Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
WWF: Werewolf Wrestling Federation
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
mitsuko045 wrote: »I said this:
In your quote reply the very first thing you say is
So who's revising history here now Holly? You asked and I answered.
And again, I never said you failed to explain why you sused Trigger, I said..."I never properly explained".
Well I did, but clearly our definitions of properly differ.
Trigger, IMO, was playing dumb. he asked a question that had an obvious answer. He should know when munchs take place and he should know that Mr King died as a result of munch, rather than die as a result of a move being reversed.
He would know this, hes not a new player....if anything hes a natural at the game going by the previous game.
I felt i had something so I called him out on it.
You however, called me out for calling out names. Then changed your stance.
No problem with you changing stance, just be adult enough to own it when you do.You said you sused him because he looked like he was sowing confusion. I pointed out others who did the same, i.e. that others have done the exact same but not aroused your suspicions. And all you could say about that was you thought he was smarter. It's all so flimsy.
No you pointed out others to be what you perceive to do the same as Trigger. They did not.
Yos queried Mr Kings name as a wrestler. I feel that could be an honest mistake if he had limited knowledge of wrestling and limited knowledge of Mr King playing previously or in fact, maybe Yos didnt read back on the thread much. Yos, and I hope he doesnt mind me saying thsi, but he has a tendancy to not read back (or not have teh time to in previous games). So Id give him a pass now.
Patricks query about finishers is a fair point, but I feel that he may be simply confused about the finisher mechanics. Others have been. I have been. I said as much this morning.
with Trigger, his issue wasnt with mechanics per say, but with teh death not being a munch, but rather a reversal. I think its obvious it was a munch. Its all different and its how I perceived these intercations.
My issue with you is how have attempted to twist narratives. Its inaccuracte.
Fair enough if you think Im a wolf for calling you out on your twisting of events, but thats a weak reason. Its petty and defensive.
do i think your a wolf? not yet. Its early. I cant yet.
but you seem certain, when you cant be. Others see that and they will see it for what it is.
Ive nothing to lose..... I know this and I can back it up with my eagerness to fight you in the Main Event...... but I dont think you wanted this. You are backed into a corner and feel you need to be the big man and counter my challenge.
Lets see how that works out.
Honestly, at the start of our little chat I was just poking around to see what would come out, I didn't really have a lean on anyone. But now after poking and getting a flimsy excuse accompanied with accusations of changing my story (when you're the one the has actually changed the story) I'm starting to lean towards you. Coupled with your odd statement to Kitten_K that we can't be sure one of the two dead is actually a villager right after the very first munch of the game. I'm not entirely convinced you're justcage rattling. You've really taken umbridge at my questioning of you.
Oh please do Desmond. I'm ready to be Little Red Riding Hood over here and take me out a wolfie.
[/QUOTE] 0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Desmond WW wrote: »In before the stampede of people posting on the first day
Desmond WW wrote: »Surely rule one would indicate undertaker or kane are in play??Desmond WW wrote: »Drew McIntyre - 19 minutes and 2-3 claymores to get the job doneDesmond WW wrote: »*looks at the kendo stick in tigers hand*Desmond WW wrote: »Are games usually this kind of slow burn?? I looked back through a few pages on each and they seem to be all action from the go?
Or am I missing something??Desmond WW wrote: »Well if the wolves are two teams competing for a win surely they wouldn't know each other so they might chomp each other!?Desmond WW wrote: »Just looking at trigger being eliminated, very little to go off on him? He must be a good player if he is being killed so quicklyDesmond WW wrote: »If thats the way the winds are blowing let noone say that I do not also blow
Holly Vs Mitsuko, Loser has to quit!! TONIGHT!!Desmond WW wrote: »reversing is automatic isnt it??
All of Dessies posts so far, for a player looking for all action, he hasn't really participated much. The reference to a Kendo stick brings me back to Steve Blackman being a vince body guard. Reaching a bit possibly.
The quick acceptance of the Holly v Mitsuko battle is a bit sussy too0
Advertisement