Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Holocaust Denial [MOD NOTE POST #1]

Options
13468918

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    You've been given several links to how the numbers have been arrived at and ignored them, instead choosing to use the same falsehoods peddled by holocaust deniers to 'prove' that everyone else is lying. Truly, victory is yours.

    What you people failed to notice. Richard Korherr was the head of the SS statistics bureau and he says 1.2 million Jews were processed from 1932 to 1943 (Guided through the camps in the General Government) this includes all the gas camps in occupied Poland including Auschwitz.

    Holocaust supporters claim Auschwitz is not included even though the General government is referring to Nazi-occupied Poland. This is disingenuous ommission by the person who wrote that Reddit post.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,799 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Richard Korherr 1.2 million Jews processed from 1932 to 1943 to Eastern European camps.

    Correct
    6 million died is fantasy.

    Incorrect

    As mentioned earlier there is no point explaining numbers to someone who will repeatedly reject/ignore/distort them for personal reasons

    For everyone else, to summarise what I posted previously:

    The Korherr report gives us details of those killed in operation Reinhard camps. Separately and not contained in the Korherr report are the killings by the Einsatzgruppen squads in Russia and on the frontline. Then there is Auschtwitz.

    Those combined are approx 4.5mm. Most documented. The ghetto killings brings it up to approx 5mm.

    and..
    And then there is the last million so to speak, that is comprised of individual deaths on transports, deaths in the Reich and other territories that were not part of larger killing scale actions like individual arrests, German caused famine in the Soviet Union, and also, crucially, the deaths caused by other Axis members such as Romania, which killed at least 170.000 if not 240.000 Jews, Croatia, Bulgaria, and others.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/76avmk/how_do_we_estimate_the_number_of_jewish_deaths_in/

    Which brings the figure to approx 6mm (between 5.4 and 6.2 for most estimates)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Correct



    Incorrect

    As mentioned earlier there is no point explaining numbers to someone who will repeatedly reject/ignore/distort them for personal reasons

    For everyone else, to summarise what I posted previously:

    The Korherr report gives us details of those killed in operation Reinhard camps. Separately and not contained in the Korherr report are the killings by the Einsatzgruppen squads in Russia and on the frontline. Then there is Auschtwitz.

    Those combined are approx 4.5mm. Most documented. The ghetto killings brings it up to approx 5mm.

    and..


    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/76avmk/how_do_we_estimate_the_number_of_jewish_deaths_in/

    Which brings the figure to approx 6mm (between 5.4 and 6.2 for most estimates)

    Wrong whoever wrote that reddit post is ignorning what was said.

    Korherr report talks about the camps in General Government of the Occupied Polish Areas. To leave Auschwitz out is disingenuous it located in occupied Poland controlled by the Nazis.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    This what Korherr said.

    Der Reichsführer-SS hat Ihren statistischen Bericht über "Die Endlösung der europäischen Judenfrage" erhalten. Er wünscht, daß an keiner Stelle von "Sonderbehandlung der Juden" gesprochen wird. Auf Seite 9 muß es folgerndermaßen heißen:
    "Transportierung von Juden aus den Ostprovinzen nach dem russichen Osten:

    This part we looking for
    Es wurden durchgeschleust
    durch die Lager im Generalgouvernement...
    durch die Lager im Warthegau..."
    Eine andere Formulierung darf nicht genommen werden...

    They were guided [through]
    through the camps in the General Government

    through the camps in the Warthegau [one of the provinces in occupied Poland]

    Before you ask Auschwitz is not a camp in Warthegau.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,917 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Did not stop Irish people from dying and having no money to buy food.

    But it was by no means a genocide. Let's leave it there.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    Holocaust supporters are mixing events up to support their view.

    Korherr report is talking about Jews processed from 1932 to 1943 through camps in Poland.

    Who wrote that piece clearly does not understand the difference between the Reinhard operation and the Korherr report.

    I laughing here just thinking about this nobody noticed the guy was mixing up different events?


  • Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭beaufoy


    Evidence points to very few Jews being murdered, testimony points to very large amount of jews being murdered. The truth is probable somewhere inbetween


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    beaufoy wrote: »
    Evidence points to very few Jews being murdered, testimony points to very large amount of jews being murdered. The truth is probable somewhere inbetween
    Nope, all evidence points to a number close to 6 million Jewish people being killed.
    All historians are in agreement on this.

    The truth is that a lot of Jews were murdered.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    Nope, all evidence points to a number close to 6 million Jewish people being killed.
    All historians are in agreement on this.

    The truth is that a lot of Jews were murdered.

    You should write a letter to them and show them this thread;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,799 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    beaufoy wrote: »
    Evidence points to very few Jews being murdered, testimony points to very large amount of jews being murdered. The truth is probable somewhere inbetween

    Historians go a good bit further than that.

    For example at the main camps (camps setup during operation Reinhard plus Auschwitz and associated camps)

    GTFZSxb.png


    1.1 mm Jews estimated killed by SS death squads

    https://www.hdot.org/debunking-denial/ezg5-number-killed/

    As mentioned before the numbers of Jews killed in the various ghettos

    Which brings it up to over 5 million. After that it becomes more difficult, documentation more sparse - they are trying to count the numbers killed during transport, in other countries a part of the Axis, etc

    So the estimates range between (using the figures from r/askhistorians) 5.4 to 6.2, with the commonly accepted figure of approx 6 mm (or 5 to 6 mm to be more pedantic)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭beaufoy


    King Mob wrote: »
    Nope, all evidence points to a number close to 6 million Jewish people being killed.
    All historians are in agreement on this.

    The truth is that a lot of Jews were murdered.

    Some historians disagree and are put in prison so doing so


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    beaufoy wrote: »
    Some historians disagree and are put in prison so doing so
    Exceedingly rarely are they historians.
    They are random people who do no use historical research. They are racists and conspiracy theorists who use deception, lies and bull**** to make their arguments, then whine like babies when they are called out.

    No historian has been put in jail for arguing for the lower end of the scale when they use actual historical evidence.

    Holocaust deniers are like wise free to do so as well. But they don't cause they can't support their views that way.

    And in some countries, then get punished for their lies. Good I say. They're ****ing nazis.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    Got proper numbers now

    The total evacuations resulted in the Reich area incl.
    Eastern territories
    and beyond in German power and
    river area in Europe from October 1939 or later until
    31.12.1942 following numbers:

    Evacuation of Jews from Baden
    and the Palatinate to France ....... 6 504 Jews
    2. Evacuation of Jews from the Reich
    Including Protectorate and
    Bialystok district to the east ......... 170 642 "
    3. Evacuation of Jews from the Reich
    territory and the protectorate
    to Theresienstadt ................. 87 193

    4. Transporting Jews out of the
    Eastern provinces on the Russian
    East: ............................ 1 449 692 [/B]"
    It was passed through
    through the camps in general
    Government ..................... 1,274,166 Juden
    through the camps in the Warthegau ..... 145 301

    So about 1.5 million Jews were transported to the East on Trains from the period of 1939 to the start of 1943.

    This would still fall short of 6 million deaths and nowhere in this report claiming 1.5 million were killed on arrival.

    I let dohnjoe explain where the other 4.5 million Jews were caught? If you look at his own table his numbers are from 1939 to 1944


  • Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭beaufoy


    Historian definition is — Define historian: a student or writer of history
    The definition covers both you and me, and I have qualifications in the subject of history
    Sorry I don't understand the rest of your answer...try re-writing


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    beaufoy wrote: »
    Historian definition is — Define historian: a student or writer of history
    Nope. Someone qualified with relevant degrees who are engaged in actual research. (Again watching youtube is not research)

    If your definition held, then everyone is a scientist as well, and I guess that means that some scientists think the world is flat.
    beaufoy wrote: »
    The definition covers both you and me, and I have qualifications in the subject of history
    Great, what research have you done into the holocaust that causes you to doubt it?
    (Again, I mean actual research, not youtube or random racist propaganda sites)
    beaufoy wrote: »
    Sorry I don't understand the rest of your answer...try re-writing
    Which part do you not understand?
    That Holocaust deniers don't use evidence, but instead dishonest tactics and propaganda?
    Or that I don't feel particularly sorry for them when they are punished for being nazi assholes?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob@ I just provided you with the Der Korherr-Bericht stats around 1.4 million Jews ended up in camps in the east including Auschwitz by the start of 1943. Dohnjoe numbers are inflated.

    6-1.4= 4.6 million Jews still. 6 million number doesn't hold up.

    You used the Der Korherr-Bericht report and believed it was credible have you not?


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,917 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    beaufoy wrote: »
    Historian definition is — Define historian: a student or writer of history
    The definition covers both you and me, and I have qualifications in the subject of history
    Sorry I don't understand the rest of your answer...try re-writing

    But have you published any papers on the topic? ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭beaufoy


    Overheal wrote: »
    But have you published any papers on the topic? ;)

    No I am frightened if I write the truth I could go to prison


  • Registered Users Posts: 324 ✭✭beaufoy


    King Mob wrote: »
    Nope. Someone qualified with relevant degrees who are engaged in actual research. (Again watching you tube is not research)

    If your definition held, then everyone is a scientist as well, and I guess that means that some scientists think the world is flat.

    It is not my definition it comes from most dictionaries



    Great, what research have you done into the holocaust that causes you to doubt it?
    (Again, I mean actual research, not youtube or random racist propaganda sites)

    Best research is the same as in courts, you listen to both arguments examine the evidence, and then make an informed decision. The holocaust non believers evidence is not very strong, but it is a lot stronger than the evidence submitted by the people who believe the holocaust happened


    Which part do you not understand?
    That Holocaust deniers don't use evidence, but instead dishonest tactics and propaganda?
    Or that I don't feel particularly sorry for them when they are punished for being nazi assholes?

    Do you punish the jews/nazi assholes who question the Holocaust



    Sorry I cannot continue with these posts, I might have to visit germany next year on business, and they could put me in prison for writing the truth


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,917 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    beaufoy wrote: »
    No I am frightened if I write the truth I could go to prison

    Ah now. I know the UK charged the guy for the Nazi dog but I don’t think they’re going after people just yet for going Galileo if you have a well intentioned, well researched, peer reviewed paper you want to go and publish. So that’s not much of an excuse, tongue in cheek or otherwise.

    Perhaps you best bow out of this thread entirely of this is a real concern for you; Boards.ie is itself prone to having to comply with search warrants for IP information after all. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,282 ✭✭✭pitifulgod


    beaufoy wrote: »

    Do you punish the jews/nazi assholes who question the Holocaust



    Sorry I cannot continue with these posts, I might have to visit germany next year on business, and they could put me in prison for writing the truth

    I have qualifications in history too. It's not very difficult to get them and plenty of people are still incredibly ignorant at the end of the degree. You and CheerfulSpring have no credible research to back you up. It's also very telling when people start to question the existence of furnaces and gas chambers...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭wexie


    beaufoy wrote: »
    Sorry I cannot continue with these posts, I might have to visit germany next year on business, and they could put me in prison for writing the truth

    No they won't, not if you can actually back up it and prove it to be the truth. But I suspect that might be somewhat problematic


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,635 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    I would not agree with this at all the British treated the Irish badly in the 1800's, must not have learned this in school? The took the national wealth from this country and demanded Irish people pay high rents, the very poor could not afford to buy food from elsewhere to feed their families. When they could not afford the rent the British landowners then kicked them out and died miserably from starvation and disease.

    Israel will be treated fairly when they act civilised. They are abusing their power by shooting unarmed Palestinians in the back for protesting and still continuing a blockade of 1 million + people and denying them human rights. Israel has engaged in false flags for years the attack on USS liberty is now known to be a covert operation to blame on Egypt and drag America into a war. Mossad motto is By way of deception thou shalt do war"

    So THAT is is you motive!
    You disagree with the current politics of Israel and will therefore cheapen or talk down the holocaust.
    You figures and arguments have been destroyed, you have nothing left, so you resort to whatabaoutery in form of the Famine. This NOT about anything else, this is about the holocaust, a well documented, historical fact.
    It's people like you that are part of a new right-wing movement in Europe that echoes what happened in the 1920's and early 30's. Or at least you're unwittinlgy playing into their hands and supporting them.
    There has to be another agenda, why else is it so important to you to discredit one particular historical fatc? Are you just a random conspiracy nutter that thinks Obama is a lizard and the Illuminati are controlled by the grey aliens? A flat Earther? Anti vaccer?
    You don't seem like the regular room temperature IQ, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing far right asshole currently spreading throughout Europe*.
    To me this is not a joke or fun conspiracy theory. This is not some far-off historical event that merely has symbolic significance.
    Through the generation of my parents and grandparents I have heard first hand accounts of the war. One of my teachers was missing an arm, my grandfather on my father's side had a dent in his head and still shrapnel embedded in it from the eastern front. My grandfather on my mother's side was the stoker on a train that was straffed by allied fighters (he survived by climbing under the train, had the hit the boiler, he would have been broiled). A guy I worked with was a prisoner in a French prison camp. My own mother and Grandmother survived a mortar exploding right on front of them. Had they stood one step closer or further away, they would have been collanders.
    They told me of people who disappeared, shops that had the "Juden" sign, people who disappeared, never to be seen again, you could not speak ill of the regime, neighbours spied at your window to check you weren't listening to an illegal broadcats by the Allied forces, in short, you have no idea!
    I know people who have SEEN Reichskristallnacht, buddy, I tell you I take VERY personal offence at pretty much anything you said on this thread.
    This is no joke.


    *They're not so easy to recognise these days. In the 90's they used to be skinheads, marching and shouting slogans. Today they are far more insidious. Dressed in suits, no tats, winning smiles and hiding their hatred of people of the wrong color, religion or country of origin behind concern and seemingly reasonable reasons. Vipers, every last one of them and seemingly the people of Europe seem to piss themselves in excitement at this development as if the next war or holocaust can't come fast enough

    edit:
    I bow out of this before I say something I regret.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭The Bishop Basher


    This would still fall short of 6 million deaths and nowhere in this report claiming 1.5 million were killed on arrival.

