Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Poppy

1121315171824

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 182 ✭✭Disgruntled Badger


    Wear the poppy with pride for the 200k Irishmen that fought for this country.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well if that isn't the understatement of the century I don't know what is. Incidentally it's likely to get worse in Catalonia before it gets better.

    I know its sounds a tad simplistic but you know its true. If Madrid hadn't acted in the stupid way that it did, a 'No' vote may have been returned in the 2017 referendum, since a number of polls indicated such an outcome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭votecounts


    Wear the poppy with pride for the 200k Irishmen that fought for this country.
    How many Irish people were murdered at the Hands of British scum.
    No proper Irish person would ever wear a poppy just west brits looking to be the queens lapdog


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    votecounts wrote: »
    How many Irish people were murdered at the Hands of British scum.
    No proper Irish person would ever wear a poppy just west brits looking to be the queens lapdog

    How many British people were pointlessly sent to their deaths by criminally inept/unconcerned generals plucked from the elite classes, may be a question the British soul might ask itself one day.

    Not while we all engage in the poppy mist though. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 182 ✭✭Disgruntled Badger


    How many Irish people were murdered at the Hands of British scum.
    No proper Irish person would ever wear a poppy just west brits looking to be the queens lapdog[/quote]

    How many? I don't think there is a known figure. Of course likely they were executed by Irishmen so the number is probably quite negligible. I wonder how long the IRA would have held out if the Allied armies of WW1 or WW2 had been defeated?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    As we're touching on the subject of WWI I'm, personally, completely spellbound by the work Peter Jackson has carried out on WWI footage.

    The silent black-and-white film of WWI gave its documentation a sort of unworldly feel -- as if it could have been captured many centuries ago in a forgotten time -- that put it at a distance from the viewer

    The colourisation, adding of speech, and sound effects brings that old WWI footage to life like a
    magic paint brush and allows us to identify more closely with the soldiers. I'm really looking forward to seeing the finished film.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    joe40 wrote: »
    Do the German government commemorate the millions of German soldiers who died in ww1. Obviously ww2 is something thing they do not wish to celebrate in anyway, but ww1 was just a war between empires.
    The poppy supports a British military establishment that have committed plenty of atrocities. I am not a sinn fein supporter but I would hate to see the poppy take hold in Ireland, or become the norm.
    Commerations tomorrow are one thing but this poppy nonsense for a few weeks is ridiculous

    Yes they do, they remember Volkstrauertag or Peoples Day of Mourning, this year it will be on Nov 18th. Do they have poppy day, no but Merkel did lay a wreath on Saturday at a WW1 cemetery along with Macron, not sure if she'll be doing anything actually at 11th hour of 11th day of 11th month


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    joe40 wrote: »
    This discussion is about the poppy. The actions of the IRA are irrelevant.

    Unless you were in Enniskillen in 1987.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Not as big a mistake as saying she'd wear the British poppy. Spectacular stupidity there.





    In fairness, it's not like any of the apologists for the British Empire here are "moving on". You all seem decidedly "enraged" at the temerity of the Irish to not accept this pathetic attempt to justify centuries of British imperialist aggression against us Irish and many others that the poppy embodies. Your imperialist dead, your imperialist heroes. No glorification for them here.

    Hardly, casualty figures for WW1
    British Empire between 950,000 and 1,100,000
    Total of the allies inc BE between 5,186,854 and 6,433,692

    Central Powers between 3,386,290 and 4,390,544

    Wonder why Tayyip Erdoga's there if it's just some imperialist celebration


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    klaaaz wrote: »
    Dublin ain't like anywhere in Kent. Dublin is part of an independent country free from British rule just like France is. Unfortunately, there are northern areas on this island still under British rule, those who have a deep affection for the British armed forces endorse the hundreds of murders of innocent Irish people through the purchase of the British poppy as the poppy funds the British soldiers who committed those murders.


    Actually I think the UK government and MoD fund soldiers etc. But let's not quibble over details


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Is everything in your world so black and white?

    Is the 21 year old lad who flew a spitfire in the Battle of Britain a ‘thug’ because he did so in a British uniform?
    Or the woman who dropped into occupied France as an agent of the SOE? Is she a ‘thug’?
    How about the men who fought the taliban in Helmand province? Were they ‘thugs’?
    Or the 19 year old conscript who died in the mud at Passchendaele? A ‘thug’ too?

    I am capable of acknowledging that the British armed forces have done both right and wrong, good and bad, shameful things and heroic acts in their history. I don’t think you are though.


    You are a shock merchant, I’m sure of it,


    ...the vast majority being 'wrong', 'bad'and 'shameful'.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Spook_ie wrote: »
    Hardly, casualty figures for WW1
    British Empire between 950,000 and 1,100,000
    Total of the allies inc BE between 5,186,854 and 6,433,692

    Central Powers between 3,386,290 and 4,390,544

    Wonder why Tayyip Erdoga's there if it's just some imperialist celebration

    First, you can be absolutely sure Erdoğan isn't wearing the British poppy. Given that not even the French wear that British symbol, it would be odd of a defeated country to do so. Second, that red British poppy is the RBL's symbol and they are explicit that it “is worn to commemorate the sacrifices of our Armed Forces and to show support to those still serving today and their loved ones”. In other words, it's fantasy land when people wear the RBL red poppy and make up their own meaning for it, denying what it commemorates: all the British Armed Forces, be they in Wexford in 1798 or Armagh in 1982, or South Africa in 1900 or any of the thugs who fought in the other colonial wars of the British.

    Anyway, I'm sure our British nationalists would be very accepting if somebody wore the Nazi Swastika because, for them, it's a personal reminder of the futility of war and nobody has a right to impose a meaning on it? Yes, that's about the stupidity level of denial here about what the British poppy actually commemorates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,666 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Wear one. Don't wear one. Whatever.

    I can 'remember' things and events without advertising. Same reason I wouldnt wear an Easter Lily or any other accessory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    Spook_ie wrote: »
    Wonder why Tayyip Erdoga's there if it's just some imperialist celebration

    Bringing attention to Turkey's Ottoman inheritance is something that is particularly close to Erdogan's heart.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,302 ✭✭✭mattser


    Is everything in your world so black and white?

    Is the 21 year old lad who flew a spitfire in the Battle of Britain a ‘thug’ because he did so in a British uniform?
    Or the woman who dropped into occupied France as an agent of the SOE? Is she a ‘thug’?
    How about the men who fought the taliban in Helmand province? Were they ‘thugs’?
    Or the 19 year old conscript who died in the mud at Passchendaele? A ‘thug’ too?

    I am capable of acknowledging that the British armed forces have done both right and wrong, good and bad, shameful things and heroic acts in their history. I don’t think you are though.


    You are a shock merchant, I’m sure of it,

    See what I mean ? There are a handful of neandarthals left behind, who trawl the internet all day every day for the cause.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,668 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Odhinn wrote: »
    ...the vast majority being 'wrong', 'bad'and 'shameful'.

    Yet you converse in its tongue and profit from it. Go figure. :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,668 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,668 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,668 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,717 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The reality is most people here could care less about WW1 or those who fought in it. It isn't an active disregard just something not seen as relevant by most.

    The evidence for that is born out in the number of commemorations and the size of the crowds.

    It is a niche event, for right or wrong it always will be. The age profiles of people involved suggest in another decade it will be confined to a handful.

    The debate about wearing the Poppy is a moot point as to see one person in the last few weeks is unusual.

    Is it right or wrong to wear it is not a real debate when most people will never bother.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Danzy wrote: »
    The reality is most people here could care less about WW1 or those who fought in it. It isn't an active disregard just something not seen as relevant by most.

    The evidence for that is born out in the number of commemorations and the size of the crowds.

    It is a niche event, for right or wrong it always will be. The age profiles of people involved suggest in another decade it will be confined to a handful.

    The debate about wearing the Poppy is a moot point as to see one person in the last few weeks is unusual.

    Is it right or wrong to wear it is not a real debate when most people will never bother.

    Shame on them then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Danzy wrote: »
    The reality is most people here could care less about WW1 or those who fought in it. It isn't an active disregard just something not seen as relevant by most.

    The evidence for that is born out in the number of commemorations and the size of the crowds.

    It is a niche event, for right or wrong it always will be. The age profiles of people involved suggest in another decade it will be confined to a handful.

    The debate about wearing the Poppy is a moot point as to see one person in the last few weeks is unusual.

    Is it right or wrong to wear it is not a real debate when most people will never bother.

    I am delighted that in the 100th year that has been no significant uptake in the acceptance of it here.
    It will die out over the next hundred as even the British forget about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,717 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Graces7 wrote: »
    Shame on them then.

    Why, honest question?

    Or is it the few who do attend commemorations for it. It's their thing, I don't agree with it or see the point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,852 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    Graces7 wrote: »
    Shame on them then.

    No Grace, I just don't feel like commemorating Robert Nairac or the UDR.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,058 ✭✭✭Mookie Blaylock


    2 minutes silence beautifully observed....makes my heart glad


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,852 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    Corbyn in his bus conductors coat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,414 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Really? I've been quite amazed by the awakening of the latent Fenian sentiment of the vast majority of the Irish population in the last couple of years.

    The affable economist David McWilliams (who is married to a northern Protestant) said recently that his 'inner Provo' was awoken by the behaviour of our bothersome neighbour.

    Oh and Irish Republicanism is on the rise in young people according to the polls. No, on the contrary, you pro-empire types are becoming an ever-decreasing oddity.

    I'd say lots of things amaze you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    First, you can be absolutely sure Erdoğan isn't wearing the British poppy. Given that not even the French wear that British symbol, it would be odd of a defeated country to do so. Second, that red British poppy is the RBL's symbol and they are explicit that it “is worn to commemorate the sacrifices of our Armed Forces and to show support to those still serving today and their loved ones”. In other words, it's fantasy land when people wear the RBL red poppy and make up their own meaning for it, denying what it commemorates: all the British Armed Forces, be they in Wexford in 1798 or Armagh in 1982, or South Africa in 1900 or any of the thugs who fought in the other colonial wars of the British.

    Anyway, I'm sure our British nationalists would be very accepting if somebody wore the Nazi Swastika because, for them, it's a personal reminder of the futility of war and nobody has a right to impose a meaning on it? Yes, that's about the stupidity level of denial here about what the British poppy actually commemorates.

    Yes just like you imposing a value on the swastika's meaning when it is a symbol from Asian religions, it's all in the context and your context is way off line with remembrance services for the centenary of the 1918 armistice, I'm scarlet for your mother


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I have to say, I do enjoy the virtue signalling that goes on about this on social media.
    I have an English guy I do some business with who is now trying to have a pop at Irish and Scottish objectors to the poppy charade. He went to the trouble of making a post at 11am.
    So much for respectful observance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,414 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    I am delighted that in the 100th year that has been no significant uptake in the acceptance of it here.
    It will die out over the next hundred as even the British forget about it.

    It looks like it's dying out , especially when you see wreaths laid by German and Irish dignitaries .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It looks like it's dying out , especially when you see wreaths laid by German and Irish dignitaries .

    We lay laurel wreaths as a 'state'.

    As I have said, I don't have a problem with respectful remembrance by anyone who wants to do it.

    The poppy charade has just become a vulgar way to taunt different peoples who threw out their colonial oppressors. The sooner it dies out here the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    We lay laurel wreaths as a 'state'.

    As I have said, I don't have a problem with respectful remembrance by anyone who wants to do it.

    The poppy charade has just become a vulgar way to taunt different peoples who threw out their colonial oppressors. The sooner it dies out here the better.

    There is no poppy charade here, in this country. There are just people who want to remember our dead. Even Fuaranach wants to remember our dead, albeit weeping tears of joy while doing so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    There is no poppy charade here, in this country. There are just people who want to remember our dead. Even Fuaranach wants to remember our dead, albeit weeping tears of joy while doing so.

    You want to specifically remember the dead who went to fight for the British empire in a slaughterfest of criminal proportions. And most of those vulgarly trying to normalise the poppy here want to/and do demean those who died for Irish aims.

    That is a shameful charade. No two ways about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    You want to specifically remember the dead who went to fight for the British empire in a slaughterfest of criminal proportions. And most of those vulgarly trying to normalise the poppy here want to/and do demean those who died for Irish aims.

    That is a shameful charade. No two ways about it.

    Look I don't know about your position, but most people with that stance aren't actually against the pointless bloodshed; the criminal irresponsibility of the officers; or the complete disregard for life. Instead they want to voice their objection to the British empire. While that is a fine position to have, absolutely legitimate, I don't think it's particularly appropriate to do it on Remembrance Sunday.

    Clearly some of the Republicans here do think it's appropriate because they actively celebrate the deaths of Irish people who died on the Western front, who in their view deserved it for fighting for the British empire. Or how was it that Fuaranach put it?
    A thug is a thug no matter where they come from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,322 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Anyone who has an opinion for or against poppies is an idiot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Look I don't know about your position, but most people with that stance aren't actually against the pointless bloodshed; the criminal irresponsibility of the officers; or the complete disregard for life. Instead they want to voice their objection to the British empire. While that is a fine position to have, absolutely legitimate, I don't think it's particularly appropriate to do it on Remembrance Sunday.

    Clearly some of the Republicans here do think it's appropriate because they actively celebrate the deaths of Irish people who died on the Western front, who in their view deserved it for fighting for the British empire. Or how was it that Fuaranach put it?

    It is absolutely appropriate to do it on Remembrance Sunday. What we should be doing, is projecting into the future how many will pointlessly die in pursuit of futile, selfish and greedy imperialism, whosoever partakes in it. Then it might have some worthwhile significance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    markodaly wrote: »
    Yet you converse in its tongue and profit from it. Go figure. :P


    The BA have their own language and give me money??


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Look I don't know about your position, but most people with that stance aren't actually against the pointless bloodshed; the criminal irresponsibility of the officers; or the complete disregard for life. Instead they want to voice their objection to the British empire. While that is a fine position to have, absolutely legitimate, I don't think it's particularly appropriate to do it on Remembrance Sunday.


    The objection is to the poppy, as the money goes to ex-british service people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,668 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Every year its the same 3 or 4 fools arguing about this topic. Sados tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    Every year its the same 3 or 4 fools arguing about this topic. Sados tbh.

    But here you are...on time, and on thread :rolleyes::rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    Odhinn wrote: »
    The objection is to the poppy, as the money goes to ex-british service people.

    What has the poppy to do with Ireland? Virtually nobody here buys or wears one, so you're tilting at windmills in this country about that.

    But if you're doing it to be part of the zeitgeist of Junkward Tom's
    Fenian sentiment

    Then making it an opportunity to attack an empire which no longer exists makes sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,668 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    But here you are...on time, and on thread :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    And yet here you are raking up the post count, yet again. Last year you raked up the guts of 1000 posts in one thread alone, here you are again this year making up for it as you were otherwise engaged on the Peter Casey thread.

    Don't you have something else to be doing on a Sunday morning Francie, or indeed any morning? Is this the best way to use your time? ..... I guess not.

    Anyway, bye.. ill see you next year, ill respond to a post if I actually care enough about the topic :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    Anyone who has an opinion for or against poppies is an idiot

    That's a good point but I haven't formed an opinion on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    And yet here you are raking up the post count, yet again. Last year you raked up the guts of 1000 posts in one thread alone, here you are again this year making up for it as you were otherwise engaged on the Peter Casey thread.

    Don't you have something else to be doing on a Sunday morning Francie, or indeed any morning? Is this the best way to use your time? ..... I guess not.

    Anyway, bye.. ill see you next year, ill respond to a post if I actually care enough about the topic :rolleyes:

    Glad you took the time to search out a thread to pretend you don't care about it :D there Mark, on this fine Sunday morning. (I am actually out walking the hills of the border atm)

    *Will let you know if any permanent pensionable posts as internet policeman come up while you are offline...not caring about stuff. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Her Majesty The Queen was sporting four poppies this morning, so I dont think there is any doubt which side of the argument she iz on.
    Hiever, and I respect her choice, she only wears it over this weekend, and not for the last few weeks. She has such class.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,190 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    She has such class.

    What were you expecting from somebody you deferentially call 'her Majesty'?

    What an odd thing to call anyone in this day and age.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Her Majesty The Queen was sporting four poppies this morning, so I dont think there is any doubt which side of the argument she iz on.
    Hiever, and I respect her choice, she only wears it over this weekend, and not for the last few weeks. She has such class.

    I mentioned this in an earlier post. She got criticised for not having one on by a Daily Star tweet before this weekend. The overlong commercialised poppy orgy needs to end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,717 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    A couple hundred in this State will attend ceremonies today.

    Says it all really, this thread will have more arguing about it than will wear poppies, attend a commemoration or protest it.

    That is how irrelevant the poppy day and symbol is.

    People just don't give a ****.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,547 ✭✭✭droidman123


    Her Majesty The Queen was sporting four poppies this morning, so I dont think there is any doubt which side of the argument she iz on.
    Hiever, and I respect her choice, she only wears it over this weekend, and not for the last few weeks. She has such class.

    Would you really lower yourself to calling someone "your majesty" you really think she is above you and better than you that you would address her,or anyone, in that manner?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,717 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Her Majesty The Queen was sporting four poppies this morning, so I dont think there is any doubt which side of the argument she iz on.
    Hiever, and I respect her choice, she only wears it over this weekend, and not for the last few weeks. She has such class.

    His Majesty The Queen never wore a Poppy up to his death in Nov. 1991.

    Anyone seen the biopic, looks great.


Advertisement