Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

My unborn child is going to hell

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,736 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    I do agree with you, and i have made it clear that there will be absolutely no indoctrination permiitted at any stage. It's just a man in a nice frock splashing a bit of water around, that's as far as it goes!
    Also i don't mean to worry you, but if you zoom in really close on that photo - i think you can see horns starting to grow!:D

    Edit: But for the sake of the day, i get years of peace. Lazy way out? Absolutely. But i don't see any real harm to any party, especially the child.

    Unfortunately it's not as far as it goes. Every child baptised because 'ah, it keeps the grandparents quiet and it does no harm' is another percentage point of artificially inflated numbers for the RCC to point at and go "Look! 84% of the country is Catholic, so there's a definite need for us to have Catholic schools.", another person for them to claim to represent, and another hurdle in getting this country secular.

    Have a naming ceremony, have a day out, have a party, just think about the long term before you decide to baptise the child. If you give in to the parents on this to keep them happy then you'll be forking out for Communions and Confirmations for as many kids as you wind up having. If I were you I'd tell the parents that I didn't share their religious beliefs, I believed it would be hypocritical and disrespectful of me to baptise my child into a religion I didn't believe in, and that the child can make up their own mind whether or not to join whatever religion they want when they're old enough.

    (Well, actually, I'd probably be a bit bolshier than that and ask them if they thought I should get them signed up for Islam, Judaism, and the Jains while I'm at it)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,016 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    Liamario wrote: »
    The man had a triple bypass about a decade ago. He thinks scientists know nothing. :rolleyes:

    I have religious in-laws and I used to tip toe a bit around it but I would just say something like "from what I can see, it depends on your respect for science".

    Anyway, loads of people have religious in-laws. The majority of country folk are still religious and huge numbers up the North are creationists. So mathematically, unless you are both 6th generation Dublin it's likely there's a few religious memes about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    I have a 3 yr old who isn't bapthised. Why would I? I don't go to church, I have nothing but contempt for the Church, why would I allow myself to be bullied or pressured by people in the family into making a decision about my child that I don't agree with?

    I don't understand it. I get the pressure thing, I have my own family even now having a go at me over it constantly and no matter how much I say NO I still get a hard time.

    BUT if I give in on this what kind of precedent does that set? And what message does that send my kids? It seems to be a real Irish thing this "what will mammy think" mentality.

    People need to learn to stand by their convictions.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Robin - how do you put up with Popette?
    Luckily, Popette only visits from her distant home occasionally.

    Otherwise, well, it's like a strange mixture of Dana, John Waters (whom she admires as "an intellectual"), an audio version of the Alive trashzine, EWTN and Herr Ratzinger all rolled into one.

    Frankly, she's hard to deal with, though on the plus side, her religious beliefs have encouraged her entire extended family to become enthusiastic atheists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    I don't think the OP has made any suggestion that the grandad is considering a sly baptism.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    I don't think the OP has made any suggestion that the grandad is considering a sly baptism.
    Liamario wrote: »

    I think he also implied that the child would get baptised whether I liked it or not.

    I wanted to break his f**king jaw.

    Ummm...he did.

    Right there in the very first post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,427 ✭✭✭Morag


    I know my Dad had at mine with Holy Water, technically according to RC doctrine you can baptise if you have been confirmed, but I don't consider it to be official and there are no church records re my kids. Apparently it meant him and other older family members sleep better knowing my kids won't go limbo.

    I have had a sibling have a go several times that if anything happens to my kids they won't get a 'proper' funeral and The Family don't be able to grieve properly or get any 'comfort' from the funeral. Their kids are baptised, which my two think is unfair on their cousins cos they don't have a choice or a say in it. Oh the joys of family.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭Liamario


    Lads and Ladies, I think it's important to note that the original post was posted over a year ago. Fionn is 9 month's old and doted on by all his grandparents.

    I think to quote my original post when making a point is likely to be conflicting with the current situation and possibly moot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,736 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    Morag wrote: »
    I have had a sibling have a go several times that if anything happens to my kids they won't get a 'proper' funeral and The Family don't be able to grieve properly or get any 'comfort' from the funeral. Their kids are baptised, which my two think is unfair on their cousins cos they don't have a choice or a say in it. Oh the joys of family.

    I hope you told them that you find them fantasising about your children dying untimely deaths quite morbid and more than a little unsettling. Oh, and that the Pope has done away with Limbo, and now all babbies go to heaven.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Ummm...he did.

