Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ulster Team Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread II

Options
1328329330331332334»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,907 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    bilston wrote: »
    Never heard of him, but it's a good name.
    He'd just be holding back the budding superstar IQ10s in the academy.:D
    :D:D:D


    Actually we could have the equivalent of a cross between Sexton, ROG, dHumph and Carter in the academy and he'd probably be binned as useless.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,028 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    bilston wrote: »
    Never heard of him, but it's a good name.

    Lionel cronje

    https://youtu.be/WPV0sbDz5cU


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    jacothelad wrote: »

    Viewing your last sentence, given the new dispensation really you are saying that Ulster shouldn't ever sign any NIQ player in the future or you would condemn that signing? What about other provinces? Can they do it? A project player is simply someone who some day might turn out to be good enough to play for Ireland. No more and no less. Those at Ulster, usually less...a lot less.

    My point was that if Ulster sign a short term player now (or no player now) but go onto sign a long term player not tied to any international country with the hope he would go onto qualify for Ireland in the summer I think its stupid. If they sign a seasoned international in the summer great but if they are going with someone who could someday qualify for Ireland in a position where everyman and his dog knows (and have known for sometime) that a replacement is needed well it's leaving it late.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,140 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    My point was that if Ulster sign a short term player now (or no player now) but go onto sign a long term player not tied to any international country with the hope he would go onto qualify for Ireland in the summer I think its stupid. If they sign a seasoned international in the summer great but if they are going with someone who could someday qualify for Ireland in a position where everyman and his dog knows (and have known for sometime) that a replacement is needed well it's leaving it late.

    Maybe there isnt anyone available until Summer. Lealifano was only available because of his health issues in 2016.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Maybe there isnt anyone available until Summer. Lealifano was only available because of his health issues in 2016.

    Maybe it just me but Ulster have had plenty of notice which they could use to beat the bushes if they wanted a project player.

    Yes Lealifano was a great bit of business at short notice but leaving to short notice was an incompetence. Maybe I won't condemn a project player signed next summer but instead condemn the incompetence and poor planning that led to one being signed at that time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,745 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Maybe there isnt anyone available until Summer. Lealifano was only available because of his health issues in 2016.

    Maybe it just me but Ulster have had plenty of notice which they could use to beat the bushes if they wanted a project player.

    Yes Lealifano was a great bit of business at short notice but leaving to short notice was an incompetence. Maybe I won't condemn a project player signed next summer but instead condemn the incompetence and poor planning that led to one being signed at that time.

    I’m not shy about asking questions about Ulster decisions, but even I think you’re being harsh here. Ulster couldn’t have signed anyone any earlier due to having to wait and see whether charges against PJ we’re going to be filed. By the time that happened any 10 worth their salt was contracted elsewhere in some way. They were very lucky that CLs personal circumstance presented an opportunity. But I really can’t see what else they could have done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    molloyjh wrote: »
    I’m not shy about asking questions about Ulster decisions, but even I think you’re being harsh here. Ulster couldn’t have signed anyone any earlier due to having to wait and see whether charges against PJ we’re going to be filed. By the time that happened any 10 worth their salt was contracted elsewhere in some way. They were very lucky that CLs personal circumstance presented an opportunity. But I really can’t see what else they could have done.

    In the short term, no, and they did incredibly well to land CL. However, their current predicament did not begin in the summer, it didn't begin when Jackson was accused, it began five and a half years ago when Ulster made a deliberate and conscious decision never to have anyone as backup to Jackson, let alone someone capable of competing for his jersey.

    In all that time, there hasn't been the first cousin of a decent out half there. Having Pienaar was a sticking plaster that was always going to come off and come off it did, even if Ulster convinced themselves it wouldn't.

    No one could have predicted what has happened with Jackson and Olding, but it could just as easily have been a torn cruciate or a broken leg and they'd be in exactly the same situation.

    Absolutely terrible squad management and the chickens might be about to come home to roost in a big way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,748 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    molloyjh wrote: »
    I’m not shy about asking questions about Ulster decisions, but even I think you’re being harsh here. Ulster couldn’t have signed anyone any earlier due to having to wait and see whether charges against PJ we’re going to be filed. By the time that happened any 10 worth their salt was contracted elsewhere in some way. They were very lucky that CLs personal circumstance presented an opportunity. But I really can’t see what else they could have done.

    In the short term, no, and they did incredibly well to land CL. However, their current predicament did not begin in the summer, it didn't begin when Jackson was accused, it began five and a half years ago when Ulster made a deliberate and conscious decision never to have anyone as backup to Jackson, let alone someone capable of competing for his jersey.

    In all that time, there hasn't been the first cousin of a decent out half there. Having Pienaar was a sticking plaster that was always going to come off and come off it did, even if Ulster convinced themselves it wouldn't.

    No one could have predicted what has happened with Jackson and Olding, but it could just as easily have been a torn cruciate or a broken leg and they'd be in exactly the same situation.

    Absolutely terrible squad management and the chickens might be about to come home to roost in a big way.

    Olding was meant to be Jackson's back up 10 with Nelson as 3rd choice. So we lost our 1st and 2nd choice 10s to unforeseen circumstances.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,748 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    molloyjh wrote: »
    I’m not shy about asking questions about Ulster decisions, but even I think you’re being harsh here. Ulster couldn’t have signed anyone any earlier due to having to wait and see whether charges against PJ we’re going to be filed. By the time that happened any 10 worth their salt was contracted elsewhere in some way. They were very lucky that CLs personal circumstance presented an opportunity. But I really can’t see what else they could have done.

    In the short term, no, and they did incredibly well to land CL. However, their current predicament did not begin in the summer, it didn't begin when Jackson was accused, it began five and a half years ago when Ulster made a deliberate and conscious decision never to have anyone as backup to Jackson, let alone someone capable of competing for his jersey.

    In all that time, there hasn't been the first cousin of a decent out half there. Having Pienaar was a sticking plaster that was always going to come off and come off it did, even if Ulster convinced themselves it wouldn't.

    No one could have predicted what has happened with Jackson and Olding, but it could just as easily have been a torn cruciate or a broken leg and they'd be in exactly the same situation.

    Absolutely terrible squad management and the chickens might be about to come home to roost in a big way.

    Olding was meant to be Jackson's back up 10 with Nelson as 3rd choice. So we lost our 1st and 2nd choice 10s to unforeseen circumstances.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,047 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    bilston wrote: »
    Olding was meant to be Jackson's back up 10 with Nelson as 3rd choice. So we lost our 1st and 2nd choice 10s to unforeseen circumstances.
    Genuine question, did Olding ever spend any time playing ten for Ulster? Don't think I've ever seen him play there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,502 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    Genuine question, did Olding ever spend any time playing ten for Ulster? Don't think I've ever seen him play there.

    Yes http://www.irishrugby.ie/provincial/39257.php#.WkkDw5fp0XM


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,748 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    bilston wrote: »
    Olding was meant to be Jackson's back up 10 with Nelson as 3rd choice. So we lost our 1st and 2nd choice 10s to unforeseen circumstances.
    Genuine question, did Olding ever spend any time playing ten for Ulster? Don't think I've ever seen him play there.

    Yeah he played there a bit. Only a few starts but would finish games there a bit more. He didn't play loads but Im pretty sure he was lined up to be back up 10 to Jackson.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭FrannoFan


    I wonder if Anscombe had been treated better maybe his kids would have joined ulster as a project player and there would be a decent 10 in situ now


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,017 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    FrannoFan wrote: »
    I wonder if Anscombe had been treated better maybe his kids would have joined ulster as a project player and there would be a decent 10 in situ now

    If he'd been treated better Ulster might be in a much better spot now. That period with Doak in charge can't have helped anyone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,047 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    bilston wrote: »
    Yeah he played there a bit. Only a few starts but would finish games there a bit more. He didn't play loads but Im pretty sure he was lined up to be back up 10 to Jackson.
    Is that not a bit like Nacewa for Leinster? He can do a job there, but it's not his best position nor would he be seen as a specialist ten these days.

