Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Public charging prices not dropping when wholesale prices drop

Options
135

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 644 ✭✭✭kaahooters


    liquid fule is only going to get more expensive, , estimated of over €3 a liter by 2030, some more, some less.

    electricity is due and expected to start dropping.

    in the long run, evs will cost the same to run as an ice, thats the stance from the government ( really its the civil service, but most people get that confused. )



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,921 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    6 years is too long to wait for BEVs to get cheaper to run than ICE. The wholesale price of electricity has dropped significantly yet the prices of public charging hasn't , if we want people to move to BEV then we have to stop screwing people who can't charge at home.

    A large portion of drivers don't have off street parking so won't buy BEV, we need to get these people out of ICE and the only way to do that is to get affordable public chargers.

    There is no point in installing loads of chargers which no one will use as they cost too much and/or take too long to charge. There is an ESB eCars 22kW charger near me charging 56c/kWh. Apple Green have 2 places near me and it's 68c at both even though 1 is 120kW and the other is 180kW. The commercial electricity rate is 23c/kWh for low users, so charging stations should be able to get it even cheaper.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Just had a look at the EasyGo abridged accounts for 2022 (2023 haven't been filed yet) and they were still in a loss making position then (accumulated losses of over a million). Will be interesting to see if that changes in 2023. They invested over a million in chargers that year and their borrowings seem to come from the parent company in the UK.

    TL:DR These guys aren't making a profit yet. I suspect prices will stay as they are until they do. Which could be this year.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,469 ✭✭✭Red Silurian


    2022 had very high wholesale electricity prices overall so that's no surprise. They invested 1m in charging infrastructure and accumulated losses of 1m suggests they would have broken even otherwise and were prioritising expansion of the network over dividends for investors. They were in contract with a few councils to provide chargers as well so that would have made the investment very cost beneficial

    It's likely 2023 was a profitable year for them as the price we paid stayed high but the wholesale prices dropped



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Except they use 10% straight line depreciation on their chargers, so the P&L cost for one year would only be about 100k. The accumulated losses were through more than one year, 2022 was ~580k. Previous year(s) 600k.

    Edit: Just to note that abridged accounts filed with the companies office don't include a P&L. You have to work stuff out from the balance sheet and notes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 644 ✭✭✭kaahooters


    i think you missed the point, or i wasnt clear.

    evs will cost the same to have and run as a liquid fuled car in 2030, it wont be any cheaper, but, it will be likley the only option.
    its either going to be a yearly nct bill based off millage to recoup lost tax, or, a straight out lump tax (like €1000) on them.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,831 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog




  • Registered Users Posts: 826 ✭✭✭ColemanY2K


    the esb have recently changed the goal posts whereby they've told service station owners that they cannot have an increase in their mic when installing chargers. this will have a limiting factor on fast and HP charger rollout going forward.

    🌞 7.79kWp PV System. Comprised of 4.92kWp Tilting Ground Mount + 2.87kWp @ 27°, azimuth 180°, West Waterford 🌞



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,244 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    56c/kWh for AC charging is a joke. It should be significantly cheaper and should also have a night rate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    I agree. But at least it's still cheaper than the UK at 56p for up to 50kWh and 81p for above that on average.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,921 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    It's a shopping centre so no overnight parking allowed and there is a lot of anti social behaviour around my area so I doubt many people would leave their cars overnight even if they could.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,743 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    The UK shouldn't be a barometer for anything 🤷😊😊😊



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,180 ✭✭✭k123456


    Is there a list online of rapid charger prices per KWH, please, I have checked and cant find one

    Interested in those without a subscription , as my use will be occasional



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Might be worth looking at Freshmile so. Doesn't cover all the rapid charging networks, but ESB eCars for one anyway. It works on a PAYG basis (minimum top up is €50 I think) and the costs are 0.30c/min + .30c kWh. By my calculations, this means you'll be getting cheaper rates so long as you don't use anything slower than 80kW. And be careful to stop charging once the charge curve goes below that point.

    Edit: Also covers Ionity, but the price is nuts €0.85/kWh.

    So if using it I'd stick to 100-200kW chargers. Those are ones that I've confirmed work on the 30/30 pricing model.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,434 ✭✭✭McGiver




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,434 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Don't agree. The state shouldn't do business. The state is a very poor entrepreneur.

    The state is in no way an SME on charging network operation and maintenance. It has no incentive to please the customers or expand its operations. I think the story with ESB so far confirms that.

    The state should let others (the private sector) to do business by correctly legislating and regulating. That's what's lacking. Grants are OK but deregulation as well creating a proper charging market would be better. And then mandating charger standards and mandatory charging installations at specific locations (urban areas especially).



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,434 ✭✭✭McGiver


    It's not much about the planet than about the air quality. This in the public interest and of a huge importance - for the public good. Air quality is a huge issue in Ireland with the highest diesel penetration. Diesel is terribly toxic for humans. The worst disaster of the Irish gov that it was pushing it back in the day!

    You would have thought they'd try to atone themselves and fix it this time with EVs. Making sure the transition is fast and for everyone, not just the early adopters & rich.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    This seems a bit contradictory. On the one hand you say that the state is a very poor entrepreneur and the on the other that the state should dictate to entrepreneurs what their business should do, whether profitable or not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,434 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Not at all.

    The State MUST regulate and legislate. It's its function. But not to do business, that's not the state's objective (and it's bad at it anyway).

    Legislating to achieve policy objectives isn't "dictating", it's what the state is for.

    I think we can agree we don't want absolute deregulation ("free market"). The state has to regulate the business in one way or another - ban public smoking, mandate child car seats, ban asbestos, mandate speed limits, mandate safety features in cars etc etc. EVs and charging network are no different, especially if the objective is to disrupt the status quo and introduce a new tech.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    All your examples are of the state legislating for safety and are across the board. Legislating to force businesses to take on uneconomic activity is not the same thing. In fact there are examples of the state stepping in to cover areas where businesses have decided they are uneconomic or high risk. Microfinance Ireland provides small business loans where the main banks have refused due to the risk profile and likely no or poor return. The school bus system is another example.

    So following those models, the state should probably subsidise such infrastructure if they are proven to be uneconomic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,743 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    If the state shouldn't do business then we'd have no public transport at all. It's not profitable across the board.

    Which would leave vast swades of our population immobile. That americanised thinking isn't the country I want to live in.

    Throwing the baby out with the bathwater comes to mind. Because the state doesn't get stuff right every time ergo it's bad. How about when businesses don't do it right ? The notion they go to the wall everytime if they get it wrong has been proven to be incorrect. Their isn't a real market in all it's senses for everything in life. There's degree of socialisation and businesses have been known to take advantage of this in negative and positive ways. Yet people herald privatisation always as a positive... begs belief really.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,434 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Public transport is a public service. That's completely different. Most would agree the state should run it.

    The state, however, doesn't run petrol stations, does it? Can you imagine it would? Would be a disaster. Neither should the state run charging network, petrol station network equivalent in the 21st century.

    Privatisation isn't a panacea but neither is state ownership. We need a balance closer to the free market and the state certainly shouldn't be an entrepreneur, it's been shown to be disastrous in Ireland and elsewhere time and time again - it doesn't work, the incentives simply aren't there.

    Now, if you look at Norway, the fast charging network is almost exclusively run by private companies (Tesla, E.On, Kople, Fastned, Recharge, Circle K, Shell, Esso, Eviny, Ionity). It's been tested and it works. Ditto, the Netherlands.

    The state needs to create rules and enforce them, create incentives and let the private sector do it. There's no "Irish way" needed. No need to reinvent the wheel.

    Edit: I'm also not a fan of the US approach, that's another extreme, just for the record 🙂



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,743 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Interesting you say governments aren't entrepreneurial. And then cite Norway one of the most entrepreneurial countries on earth with how they do things with state resources access to them and brining back ownership of them.So much so that they've got an investment fund that's the envy of nations. Successive governments have pursued same policies for decades.

    Btw I'm not talking about ev networks I'm talking about how the free market is being poised versus government led. Which you indicate is always bad. Not true.



  • Registered Users Posts: 302 ✭✭D_D


    The issue here is this is a 'chicken and the egg' problem... Which comes first, the new market of EVs so private business can cater for public charging demand? Or the charging network so the demand for EVs increases?

    The government (and ESB) looked at this problem and rightly so thought that the charging network needed to be in place to give some reassurance to folks who want to purchase an EV.

    If left to private business, with no charging network would be profitable for many years (and a bigger risk if the EV market didn't take off), no charging network would have been built.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,921 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    There's no point in building infrastructure if it doesn't deliver the benefit of BEV ownership to people. The wholesale cost of electricity has dropped significantly but none of the charging providers have dropped their prices, if petrol stations did the same it would be all over the news.

    95% of BEVs are charged at home because for a large portion of the population there is no benefit to owning a BEV. Even the grants for Multi Unit Developments to install charging infrastructure are useless as the current options are no cheaper than the public chargers. What are the odds that any of the charging hubs that we are supposed to be getting for people with no access to charge at home will also be expensive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 302 ✭✭D_D


    Again, I'll come back to my point, there wouldn't be many people buying BEVs if the charging infrastructure outside the home wasn't in place.

    I know you say 95% of charging happens at home, and that is correct, but people wouldn't buy a BEV if they didn't think they could do a long trip with them. And to get over this hurdle, the government and ESB stepped in to fill this gap.

    Also, you answered your own question. 95% of charging is done at home, so these fast charging sites need to make their money back from the remaining 5%. Very difficult to do on expensive infrastructure. And if 95% of your charging happens at home, why complain about the remaining 5% which you'll need to pay at a higher rate?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,271 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Home charging is 90% according to the SEAI from CSO data. But yes, you're correct and public charging prices will only come down when there are enough BEVs on the road to make that possible. I've made this point a few times on this forum and even went to the trouble of getting EasyGo's accounts from the companies office to prove it.

    Having said that, the best way to get more BEVs on the road and potentially lower prices is to push money into the infrastructure and remove that excuse from the litany that people trot out to explain their decision to keep buying ICE cars.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,244 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    @D_D "…95% of charging is done at home, so these fast charging sites need to make their money back from the remaining 5%. Very difficult to do on expensive infrastructure."

    But do the likes of Ecars have to make their money back, when a very high percentage of their funding is grants from the state?

    @prawnsambo "But yes, you're correct and public charging prices will only come down when there are enough BEVs on the road to make that possible."

    At the current prices that are being charged for DC fast charging there isn't going to be an increase in BEV sales, which are currently declining.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 429 ✭✭Mad_Lad


    Give over, Ireland is the most deforested land in continental Europe yet we feel the right to criticize Brazil for their destruction of rainforest ?

    Ireland has less tress than Snowdonia in Wales for F1ck sake, so much emphasis on cars but nothing about replanting real forest.

    If we were to replant our hardwood forest we could effectively remove the effects of hundreds of thousands of ICE cars and probably much more.

    Why is there no incentive or talk to move people from big cars with 1 driver of family cars to 1 driver transport such as motor bikes or scooters which offer much better fuel economy and far less congestion ? why should we offer grants for expensive very heavy and often larger crossover type electric cars vs much more fuel efficient less traffic clogging 2 wheel transport ?



Advertisement