Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

The case against average speed cameras

13468911

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,178 ✭✭✭✭Esel
    Not Your Ornery Onager




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,909 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    M50 is often at snails space. You could merge at walking space.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,807 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Every single car I've driven has had the speedo show a faster speed than what you're doing, usually around 4-5kph of a difference. So for motorway driving I usually stick the cruise control at 125 and it has me zipping along at 119 or 120.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,463 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I think they get worse over time as well. When my old '98 fiesta showed 75mph on the speedo the sat nav was registering just 108km/h a full 12kmph out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 KeithKelly1992


    What’s wrong with a ton on a motorway in right conditions?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 53,144 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    as has been done to death here - speedos are legally allowed overstate your speed, but not understate it. if you're driving a car whose speedo understates your speed, that in itself is an offence AFAIK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,807 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    If people feel it's okay to do a chunk higher that the posted speed limit on motorways then they would also feel similarly empowered to do higher than the posted limit on national roads and regional roads and so on down.

    Laws is laws.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,664 ✭✭✭con___manx1


    Iv done all that myself speeding and bullshit especially when I was younger. The right conditions has nothing to do with it. I wouldn't say that a speeding driver is even a bad driver but the problem is it leaves very little margin for error especially with the amount of absolutely shocking drivers on the road that are following the speed limit. Just drifinting into lanes and slamming on merging on the motorway at ridiculous slow speeds and so on. A couple of near misses usually slows alot of lads down but for some it can be alot worse than that.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I've often exceeded that speed in the past and it was stupid of me.

    No matter how good a driver you think you are, you're not! You can't see the small debris on the road that could puncture a tyre.

    You've no control over so many factors. Jesus, a few posts up, people were admitting they don't know what lane to be in!

    There are places where you're welcome to hit those speeds but remember that even the best racing drivers, driving in controlled conditions, crash!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,471 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Its simple, would you remain in the right lane if you were overtaking on a single carriage way?
    If you wouldnt, then dont do it on the motorway either, move back to lane 1 and then into lane 2 if needed, people merging on to the motorway will be at motorway speeds, so you dont necessarily need to be overtaking them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,013 ✭✭✭creedp


    Ahem there's a subtle difference between driving on the right lane of a two lane road and a motorway.

    Are you being definitive when you say [all] drivers entering a motorway will be doing motorway speeds, 120kph I presume



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭kirving


    "Not tolerate lane hogging" is code for aggressively, tailgate, beep and flash other cars out of the way. Fantastic. That type of behaviour is reflected in Italy's road death statistics which last year were 50% higher than in Ireland.

    The yield sign in France, is for the cars on what would otherwise be the main carriageway. You did specifically ask this question in the below post.

    Priorite a droite is France's attempt, in certain situations, to put onus on faster cars to slow, rather than underpowered cars to speed up, and is reminiscent of right of way on a ski slope. Makes a lot of sense.

    Your original post, and the other which I have quoted below, all too commonly come from drivers who are more concerned about rigidly sticking to (and subsequently quoting) rules of the road, rather than just moving over to accommodate someone else, because "they don't have to".

    Given how roads are actually designed, it is completely unrealistic, and in some cases outright impossible, for slower traffic to be able to get up to speed and merge safely onto a motorway in under 50m, following an unsighted, 90° entry road. The only option is to stop dead on the sliproad.

    There seems to be this mistaken understanding that "keep left unless overtaking" is a command from God himself, that no other circumstance can ever override it. As an example, I posted a video to the dashcam thread a while back, and I was immediately questioned as to why I moved to the right lane.

    Eh, becuase I'd rather not kill a Garda who might trip and fall in front of me. But hey, if the RSA weren't arsed putting good practice onto paper, why should I take it upon myself to accomdate anyone else?

    Screen Shot 2024-10-04 at 10.38.11 AM.png



    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/121235555/#Comment_121235555



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,114 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Keep left unless overtaking is the legal requirement while driving. You could make an argument about the left lane being obstructed by the stoppage in the hard shoulder. But it doesnt change the statutes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭kirving


    Do you really believe that drivers should keep left for example where a Garda is standing to the right side of a vehicle in the hard shoulder, or when they see another car joining from a clearly short slip road?

    Other countries, with functioning governments, have thought this through, and decided that move-over laws are valuable for everyone's safety

    Funny thing about the speeding van is that he was probably well aware of the average speed check just 10km up the road, so was going extra fast here to try and save some time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,370 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1547821562496621?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,573 ✭✭✭beachhead


    Speeders in Asia? Average drive zones? Which Asian countries?

    Speeders in Asia are known as killers or even sleeping or just stupid. But speed cameras,where?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,471 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Bless you.

    There isnt actually, in both cases you are overtaking and so you move back when you are done, you dont hang around in a non driving lane just because you might be overtaking again in future.

    a) It would depend on the motorway, not all are 120

    b) people should be entering at the same speed the traffic already on the motorway is moving at, thats how you merge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,013 ✭✭✭creedp


    Seriously if you're equating driving in the rhl of a 2 lane road to that of a motorway you need to put your head in a cold bucket of water and hit the reset button.

    On Your (b) point - we're not doing the theory test here. We're dealing with the real world and real people, so what should happen is just pie in the sky. What's important is reacting to what going on outside not shaking your fist at the outside world from inside your perfect world while quoting the rotr



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,471 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    I'm equating the decision on when to move a back into the driving lane as the same in both scenarios. There is simply no reason to hang around on lane 2 or 3 if there is space to pull back into the driving lane.


    So your argument is that "since some people might not follow the rules, there is no point in me bothering either" Awesome attitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,013 ✭✭✭creedp


    Forgive me father, I have sinned, in accordance with the scripture of the theoretical world. I probably will burn in RSA hell. Christ almighty ....."awesome attitude" 😇



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭JohnC.


    People like you are a danger on the road and you don't even see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,236 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    but remember that even the best racing drivers, driving in controlled conditions, crash!

    What have racing drivers on a open/closed circuit got to do with road users?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,013 ✭✭✭creedp




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,318 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Maybe if you had properly read my post (which replied to someone suggesting being allowed to drive at 100mph on a motorway "in the right conditions") and not taken a line out of context you would not need to ask! 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,013 ✭✭✭creedp


    Love watching the videos online of lads cruising at 300kph on 2 lane autobahn. Surprising they haven't vaporised by now given the pearl clutching by some on here about doing 130/140 kph on Irish motorways



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,236 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    You can be driving at 100mph and not racing anyone, no?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,062 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    This, how is it complicated, every anpr camera, be it tolls, average cameras, squad car cameras and so on should be all linked. It would be a big but simple database, but the code for it could be knocked out to calculate for max time between cameras, even mobile ones, and then doing a simple higher or lower comparison.

    Yes it will miss speeders who go a longer route or stop somewhere but eventually with every red light camera, every till, every ANOR capable camera involved, it would eventually just become cultural to drive within the speed limit.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    What I am suggesting for, say the M7, would be to place a camera every 10 kms from Dooradoyle to the Toll at Portlaise. Any vehicle going from the first to the last of that string would pass 9 checks, with time through each one, plus NCT, Tax, Ins. So any failure missed in one would be found in one of them. Speed would be checked over each distance, or any pair of cameras if any one camera missed the vehicle.

    Having seen them in operation in the UK, vehicles tend to keep to the limit.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,062 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Id go further and go for red light cameras at every light in the country and tie in every toll camera. If someone passes the last red light on the N4 or the M50 toll then passes the M4 toll or a red light in Galway city quicker than they legally could, they get pinged. Same going through Dublin. You get from one end of the quays to the other too quick, your pinged. Hell one end of a street to another.

    Yes motorways are safe, but the lads running junctions in a town centre causing near misses are the same ones doing 160 in a Seat Ibiza on the motorway waiting for a piston to shoot through the bonnet.

    Until it stops via fear, then the next generation just learn that's the way to drive. Piecemeal enforcement doesn't work unfortunately.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    While every yet to installed enforcement camera be link to catch those errant drivers might be an aim, that has no relation to current proposals.

    I think the planners of such things are thinking of discrete stretches of about a few Kms of average speed camers to catch those who speed over that stretch. What I am suggesting is having about 10 such cameras over the whole M7 from the toll at Portlaoise to Limerick, all linked, to detect any motorist speeding, or no NCT, Ins, or Tax.

    Otherwise, they will patrol only 10% on the route.

    They can do urban roads later when they put cameras on the red lights.



Advertisement