    I know he originally came to Leinster as a ten, but never really shone there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,748 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    bilston wrote: »
    Yeah he played there a bit. Only a few starts but would finish games there a bit more. He didn't play loads but Im pretty sure he was lined up to be back up 10 to Jackson.
    Is that not a bit like Nacewa for Leinster? He can do a job there, but it's not his best position nor would he be seen as a specialist ten these days.

    I know he originally came to Leinster as a ten, but never really shone there.

    Don't think so. I believe the intention was that Olding would be Jackson's back up but he was never fit long enough to get many games there.

    Of course the problem with that is that if Olding had stayed fit and available he would probably have been in the Ireland squad alongside Jackson.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,047 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    bilston wrote: »
    Don't think so. I believe the intention was that Olding would be Jackson's back up but he was never fit long enough to get many games there.

    Of course the problem with that is that if Olding had stayed fit and available he would probably have been in the Ireland squad alongside Jackson.
    I've had a look back and I can only find three starts for him at ten for Ulster. One in his first season and two last season. He's benched at 20 a handful of times. He's played at 12 for the majority of his career. Can't really see how that takes him out of the Nacewa 'break glass in case of emergency' bracket.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,748 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    bilston wrote: »
    Don't think so. I believe the intention was that Olding would be Jackson's back up but he was never fit long enough to get many games there.

    Of course the problem with that is that if Olding had stayed fit and available he would probably have been in the Ireland squad alongside Jackson.
    I've had a look back and I can only find three starts for him at ten for Ulster. One in his first season and two last season. He's benched at 20 a handful of times. He's played at 12 for the majority of his career. Can't really see how that takes him out of the Nacewa 'break glass in case of emergency' bracket.

    I said earlier that he had only started a few times at 10, but he finished at 10 quite a few times. I'm not really sure what we are debating here!

    Ulster's plan, from what I understand was that Olding was going to be Jackson's understudy at out half hence the lack of an alternative. I'm not saying that was a good idea, but I believe that to be the reason why little recruitment has been done in the position.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,047 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    bilston wrote: »
    I said earlier that he had only started a few times at 10, but he finished at 10 quite a few times. I'm not really sure what we are debating here!

    Ulster's plan, from what I understand was that Olding was going to be Jackson's understudy at out half hence the lack of an alternative. I'm not saying that was a good idea, but I believe that to be the reason why little recruitment has been done in the position.
    I'm just saying that as a backup, it wasn't used very much (an understatement imo) and couldn't have ever been a serious proposition. Or else very poor development work was put in on Olding or Nelson to make them any kind of option until the glass broke.


  • Registered Users Posts: 691 ✭✭✭$ausage$


    FrannoFan wrote: »
    I wonder if Anscombe had been treated better maybe his kids would have joined ulster as a project player and there would be a decent 10 in situ now


    Mod: Libellous comments removed. Post this kind of thing again and you will be banned.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,748 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Well his nickname was the cowboy!

    It's a shame though because we played some great rugby under him. Northampton away being a particular highlight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,047 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    So being a bit bored in the Christmas aftermath, I made the following table. It's complete as far as selections go, but not so complete with injury situations. Anything left blank can be filled in later if the information is to hand. The positions are loosely based on where they've started, I haven't differentiated between TH and LH props for example and if a player is a Wing/FB, I've listed them as a wing in the understanding that they can switch.

    S = Start, B = Bench, U = Unavailable, (a) = Academy player.
    Bold = Home, Red = Loss, Green = Draw.

    Player|Pos|01/09|09/09|15/09|22/09|30/09|06/10|13/10|22/10|28/10|04/11|24/11|01/12|10/12|15/12|23/12|01/01
    Opp||Che|Ben|Sca|Dra|Zeb|Con|Was|LaR|Lei|Kin|Ben|Dra|Har|Har|Con|Mun
    Ah You|P|B|B|B|S|S|B|B|B|S|U|U|U|U|U|U|S
    Andrew|H|B|B|B|B|S|B|B|||S|S|S|B|B|S|U
    Best|H|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|B|S|U|U|B|U|U|S|U
    Black|P|B|S|||S||B|S|S|B|S|B|S|S||B
    Bowe|W|S|S|B|S||S|B|S|S|B|S|S|S|U|U|U
    Browne|L||B|||S|||||||||||
    Busby|W||||||||||||||||
    Cairns|SH|||||||||S|||||||
    Cave|C|B|||S|S|||S||S|B||||S|
    Coetzee|No. 8|S|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U
    Cooney|SH|S|S|S||S|S|S|B||S|S|B|S|S|S|S
    Dalton (a)|L|||||||||||B|B|U|U|U|U
    Deysel|F|S|S|||S|S|S||S|||||||S
    Diack|L|S|S|B|S||B|S|B|B|B|U|U|U|U|S|B
    Gilroy|W|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|S|S|S|S|S|S|S
    Hall (a)|F|||||||||||S|||||
    Henderson|L||||B|S|S|S|S|S|U|U||S|S|S|U
    Henry|F|S|B|S|S||S||S|S|S||B|B|S|U|U
    Herbst|P|S|S|S|B|B|S|S|S||S|||S|S|S|B
    Herring|H|S|S|S|S||S|S|S|B||B||S|S||S
    Herron|OH||||B||||||||||||
    Jackson|OH|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U
    Jones (a)|F|||||||||||B|S|||S|S
    Kane|P|||||||||B|B|S|S|B|B|B|
    Leali'fano|OH|S|S|S||S|S|S|S|S|S|S|S|S|S||S
    Ludik|W|S|S|S||S|B|S||B|S|S|S|B|S|S|S
    Lyttle|C||||B|B||||||||||B|S
    Luke Marshall|C||B|S||S|S|S|B|S|U|U|U|U|U|U|U
    The other Marshall|SH|||B|S||B|B|S|||B|S|B|B|B|B
    McBurney|H|||||B|||||B|||||S|B
    McCall|P|S||S|S||S|S|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|S
    McCloskey|C|S|S|S|S||S|S|S|S|U|U|S|S|S||S
    McPhillips|OH|||||||||||||||B|B
    Nelson|W|B|B|B|S|B|B|B||B|B|S|B|B|B|S|
    O'Connor|L|S||S|S||S||S|S|S|S|S|S|S||S
    O'Hagan|P||||||||||||||||
    Olding|C|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U
    Owens|W||||||||||||||||
    Patterson|C||||||||||||||||
    Payne|FB|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U
    Piutau|FB|S|||S|S|S|S|S|S|S|S|S|S|S||S
    Rea|L|B|S|S|B|S||B|B||S|||B|B|B|B
    Reidy|F|B|S|S||S|B|S|S|S|S||S|S|B|S|U
    Ross|F|||B|S|||B|||B|S||||S|
    Shanahan|SH|B|B||B|B|||||||||||
    Simpson|P|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U|U
    Stewart (a)|SH|||||||||B|B||||||
    Stockdale|W||S|S|S||S|S|B|S|U|U||S|S|S|U
    Timoney (a)|No. 8||||S|B||||||S|S|S|S||S
    Treadwell|L||S|S||B|S|S|S|B|S|S|S|S|S||S
    Trimble|W|S|S|S||S|||S||S|B|B||B|S|B
    Van der Merwe|P|||||||||||B|S|||B|
    Warwick|P||B|B|B|B|B||B|B|S|B|B|B|B|S|


    There are some players who haven't started a game all season and I have no idea why. I'm sure it's injury related but there's only so much searching I can do before I bcome bored silly. :)


    E&OE ;)


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,166 Mod ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    Ulster team talk continues here


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement