Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Important changes at RapidShare.com

Options
17810121317

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭SickBoy


    Krieg wrote: »
    Still no incentive for uploaders though, which maybe the real downfall of rapidshare with these changes.

    This is the real nuts and bolts of the problem.
    For those people trying to justify how the new system will give them more value for money by utilising happy hour are not seeing the bigger picture.
    No uploaded content to rapidshare means nothing to download.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭Bob_Harris


    SickBoy wrote: »
    This is the real nuts and bolts of the problem.
    For those people trying to justify how the new system will give them more value for money by utilising happy hour are not seeing the bigger picture.
    No uploaded content to rapidshare means nothing to download.

    What is the incentive to upload to the majority of file hosts? Rapidshare was one of the few that offered any reward for uploading.

    People will continue to upload to rapidshare for simple "online kudos". It may not be as popular as before but you will most likely find what you are looking for, except now you are getting more value for money with the new system ... long live rapidshare :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,178 ✭✭✭✭NothingMan


    If you take advantage of scheduling downloads during Happy Hours (1am-9am Irish Time) then you can get 300GB/month and don't have to restrict yourself to 1 day downloading, 4 days no-downloading :)

    I tend to download very spur of the moment and I wouldn't leave a laptop on overnight anyway. I may set up a spare PC as a download server.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭Burgo


    Bob_Harris wrote: »
    What is the incentive to upload to the majority of file hosts? Rapidshare was one of the few that offered any reward for uploading.

    People will continue to upload to rapidshare for simple "online kudos". It may not be as popular as before but you will most likely find what you are looking for, except now you are getting more value for money with the new system ... long live rapidshare :pac:

    You get more value for money as a downloader but nothing as an uploader under the new system, and when all the uploader move on to other sites then what are you left with?
    SickBoy wrote: »
    No uploaded content to rapidshare means nothing to download.
    You got it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭corny


    Much happier its done on a monthly instead of daily basis. Staying under 1GB every day was a pain. They've caused a bit of resentment already with their changes but under this new system my account has increased in length by nearly 2 years so i'm happy enough! Hopefully i'll still have something to download though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭Bob_Harris


    Burgo wrote: »
    You get more value for money as a downloader but nothing as an uploader under the new system, and when all the uploader move on to other sites then what are you left with?

    Right, but they won't all move. Enough will continue to use it for a decent supply of content.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    Bob_Harris wrote: »
    What is the incentive to upload to the majority of file hosts? Rapidshare was one of the few that offered any reward for uploading.

    +1


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,755 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I'd imagine it'll take a few days for these new (new) changes to sink in while people figure out the costs.. then the uploaders will decide what to do, and then we'll know if there's any point to a RS account anymore (regardless of how long they've extended it for).


  • Registered Users Posts: 45 jinxleprechaun


    Kaiser2000 wrote: »
    I'd imagine it'll take a few days for these new (new) changes to sink in while people figure out the costs.. then the uploaders will decide what to do, and then we'll know if there's any point to a RS account anymore (regardless of how long they've extended it for).



    Maybe it's my old age or maybe it's because I've just finished a run of nights from work but I am getting bogged down with all this malarkey. Why could'nt they just leave things as they were - if it ain't broken then why fix it?



    I'll be obliged for someone to breakdown the new offering for me - does unused traffic accumulate if unused from day to day or not?? etc etc etc

    Tnx in advance to those with more patience


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,284 ✭✭✭Ardent


    I'll be obliged for someone to breakdown the new offering for me - does unused traffic accumulate if unused from day to day or not?? etc etc etc

    This I would like to know as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    Maybe it's my old age or maybe it's because I've just finished a run of nights from work but I am getting bogged down with all this malarkey. Why could'nt they just leave things as they were - if it ain't broken then why fix it?

    I'll be obliged for someone to breakdown the new offering for me - does unused traffic accumulate if unused from day to day or not?? etc etc etc

    Tnx in advance to those with more patience
    Ardent wrote: »
    This I would like to know as well.

    Previous page folks, just one page away

    Old RS
    5GB/day x 365 = 1825GB/year for €55

    Traffic accumulated up to a maximum of 25GB, anything more was wasted.

    New RS
    30GB/month x 12 months for the basic RapidPro = 360GB/year for 1188 rapids

    1825-360 = 1465GB "missing" when compared with Old RS

    1465/5 = 293 blocks of additional traffic required (5GB per block)

    293x14 = 4102 rapids (14 rapids per block of 5GB traffic)

    1188+4102 = 5290 rapids/year for 1825GB traffic

    5290 = 5000 + 400 rapids = €49.75 + €4.99 = €54.74

    You'll have 110 rapids left over from this purchase, which you can use to buy another 7 blocks of 5GB traffic (35GB) so for €54.74 per year you can get 1860GB traffic/year instead of €54.99 for 1825GB/year

    Traffic also has no accumulation limit because you're buying traffic with rapids when you need it, not getting it on a daily basis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 29 iquitalready


    Maybe it's my old age or maybe it's because I've just finished a run of nights from work but I am getting bogged down with all this malarkey. Why could'nt they just leave things as they were - if it ain't broken then why fix it?



    I'll be obliged for someone to breakdown the new offering for me - does unused traffic accumulate if unused from day to day or not?? etc etc etc

    Tnx in advance to those with more patience


    It doesn't work 'day-to-day' anymore, it's more a 'month-to-month' setup. There is only one choice now called 'RapidPro' which costs 99 Rapids for 30 days and gives you 30GB traffic to use in that timeframe. So if you download 3GB today, you'll have 27GB left for the remaining 29 days. If you run out of traffic share before the 30 days is up, you can buy an extra 5GB for 14 Rapids. This can be setup to automatically debit your account in such a scenario, along with a choice to automatically extend your account after 30 days. The question of unused traffic accumulation only becomes relevant when the 30 days are up. Rapidshare themselves state that 'unused traffic volume does not expire', so I'm taking this to mean that it will carry over but I'll believe it when I see it.

    With only one choice of package and more control over how and when you use your Rapids, in my opinion this is definitely a better system than before but still requires the use of happy hours to be viable (for moderate to heavy downloaders at least). Thankfully JDownloader makes it easy to schedule downloads and will even shut your system down when it's done. :D

    Of course none of this helps the uploaders so it won't stop the haemorrhage from Rapidshare. My fear is that, while there are many excellent alternatives, there is none that stand head-and-shoulders above the rest the way Rapidshare did and in the future we'll need multiple accounts to get the same level of content options we had with Rapidshare.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    It doesn't work 'day-to-day' anymore, it's more a 'month-to-month' setup. There is only one choice now called 'RapidPro' which costs 99 Rapids for 30 days and gives you 30GB traffic to use in that timeframe. So if you download 3GB today, you'll have 27GB left for the remaining 29 days. If you run out of traffic share before the 30 days is up, you can buy an extra 5GB for 14 Rapids. This can be setup to automatically debit your account in such a scenario, along with a choice to automatically extend your account after 30 days. The question of unused traffic accumulation only becomes relevant when the 30 days are up. Rapidshare themselves state that 'unused traffic volume does not expire', so I'm taking this to mean that it will carry over but I'll believe it when I see it.

    With only one choice of package and more control over how and when you use your Rapids, in my opinion this is definitely a better system than before but still requires the use of happy hours to be viable (for moderate to heavy downloaders at least). Thankfully JDownloader makes it easy to schedule downloads and will even shut your system down when it's done. :D

    Of course none of this helps the uploaders so it won't stop the haemorrhage from Rapidshare. My fear is that, while there are many excellent alternatives, there is none that stand head-and-shoulders above the rest the way Rapidshare did and in the future we'll need multiple accounts to get the same level of content options we had with Rapidshare.

    Brief Rundown of whats going on at RS
    Rapidshare are probably trying to cut their costs which is why they're messing with the old package. Previously every account got 50GB of storage which was secure, as in the files were never deleted no matter when they were last downloaded. You can bet that they have a lot of premium accounts, so that's a lot of storage required. Even if that storage is never used by most premium account holders, they certainly would have a gripe if they tried to upload 50GB and found RS hadn't got enough storage space to give them. These hard drives cost money to buy, replace broken ones, etc etc. Then there was the traffic - everybody gets 5GB/day whether or not they used it. This means at any one time, Rapidshare had to have enough bandwidth to supply all premium members with their 5GB. This cost them money, even though a lot of users probably didn't use 5GB/day. Something needed to be done to cut their costs, and to add flexibility for the smalltime user.

    With the new packages it became a situation that if you used more (traffic or storage) then you paid more. If you used less, then you paid less - just like internet providers do with their download caps, pay more to get more. The 'Rapids' thing comes into it make it easier to manage credit cards and stuff. You block-buy Rapids, and these are the payment for RS services. Nobody wanted Rapidshare charging their credit card €4.95 one week, and €9.95 two weeks later. It works for Microsoft (Xbox Live Arcade games and downloadable content costs Microsoft Points, purchased in bulk packages for €x.xx), so why not for RS.

    There were a number of flaws with the system. Charging for Rapids was done daily, requiring micromanagement to ensure you're getting the best package for your needs for the following 24 hours. There were big steps between the packages on offer (Traffic 1GB->5GB->20GB->...) and Traffic did not acccumulate. So if you downloaded 1.0001GB, you were bumped up to 5GB, costing you 16 more rapids and you then had until 00:00CET (i.e. the start of the next day in the RS timezone) to use that traffic. There was no way to stop upgrading from package to package, if you lost the run of yourself you could have been up on the max package, costs through the roof per day with no need. There was no low-storage, high-traffic option - traffic and storage was intertwined, and it shouldn't be.

    RS knew some of the problems, so they implemented a minimum package that you would revert to 24 hours after your last upgrade, giving you a full day to use the new traffic you paid for and maximum package to stop you going over whatever limit you wanted to set yourself. I suppose most people set it to the 1GB package at the start of the 24 hour period, and the max package to be the 5GB/20GB package - now they were saving on the little download days with enough flexibility on the big download days without going overboard.

    This wasn't enough, people were still complaining and worse still for RS, cancelling. I wasn't happy with a 24 hour limit to use my bandwidth, I sent in my own request for a cancellation. There were options open to RS - e.g. a better option would have been to increase traffic 1GB at a time from the base package, at a cost of 4 rapids/GB. Most people can live with losing a few hundred MB of traffic if RS really wanted to reset the traffic allowance every day. But when you're talking 1GB+ it's different. Even better would have been to re-enable that old reliable thing called TrafficShare. With TrafficShare you bought traffic in blocks of 100GB. If, on a certain day, you exceeded your traffic allowance of 5GB (or more, depending on how much you had accumulated over the previous 5 days) the rest of your downloading would reduce your trafficshare traffic rather than stop you downloading altogether. There was no limit for TrafficShare, you bought 1TB of traffic, you had 1TB of traffic forever until you used it all. If they had enabled trafficShare where you bought traffic for rapids then I suspect most people would have set their account to the 1GB package and 'topped up' with TrafficShare on the busy days.

    Alas, today they have listened to their users and fixed up their broken system.

    Rapids still exist, you still buy 'rapids' with your real money. There is only 1 package. Everybody has it. It costs 99 Rapids every 30 days for 30GB of traffic and 10GB of secure storage. You buy extra secure storage at a cost of 2 Rapids/Month per GB. You buy extra traffic at a cost of 14 rapids for 5GB. This is done automatically by default - every time you run out of traffic, you top up with 5GB, deducting 14 rapids from your total. The traffic you purchase, accumulates. I've done the math and provided you stay under the 10GB of secure storage (you can have any amount of unsecure storage where files are deleted after 60 days without a download), you can have the exact same as your old premium account with this new package for a recession busting price save of €0.25 :P That €0.25 saving gets you an extra 100 or so Rapids, or an extra 35GB/year.

    Why the new package is better than the old RS?
    Because it's way more flexible. The old RS forced you to have (and thus pay for), 150GB of traffic every 30 days. If you didn't use RS regularly your traffic would accumulate to the 25GB maximum, and every day thereafter you would be wasting 5GB of traffic because you were at your max. This is not an issue anymore.

    If 1GB/day does you, then you can have a year of premium RS access for ~360 rapids, or €4.99/year. If you think you can get by less 150GB/month traffic in total then you are still saving. If you want a heavy day of downloading (>25GB in 1 day without Happy Hours) this is now possible; As I mentioned, the Old RS would have required you to top up your account with TrafficShare at a cost of €9.99 for 100GB, or 10c per GB. The top up package of 5GB for 14 rapids works out at only 3.49c per GB max (cheaper if you bulk-buy rapids instead of the 400 rapid price), which is nearly a third of the price and you only buy what you need in 5GB alotments; So if these heavy days of downloading are rare you're not spending money on something you hardly use - you're pay as you go.

    In my own situation, I could probably get the exact same service from RS this year as I did last year, but at a cost of €30 instead of €55 for the year; There were a lot of times during the last year where I let the traffic balance accrue to the 25GB max and wasted a few days worth of traffic.

    This new package also gives users a bigger incentive to use Happy Hours. Instead of a "Meh, it doesn't matter when I download, I get 5GB every day and that's that" the thought becomes "If I don't need this now, I can just schedule it for later, saving myself 14 rapids" - Sure, it's not much looking at the small picture. But do this 10 times and you've saved €1.40. Do it 100 times and your RS bill drops by €14.
    With only one choice of package and more control over how and when you use your Rapids, in my opinion this is definitely a better system than before but still requires the use of happy hours to be viable (for moderate to heavy downloaders at least).

    No, it doesn't require the use of happy hours to be viable. See my post above for the maths on it, the new system is cheaper whether you choose to operate the old RS style of 5GB/day traffic or want to go higher in traffic, it's still cheaper.
    Of course none of this helps the uploaders so it won't stop the haemorrhage from Rapidshare. My fear is that, while there are many excellent alternatives, there is none that stand head-and-shoulders above the rest the way Rapidshare did and in the future we'll need multiple accounts to get the same level of content options we had with Rapidshare.

    What about uploaders?
    What about them? :rolleyes: Rapidshare is right, their rewards system did reward people who uploaded copyrighted material with gifts of monetary value - who hasn't seen somebody selling a 30-day or 1 year RS account at a cheaper price than RS? Before file hosts the people who uploaded copyrighted material to public FTPs/pubStros, private FTP sites, curried between Topsites etc didn't do it to make money - sharing is always what it's been about, and psuedo-fame for the groups who release copyright material. This is before you even get into the 'ethics' of "the scene" and how profiting from it is a major no-no. Any uploader who moves away from RS because of the loss of a reward scheme is a d*ck who's forgotten their place :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,092 ✭✭✭Le King


    I still don't understand. Let's say I want to download 5GB a day? Let's say I then download my 5GB, then what happens? Can I download in Happy Hour for free?

    I is confused!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13 dizzy_davidh


    You can bet that they have a lot of premium accounts, so that's a lot of storage required. Even if that storage is never used by most premium account holders, they certainly would have a gripe if they tried to upload 50GB and found RS hadn't got enough storage space to give them. These hard drives cost money to buy, replace broken ones, etc etc. Then there was the traffic - everybody gets 5GB/day whether or not they used it. This means at any one time, Rapidshare had to have enough bandwidth to supply all premium members with their 5GB. This cost them money, even though a lot of users probably didn't use 5GB/day.

    I'm sorry but I've been in the capacity planning game and that statement just isn't realistic.

    Very few business scope their resources for 100% capacity, of which I'm certain Rapidshare is one, as they would be throwing money away otherwise. They will have a capacity plan which increases\decreases their storage and a bandwidth management policy that does much the same for connectivity.

    50gb storage for all premium users would mean an immense stockpile of storage would have been standing idle if they did provide for 100% use.

    I would surmise that ratio of users who don't store files and those that do is way greater than 25\1 and so it would be ridiculous for them to plan for 100% usage.

    As for their bandwidth, their systems will be using some pretty good packet shaping\dictionary compression tech to reduce their network overheads and so their bandwidth capacity will also never need to be 100% for all customers all of the time (especially when you consider the crappy broadband speeds that most customers experience!).

    Lastly, there is most likely some availability criteria in terms and conditions of service which cover them for outages which would most likely also cover them if they found they temporarily couldn't provide capacity\bandwidth for their customers and in the long term if they were to be faced with some shortfalls it is realistically no big deal for large companies to bring on-line additional storage arrays and connectivity.

    Some firms have deals with their hardware providers in relation to DoA and failed kit as well as free loan deals for short-term capacity and upgrade\migration purposes. HP for example loaned my previous corp. employer a bunch of servers to increase remote working capacity during a period of bad weather that stopped staff getting to work and when the crisis was over the kit was handed back having cost the firm nothing for it's use. If memory serves, the firm's ISP also provided a short-term increase in connectivity in the same way for no cost (dark-fiber).

    All this is off-topic as far as Rapidshare's recent changes are concerned but it does go someway to dispel the myth that customers are provided for 100% of the time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭Caliden


    So glad they changed it back to singular tier system (bar those who download a serious amount per month).
    The whole rapids scheme had my head wrecked and the auto upgrade integration was more a hinderance than anything else as I normally only download overnight (unattended) when I really want something.
    Had discussed this with a friend who uses rapidshare and we agreed that once our subscriptions had run out that hotfile would be the place to go but for now I'm sticking with rapidshare for pure convenience.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I really can't be arsed any more with Rapidshare.

    This, you have 2478 minutes left on your account, and 345 rapids, wtf.

    Subnetting is easier than all this rapido malarky.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,217 ✭✭✭LFC5Times


    Folks, which is a better option going forward - Hotfile or Megaupload?

    Cheers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,126 ✭✭✭✭calex71


    LFC5Times wrote: »
    Folks, which is a better option going forward - Hotfile or Megaupload?

    Cheers

    Hotfile, even though I can think of the few reasons why megaupload is good there just seems to be more hotfiles about the place if you get me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭Burgo


    LFC5Times wrote: »
    Folks, which is a better option going forward - Hotfile or Megaupload?

    Cheers

    Unclear as of yet, time to play the waiting game!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,088 ✭✭✭stevek93


    July 06, 2010
    As a result of the recent adjustments to our product and pricing model we have received a lot of feedback from our users. There was also positive response but we want to be honest with you: most answers were negative. With our adjustments we have alienated many users. As a matter of course, that was not our intention. Instead, it is our goal to introduce a system that gives our users more flexibility. However, we are happy about every single user response that we have received as this is the only way we can learn what our users really want. That is the reason why we have fundamentally revised our offer one more time and made it much simpler.

    In addition to the free Premium Accounts, with immediate effect there is only one package for everybody: RapidPro

    For 99 Rapids users immediately receive a traffic volume of 30 GB and a storage volume of 10 GB which last for 30 days.


    price/ 30 daysstorage/ 30 daystraffic/ 30 daysRapidPro99 Rapids10 GB30 GB

    If users need more volume, they can buy extra volume, of course. Each additional 1 GB of storage costs 2 Rapids per 30 days. 5 GB additional traffic volume will be charged with only 14 Rapids.

    Additional storage:Additional traffic:1 GB = 2 Rapids/month5 GB = 14 Rapids

    http://www.rapidshare.com/news.html

    Love the part 'but we want to be honest with you: most answers were negative'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 464 ✭✭PJTierney


    I might just move to megaupload or mediafire instead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,983 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    Note to rapidshare. Yes you have made your system better for the average user and the same cost for a heavy downloader. But you have screwed the pooch with the people who place the content on your site. And that's where you have failed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭sink


    AFAIK Megaupload and Hotfile the two leading alternatives don't offer rewards to uploaders either, Rapidshare was unique in that respect. Nor do torrent and newsgroups uploarders receive any reward beyond kudos. The entire filesharing ethos is anti profit, and anyone who pirates for profit is generally looked down upon by the warez scene.

    Rapishare has lost it's competitive edge perhaps ending it's dominance, but it won't die completely. It will just share the stage with several other file hosting services with little to distinguish them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭Bob_Harris


    Note to rapidshare. Yes you have made your system better for the average user and the same cost for a heavy downloader. But you have screwed the pooch with the people who place the content on your site. And that's where you have failed.

    Just had a quick look at "the place" where I usually find links to "stuff" and there are plenty of rapidshare links for stuff uploaded even after the rapidshare changes.

    Rapidshare remains very popular due to lots of people having premium accounts before the changes came in.

    I think the thing people don't understand is that a lot of people do not seek rewards for uploading stuff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭branners69


    My fear is that some stuff will be available on Hotfile, Megaupload and Rapidshare so I will need accounts with them all!!

