Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Slut shaming men is fine but don't dare do it to a woman.

Options
1356789

Comments

  • Options
    #62
    Sleeper12
    Registered Users Posts: 16,986 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    Kevin Finnerty wrote:
    He's a scumbag now?

    Scumbag of the worst kind
    twowheelsonly wrote:
    Who says he has a small baby ?? That's a massive presumption just because people have seen a Moses basket in the photo. In my experience Moses baskets serve more time as clothes horses than baby holders !!

    I did put (it appears) in the sentence because all we know is that there is a moses basket in the photo. In my experience a small baby goes in a moses basket. When baby grows out of it, it goes in the attic. It would be quite unusual to find a moses basket that's not in storage unless there is a small baby. I don't know for a fact that there is a small baby so I said (it appears)


  • Options
    #63
    smelly sock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    Scumbag of the worst kind



    I did put (it appears) in the sentence because all we know is that there is a moses basket in the photo. In my experience a small baby goes in a moses basket. When baby grows out of it, it goes in the attic. It would be quite unusual to find a moses basket that's not in storage unless there is a small baby. I don't know for a fact that there is a small baby so I said (it appears)


    Scumbag? The man could be a very good father for all we know and has made a massive mistake. Maybe he and his wife are having issues? Maybe this is a total stitch up. Seems a bit to perfect of a fit tbh for busy body feminist prudes to get a hold of this. Im calling BS on this.


  • Options
    #64
    Nermal
    Registered Users Posts: 2,629 ✭✭✭Nermal


    A short step from this to revenge porn or blackmail. I don't know what the Indo are thinking.


  • Options
    #65
    Church on Tuesday
    Registered Users Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Church on Tuesday


    Well Holy Moses...


  • Options
    #66
    Sleeper12
    Registered Users Posts: 16,986 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    smelly sock wrote:
    No but i dont believe an adulterer is a scumbag either though.

    Did you ever hear someone say "you are a lying, cheating, scumbag"?

    That's exactly what a scumbag is lying & cheating
    smelly sock wrote:
    Scumbag? The man could be a very good father for all we know and has made a massive mistake. Maybe he and his wife are having issues? Maybe this is a total stitch up. Seems a bit to perfect of a fit tbh for busy body feminist prudes to he hold of this. Im calling BS on this.


    Being a good father has nothing to do with it. That just means that you are a good father. The General was a great father as was John Gilligan. What's that got to do with anything?

    He's a crap husband. Do you think he'll sort out said issues by going on tinder or will that make things worse?

    If his marriage has broken up then there is no need for secrecy. He's trying to hide this from his wife. That's cheating and lying.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #67
    Sleeper12
    Registered Users Posts: 16,986 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    Nermal wrote:
    A short step from this to revenge porn or blackmail. I don't know what the Indo are thinking.


    It's not just the indo. It's in a few papers & all over social media


  • Options
    #68
    Outlaw Pete
    Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    If that was me I'd be dancing right about now and straight to a solicitors in the morning to look into suing every single media outlet that posted the image, doesn't matter that his identity is not revealed.

    I'd say Tinder also have leave to sue as I doubt they okay'd the use of the image.


  • Options
    #69
    smelly sock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Outlaw Pete wrote: »
    If that was me I'd be dancing right about now and straight to a solicitors in the morning to look into suing every single media outlet that posted the image. Doesn't matter that his identity is not revealed.


    I'd say Tinder also have leave to sue as I doubt they okay'd the use of the image.


    Almost sure he'd have no case. How would he?


  • Options
    #70
    screamer
    Registered Users Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭screamer


    If he put himself out there...he's fair game. Slut shaming? More like calling him out for the idiot he is.....


  • Options
    #71
    oneilla
    Registered Users Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭oneilla


    Outlaw Pete wrote: »
    If that was me I'd be dancing right about now and straight to a solicitors in the morning to look into suing every single media outlet that posted the image, doesn't matter that his identity is not revealed.

    I'd say Tinder also have leave to sue as I doubt they okay'd the use of the image.

    People have been posting screenshots of Tinder bios for the purpose ridicule for years and yet, I've not come across any lawsuits.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #72
    DickSwiveller Returns
    Closed Accounts Posts: 752 ✭✭✭DickSwiveller Returns


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    Did you ever hear someone say "you are a lying, cheating, scumbag"?

    That's exactly what a scumbag is lying & cheating




    Being a good father has nothing to do with it. That just means that you are a good father. The General was a great father as was John Gilligan. What's that got to do with anything?

    He's a crap husband. Do you think he'll sort out said issues by going on tinder or will that make things worse?

    If his marriage has broken up then there is no need for secrecy. He's trying to hide this from his wife. That's cheating and lying.

    He made a mistake. I'm sure he regrets it now. Do you really think the pondlife slagging him off on twatter even care about his wife?


  • Options
    #73
    DickSwiveller Returns
    Closed Accounts Posts: 752 ✭✭✭DickSwiveller Returns


    I really hate twitter. It seems to be infested with nasty, shallow losers who have nothing better to do than bully or abuse people they don't like.


  • Options
    #74
    somefeen
    Registered Users Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭somefeen


    I thought topless torsos were native to grindr?


  • Options
    #75
    well spoken man
    Registered Users Posts: 351 ✭✭well spoken man


    Probably just a little randy..never gonna go through with it....well u know the rest...


  • Options
    #76
    Sleeper12
    Registered Users Posts: 16,986 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    Outlaw Pete wrote:
    If that was me I'd be dancing right about now and straight to a solicitors in the morning to look into suing every single media outlet that posted the image, doesn't matter that his identity is not revealed.

    Outlaw Pete wrote:
    I'd say Tinder also have leave to sue as I doubt they okay'd the use of the image.

    He put himself on a public forum. The papers offered no more information than he made public himself. The only person he could sue is himself as he's the idiot that put the information out there


  • Options
    #77
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Never post anything on the internet that you would be embarrassed or ashamed if your family read it.


  • Options
    #78
    smelly sock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    bubblypop wrote: »
    Never post anything on the internet that you would be embarrassed or ashamed if your family read it.

    Why?


  • Options
    #79
    AfterLife
    Closed Accounts Posts: 302 ✭✭AfterLife


    DickSwiveller Returns wrote: »
    I really hate twitter. It seems to be infested with nasty, shallow losers who have nothing better to do than bully or abuse people they don't like.

    LOL. Most of your posts in the last few days have been slagging off people you don't like.


  • Options
    #80
    Sleeper12
    Registered Users Posts: 16,986 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    DickSwiveller Returns wrote:
    He made a mistake. I'm sure he regrets it now. Do you really think the pondlife slagging him off on twatter even care about his wife?


    Ah get away with yourself. Yes he regrets it now but for the wrong reason. I doubt he'd be regreting it tonight if he got what he wanted last night and his wife didn't find out. He regrets it now the same way a drug smuggler regrets it when he's caught. They never, ever regret it unless caught.

    He deserves every bit of sagging he gets. He seems to be as clever as the two hit men who put the bullets in the gun upside down.


  • Options
    #81
    Sleeper12
    Registered Users Posts: 16,986 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    DickSwiveller Returns wrote:
    I really hate twitter. It seems to be infested with nasty, shallow losers who have nothing better to do than bully or abuse people they don't like.

    The guy in the photo is the nasty, shallow loser when you really think about it.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #82
    smelly sock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    The guy in the photo is the nasty, shallow loser when you really think about it.

    Him and the twitter feminist nosey fookers.


  • Options
    #83
    DONTMATTER
    Site Banned Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭DONTMATTER


    Is this another angry men thread? :D Seriously, it's like an infestation.


  • Options
    #84
    shakeitoff
    Registered Users Posts: 564 ✭✭✭shakeitoff


    Skinnyfat, pigeon chested 42 year old puts up a shirtless pic on Tinder, I wonder who he thought was going to match with. He'd have to have legit swiped on wilderbeasts to even stand a chance. What a waste

    (I can't get over his fat handles! Rotten)


  • Options
    #85
    DickSwiveller Returns
    Closed Accounts Posts: 752 ✭✭✭DickSwiveller Returns


    AfterLife wrote: »
    LOL. Most of your posts in the last few days have been slagging off people you don't like.

    LOL who?


  • Options
    #86
    smelly sock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    shakeitoff wrote: »
    Skinnyfat, pigeon chested 42 year old puts up a shirtless pic on Tinder, I wonder who he thought was going to match with. He'd have to have legit swiped on wilderbeasts to even stand a chance. What a waste

    (I can't get over his fat handles! Rotten)

    How do you know he didnt match? Could have been at it all night.


  • Options
    #87
    meeeeh
    Registered Users Posts: 11,624 ✭✭✭✭meeeeh


    Indo seem to be a bit short on the stuff to write about. But this is almost natural selection making sure the dumb don't produce more offspring.


  • Options
    #88
    givyjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    DONTMATTER wrote: »
    Is this another angry men thread? :D Seriously, it's like an infestation.

    Hi Missus.


  • Options
    #89
    Cushie Butterfield
    Registered Users Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭Cushie Butterfield


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    The guy in the photo is the nasty, shallow loser when you really think about it.

    That is if the guy in the photo is actually the guy who set up that profile. For all we know it could be an image he pinched. He could then send someone else’s face pic, or even his own to interested parties.

    The whole thing seems a bit suspicious to me & I really think it’s just someone with too much time on their hands with a fake profile - a bored teenager maybe.

    It wouldn’t be the first time this sort of thing happened & wouldn’t be the last either. If the people that were outraged & really wanted to out him they would have asked for a face pic & plastered that all over the place also, instead of some random torso image.


  • Options
    #90
    Cleopatra_
    Closed Accounts Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Cleopatra_


    nthclare wrote: »
    Helpfully he'll come across Cleopatra...

    My last date off tinder was a basket case.....

    You were looking for me? :p

    This isn't slut shaming, I'm pretty sure the issue those women had with him is that he's married. Still not cool to screen grab and put on Twitter, who made them the morality police.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #91
    Outlaw Pete
    Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    He put himself on a public forum. The papers offered no more information than he made public himself. The only person he could sue is himself as he's the idiot that put the information out there

    Well, we're really at an infancy stage to say that for sure. I know the small print in the T&Cs of most of those sites say that by accepting their terms they can publish your images and allow others to also, but there does seem to be something of a grey area there.

    Take this case for example:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5945807/Bauer-Media-sued-woman-using-image-story-sex-injury-Tinder-date.html?ito=social-facebook_Australia


Advertisement