JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years

They are the single strongest argument against the latest conspiracy they are promoting

"Magic" Single bullet in 6 minutes

Full documentary here

Clearly, the debunkers do not understand much because they think it's copying and pasting now if you provide real information, as said by the HSCA. I am drawing from the HSCA timeline of events. He lied, stating that I copied and pasted from Wikipedia. However, I choose not to comment on this post any further, which is a waste of time.

The poster named Nal uploaded this image last year or at the start of this year when making an argument. The image depicted a sequence of events related to the infamous "magic bullet" When I confronted him about the discrepancy in the reported size of the wound, he became indignant.

The well-known debunker's strategy of misdirection won't work on me.

The bullet is tumbling end over end, resulting in a 3 cm shoulder wound they claim. To further reinforce this, the image even mentions that the length of the Carcano bullet precisely matched the wound. 

A bullet entering a person is more likely to be tumbling or wobbling when it exits the body rather than yawing. This is the result of the bullet's interaction with the soft tissues of the target. A bullet that yaws, typically only happens when the bullet leaves the barrel of the rifle and is on its way to the target.

The argument that a bullet with a 3-centimeter sideway motion can be fitted into a 1.5-centimeter hole without widening it is not supported by the evidence. Medical findings confirm that the rear bullet had a clear path and hit Connally's shoulder, resulting in a 1.5 cm wound.

The wound was caused by the bullet's nose part striking Connally's skin.

Nal has consistently challenged his own theory by uploading more videos that clearly demonstrate a tumbling bullet leaving a jelly-like substance and hitting the wall sideways.

The man on the video produces an unfired Carcano bullet and measures it against the hole made in the wall.

In summary, the bullet exits and tumbles, causing it to travel in a sideways direction. This leads to the likelihood of creating a hole that is 3cm in length. It is important to highlight that none of these lone gunman theorists have reviewed the Connally medical evidence. This oversight is glaring, as none of them seem to have noticed that Governor Connally's wound was too small for a sideways hit.

Have a look at this

There are any number of reasons why any number of people/organisations may want a US president out of the picture. Appeals to motive are simple to create.

The real question is - if something else occurred, what was it? What happened? As of yet, no one has found anything credible, and as far as I can tell they have no interest whatsoever in determining that.

Which in itself is a big tell, especially after 60 years.

In my view, this video is an incorrect depiction for the same reason as the previous two.

Here is partial chronology of initial medical thoughts relevant to the shoulder wound, of course familiar to all on here:-

[X-rays] In as much as no complete bullet of any size could be located in the brain area and likewise no bullet could be located in the back or any other area of the body as determined by total body X-Rays and inspection revealing there was no point of exit, the individuals performing the autopsy were at a loss to explain why they could find no bullets.

During the latter stages of this autopy, Dr. Humes located an opening which appeared to be a bullet hole which was below the shoulders and two inches to the right of the middle line of the spinal column.

This opening was probed by Dr. Humes with the finger, at which time it was determined that the trajectory of the missile entering at this point had entered at a downward position of 45 to 60 degrees. Further probing determined that the distance travelled by this missile was a short distance in as much as the end of the opening could be felt with the finger.

Immediately following receipt of this information [bullet found on stretcher], this was made available to Dr. Humes who advised that in his opinion this accounted for no bullet being located which had entered the back region and that since external cardiac massage had been performed at Parkland Hospital, it was entirely possible that through such movement the bullet had worked its way back out of the point of entry and had fallen on the stretcher. On the basis of the latter two developments, Dr. Humes stated that the pattern was clear that the one bullet had entered the President’s back and had worked its way out of the body during external cardiac massage and that a second high velocity bullet had entered the rear of the skull and had fragmentized prior to exit through the top of the skull.

[Later, throat wound] But now, James Humes faced a serious dilemma. He and his colleagues had failed to include one of Kennedy's wounds in their autopsy findings. Dr. Perry's description of the wound as very small and round sounded like the description of an entrance wound. But with no exit wounds anywhere in the body and no bullets found still in the body, Humes was puzzled. It appeared that both the ullets that entered the president's back and the one that entered his throat had not exited, yet had somehow disappeared.

After thinking about this, Dr. Humes telephoned Dr. Perry again to obtain a more precise description of the throat wound. During their conversation, Humes had a sudden inspiration and shouted, "so that's it!" He went home, attended a school function with his son, and slept for several hours. Then he took his original autopsy notes, stained with John Kennedy's blood, and burned them in his fireplace 😱

Then he drew up a new autopsy protocol based on the new information he had gleaned from Dr. Perry. The new report stated that a bullet had entered Kennedy's neck and exited from his throat. Even though there was only slight medical evidence to confirm this, Dr. Humes concluded that it provided the only reasonable explanation for the wounds in Kennedy's body.

-----------------

To summarise, Humes initially thought the shoulder bullet fell back out of its entrance wound, but later went along with repurposing the shoulder bullet by referring to it as ‘the (back of) neck bullet’.

Contrary to the obfuscation from Humes, WC, HSCA & media depictions, this is what joining the two wounds implies for approximate trajectory and angle required (for someone sitting upright ).

Since the entrance angle was downward (45-60 degrees), even granting a significant ricochet off a bone (maybe not impossible) the exit trajectory would then have to be approximately the upward angle as in the diagram, meaning it is impossible for this repurposed shoulder bullet to be the one that continued on to hit Connolly (the MB).

This is one of the reasons why regardless of any other aspect of the assassination people are expected to look at the Naval hospital autopsy shoulder wound and despite the evidence of their eyes accept that ‘yes that wound is in his neck’. This entire framing is not reality based.

I’d agree with this alleged angle & trajectory. This drawing is more or less anatomically correct in that it shows that, for a bullet to exit the throat below the AA it has to enter the back of the neck at a point above this alleged exit. As is known there is no wound at the back of Kennedys neck at this point or any part of his neck. 

The lone gunman story is what is strait-jacketed & contorted beyond belief. When that is dropped, everything gets very straightforward.

The shoulder wound could be a splinter from other bullets (that hit other objects or the car). There could have been two shooter teams on two different floors of the TSBD & one in the Knoll. All the bullets in the car & Dealey Plaza were picked up; some were recorded in evidence, some were not because they show multiple marksmen. At least one not found bullet was later ‘found’ to fit in with the evolving cover storey (i.e. the scene had been cleaned too much). The front windscreen was taken out & replaced at Parklands & the whole car was stripped of all evidence & a new interior put in straight after this etc.

Alright, but you don't have any credible evidence for your theory he was killed by Dulles and some unnamed 3 x 3 shooter team. If there are no alternative theories with supporting evidence, there's nothing to discuss

So far all I've witnessed is an indulgence in denial/incredulity.

Just listened to the latest episode in the Who Killed JFK? podcast...just wondering The Nal from the last part of your post that you dont think Oswald had any links to the CIA?

Havent listened to it myself, its on the list, but Ive never seen any evidence linking Oswald to the CIA.

On the list aswell. Anything interesting or new in it?

No, I haven't read the whole memoir.

Over the years, I have read segments of it online. The life of George De Mohrenschildt has red flags that suggest he was a con man and a manipulative individual. He was married four times, and all four wives accused him of being an abusive and serial cheater. This pattern of behavior suggests that De Mohrenschildt may have also exploited those around him for his own financial gain. He wasn't poor by any means, but he was essentially someone whom CIA intelligence could use because of his love for money and willingness to do work for them.

J Walton Moore and George spun the narrative that George went to his CIA friend, who happened to be the head of the CIA field office in Dallas, to inquire about Oswald. However, this narrative does not make sense unless one considers the other way Moore approached George to keep tabs on Oswald. There was literally no reason for George, who was interested in individuals who looked after him, to suddenly take an interest in Oswald, especially considering Oswald's declarations of being a Marxist. Even if you buy the official line on this, we have direct knowledge from this event alone that the CIA knew who Oswald was before the relationship started.

The authorities in Yugoslavia had been monitoring George movements in 1957. They were suspicious of his intentions and suspected that he was conducting some sort of clandestine photography operation. The authorities believed that George was gathering sensitive information with the intention of passing it on to the CIA.. One of the key qualities that made George invaluable to the CIA was his adaptability and ability to establish relationships on the ground, at least in the early days before 1963.

CIA assets come in many forms, with varying levels of visibility and direct involvement. Some assets may be recruited directly into the agency, while others may have pre-existing relationships with the CIA. One interesting case involves George and Ruth Paine, who were seemingly ordinary American citizens but were actually clandestine CIA assets.

The Paines operated under a carefully crafted facade, maintaining the appearance of ordinary American citizens. The CIA implemented firewalls to ensure that there was no direct, solid proof linking the Paines to the agency as assets.George was likely brought into look after Oswald after he returned from Minsk; the CIA couldn't send an actual CIA person that would be well known to look after him in the open. However, after a certain period of time, George was traveling, and Ruth Paine and her husband took over the role of helping this couple.Ruth knew that she was helping the Oswald family for the CIA, and she likely told the truth that she did not like Lee all that much. Despite her reservations about Lee, her role was still to help him. She carefully introduced him to a job at the Texas School Book Depository (TSBD).

George shot himself when the HSCA came after him. However, it is important to note that George's death was not an isolated incident. Mob figures and civilians allegedly involved in the event or witnessing it were also being to die off. This raises serious questions about the extent of corruption and violence that surrounded the hearings conducted by the HSCA (House Select Committee on Assassinations). George started to panic when he realized HSCA might have something on him. The realization that his life could be in danger if the truth were to come out might have caused him great distress and anxiety and he couldn't handle the pressure of the cover-up anymore?

According to the official narrative, Oswald was a socially isolated individual with limited financial resources. Yet, there are scenes depicted where individuals are helping him distribute flyers on the streets of New Orleans. The identities of these individuals are never revealed. The TV crew, with no apparent motive, suddenly made it their business to take a keen interest in a nobody who was handing out flyers on the streets.It is natural for anyone with a brain to raise suspicions when a TV crew actively positions themselves on the street and decides to film Oswald without bothering to ask any questions or seek clarification regarding his actions. 

Oswald defection was probably a CIA-sponsored operation to gather information on the Soviet Union and its operations.He returned home, where they closely observed him and compensated him. He was then given another opportunity to serve his country in New Orleans and perhaps Mexico. After this incident, it seemed as though planners of the JFK assassination may have looked at Oswald and concluded that he could no longer contribute effectively. They decided to get rid of him. Depending on whom you talk to, Oswald is either the fall guy or one of the killers.

This is also worth a read. Some of it speculation but a lot of it just good old fashioned proof.

So many words with so much waffle and so little said.

This though

According to the official narrative, Oswald was a socially isolated individual with limited financial resources. Yet, there are scenes depicted where individuals are helping him distribute flyers on the streets of New Orleans. The identities of these individuals are never revealed. The TV crew, with no apparent motive, suddenly made it their business to take a keen interest in a nobody who was handing out flyers on the streets.It is natural for anyone with a brain to raise suspicions when a TV crew actively positions themselves on the street and decides to film Oswald without bothering to ask any questions or seek clarification regarding his actions. 

So all of this, again, is a lie. Or I should say, whatever website you ended up on when you Googled this is wrong.

One of the men was called Charles Steele. Oswald asked 2 men queuing at the unemployment line, incuding Steele, to hand out flyers for 20 minutes for $2. Which they did.

The TV crew were there because it was very unusual for an American to be handing out pro Castro leaflets at the time. Less than 2 years after the Cuban Missle Crisis. So when they heard about it they sent a camerman down, their HQ was close by.

Good to know that a small local New Orleans TV station are also part of the conspiracy though! Lets add them to the pile.

 Ruth's sister, who worked at the CIA, further strengthened the intelligence connection. The involvement of Ruth's sister suggests a possible familial connection to the intelligence community, raising questions about the extent of Ruth's knowledge and involvement.

Additionally, Ruth's husband, Michael Paine, had significant connections to military-industrial complexes. As a well-off businessman, Michael's connections with influential figures and organizations within the defense industry further deepen the intelligence ties surrounding Oswald and his family.

Have to be Idiot Not to Notice CIA Was Keen to Have Families with Intelligence Backgrounds Look After the Oswald Family