    Will just have to wait and see!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13 dizzy_davidh


    I think the latest changes are a vast improvement over the previous model and credit is due to Rapidshare for listening to their customers, complaints and all, and making changes so quickly.

    I feel a lot more positive to the one type of account with the 30 days rolling service. I thing I don't get though is when they mention 'free premium' what is it?

    Like many folk I don't store anything on Rapidshare and simply have an account to access files so is there a configuration that makes things cheaper for people in my situation by perhaps not paying for the storage space but still allowing the download traffic? Perhaps that is what the free premium versus RapidPro types of accounts are?

    I do still think though that with the rewards for hosters now being gone the vast majority of uploaders will move from Rapidshare and so having an account with them will become pointless as Rapidshare will stop being used as a mirror for peoples files.

    Oh, and for the benefit of the person who mentioned the dodgy 'happy hour' configuration settings in JDownloader, these have now been removed again with today's update (07/07/10) and so you will need to manage your happy hour downloads manually or try using the scheduler plugin to enable\disable premium usage and start your downloads (if you can bothered with trying to get it to work).


  • Posts: 14,344 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I wish their 'rapids' were a little easier on the brain.

    I'm never going to be a mathematician. Simple multiplication can boggle me at the best of times. Why can't 1 Rapid = 1GB? That way I would always know what I'm doing. Instead, I have a whole new currency to get my head around.

    Rapidshare wrote:
    Each additional 1 GB of storage costs 2 Rapids per 30 days. 5 GB additional traffic volume will be charged with only 14 Rapids.

    So... if I'm downloading, if I go over my limit, I get an extra 5GB allocated to me? If I go over that, I get another 5GB given to me?


    SO i'd be correct in saying, If I download 40GB in one month (they provide you with the first 30GB "free") I'm down 28rapids?

    I could very easily hit, and have before, 200GB in a month. That would now cost me a fortune?


    EDIT: To just play on what I said above. I want to Download 200GB in one month. I'm given 30GB at the start of the month at a charge of 99 rapids. For every additional 5GB i use, i'm charged 14 rapids. Thus, 170GB additional traffic will cost me approximately 476 Rapids? (My overall for the month, when including the 99 Rapids they take, is equal to 575 Rapids?)

    1,000 Rapids is €9.95. To simplify this, I'll say 1,000 Rapids is €10.

    476 Rapids is equal to approximately €4.76
    575 Rapids is equal to approximately €5.75

    Thus, if you want to download 200GB a month, 12 months in a row, your account will cost you €69? That €69 is an overall cost, though. You won't be required to pay for trafficshare.

    200GB x 12 (months) = 2,400GB (2.4TB)
    2,400 / 69 (Euro) = 34.7


    So... 35c per GB?

    If you want to download 200GB per month for a year, at 575 Rapids per month, for a years worth it'll cost you 6,900 Rapids (575 x 12 = 6900).


    That does seem to work out alright.

    Now of course, downloading 200GB per month is taking it a bit to the extreme, but I'm just using that figure for the sake of it as, though it's extreme, it's also feasible for a lot of people.


    I've currently got 3,800 rapids in my account and i'm 'paid up' for another 28 days. What is confusing me, though, is that it's saying I've got 49GB of traffic left. How is that? I haven't downloaded anything since the start of July :confused:

    There's nothing I want to download, but at the same time, i don't want to waste that in the event it doesn't get carried across.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 CFoo


    As others have said, the cost may be more attractive but if no one is uploading what good is having a Rapidshare account? Ever since the changes, about 95% of the files of the usual sites I visit have gone to different providers. If this continues, I certainly won't be spending anymore money on Rapidshare and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

    The clock is ticking for Rapidshare and I foresee downsizing in the future.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,321 ✭✭✭IrishTonyO


    CFoo wrote: »
    As others have said, the cost may be more attractive but if no one is uploading what good is having a Rapidshare account? Ever since the changes, about 95% of the files of the usual sites I visit have gone to different providers. If this continues, I certainly won't be spending anymore money on Rapidshare and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

    The clock is ticking for Rapidshare and I foresee downsizing in the future.

    don't know what sites you are using if 95% are gone, it is nothing like that anywhere I have been


Advertisement