare any debate to Brexit by replacing words. What's the point of it?

    well it helps that you made it much easier by just reusing brexiteer arguments.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    15-20 years
    markodaly wrote: »

    Well, first of all, the North is run at a deficit of £4,939 per person.
    That is £8,890,200,000 per year.

    How do we bridge that gap in the medium or short term?

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-48431630

    You realise that's nonsense right? This includes NI's contribution to such British money holes as:

    -Renting the trident system that might/might not work and they might or might not be allowed use it on the day they need to

    -Trillion pound occupations of middle eastern countries

    -The UK royal family money hole, including keeping your man in armoured Roles Royces to plow into the commoners

    - Paying for Brexit, including handing over massive sums to ferry companies that don't own any boats.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    15-20 years
    markodaly wrote: »
    In fairness, you are taking the ultra contrarian view.
    Reminds of this quote from Mao Zedong on the impact of the French revolution.

    :rolleyes:

    Oh jeeze, if it's not Brexit, it's Mao, a Hitler reference is only around the corner I'm sure.

    Bottom line, obscure comparisons to situations with parallel issues isn't an argument.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,262 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    cgcsb wrote: »
    You realise that's nonsense right?

    Presumably you can provide the correct figure for us so?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    15-20 years
    Presumably you can provide the correct figure for us so?

    We don't have it, the UK cook the books, so obtaining these figures isn't possible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,262 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    cgcsb wrote: »
    We don't have it, the UK cook the books, so obtaining these figures isn't possible.

    Maybe you could make some figures up?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    15-20 years
    Maybe you could make some figures up?

    Sure might as well, everyone else is at it, let's say it costs €1.50


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    20-30 years
    cgcsb wrote: »
    You can literally compare any debate to Brexit by replacing words. What's the point of it?


    hehe. Is it too late for me to trademark Fuaránach's law: 'As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Brexit or Brexiteers approaches 1'?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,770 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    So in summary...

    The UI advocates here link to a report that starts by saying data is limited and lots of assumptions have been made... then try to call out those who actually READ it and highlighted those points by using terms like Partitionists (what is this.. the 1920s?)

    They still can't point to any real benefits for either side to justify the massive cost and upheaval involved, but reckon things like economic factors will "be grand". But yet the "Partitionists/West Brits/insert archaic term here" are the ones who are wrong!

    That about cover it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,317 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    So in summary...

    The UI advocates here link to a report that starts by saying data is limited and lots of assumptions have been made... then try to call out those who actually READ it and highlighted those points by using terms like Partitionists (what is this.. the 1920s?)

    They still can't point to any real benefits for either side to justify the massive cost and upheaval involved, but reckon things like economic factors will "be grand". But yet the "Partitionists/West Brits/insert archaic term here" are the ones who are wrong!

    That about cover it?


    Pretty much. They think it is a great idea and it is up to the rest of us to prove them wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭Berserker


    cgcsb wrote: »
    We don't have it, the UK cook the books, so obtaining these figures isn't possible.

    Are you saying that these figures are the cooked version :eek:; i.e. manipulated to make NI look as good as possible? The UK wants to get rid of NI, so they are hardly going to make NI look worse, are they?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    20-30 years
    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    They still can't point to any real benefits for either side to justify the massive cost


    Still waiting for evidence from the Defenders of this Realm (How about that?) of those "massive costs"...


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,262 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    https://banda.ie/wp-content/uploads/Sunday-Times-Apr-2019-Report.pdf

    Latest B&A report shows only 37% of respondents are willing to pay more tax for a UI - or at least that's the pavlovian response they told a pollster.

    One wonders how many of them would actually commit to paying for it - 30%. 25%, less?

    There seems to be a lot of us Partitionists about :D:D:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,015 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    10-15 years
    https://banda.ie/wp-content/uploads/Sunday-Times-Apr-2019-Report.pdf

    Latest B&A report shows only 37% of respondents are willing to pay more tax for a UI - or at least that's the pavlovian response they told a pollster.

    One wonders how many of them would actually commit to paying for it - 30%. 25%, less?

    There seems to be a lot of us Partitionists about :D:D:D

    Yeah if there was a poll on paying more tax for the Children's hospital or Irish Water how might that fare?
    If you ask people do they want to pay more tax they're likely to say no.
    If there were one on should we build a new hospital or overhaul the water system they'd likely say yes. Means little, especially considering any numbers are pulled from someones arse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,015 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    10-15 years
    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    So in summary...

    The UI advocates here link to a report that starts by saying data is limited and lots of assumptions have been made... then try to call out those who actually READ it and highlighted those points by using terms like Partitionists (what is this.. the 1920s?)

    They still can't point to any real benefits for either side to justify the massive cost and upheaval involved, but reckon things like economic factors will "be grand". But yet the "Partitionists/West Brits/insert archaic term here" are the ones who are wrong!

    That about cover it?

    I wouldn't be voting for it for personal monitory gain. The concept that 'it must enrich us or why bother?'
    is where you're missing the point. There's no 'we'll be grand' as regards any costs. It's something we should do and it'll cost what it costs. We've spent on 'taking one for the team' and various quangos, bondholders and lost money on sweet deals. A UI is far more worthy IMO.

    Be careful Boris doesn't see these comments on how pointless having it is or the Unionists will get a kick up the arse out of it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,262 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    It's something we should do and it'll cost what it costs.

    Thankfully not everyone is as cavalier when it comes to mortgaging our children's futures on some Shinnerbot pipe-dream.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    20-30 years
    Berserker wrote: »
    if NI is to reduce the handout it receives, it will need to experience economic growth in it's private sector.

    That's a massive assumption. Maybe it will just not be able to get the handout from the English to raise the living standard, or the living standard over in Britain will decline?
    Berserker wrote: »
    That will mean that Brexit will be a success for NI. I was under the impression that Brexit is going to cripple the UK.

    All economic predictions are that the NI economy will be the worst hit part of the UK in the event of a no-deal Brexit. It's already a basket case in every respect - and the handful of areas it was holding on to its older technical skillset have been kicked in the goolies with Bombardier's recent decision to leave.

    All those mad Fenians in the... Confederation of British Industry are warning of the "devastating" impact of a no-deal Brexit: No-deal Brexit could cost Northern Ireland €5.7bn over 15 years

    A BBC summary of other research into the effect of Brexit on the North: Brexit: What would no-deal mean for the NI economy?
    Berserker wrote: »
    People in the RoI and NI, who are not blinded by nationalism, will vote with their heads and put their own well being first.

    You assume both are mutually exclusive, yet like others here you've failed to give evidence for this faux rational position.

    The main issue with reunification will be the socio-political one of how to deal with the shockingly inordinate number of egregiously undereducated troglodytes which the British state has nurtured in welfare class loyalist areas of the Six Counties. Economically, an all-Ireland state of 6.7 million people will have greater economies of scale than the current state of 4.8 million people. And very many business classes south of the border would be quite happy to get rid of the existence of those cheaper prices up the road, while many in the welfare classes would be quite happy to get the higher welfare here. And so on with various toing and froing between discrete economic interests.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,317 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    That's a massive assumption. Maybe it will just not be able to get the handout from the English to raise the living standard, or the living standard over in Britain will decline?



    All economic predictions are that the NI economy will be the worst hit part of the UK in the event of a no-deal Brexit. It's already a basket case in every respect - and the handful of areas it was holding on to its older technical skillset have been kicked in the goolies with Bombardier's recent decision to leave.

    All those mad Fenians in the... Confederation of British Industry are warning of the "devastating" impact of a no-deal Brexit: No-deal Brexit could cost Northern Ireland €5.7bn over 15 years

    A BBC summary of other research into the effect of Brexit on the North: Brexit: What would no-deal mean for the NI economy?



    You assume both are mutually exclusive, yet like others here you've failed to give evidence for this faux rational position.

    The main issue with reunification will be the socio-political one of how to deal with the shockingly inordinate number of egregiously undereducated troglodytes which the British state has nurtured in welfare class loyalist areas of the Six Counties. Economically, an all-Ireland state of 6.7 million people will have greater economies of scale than the current state of 4.8 million people. And very many business classes south of the border would be quite happy to get rid of the existence of those cheaper prices up the road, while many in the welfare classes would be quite happy to get the higher welfare here. And so on with various toing and froing between discrete economic interests.

    are the egregiously undereducated troglodytes exclusively in loyalist areas?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭_blaaz


    10-15 years
    How will their quality of life be 'brought up'?

    Losing the NHS, billions of euros in subvention and ten of thousands of cushy public sector jobs.

    The turkeys up there won't be voting for Christmas and we won't be voting to take over the turkey farm.

    Mate....NI has by far and way worst poverty rates on the island??


    If you think poverty equals higher quality of life...you shout up that tree all yous want...but people will probably laugh at you like


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,015 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    10-15 years
    Thankfully not everyone is as cavalier when it comes to mortgaging our children's futures on some Shinnerbot pipe-dream.

    Like Noonan and Enda were? Neither SF nor Enda Kenny own the idea of a UI.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,262 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Like Noonan and Enda were? Neither SF nor Enda Kenny own the idea of a UI.

    I don't believe Noonan or Kenny ever voted in a referendum on unification and even if they had, I'd fail to see the relevance to how the rest of us will vote, so I'm not sure what your point is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,262 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    _blaaz wrote: »
    Mate....NI has by far and way worst poverty rates on the island??

    Sounds charming - where do i sign up to be their sugar-daddy?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    15-20 years
    Berserker wrote: »
    Are you saying that these figures are the cooked version :eek:; i.e. manipulated to make NI look as good as possible? The UK wants to get rid of NI, so they are hardly going to make NI look worse, are they?

    No they cook the books for all the UK regions to make them think they are beholden to the great Londinium, the Romans taught them this trick, it creates the illusion of dependency on the empire. Most of Ireland broke away regardless, because our great grandfathers had the good sense to recognise that the imperialists weren't benign overlords here to protect us from ourselves.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,317 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Still waiting for evidence from the Defenders of this Realm (How about that?) of those "massive costs"...

    You know what, if they ever do decide to have a poll on this i really hope they put you or somebody like you in charge of campaigning for a yes vote. You would be the best weapon the No side could hope for.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    20-30 years
    The main issue with reunification will be the socio-political one of how to deal with the shockingly inordinate number of egregiously undereducated troglodytes which the British state has nurtured in welfare class loyalist areas of the Six Counties.
    are the egregiously undereducated troglodytes exclusively in loyalist areas?

    The inordinate number are, yes, ohnonotgmail. That word was put there for a reason. Explore it.

    Finola Meredith in The Irish Times (2013):
    It is only in the area of education where working-class Protestants are seen to be doing even worse than their Catholic counterparts: the 2010 deprivation measure found that 12 of the 20 most deprived wards assessed on education, skills and training are predominantly Protestant, as are 26 of the worst 30 wards for school pupil absenteeism. In 2011, a report aimed at improving educational standards among young working-class Protestants explored several community and cultural reasons for this, particularly deindustrialisation and the loss of traditional labour markets and skills. Plentiful trades and apprenticeships in the past meant there was less emphasis on the need for qualifications; when the jobs evaporated, the pattern of educational disengagement endured, and has now become augmented by a kind of listless fatalism. As east Belfast Progressive Unionist Party councillor John Kyle puts it: “There is a culture of worklessness, which perpetuates the expectation that there will be no work in the future.”

    Poorer Protestant boys underachieving (BBC, 2014)

    Catholics pupils perform better than Protestants (Irish News, 2017)

    Poorer Protestant boys faring worst in Northern Ireland schools, says report (Belfast Telegraph, 2019)


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    15-20 years
    Thankfully not everyone is as cavalier when it comes to mortgaging our children's futures on some Shinnerbot pipe-dream.

    But you're happy to flog the nation's children to the British Empire to save a percentage?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    20-30 years
    For anybody who still has their head in the sand about the extent or significance of demographic change in the North, here are the latest (April 2019) official figures on the religious denomination of all students in education there: Number of Catholic children in schools at all-time high (Irish News, April 2019)
    THE religious divide in schools is at its widest ever with the number of Catholic children at an all all-time high.

    Official government figures also reveal the percentage of pupils who identify as Protestant is plummeting.

    There are now more Catholic children at nursery, primary, secondary, grammar and special schools.

    On school census day this year there were 175,617 Catholic pupils - 50.7 per cent of all enrolments. It is the first time this figure has topped 175,000.

    There were 114,314 Protestant children - 33 per cent - while 56,408 identified as `other'.


    The Irish Times (May 2019):
    This trend away from a Protestant majority “is likely to continue”. The main drivers of change are differing birth and death rates between the two communities, the effect of migration, and loss of affiliation, which is more pronounced in urban areas and in the east of Northern Ireland.

    Both Queen’s and Ulster University have a majority of students from a Catholic background; conversely, 63 per cent of students who study in Britain do not return to Northern Ireland, and the report cites other studies which have suggested their numbers are disproportionately Protestant.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement