Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1107510761078108010811834

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    I think it was mentioned before Lowe was on 300k



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,783 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Lots of numbers get "mentioned" though! :)

    Though it does seem about right I guess



  • Administrators Posts: 56,514 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    McCarthy will absolutely get one and Henderson will definitely not get another one.

    Henderson's deal is up in 2025 but I don't think McCarthy will have to wait until then, I suspect the IRFU will bump his contract soon enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Interestingly, the IRFU are undertaking a review of their contractual system, which will be completed before Humphreys takes over from Nucifora.

    I'm assuming Humphreys is having some input and/or will have some good ideas of his own.

    The only scope for practical change that I can see is an increase within this IRFU "scaled payment structure" ( €50,000, €90,000 or €110,000) for provinces that meet a certain criteria.

    e.g. Connacht. How do the IRFU determine the extent of financial support for the Contracts in a Province?

    Central Contract: 1. Bundee Aki (XV expires 2025)

    Tier 1 Contract (up tp €110k from IRFU): 1. Hansen (XV 2025), 2. Bealham ( XXIII 2025)

    Tier 2 Contract (up to €90k from IRFU): 1. Prendergast (Squad 2025), 2. Carty (2025), 3. Blade (Squad 2026) 4. Butler (2024) 5. Joyce (2025?) 6. JJ Hanrahan (2025?)

    NIQ Contract: 1. Cordero, 2. Hurley-Langton, 3. Porch (2025, IQ in 2024). IRFU Financial contribution = €X Amount(€0?)

    Tier 3 Contract (up to €50k from IRFU): The 49 reaming players in squad and academy.

    https://www.irishrugby.ie/2023/10/31/bealham-commits-to-connacht-with-two-year-contract-extension/

    CEO: Ruane - Performance Grade B1. PLUS IRFU Didn't have to remove him - TICK

    Head Coach: Wilkins (2027) - Performance Grade D1. PLUS IRFU Didn't have to remove him - TICK

    Team Performance Grade - C3

    Financial Performance Grade - C1

    Stadium Grade: Sportsground. Rented from Galway Agricultural and Sports Society. Grade D3

    Stadium and Facilities Redevelopment: Cost - €40m Plus(!) with Govt Grant of €20m. Completed for start of 2026/27. IRFU Financial Support = €0(?)

    IRFU ALGORITHIM: = €X* million for 24/25 Contracts.

    *Heavily weighted on Irish team representation because that is THE cash cow.

    https://www.irishrugby.ie/2023/11/24/grand-slam-success-brings-a-more-positive-impact-to-irfu-accounts/

    The benefits of having ALL of the Irish players playing in Ireland are Massive.

    No system is perfect, but its a bloody good system.

    If people have better idea's, fair play, and why do you think the IRFU would not implement them?

    The simple cold hard truth is some provinces are underperforming. e.g. Ulster - From the top to the bottom. I don't want to pick on Ulster but its a pertinent example. The IRFU are not going to give them more cash because they haven't seen a return on investment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    So how do the IRFU improve what's coming out of Ulster? Shout at them louder?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I mean you can take the hump or you can make a suggestion yourself. I don't know. What do you think?

    They sent Richie Murphy up…



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Plenty want the system to stay as it is because it benefits their team



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I don't buy that. My team is Ireland. The IRFU's team is Ireland.



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Iv yet to see any non leinster fan say this systems not broken. Perhaps i can be proven wrong but those who benefit from a broken system are more likely to defend it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I have.

    Make each province pay a small part of each central contract and use the centrally saved money to bolster the Ulster, Connacht and Munster academies, and talent identification systems. Money goes straight into that, can't be spent on NIQs, contracts or anything else.

    Allow provinces other than Munster to host money-spinning games against invited international sides.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Do the IRFU not already fund or part fund the academies for the provinces? something was mentioned on a podcast before about the IRFU over the academies. I can't remember what it was before

    But lets say they offer more money into the academies, what would you change?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I imagine if you talk to any of the academies, they'd have pretty urgent ideas how money could be used to improve what's happening there.

    Certainly, in Ulster, they could do with another talent identification officer - someone pointed more towards the clubs than schools. Maybe another Academy place or two? Maybe more/better coaches? More money for the underage pathway? Mayeb a review of the systems with an eye to improving it?

    If the point is that we're not bringing enough players through (with which I agree 100%), lets remedy it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    As a Munster fan, I'd love to see us invest in our academy rather than spending money on expensive NIQs. Look at what proper investment in S&C and facilities done for the Limerick hurlers. I'm not saying it'll definitely work but it would be worth trying I think. I don't think revising how central contracts are distributed is gonna close the gap to Leinster, we need a better feeder system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The IRFU's remit is broader than just the Ireland team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Munster are investing S&C and centres of excellence to help in better feeder systems, IRFU have allowed Munster to turn some of their operational costs for this into the long term loan.

    Of course, the provinces need more help with this. None would have anything like the money JP pours into Limerick. He's twice now given €1m to each county so you can only imagine what he's pumping into Limerick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    That's good to know. Would be good if there was some way that province's supporters could contribute to academy funding. I think there'd be an appetite for that. Some kind of fund where people could put e5 a month or something and know that it's going straight into improving the academy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    ok.

    What's a small amount? €50k each? Leinster will have 10 players on a central contract = €500k.

    That €500k of "centrally saved money to bolster the Ulster, Connacht and Munster academies, and talent identification systems"

    Now to my mind you have now created an unfair system. Each of those players is a regular Starter for Ireland. You are effectively penalising Leinster for producing each and every one of those players. You are also penalising that team in the hope that more players will be produced in the other provinces.

    That's some leap when you consider that all of those provincial academy's combined have contributed 2 players (POM & Crowley) to the current starting XV.

    Thats a €500k penalty every season for Leinster who also have to pay for all the other Leinster players that played for Ireland this season: Lowe, Baird, McCarthy, Kelleher, Conan, Healy, Frawley, Harry Byrne, Larmour and Ross Byrne.

    To pick a round figures of €300k per season for each of those 10 players = €3million per season.

    That's not including JOB, Connors, McGrath and Deegan and Ruddock who have also all been capped. €200k = €1m per season

    I said it before and ill say it again. The current system is not perfect. But its bloody good. It certainly isn't broken

    I dont agree with the premise of Thornleys article that the system is purposely loaded to favour Leinster. Not at all. That type of shite only breeeds resentment. The simple facts are that the best players are playing for Leinster.

    Just as they were playing for Munster in 2001.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    I do agree with coach's, maybe a pathway for explayers into coaching via the academies.

    I think we do have to agree Ireland at the moment is probably at the most successful period ever, but we can't stay still. We need to continue to improve.

    The question then is what do you do with the current players if they get more from the academy, you suddenly run into a backlog, so do the IRFU need another province. England and France have multiple clubs/squad to spread players around, Ireland is limited to 4.

    Do we align with a Pro D2 club to allow players to move over to get time? or align with clubs in AUs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I dont agree with the premise of Thornleys article that the system is purposely loaded to favour Leinster. Not at all. That type of shite only breeeds resentment.

    I think that's unfair on Thornley tbh.

    His point wasn't that things were loaded to favour Leinster on purpose. But that they do favour Leinster.

    That doesn't mean it's by design. But the absolutely do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Not sure if you are taking a pot shot or not. Because I think most of here would know that.

    IRFU deficit of just under €1 million in their annual accounts up to 31st July 2023

    https://www.irishrugby.ie/2023/11/24/grand-slam-success-brings-a-more-positive-impact-to-irfu-accounts/

    “Our deficit for 2023/24 is likely to be well in excess of this €10 million,” admitted Potts. “However, we do expect a return to close to break even in 2024/25, the following year, and at no stage in the next 10 years are we forecasting that the IRFU will go into debt." - Kevin Potts

    Is that €10m a typo? Is it not €1m deficit?

    https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/2023/11/25/irfu-chief-kevin-potts-insists-irish-rugby-in-good-financial-state-after-10m-world-cup-costs/

    There seems to be a traine of thought that the IRFU have this vast amount of money that they are funneling into Leinster in order to keep the other provinces down. That is madness. The IRFU need all the Provinces to contribute. It's just not happening.

    You're right I'm prob been a bit harsh.

    But I think with the headline (editor) and lines like this it will stoke opinion against Leinste

    "Yet there’s also no doubt that the union’s system both rewards and favours Leinster to an increasing degree."

    "Leinster will thus not have to pay one cent toward the salaries of 10 frontline international players, whereas the other provinces will have a combined three who fall into this category, and will therefore have to at least partly fund the contracts of nine more players on their rosters"

    "But this is a classic case of the rich getting richer and the irritation for the other provinces is that the socio-economic and geographical advantages that Leinster enjoy are, as they see it, compounded by the IRFU’s contractual system."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,108 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Why should leinster pay nothing towards their players? You arent penalising Leinster for asking them to pay towards their players. Andrew porter will play more for Leinster in a season than he will ply for Ireland in general. Asking them to contribute to his wages seems reasonable to me.

    Again I'd probably scrap the central contracts system. It made sense when there was club games during international windows but that no longer applies. Replace it with a payment towards the provinces when their players are selected for Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Because they wont be able to keep them all.

    If the model is tweaked too much Leinster could lose a Porter, or a Sheehan, or both. Or even more. That has a negative impact on Irish rugby.

    They go to France. There is no doubt in mind that the current Irish team is succeeding with a small pool of players because they are at home and managed well.

    It's been said before and I know it pisses people off, the Leinster centric Irish team is actually helping the national team at present.

    It wants more from the other provinces. It needs more from the other provinces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    "It's been said before and I know it pisses people off, the Leinster centric Irish team is actually helping the national team at present."

    Also, if my main remit was to make sure Ireland win as many matches as possible, I'd actually want the majority of players coming from 1 province. It helps with cohesion and systems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,108 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Depends on the tweaks.

    Lets say Porter is on a Leinster contract. Leinster get a payment for every game he plays for Ireland and that covers a lot of his wage. Porter also gets a match payment to top up his Leinster salary.

    Club players already get a match fee but the club doesnt. In the system above then Connacht would get the payment for Hansen in the year he plays for Ireland instead of having to wait a few years for a central contract to be offered. The same for Munster and Crowley, Or the game McCloskey plays.

    The risk is if Leinster are forced to pay a big contract to keep Porter, but then his form falls off a cliff and he is no longer selected for Ireland. Leinster are then stuck with a high paid player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,939 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Not at all taking a pot-shot.

    My point is that I think it's too simplistic to say "the IRFU's team is Ireland". They also have a remit and responsibility to the Provinces (and indeed more broadly).

    The Ireland team is obviously the big income generator, and will always have primacy. But if there is an increasing perception that there's a significant imbalance in the system, it may begin to disenfranchise provincial supporters. That can't be good in the long run.

    Yes, you're correct to say that Munster had a majority of the central contracts in the 2000's because they had the better players. But the % distribution of those central contracts was nothing like it is now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,860 ✭✭✭leakyboots




  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    #TeamOfThemuns



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Munster supporters club do contribute to academy/development funding or at least did through giant draw they held monthly..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,539 ✭✭✭✭phog


    A fan base contributing to a province's operational cost is not the solution. It's nothing more than a gesture.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 fitzgea1


    But why, isn't that what supporters are? I'm not saying it's the solution but the other provinces need to start thinking outside the box if they want to catch up to Leinster



Advertisement
Advertisement