    Right there in the very first post.

    Well he didn't do a sly baptism so who cares


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    I don't think the OP has made any suggestion that the grandad is considering a sly baptism.
    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Ummm...he did.

    Right there in the very first post.
    Well he didn't do a sly baptism so who cares

    :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,477 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Well he didn't do a sly baptism so who cares

    Erm... weren't you the one who brought it up after OP was just giving us an update on what had happened?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    Liamario wrote: »
    Another amusing thing he said was that by not baptising the child, I'd be taking away my child's ability to choose for itself.

    I love the old "give him a choice by removing all his alternatives" argument.

    Frankly I think nobody should be baptised or otherwise inducted into a religion until they are old enough to understand and give informed consent. We have rules guaranteeing it for sex, marriage, drinking, driving &c. so why not for religion?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    Penn wrote: »
    Erm... weren't you the one who brought it up after OP was just giving us an update on what had happened?

    Indeed I was, then I realized that the OP was over a year ago, hence "who cares". I don't anyhow.

    By the way OP I'm glad the little fellah is doing well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    I love the old "give him a choice by removing all his alternatives" argument.

    Ive heard Jews using that one to justify circumcision. No joke.
    Frankly I think nobody should be baptised or otherwise inducted into a religion until they are old enough to understand and give informed consent. We have rules guaranteeing it for sex, marriage, drinking, driving &c. so why not for religion?

    Agreed. Luckily though, religion doesn't really matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭Brian Shanahan


    robindch wrote: »
    You're missing that I suggested that the deal is that the OP concedes on the baptism in return for the dad conceding on everything religious after the baptism. See this post.

    That compromise will never happen. Even if Liam's father seems to agree to it, he won't be, because he'll have seen his son backing down over the baptism, and will see his grandson as a good catholic in need of communion and confirmation.

    The baptism will forever be used as a wedge to widen the area in which Liam's father has veto over the raising of his grandson.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe




    Agreed. Luckily though, religion doesn't really matter.

    With 93% of our State funded primary schools under the control of one religion it sure as **** matters!

    When precious time/resources are spent in our State funded schools on religious indoctrination/ preparation for religious rituals rather than maths/science it sure as **** matters.

    When people are forced to baptise their children to help them secure a place in a State funded school it sure as **** matters.

    When one has no option in a court of law but to swear an oath on a 'Holy Book' (as happened me 2 years ago) it sure as **** matters.

    When our Head of State has to utter the words '"In the presence of Almighty God I do solemnly and sincerely promise and declare that I will maintain the Constitution of Ireland and uphold its laws, that I will fulfill my duties faithfully and conscientiously in accordance with the Constitution and the law, and that I will dedicate my abilities to the service and welfare of the people of Ireland. May God direct and sustain me" upon taking office it sure as **** matters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    With 93% of our State funded primary schools under the control of one religion it sure as **** matters!

    Id be more concerned with the state funding black hole banks as opposed to relatively paltry sums you suggest here.
    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    When precious time/resources are spent in our State funded schools on religious indoctrination/ preparation for religious rituals rather than maths/science it sure as **** matters.

    Kids don't have to participate in religion in schools.
    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    When people are forced to baptise their children to help them secure a place in a State funded school it sure as **** matters.

    They are not forced. Their are alternatives.
    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    When one has no option in a court of law but to swear an oath on a 'Holy Book' (as happened me 2 years ago) it sure as **** matters.

    You do NOT have to swear on the bible. If you did then you are a walkover and a hypocrite.
    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    When our Head of State has to utter the words '"In the presence of Almighty God I do solemnly and sincerely promise and declare that I will maintain the Constitution of Ireland and uphold its laws, that I will fulfill my duties faithfully and conscientiously in accordance with the Constitution and the law, and that I will dedicate my abilities to the service and welfare of the people of Ireland. May God direct and sustain me" upon taking office it sure as **** matters.

    Its only words. Get over it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Id be more concerned with the state funding black hole banks as opposed to relatively paltry sums you suggest here.

    The banks have nothing to do with it - the State has managed to find 90 million euro to build schools for the Christian Brothers which will then come under the control of the Edmund Rice Trust who insist on a Catholic ethos.
    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/90m-payout-row-over-vacant-school-29077025.html
    Kids don't have to participate in religion in schools.

    Schools should be educating - not indoctrinating.


    They are not forced. Their are alternatives.
    In some urban centres only.


    You do NOT have to swear on the bible. If you did then you are a walkover and a hypocrite.

    Tell that to the judges of Cork District court - and less of the insults if you don't mind.
    A friend of mine was recently called for jury duty in the same court - again she was told there was no option but to swear on the Bible.


    Its only words. Get over it.

    No. It's my country too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin



    Kids don't have to participate in religion in schools.



    They are not forced. Their are alternatives.


    Do you have kids? Its easy not to see how serious it is if you don't have dealings with the education system. I think most schools are pretty good about accommodating students who aren't Catholic but its extra work for them and its hassle for the kids especially when there is an obvious alternative ie keeping faith teachings to outside school hours.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Teach me to be cool and apathetic like you, KidChameleon!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Do you have kids? Its easy not to see how serious it is if you don't have dealings with the education system. I think most schools are pretty good about accommodating students who aren't Catholic but its extra work for them and its hassle for the kids especially when there is an obvious alternative ie keeping faith teachings to outside school hours.

    I suspect Kidchameleon has never had to listen to a 6 year old rant that she spends too much time in school learning about holymarymotherofgod and not enough time learning to read and do maths.

    When a 6 year old asks to be homeschooled so she can learn and not have to hear about religion something is terribly wrong with our education system.

    When someone thinks that religion and it's all pervasive influence over the Irish state 'doesn't matter' - there is something terribly wrong with our education system.

    When 90 million euro is being handed over by the State to an organisation to build schools which was found guilty of systemic child abuse (http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/thousands-raped-in-irelands-christian-brothers-schools-28522897.html) and filed for bankruptcy (http://www.pcvalaw.com/christianbrothers/) to avoid paying reparation to it's victims while at the same time placing it's assets into a private trust - something is rotten at the very heart of the State.

    But sure - it's not like any of that matters.....:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Tell that to the judges of Cork District court - and less of the insults if you don't mind.
    A friend of mine was recently called for jury duty in the same court - again she was told there was no option but to swear on the Bible.

    I could be wrong, but I understand it is possible to affirm an oath rather than swear one. Controversy over oaths is nothing new, Quakers also refuse to swear oaths. The affirmation goes by:

    “I, do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that the evidence that I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”.

    It isn't surprising that your friend would be unaware of this as most people aren't, but a district court judge should be aware of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,781 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    Sarky wrote: »
    Teach me to be cool and apathetic like you, KidChameleon!

    Or how to miss all the points so impressively!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    I could be wrong, but I understand it is possible to affirm an oath rather than swear one. Controversy over oaths is nothing new, Quakers also refuse to swear oaths. The affirmation goes by:

    “I, do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that the evidence that I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”.

    It isn't surprising that your friend would be unaware of this as most people aren't, but a district court judge should be aware of it.

    I have done this in the UK but caused consternation in Cork when I told the guard handling the case that I refused to swear on the Bible and asked what alternatives were available. After much tutting I was told by the clerk of court that there was no other option - as it happened I was a witness and the defendant eventually pleaded guilty so I wasn't called to the stand (I only wasted a day hanging around waiting...).

    Friend specifically asked for an alternative should she be picked for a jury (it may have been Circuit Court in her case but it was still in Cork), citing her atheism, and was also told there was no alternative...she wasn't picked so again it ended up with her not having to take the oath.

    TBH, I was hoping to be called to the stand as I was planning on refusing to swear on the Bible and insisting an alternative option be provided.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    Bannasidhe wrote: »

    I have done this in the UK but caused consternation in Cork when I told the guard handling the case that I refused to swear on the Bible and asked what alternatives were available. After much tutting I was told by the clerk of court that there was no other option - as it happened I was a witness and the defendant eventually pleaded guilty so I wasn't called to the stand (I only wasted a day hanging around waiting...).

    Friend specifically asked for an alternative should she be picked for a jury (it may have been Circuit Court in her case but it was still in Cork), citing her atheism, and was also told there was no alternative...she wasn't picked so again it ended up with her not having to take the oath.

    TBH, I was hoping to be called to the stand as I was planning on refusing to swear on the Bible and insisting an alternative option be provided.

    It doesn't say a lot for those judges that they didn't know how to handle a situation such as this. The current act has been in place since 1888 ffs! I'd encourage anyone who gets a summons or jury duty to inform themselves as to their right to make an affirmation rather than swear an oath, I don't particularly like the idea of oaths myself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 789 ✭✭✭jimd2


    As a catholic parent I would not have an issue with a significant reduction and eventual elimination of religious teaching in Catholic run schools. The schools are paid for by the state and it is only through the fact that the schools are owned by the religious that they have an influence. I have been on a board of management and the religious influence is almost non existant.

    Preparation for confirmation anyway (and probably communion) should be outside school. Perhaps even during the day and the teacher continuing to teach those not participating or evn totally outside in the evenings. This will mean that the families that are committed to it will stay involved and others wont. It will also get away from the farce in which religious "events" are thought up by the PP in order to get the parents to bring the kids to mass a few times in the year.

    After all, baptism is arranged outside school so can the other ceremonies.

    My biggest gripe is with secondary school. We have a daughter doing junior cert and too much time is spent on other subjects like religion, sphe, civics - I am not even sure of the names. There should be one subject covering health and developmental issues. I actually think the time saved should be spent on more PE and also some resource in which older kids help junior certs in subjects they are struggling on. Some teachers resist this as it shows them up. If kids dont have an interest in religion when they hit the teenage years, boring classes wont help and may put them off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Benny_Cake wrote: »
    It doesn't say a lot for those judges that they didn't know how to handle a situation such as this. The current act has been in place since 1888 ffs! I'd encourage anyone who gets a summons or jury duty to information themselves as to their right to make an affirmation rather than swear an oath, I don't particularly like the idea of oaths myself.

    That's why I was hoping to be called to the stand to force the issue - apparently they were having a lot of trouble finding anyone willing to come forward and bare witness against this particular person (he broke into my car and was caught with items belonging to me on his person). At the time he was out on bail after 3 serious assault charges plus a few burglaries - lets just say the Guards wanted to see him go down and really really wanted a witness against him so were delighted when I said I would testify that the property they recovered was mine.

    The clerk of court (who is a neighbour of my mother's) and I had the following conversation:
    'I'm pretty sure there is an alternative'.
    'No, there isn't - just swear on the Bible ffs!'
    'No.'
    'you always were a troublemaker.'
    'Bite me - if you want me to testify, give me an alternative oath or I'm going back to work now.'
    'I'll tell your mother on you.'
    'Do that - but I should warn you, she'll take the head off you.'
    'Stand over there and I'll get back to you' *glare*

    The clerk never did get back to me, 2 hours later the defendant pleaded guilty so I wasn't called, the clerk complained to my mother and mother went through the clerk without taking a short cut.

    My Mam has a vicious tongue on her. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,370 ✭✭✭Knasher


    Kids don't have to participate in religion in schools.
    In a lot of schools, not participating isn't at all feasible. There have been many threads from parents here, where they reported having the option to not have their children participate, only to find out later that their choice wasn't being respected. Or that to exercise that choice, they would have to supervise the children during the school day themselves. Or that religion was interspersed throughout the day so avoiding it was largely impossible.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 42,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beruthiel


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    'you always were a troublemaker.'
    'Bite me - if you want me to testify, give me an alternative oath or I'm going back to work now.'
    'I'll tell your mother on you.'

    There you are in an Irish court, talking to the court clerk, and that's an actual, real conversation!
    Only in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,736 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    A friend of mine is in court quite a bit (on the side of the good guys, I promise!) and she said that while there is the affirmation, taking that rather than swearing on the bible may make the jury more hostile toward you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭Bloodwing


    Bannasidhe wrote: »

    That's why I was hoping to be called to the stand to force the issue - apparently they were having a lot of trouble finding anyone willing to come forward and bare witness against this particular person (he broke into my car and was caught with items belonging to me on his person). At the time he was out on bail after 3 serious assault charges plus a few burglaries - lets just say the Guards wanted to see him go down and really really wanted a witness against him so were delighted when I said I would testify that the property they recovered was mine.

    The clerk of court (who is a neighbour of my mother's) and I had the following conversation:
    'I'm pretty sure there is an alternative'.
    'No, there isn't - just swear on the Bible ffs!'
    'No.'
    'you always were a troublemaker.'
    'Bite me - if you want me to testify, give me an alternative oath or I'm going back to work now.'
    'I'll tell your mother on you.'
    'Do that - but I should warn you, she'll take the head off you.'
    'Stand over there and I'll get back to you' *glare*

    The clerk never did get back to me, 2 hours later the defendant pleaded guilty so I wasn't called, the clerk complained to my mother and mother went through the clerk without taking a short cut.

    My Mam has a vicious tongue on her. :D

    Mind me asking how long ago that was? I've never had an issue with taking the affirmation, personally if I met a clerk like that I'd refuse to take the oath regardless of the consequences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭Liamario


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    That's why I was hoping to be called to the stand to force the issue - apparently they were having a lot of trouble finding anyone willing to come forward and bare witness against this particular person (he broke into my car and was caught with items belonging to me on his person). At the time he was out on bail after 3 serious assault charges plus a few burglaries - lets just say the Guards wanted to see him go down and really really wanted a witness against him so were delighted when I said I would testify that the property they recovered was mine.

    The clerk of court (who is a neighbour of my mother's) and I had the following conversation:
    'I'm pretty sure there is an alternative'.
    'No, there isn't - just swear on the Bible ffs!'
    'No.'
    'you always were a troublemaker.'
    'Bite me - if you want me to testify, give me an alternative oath or I'm going back to work now.'
    'I'll tell your mother on you.'
    'Do that - but I should warn you, she'll take the head off you.'
    'Stand over there and I'll get back to you' *glare*

    The clerk never did get back to me, 2 hours later the defendant pleaded guilty so I wasn't called, the clerk complained to my mother and mother went through the clerk without taking a short cut.

    My Mam has a vicious tongue on her. :D

    I've never met your mammy, but I love her :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Beruthiel wrote: »
    There you are in an Irish court, talking to the court clerk, and that's an actual, real conversation!
    Only in Ireland.

    I was laughing - the clerk was not.

    Bloodwing wrote: »
    Mind me asking how long ago that was? I've never had an issue with taking the affirmation, personally if I met a clerk like that I'd refuse to take the oath regardless of the consequences.

    Would be coming up to the 3 year mark soon - I remember as I was about to trade in that car as I needed a bigger car to fit 2 child seats plus 3 adults plus 2 dogs and instead had to go through the insurance rigmarole - possibly I agree to testify out of sheer annoyance at being forced to deal with an insurance company.

    I kept insisting there must be an alternative and the clerk kept insisting there wasn't and frankly failed to understand why I even had an issue.
    Liamario wrote: »
    I've never met your mammy, but I love her :o

    The clerk got off lightly compared to the Art teacher who rang her looking for me and proceeded to complain about her grandson to her... or the Nun who complained me for questioning Papal infallibly...

    All her geese and swans and woe betide anyone who dares to suggest we arn't perfect. :D

    Mind you, she's quiet in comparison to my Nan - that woman was a force of nature.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Wait, that was 3 years ago? I understand from previous posts that you're pretty conclusively a grown adult*, and someone tried the "I'll tell yer ma" line on you!?

    *I mean that in the nicest way possible.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Sarky wrote: »
    Wait, that was 3 years ago? I understand from previous posts that you're pretty conclusively a grown adult*, and someone tried the "I'll tell yer ma" line on you!?

    *I mean that in the nicest way possible.

    Yup - was well on the 'wrong' side of 40 at the time and was urged by the guards to testify as in a certain light I look like a veh respectable and all round upstanding citizen.

    Plus, some of the stuff taken from my car was work related so had the 'logo' of a certain university all over it (i.e a really ****ty laptop and enough waffle on headed notepaper to account for half a rain forest) for extra added grown-upness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    I was called for jury duty a couple of years ago in the Central Criminal Court. It was made clear in the documentation and on the days we had to attend that the option of affirming or swearing on a Koran/other relevant religious book was available. I don't remember it being a big hidden secret.

    I have heard from people I know in the legal profession that those who chose to affirm and those of non-Christian faiths who ask for other books can be looked on in a less than favourable light. There's no recent studies to show whether jurors or witnesses are viewed differently for non bible affirmations AFAIK though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Sh*tty laptop? Aw, don't dash my hopes, I just convinced my supervisor to get me a desktop :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Sarky wrote: »
    Sh*tty laptop? Aw, don't dash my hopes, I just convinced my supervisor to get me a desktop :(

    Hahahahahahahahahaha

    I'm sure it'll be grand.


    Hahahahahahahahahaha.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    lazygal wrote: »
    I was called for jury duty a couple of years ago in the Central Criminal Court. It was made clear in the documentation and on the days we had to attend that the option of affirming or swearing on a Koran/other relevant religious book was available. I don't remember it being a big hidden secret.

    I have heard from people I know in the legal profession that those who chose to affirm and those of non-Christian faiths who ask for other books can be looked on in a less than favourable light. There's no recent studies to show whether jurors or witnesses are viewed differently for non bible affirmations AFAIK though.

    Damn - I should have asked for a Koran and watched them freak...

    I just mentioned it to the guard as a btw kinda thing as I noticed everyone was swearing on the Bible so I thought better say something before I get up there. I thought it would be a case of 'oh, thanks for telling us, no problemo.'

    I really was amazed at the attitude shown but thought it was a once off 'oh look here comes yer wan the troublemaker' by the clerk but then atheist friend told me she had asked when called for jury duty and she met the same response (without the 'I'll tell your Ma' part - the clerks don't know her Ma as her Ma lives in Carlow).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,438 ✭✭✭TwoShedsJackson


    lazygal wrote: »
    . It was made clear in the documentation and on the days we had to attend that the option of affirming or swearing on a Koran/other relevant religious book was available.

    Is there an alternative to swearing on some religious book or another?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    I'd swear on the Satanic Verses. For the laugh, like. I mean swearing on the bible is about as significant as swearing on Fifty Shades of Grey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Sarky wrote: »
    I'd swear on the Satanic Verses. For the laugh, like. I mean swearing on the bible is about as significant as swearing on Fifty Shades of Grey.

    I'm rather fond of The Annals of Loch Cé and I certainly have more 'faith' in it than any 'Holy Book'...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,427 ✭✭✭Morag


    Is there an alternative to swearing on some religious book or another?

    There is you affirm rather then swear, basically you hold up your hand and promise to tell the truth and it's a legally binding oath, no books, no mention of deity. Did it myself over 10 years ago.


    Any court clerk who does not know this should be sacked imo.
    It's not new and is covered by the The Oaths Act from 1888.

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1976/en/act/pub/0004/sec0018.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭Bloodwing


    I must ask if i can swear on this next time I'm in court.....

    The_Gospel_of_the_Flying_Spaghetti_Monster.jpg

    Then we'll see who looks down on me!!

    My favorite example of the oath going wrong has to be the day a young Guard stood in the box for the first time, picked up the bible and proceeded to caution the Judge. Poor lad died right there in the box.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,016 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    Bloodwing wrote: »
    I must ask if i can swear on this next time I'm in court.....

    The_Gospel_of_the_Flying_Spaghetti_Monster.jpg

    Then we'll see who looks down on me!!

    My favorite example of the oath going wrong has to be the day a young Guard stood in the box for the first time, picked up the bible and proceeded to caution the Judge. Poor lad died right there in the box.

    What would happen if you were in court and ask to swear on the Bible and you said "F*ck that piece of sh*t" and thumped it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    No. It's my country too.

    I'm curious, why do you get so offended by a couple of sentences in a document. Sentences that have absolutely no effect on your life?

    Look if you swear on a bible with views like yours, it makes you a hypocrite, that's not an insult, that's a fact. At the end of the day you don't have to and I'm glad you were not put in that position in the end.

    Oh yes I do have a child by the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    I'm curious, why do you get so offended by a couple of sentences in a document. Sentences that have absolutely no effect on your life?

    Look if you swear on a bible with views like yours, it makes you a hypocrite, that's not an insult, that's a fact. At the end of the day you don't have to and I'm glad you were not put in that position in the end.

    Oh yes I do have a child by the way.

    Kid - if you don't get it by now I'm not wasting any more time explaining it to you. Perhaps someone with more patience than I will be willing.

    You are also free with bandying words like hypocrite around - given that I was clear that I refuse to swear an oath on a Bible I am not sure you know what this word means - you are certainly not using it correctly.
    Either that or you don't bother actually reading what people say before leaping to insult slinging.

    If you are content to have your child indoctrinated, that is your choice. You do not have the right to make that choice for other parents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    robindch wrote: »
    Luckily, Popette only visits from her distant home occasionally.

    Otherwise, well, it's like a strange mixture of Dana, John Waters (whom she admires as "an intellectual"), an audio version of the Alive trashzine, EWTN and Herr Ratzinger all rolled into one.

    Frankly, she's hard to deal with, though on the plus side, her religious beliefs have encouraged her entire extended family to become enthusiastic atheists.
    For the longest time I have been reading your posts, thinking popette was your wife. I was always baffled imagining how your family worked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,846 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    What would happen if you were in court and ask to swear on the Bible and you said "F*ck that piece of sh*t" and thumped it?
    Contempt of court. Exactly the same would happen if you expressed your disdain in a similar fashion for an invitation to make a non-religious affirmation.

    Being an atheist is not a licence to be an *rsehole!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement