Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Fake Al-Qaeda provoking Islamaphobia
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
PirateShampoo wrote: »Using ceramics has a heat shield and using them for a barrel of a gun is 2 different things.
Ceramics cant withstand the explosive force of the bullet. It would shatter.
Ceramic Piston;)0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
So you're speculating and guessing. .
Wrong. You are speculating based on nothing but the belief that you have that it is not possible when Beatriz Paredes, President of the Mexican Chamber of deputies said:
"the Glock pistol was specially made of plastic to evade detection systems. "
No you have dismissed this based on the faith of your beliefs. Not very skeptical of you, is it?
Not going to dignify that with a response.Is it possible that Glocks make phaser? Or a gun that shoots hugs! I dunno, but you can't prove they not made it.
Desperate straw reaching. .
Because Jews have a proven history of impersonating Muslims to push an anti-Islam agenda. History repeats itself. EDIT: Nothing to do with actual religion though, more to sides in a conflict, much like the situation in the North.Then way raise their religion. .Infact aside from lurid idiotic conspiracy sites I see no source for this story. Where the men convicted of these crimes? How did Aztlan.net find out they were mossad so quickly .
This has all been addressed and I have no intention of going over it again. The sources have been A Mexican Government official site, respected Mexican mainstream media organisations and some but very little CT sites.Did this even happen?
:D
Ha, for someone who knows so much you know very little.0 -
The key term is phobia, an irrational fear:
This image is of Theo van Gogh, lying dead in the street with a knife in his chest:
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/attachments/off-topic-forum/91786d1257449884-one-place-earth-not-destroyed-2012-theovangogh.jpg
Fresh news:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8676351.stm
An irrational fear.0 -
Flamed Diving wrote: »The key term is phobia, an irrational fear::D No its not. Islamaphobia has nothing to do with fear of Islam. It is about prejudice against Islam - Which I might add you seem to support based on your last post.
Do you think homophobia is a fear of homosexuals too?
Here is a definition of Islamaphobia1) Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
2) Islam is seen as separate and 'other'. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
3) Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.
4) Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a 'clash of civilisations'.
5) Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage.
6) Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand.
7) Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
8) Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.
So in short it has nothing to do with fear, irrational or otherwise0 -
Flamed Diving wrote: »
Is this representative of you?
Or would it be irrational for an outsider to fear you and be prejudiced against you (assuming you are Irish) based on these scenes?0 -
Flamed Diving wrote: »
Notice how all the plaqards have clearly been written by one single person?
Notice how the majority seem to be in the middle, have their faces uncovered, carry no hate-filled plaqard and importantly pay no attention to the photographer(s)Flamed Diving wrote: »
Yeah smile for the Western media you hate so much:rolleyes:Flamed Diving wrote: »
This admittedly is disturbing but it is clearly a photoshoot to be used for propoganda regardless of who has staged it. Without context it could be anything, a TV show even. Spot the guy in between the two blokes on the right? He must've forgot his evil terrorist costume that day.Flamed Diving wrote: »
Again without context this could be anything. Celebrating a penalty shootout victory, a scene from a movie, a yoga class...anything.Flamed Diving wrote: »
Glad you brought this joker up. His name is Shakeel Ahmed and he is a professional protestor from Kashmir He is always on hand when our western media need a good shot of an Angy Muslim. He even has his own nickname Islamic Rage Boy.
See here for his professional portfolio:
http://snappedshot.com/archives/964-Professional-Protester,-Jihadi-style.html0 -
Advertisement
-
Saw this, and thought of you:
Fair play to you on dodging the most pertinent links, as if they did not exist.
It was to be expected. Here, I will let you do it again:
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0516/breaking9.html
'Religion of Peace'0 -
-
Flamed Diving wrote: »Saw this, and thought of you:
Fair play to you on dodging the most pertinent links, as if they did not exist.
It was to be expected. Here, I will let you do it again:
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0516/breaking9.html
'Religion of Peace':D:D
Please point out in the article where it says Muslims committed the arson attack?
If you can't I'll have to assume you have a prejudice against Islam (see definition above
) is clouding your judgement. 0 -
-
-
-
-
-
While the Basque movement has killed 800 odd people in it's 40 year existance. Al Qaeda killed nearly 200 with a single bombing in Madrid.
Some perspective please.
You're really saying that on an Irish forum?
No ONE is saying terrorist is the exclusive domain of muslims.
This is pretty much a dictionary description of a stawman. Your original points were about a fake Al Qaeda organised by jews. Now it's "other people can be terrorists too"
Please tell me how the hypothesis of paid agitators/intelligence agents posing as Islamic terrorists to demonise Muslims is contradicted by the fact of non-related worlwide terrorist attacks.
You say no one is saying terrorism is the exclusive domain of Muslims, I agree, Don't know why you are raising this though
, I was merely demonstrating that not all terrorist attacks are fase-flag intelligence op's. But to demonise all Muslims and lap up the media bull**** to judtify wiping out an innocent Pakistani family is highly ignorant.
To demonstrate the blurred lines I'd share with you the story of Khalid Khawaja.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/17/pakistan-taliban-hostage-murder-tape
Khawaja was a mujahadeen (setup by the CIA) fighter, bin Laden's (setup by the CIA) personal pilot and close associate, "former" ISI (extension of the CIA) agent, and was killed last month by the PTT (Creation of the CIA) for being a CIA collaborator.
This is what he had to say in a 2005 interview:Khalid Khawaja: In fact, the issue is terrorism. It is states and governments which sponsor terrorism to begin with, and subjects become the ultimate victims, and then a vicious cycle of terror rotates. In this state-sponsored crime there is no exception, and Pakistan, India, the US and Israel all have the same role.
Many of us call it a battle between East and West, between the Islamic and Judeo-Christian world, but it is neither of these. It is in fact the ruling regimes that want to dictate their will, and then they exploit [people] in various ways. Sometimes in the garb of monarchy, sometimes for democracy, and sometimes for dictatorship.
Ninety percent of people accept to be ruled, but there always remain some elements who refuse to succumb. They fight for freedom and resist till their last. However, in this conflict of two minorities - those who impose their will and those who resist it - the majority remains the sole victim. Yet people talk about Islam versus Christianity or Judaism. The basic theme remains the same. There is a group of people who want to impose their will, whether they happen to be Christian or Muslim, and there is a group of people who want to resist, and there is a silent majority which is trampled in between.KK: In Afghanistan's case, a similar game was carried out on a massive scale when Muslim youths from all over the world were brought in by Pakistan and the US [to fight against the Soviets in the 1980s]. They were tools for the empires' proxy war. The name of jihad was used. The state religion in those days supported jihad against India [in Kashmir] and the USSR [in Afghanistan]. However, once jihad was established, the states did not have any way to convince Muslims that jihad was only against the USSR and India, and not against the US.
Now, again, it is a question of a state imposing its will. The message is clear: if you are against us, we will kill you and your sympathizers. In this state terrorism, there is no exception, be it Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Pakistan, India, the US or Israel. All are the same.
EDIT- ANOTHER EXAMPLE
- http://www.sott.net/articles/show/142070-Police-had-role-in-Bali-blasts-Former-Indonesian-PresidentThe Australian
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:42 EDT
INDONESIAN police or military officers may have played a role in the 2002 Bali bombing, the country's former president, Abdurrahman Wahid has said.
In an interview with SBS's Dateline program to be aired tonight, on the third anniversary of the bombing that killed 202 people, Mr Wahid says he has grave concerns about links between Indonesian authorities and terrorist groups.
While he believed terrorists were involved in planting one of the Kuta night club bombs, the second, which destroyed Bali's Sari Club, had been organised by authorities.
Asked who he thought planted the second bomb, Mr Wahid said: "Maybe the police ... or the armed forces."
"The orders to do this or that came from within our armed forces, not from the fundamentalist people," he says.
The program also claims a key figure behind the formation of terror group Jemaah Islamiah was an Indonesian spy.
Former terrorist Umar Abduh, who is now a researcher and writer, told Dateline Indonesian authorities had a hand in many terror groups.
"There is not a single Islamic group either in the movement or the political groups that is not controlled by (Indonesian) intelligence," he said.
Of course the CIA has a long history with Indonesian intelligence. This just scratches the surface.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Indonesia0 -
Advertisement
-
Advertisement