New "anti-gay" commercial

Dr. Jonathan Crane

It's almost 2013, better continue making this country as backwards as possible.

efb

David et Al and their broad strokes

Brenda shrieks:-
"Won't somebody please think of the children"

CommanderC

oh....I feel sick.

Chancer3001

my god that's retarded.

mikom

Created by the Iona Institute.
There is a special circle of hell set aside for these cavemen............ If there is a hell.

Here is their recent begging email.......... http://www.broadsheet.ie/2011/12/09/spare-a-thought-this-christmas/

Benny_Cake

They would have saved time and effort by simply having David Quinn say "I believe in Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve", because that's basically the message of the video.At least the helpful diagram resolved the question of where babies come from.

GalwayGuy2

Guerrilla Bigotry:S

Professey Chin

What the fuck is this shit?!

unseenfootage

Dr. Jonathan Crane wrote: »

It's almost 2013, better continue making this country as backwards as possible.

Nothing backward about expressing your views.

What is backward is to consider such views to be backward.

meoklmrk91

The iona institute can take its bull****, discriminatory ad and shove it up the highest point of its unevolved, primitive hole.

squod

Warning thread may contain views which differ to your own view.

tayto lover

Don't think there were any lies told in the advert at all.

How Soon Is Now

This is going to go well i can tell ha. I'm getting in and out of this one early i have a past in these kinda threads when i see the you know whats come out in force........

Think i would laugh if i seen it on telly though ad break during Fair City tonight go down great :pac:

efb

tayto lover wrote: »

Don't think there were any lies told in the advert at all.

Best taken care of by a father and a mother- not factually true

theteal

I know they got paid for it but the actors must feel repugnant being recorded saying that shizz.

Hands up, who else groaned when they saw the logo at the end to show who produced this masterpiece?

Ally Dick

I couldn't care less if a gay or a lesbian couple want to get married. It's none of my business. I don't understand people who want to make it theirs

deisedude

Those voiceover artists should be ashamed of themselves. Anything for a quick buck

tayto lover

efb wrote: »

Best taken care of by a father and a mother- not factually true

Maybe, maybe not. That would be a hard one to prove alright.

Herb Powell

tayto lover wrote: »

Don't think there were any lies told in the advert at all.

That is why it is so fuccked up. Idiots will think they actually make a good point, and agree with them.

This is shiit.

squod

deisedude wrote: »

Those voiceover artists should be ashamed of themselves. Anything for a quick buck

It's all done by ventriloquists.

efb

tayto lover wrote: »

Maybe, maybe not. That would be a hard one to prove alright.

You could look at the accredited studies on it by credible institutions

c_man

Uploaded to Youtube by "OnKneesforJesus4"




:pac: LOL

efb

c_man wrote: »

Uploaded to Youtube by "OnKneesforJesus4"




:pac: LOL

Really lol

mikom

tayto lover wrote: »

Don't think there were any lies told in the advert at all.

Quote for advert: Every child ever born had a mother and a father.

Where does that leave the baby jesus?



By the way folks, here are the iona institute patrons as listed on their website....

Professor Patricia Casey: Patricia Casey is a senior consultant psychiatrist at the Mater Hospital in Dublin, as well as a lecturer at University College, Dublin.


Breda O'Brien: Breda O'Brien is a teacher and a columnist with The Irish Times. She is best known for her commentary on religious and social affairs.


Fergus O'Donoghue SJ: Fr O'Donoghue is a Jesuit. He is the Editor of Studies, a quarterly journals dealing with matters of religion and culture. Prior to becoming Editor of Studies, he was a lecturer in Church history at Milltown Institute.


Dr James Sheehan: James Sheehan is founder of the Blackrock, Galway Clinics and Hermitage Clinics, private medical facilities which operate according to a Catholic ethos.


Vincent Twomey: Fr Twomey is a member of the Divine Word Missionaries. He was professor of moral theology at St Patrick's College, Maynooth, until 2006. He is one of Ireland's foremost experts in Catholic moral theology.




I suggest you do your research on these patrons.

Sonics2k

tayto lover wrote: »

Maybe, maybe not. That would be a hard one to prove alright.

Yeah, it's already been proven.

Also, inb4 Philogos.

Froyo

Herb Powell wrote: »

That is why it is so fuccked up. Idiots will think they actually make a good point, and agree with them.

This is shiit.

They are making A point, which they are fully entitled to do.

Getting a bit tired of 'it's OK to express your view as long add it's to a similar belief system as mine'. Usually trotted out by people telling others they should just accept everything.

Now, maybe they should in some instances, but attacking them is not always the way to go about it.

I couldn't care less about marriage of any kind personally.

galwayrush

Who cares about something like this video either way.

Corkfeen

unseenfootage wrote: »

Nothing backward about expressing your views.

What is backward is to consider such views to be backward.

But the views that one can hold, can very easily be backwards. To criticise backward views as being backward is actually more of a sign of progression. For example, I can safely say that the KKK hold backward views, can I not?

Not every view holds the same amount of weight and the IONA institute's views tend to hold no weight whatsoever, the IONA institute's view in this regard is bigoted, they merely attempt to come across as balanced but they are most definitely not.

R0ot

unseenfootage wrote: »

Nothing backward about expressing your views.

What is backward is to consider such views to be backward.

"There's nothing different about different rules for different circumstances"

Okay so let's make black people, just because of a difference in skin colour, sit at the back of the bus I mean it's okay because they are in a different circumstance of skin than white people right?

Get out of here mate if you don't think this video is backward, opinion is there own but our opinion is it's BACKWARD.

mikemac1

R0ot wrote: »

our opinion is it's BACKWARD.

our opinion?

Do you speak for us all?

Corkfeen

mikemac1 wrote: »

our opinion?

Do you speak for us all?

You're being slightly pedantic....

unseenfootage

Corkfeen wrote: »

But the views that one can hold, can very easily be backwards. To criticise backward views as being backward is actually more of a sign of progression. For example, I can safely say that the KKK hold backward views, can I not?

Not every view holds the same amount of weight and the IONA institute's views tend to hold no weight whatsoever, the IONA institute's view in this regard is bigoted, they merely attempt to come across as balanced but they are most definitely not.

Are those views backward?

R0ot

mikemac1 wrote: »

our opinion?

Do you speak for us all?

Yes, now bow before me pleb!*

*This is just my opinion that I rule you all.

5uspect

I'll see the Iona Institutes bull**** and raise you the glorious Lisa Hannigan.

ScumLord

unseenfootage wrote: »

Nothing backward about expressing your views.

What is backward is to consider such views to be backward.

That doesn't really make much sense.

mikemac1

Corkfeen wrote: »

You're being slightly pedantic....

I don't think so

Only one way to decide

Hey OP, give us a poll!

jubella

This video makes me sad

Sure, everyone is entitled to their views, but I think it's wrong when those views that some people shouldn't have the right to marry the person they love are given a public platform.

Drakares

Look at the other videos uploaded by OnKneesforJesus4.. Hahahah

mikom

unseenfootage wrote: »

Nothing backward about expressing your views.

What is backward is to consider such views to be backward.

Oh really..........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMbfQ117Jts

tayto lover

Herb Powell wrote: »

That is why it is so fuccked up. Idiots will think they actually make a good point, and agree with them.

This is shiit.

Are they only idiots if they don't agree with your opinions?

For the record I have nothing against two gays getting married and adopting kids but I also think that the mother and father thing is best.

Sar_Bear

What... What is that utter shit?!


I know alot of kids who would be better off with two mams or two dads instead of the shitty parents they have now.

tayto lover

mikom wrote: »

Quote for advert: Every child ever born had a mother and a father.

Where does that leave the baby jesus?



By the way folks, here are the iona institute patrons as listed on their website....

Professor Patricia Casey: Patricia Casey is a senior consultant psychiatrist at the Mater Hospital in Dublin, as well as a lecturer at University College, Dublin.


Breda O'Brien: Breda O'Brien is a teacher and a columnist with The Irish Times. She is best known for her commentary on religious and social affairs.


Fergus O'Donoghue SJ: Fr O'Donoghue is a Jesuit. He is the Editor of Studies, a quarterly journals dealing with matters of religion and culture. Prior to becoming Editor of Studies, he was a lecturer in Church history at Milltown Institute.


Dr James Sheehan: James Sheehan is founder of the Blackrock, Galway Clinics and Hermitage Clinics, private medical facilities which operate according to a Catholic ethos.


Vincent Twomey: Fr Twomey is a member of the Divine Word Missionaries. He was professor of moral theology at St Patrick's College, Maynooth, until 2006. He is one of Ireland's foremost experts in Catholic moral theology.




I suggest you do your research on these patrons.

I am not interested in the "baby Jesus" thing at all as I am not a bit religious.
I don't care who the patrons are either.
I gave my own opinion as I saw it.

Corkfeen

unseenfootage wrote: »

Are those views backward?

They want to limit the rights to equality of a group of people because their religion does not support it. That hardly constitutes a progressive viewpoint. Same sex couples are as good parents as any, studies have proven this so their points are moot. Their entire argument boils down to, 'Won't somebody please think of the children?'. They are required to be extremely ignorant of the actual facts or choosing to lie to push their agenda.

Stheno

Where is the ad running? Is it on t.v.?

mikom

tayto lover wrote: »

I am not interested in the "baby Jesus" thing at all as I am not a bit religious.
I don't care who the patrons are either.
I gave my own opinion as I saw it.

I gauged that from the offset.
That is why I included the word "folks" in my post, as in "By the way folks, here are the iona institute patrons as listed on their website".

Annasopra

Stheno wrote: »

Where is the ad running? Is it on t.v.?

Just youtube. It can't be aired on tv because we don't allow political ads on TV

LivelineDipso

Nothing wrong with this group exercising their free speech.

I am not bothered one way or another by homosexuals getting married and adopting kids once they raise them without purposely imposing Gay lifestyles on them.

I hate to be one who delivers reality to you, but 90% of Irish people would agree with this advertisement.

Just how it is. Getting angry at the ad won't change things.

The problem is that the two 'camps' (pun intented) are devided between religious nutters and poltically correct nutters.

In the middle falls the majority of the Irish nation. These are the ones you need to inflence with calling them bigots.

token101

Ally Dick wrote: »

I couldn't care less if a gay or a lesbian couple want to get married. It's none of my business. I don't understand people who want to make it theirs

This. And this:

Syllabus

made some interesting points imo

made some retarted points imo

expressed their pov very well imo








imo

mikom

LivelineDipso wrote: »

Nothing wrong with this group exercising their free speech.

Do you know that this group is a registered charity?

unseenfootage

Corkfeen wrote: »

They want to limit the rights to equality of a group of people because their religion does not support it. That hardly constitutes a progressive viewpoint. Same sex couples are as good parents as any, studies have proven this so their points are moot. Their entire argument boils down to, 'Won't somebody please think of the children?'.

Does everything have to be progressive?