    Who gives a **** :confused:

    I don't have any history degrees but I visited Buchenwald as a teenager and the experience never left me. I remember the tour guide telling us we couldn't smoke and had to stay quiet out of respect but there was no need. From the second we walked in not one of us made a sound. It was eerie. You could sense the evil that went on there and Buchenwald was far from the worst of them if you can use that term.

    I saw the ovens and the trolleys that fed the bodies into them.. They're still there.. Go have a look for yourself.

    I also went to listen to Tommy Reichental recently and bought his book. His was the first time i ever heard a first hand eye witness account of the events as he witnessed them. Most of his family were killed. It's a facinating but tragic story told by a very humble man. I recommend you take the opportunity if it comes your way.

    I brought my kids to see the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam recently. I hadn't been for years. They place has changed a lot and is far more geared for tourists now but that doesn't lessen the impact of walking through those rooms and reliving the absolute nightmare that it must have been being Jewish in occupied Holland and waiting for that "call".

    I despise Israel today and it's illegal land grab and genocide of the Palestinian people. It sickens me that the Jewish people who suffered so much loss in such recent history would be the very ones to repeat the same atrocities on another people. I would even question the legitimacy of Israel as a state.

    But as bad as they are now, as hypocritical as it may appear and as angry as you might be about the current situation, none of that changes the fact that the Holocaust is a matter of historical record. There is no doubt about what happened and the numbers murdered are horrific regardless of who's account you go with..

    I think you're letting your anger about today's issues cloud your judgement of the past. It might serve you better to try and separate the 2 events.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,799 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    beaufoy wrote: »
    Some historians disagree and are put in prison so doing so

    Different historians have different figures

    e.g.
    Lestschinsky - 5.9 mm
    Bauer/Rozett - 5.8 mm
    Gilbert - 5.75

    Depends on their research, methods, new information, etc

    Denialism is something completely different and is not based on legitimate research or historical method


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,229 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    beaufoy wrote: »

    It is not my definition it comes from most dictionaries
    So then some scientists believe in the flat earth, therefore the flat earth idea could be true.
    beaufoy wrote: »

    Best research is the same as in courts, you listen to both arguments examine the evidence, and then make an informed decision. The holocaust non believers evidence is not very strong, but it is a lot stronger than the evidence submitted by the people who believe the holocaust happened
    You've done no research on the topic then as an actual historian.
    beaufoy wrote: »

    Do you punish the jews/nazi assholes who question the Holocaust
    I don't punish anyone. But I'm not going to shed a tear for the nazis who deny the holocaust happened and spread lies and misinformation.
    beaufoy wrote: »

    Sorry I cannot continue with these posts, I might have to visit germany next year on business, and they could put me in prison for writing the truth
    No you won't. The law isn't used to go after randomers who buy the conspiracy garbage. It's for dicks like David Irving.

    Dohn Joe posted some examples of actual historians who argue the number is lower than others.
    Why are they not arrested?

    The answer is they are doing actual research using actual evidence. They are not denying like folks like Irving.
    Questioning the Holocaust is fine. Denying the holocaust happened based on racist propaganda is not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    pitifulgod wrote: »
    I have qualifications in history too. It's not very difficult to get them and plenty of people are still incredibly ignorant at the end of the degree. You and CheerfulSpring have no credible research to back you up. It's also very telling when people start to question the existence of furnaces and gas chambers...

    Don't think so I just used research by holocaust supporters to back up what I said. This was ignored and not surprised, by that. When you can't debunk the evidence attack the person!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Different historians have different figures

    e.g.
    Lestschinsky - 5.9 mm
    Bauer/Rozett - 5.8 mm
    Gilbert - 5.75

    Depends on their research, methods, new information, etc

    Denialism is something completely different and is not based on legitimate research or historical method

    Again numbers don't match up with Korherr-Bericht report and the number of Jews transported from occupied Europe to the East from 1939 to 1943.

    Korherr clearly states in his report 1.4 million (350,000 Jews per year) Jewish people were processed from all Reich lands to the East from the period 1939 to 1943.

    Most of the Jewish people will be caught in this time period, the only numbers not accounted for are Jews living in the Soviet Union.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,412 ✭✭✭Harika


    Again numbers don't match up with Korherr-Bericht report and the number of Jews transported from occupied Europe to the East from 1939 to 1943.

    Korherr clearly states in his report 1.4 million (350,000 Jews per year) Jewish people were processed from all Reich lands to the East from the period 1939 to 1943.

    Most of the Jewish people will be caught in this time period, the only numbers not accounted for are Jews living in the Soviet Union.

    Korherr denied to have written that report, so you really want to use that as source?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    Harika wrote: »
    Korherr denied to have written that report, so you really want to use that as source?

    Was this report not handed to Heinrich Himmler in January 1943? What your source for this info?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement