Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The new recycling system

1131133135136137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,026 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    When Lidl were running the trial in their Glenageary store, the apperatue that is jammed with bottles led to a massive bin. The other opening was not sealed off either. Maybe they changed it, and if so, not great thinking. People shold be bringing the bottles empty and as clean as they can be. That's always been the guidance on all items for recycling bins

    As others have said, leaving bottles on the floor is littering. Two of the bottles jamming the opening would never be in scope are not even PET. I guess some people are just used to their mammies cleaning up for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,047 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It's not rubbish. They are being left with RVM items for proper segregated processing. Putting them in the green bin isn't good enough anymore, didn't you get the memo?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,984 ✭✭✭bren2001


    If you go to a glass bank and the bank is full and you leave your glass on the ground, you've left rubbish on the ground. You've littered. Its no different in the image above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,417 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,047 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    If you go to a WEE recycling point and you leave your rubbish beside the crate, you're not littering and I've seen people do it in Power City etc. You're returning the items for proper segregated processing.

    It's the responsibility of the shop to have their RVMs working. That's what they are getting their slice of the money for. That makes it their responsibility.

    The cans and bottles aren't a danger to anyone, they aren't being degraded by being left where they were.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,655 ✭✭✭baldbear


    Why couldn't they just leave it that you use your green bin in the gaff. Instead of loading up the car to drive to a broken machine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    Lidl. Reported to the staff. In fairness, they checked it but were not sure what it meant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,187 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I'm not familiar with Glenageary but in our local Lidl it's a tiny sink about the size you see in an aircraft toilet. An instruction sign says it's for emptying liquids. You can see the stainless steel surround in the pic.

    The problem for stores providing bins to put rejects in is that they are left with a new stream of waste that they are not set up to deal with and will cost them money to get rid off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,026 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    Having loose items on the ground is a hazard. In the photo, this area is a through way to the escalator, it should be clear so people can pass by unhindered.

    It's not clear the machine was out of order. The items on the ground and in the bags may be non-deposit items and should have been disposed of at home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,226 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    One appears to be working. The sacks look like someone bringing in bottles they've been keeping since they first heard of this and then realising they won't get anything for many or any of them



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    i have'nt changed any tune at all, i still think the scheme is a scam and a joke. My views on it are still the same since day 1 here. i take it you have'nt read much of what was said between pages 30 and 60? if so, you missed alot of interesting reads.

    a person making use of the scheme does'nt necessarily mean they agree with it or changed their tune. it just means they don't wish to throw away money. its lesser of 2 evils and being caught between a rock and a hard place. re-turn has done a terrible job with the scheme, and there's so many people posting here daily expressing simular concerns and frustrations with the scheme so i'm not alone in this.

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    yeah but will the barcodes be changed also? or just simply have only a logo added near them?

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,984 ✭✭✭bren2001


    If you go to a WEEE recycling point and the crate is full, the staff will tell you its ok to put your item beside the crate. If you go to an RVM and its full, the staff will never tell you its ok to throw your containers on the ground. Whether they are in a bag or not. Its littering. Theres no other way to describe what is in that photo and I'm stunned anyone would try to defend that persons (or those peoples) actions.

    Further, theres no indication in the RVM that it's full. They look like rejected items which should be disposed of via other methods.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,172 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    The extra bin will only attract all sorts of everything, such as used nappies, and not all in a nappie bag.

    Here in Nenagh I regularly see folk stuffing the council street bins with domestic waste, or else just leaving bags of rubbish beside the street bins.

    Was in Navan recently for two weeks, even worse

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    they really should have prepared for this, partially i'd say they are to blame. lack of foresight and bad management. but really its just extra work thats being given to the store due to having this RVM scheme forced on them. added responcibilties and inconveince caused by the scheme in general. return inconviencing both consumers and stores it seems

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,047 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Sure they could just stuff a nappie bag in the RVM slot then, if a nappie is the kryptonite of all bins.

    I just don't think it is reasonable to say, bring the items to an RVM. RVM out of order. And shove all the inconvenience onto the ordinary punter, while rewarding the supermarkets with a revenue generating RVM.

    It's an inconvenience for the shop? But not an inconvenience for someone who has tried to do the right thing by bringing items to the RVM? But now is expected to take back the bottles, maybe ones carried on foot?

    If the people did the right thing by bringing the items to an RVM. They are then the responsibility of Re-turn and their remunerated agents.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 240 ✭✭Repo101


    Two points on this system, I would assume that part of the reason for it is that some of our recycling ends up in landfill in circumstances when the recycling depots are full but then again why not extend it to cardboard and other recycling materials if that was a driver in this decision. Secondly, the only change I see is that people who would ordinarily recycle in their green bin at home will probably use the scheme to recoup their deposit but those who dump recycling materials will continue to be lazy and a similar amount of recyclable bottles and cans will end up in landfill. Similarly, I assume the scheme is to incentivise people who would ordinarily purchase a can or bottle while out in a city or town to use the scheme as opposed to putting it in a waste bin.

    It's hard to see a major increase in recycling as a result of this scheme. Another great idea in a utopia but won't result in any material difference in the amount of bottles and cans ending up in landfills.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭chewed


    So, I tried my 4 cans of beer I bought in SUperValu in the machine at Lidl. Even though they didn't have the official barcodes I was about to get my 60c voucher and redeem in the store.

    So, do I need to ensure that the cans are not crumpled or distorted in anyway for the machine to be able to read them properly? It's quite difficult to keep empty cans intact. And then, what happens if the machine decides it doesn't want a can? Are we to just suck it up and accept the 15c loss?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    i seen someone being told by staff that its okay to leave the bag of cans and bottles near the machine aslong as its left standing up, and not spilling out onto the floor. and aslong as its not in the way of anyone passing to go into the store. although it was'nt the same lidls in the the picture that said this

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭highdef


    Totally agree and sure that's plain obvious that it's littering. It always pisses me off at bottle banks when someone has littered by leaving bottles in plastic bags, or sometimes just left on the ground, just because the bottle bank is full at that visit. Exact same goes for people littering by leaving plastic containers and aluminium cans on the ground near a reverse vending machine.

    Bring the stuff back with you and try again another time when you can hopefully successfully carry out the steps required for an individual to partake in the recycling process.

    Those who leave the stuff behind are selfish littering pricks, there's no arguing with that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,026 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    My thought too. Ironically, they would have got 10c for each undamaged can and bottle prior to Feb 1 at this same store. I availed if it frequently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    "If the people did the right thing by bringing the items to an RVM. They are then the responsibility of Re-turn and their remunerated agents"

    if bin companys and the government did the right thing to begin with, with our recycleables, we would'nt be in this mess of a situation. Lets all not forget the real reason behind the creation of this re-turn scheme (asides from money and footing the bill on the public as per usual) and that reason is bin companies giving the illusion of recycling and not properly disposing of the recycleables and not even recycling them. The management of recycling was their responcibility, they choose to dispose of it in a non-responcible manner and just pass it on for a quick profit, or burn it, or put it in a landfil. But we get punished for this instead with being lumbered with this scheme, as ireland had no good stats when confronted by EU over this. For being one of the most richest counteries in all of europe, and expensive, one would think we'd have a much better recycling rate or some sort of system in place prior to all this.

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,364 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Whether they are in a bag or not. Its littering. Theres no other way to describe what is in that photo and I'm stunned anyone would try to defend that persons (or those peoples) actions.

    Littering would be more defined as a public place, Lidl is private place which is open to the public with conditions.

    Either way it is up to Lidl to make sure their premise is litter free regardless of how the litter got here. They clearly haven't. So any safety concern is entirely on them.

    But this was another problem the purists on here were warned about but refused to accept.

    A large portion of people will not spend their time carting rubbish around with them.

    Even Lemmings must have a point where they go fúck this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭jj880


    Here's a quick intro for you:

    If you wash out your containers, store them in your home, keep them from getting damaged and the RVM doesn't accept them not to worry. Keep driving round until you find more machines that might take them, go into a shop to rear up with your bar code checker (they might refund you) or drive round some more looking for RVMs that might have a reject slot that might not be overflowing. Keep at it until your head is so melted you can't be bothered anymore, go home, crush everything and put it in your recycle bin and pipe down. Whatever you do dont be leaving anything at the RVMs littering like a scumbag you scumbag! Congrats you're paying for both deposits and your recycle wheelie bin.

    You're now all up to speed on using Re-Turn. Its definitely not a quango. Good man yourself. I bet you feel better now after doing your bit for future generations 👍

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,984 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I agree they should have a bin there. If you want to argue contributory negligence as a mitigating factor, sure. It still doesn't excuse leaving your rubbish there. There are people arguing it isn't littering when it clearly is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,364 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Are we to just suck it up and accept the 15c loss?

    Yes, but you are to bring it back home with you and put it in your bin that has gone up in price because of this scheme.

    The idea that the can or bottle sees anything but landfill or incineration is slim.

    Basically shut up and put up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭chewed


    I think I'll just stick to bottles of beer in future! I'd rather bring these to a bottle bank and not worry about whether I'm getting any money back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    i agree its not nice, but its also not nice for one to have the mat pulled from under them when they have their hopes up thinking they're gonna redeem a bunch of cans only for none of them to go through and all get rejected. at that point bringing them back home was unplanned and unexpected so i can imagine why people just leave them there. Out of frustration or inconvenience, they didn't wanna add more inconvenience to their day after already being inconvenienced enough by this prior.

    i believe its only littering when its going all over the place and dirty and messy. if its neat and standing upright in a bag beside the machine, and not in anyones way then that sort of okay. its not nice to see it just being left there because its an eyesore and it would send the wrong message to other people seeing others get away with it and then others adding more to it. the staff should be regularly clearing the area.

    if someone trips on a can/bottle trying to enter the store, or if these bags pose some other sort of hazard, guess who gets sued?

    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭BoardsBottler


    i tried that, sadly no luck and was not possible without going to glenegary. other than that there was virtually none in dublin. and i doubt someone would go all the way to wexford or cork just for a vouchers that had to be spent instore.

    i would take a wild guess and say the people holding onto can and bottles thought they were gonna be able to get cash for them if they wait it out and hold onto them. till the scheme goes live. We were'nt shown any re-turn logo on containers until ages after the scheme was first mentioned, i remember having to post here about it asking the person you had responded to, since they had gotten one august and uploaded a picture of theres in response to me. as it was like some sort of rare find or something, or a myth than no one really knew.

    some bottles around august even got updated with a "recycle me" blue line at the bottom of the bottle labels, and this led to some confusion, as to look like they were redeemable and assumed to be the new updated labels instead of the logo being put on them.


    They just want the quick easy money cash grab recyclables and to up their recycling stats at your expense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭highdef


    I mentioned that I brought about 15 bottles and cans of various sizes to my local reverse vending machine. None had the return logo even though some were bought after 1st Feb at a higher price than the days before so can only assume they had the extra charge applied. I gave up after about ten items as it was becoming futile. Bringing them back home was unplanned and unexpected but leaving the items there was absolutely out of the question. They were still my items until successfully entered into the vending machine and my token receipt paper slip is in my hand. Leaving them there is plain and simple littering and I'd be a massively selfish cnut if I had left them here. (Exact same applies at a glass bottle bank in terms of leaving the bottles there if the bank is full)

    As the recycling bin at the house was full to the brim in the house that I part time live in, in Trim, I ended up bringing them to my own house in Longford where I crushed up all the items and put them in my own recycling bin there. Yes, it was an inconvenience but no, I won't leave my litter to be someone else's problem because I'm not a horrible littering ba$tard like that.

    Your personal belief of what littering is just that, your personal belief. It's similar to someone who drives over the speed limit because it's his/her belief that the speed limit is too low.........regardless of his/her belief, the person is still speeding.

    Littering:

    Wikipedia: "Litter consists of waste products that have been discarded incorrectly, without consent, at an unsuitable location. "

    Britannica Dictionary: "things that have been thrown away and that are lying on the ground in a public place"

    Cambridge Dictionary: "the act of dropping rubbish on the ground in public places"

    It's already been mentioned about what constitutes a private and a public place but to keep things as simple as possible for everyone, if a place is open to the public, consider it a public place. If it's not open to the public......an office, your home, a prison, etc, it's a private place.

    Not 100% of a prison being a private place but I can only assume you have to be invited and granted permission to enter a prison.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement