JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years
Comments
-
-
-
-
Yes, she wouldn’t have known about the presidential visit or route. Edit: To clarify, its not to imply she is involved in any way in the plot. It is only that she is an obedient cog to the establishment, she is the type that believes the US foreign policy can do no wrong or domestic police can do no wrong and her laugh about the Oliver Stone film was cringe.
Once Oswald was in place the route could easily be tailored to his location.
Chicago & Tampa would have been prepared & ready with a similar but different set of characters. If they were used we’d never have heard of LHO or Paine.
Contrary to her claiming they were looking for an American to accuse of surveillance in Nicaragua, she drew attention to herself by inappropriately making copious notes at meetings of every organisation name, leadership names & other useful information and brought a photographer who took photos of everyone. It later turned out the organisation that sent her didn’t request or know anything about a photographer (first paragraph).
Post edited by Lucien_Sarti on0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Yes, some think he fired a shot that day, others think he didn’t, its not known for sure. I’d be in the latter group. The trial of LHO would have been interesting for the citizens- maybe leading to the end of the US /as a constitutional republic, which is probably why it was prevented. He'd have been Epsteined or fallen out a 5th floor window etc. if Ruby screwed it up.
An observation on the MB by someone else: “There was a piece in JFK Revisited showing edits made by Gerald Ford's pen, altering the Warren report's description of the location of a wound in Kennedy's back, falsely claiming it was in his neck to keep things consistent with the Magic Bullet (they assumed images wouldn't be released)”.
I agree, Dealey Plaza was a shooting gallery that day, where the chance of missing was virtually ruled out. Around 30 people or more instinctively ran up the grassy knoll after the shooting.
Not CIA this time 😶 but the US Dept of Defence (what’s the difference- all US agencies spread endless human suffering around the world for the same gangsters in charge) planning on faking evidence in ‘62 of Cuban responsibility if John Glenn died during the first American space mission (Operation Dirty Trick). In March 1963, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor, asked for a report on what could be done "to plan and incite a revolt in Cuba." Because of past difficulties in contriving "a timed uprising," he said consideration should be given to "engineering an incident as a cause for invasion."
archive.ph/vlt5H#selection-927.0-934.0
This is a regime mouthpiece, the WP, giving one of countless examples of what the US is and people say “No, the good guys would never -not find- other rifle bullets in Dealey Plaza, that is outside the range of what is possible”.
Right!
Post edited by Lucien_Sarti on0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
In a previous post, I mentioned how the HSCA investigation turned out to be a bit of a farce and a big cover-up by the CIA. One of the key figures in this farce was George Joannides, the CIA liaison to the HSCA. The CIA was initially helpful with HSCA by allowing them the opportunity to set up an office in Langley, Virginia, where they could review and access documents. There was an agreement between the HSCA and the CIA regarding non-disclosure, ensuring that sensitive information would not be disclosed to the public.
HSCA's collaboration with the CIA involved two clerks from the CIA who would provide them with documents for review and authorization. The documents were mainly reviewed and sanctioned by the CIA first before being handed over to the HSCA.
HSCA's investigation focused on given leads that implicated Bill Harvey and David Atlee Phillips, both CIA, who were alleged to be involved in the Kennedy conspiracy. In 1977, their efforts yielded promising results, indicating that the investigation was on track. However, things took a sinister turn in 1978. Scott Breckenridge, an attorney from the CIA's legal department, approached HSCA and informed them there would be a new point of contact within their organization. Breckenridge stated that his aim was to provide further assistance. It turned out to be a lie
The HSCA began encountering difficulties in obtaining documents when George took over. The documents were often redacted, leaving out crucial information. The request for different documents was denied. With the sudden obstructions and redactions, the cooperation between the HSCA and the CIA had deteriorated.
HSCA investigators, including Blakey as the chief counsel, have gone on record since the investigation ended to claim that the CIA terminated its cooperation because they could have found potentially damaging information. They contend that the CIA feared the revelation of sensitive information that could be explosive.
It is worth noting that the HSCA team was not aware of the CIA's operations in Miami until 2001. It was discovered that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was running an operation there that involved collaboration between the agency and anti-Cuban exiles. It was also revealed that this group, known as Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil (DRE), was the same group that had a confrontation with Lee Harvey Oswald in New Orleans.
Carlos Bringuier, who was involved in the New Orleans incident, was a member of DRE. The HSCA investigators requested information regarding the identity of the CIA handler assigned to DRE, but they were not aware of the handler's presence throughout the duration of the investigation. The handler, however, was posing as a fellow investigator (our George) and observing the HSCA's activities.
Furthermore, leaked files have revealed that Joannides met Lee Harvey Oswald three weeks before the assassination. This raises serious questions about the CIA's actions and their deliberate obstruction of the investigations. More to this story, I leave here for now.
People on the side who believe Oswald acted alone often ignore information that does not fit with their narrative. The magic bullet theory, while seemingly promising when it was first suggested as the cause, is a clear hoax. What these magic bullet theorists have been claiming for years on YouTube and in books, and elsewhere is a lie.
They have been claiming for decades that the Carcano bullet that hit Connally on the right shoulder opened a 3cm wound. The image attached contains this false claim (entry wound)
The statement, "All based on a lie and fact, it still held up as evidence", is amazing to me. Dr Shaw, the surgeon who performed the operation on Governor Connally, stated to the Warren Commission and the HSCA that the bullet that hit Connally caused a 1.5-cm wound. He also added that the 3-cm wound was an enlargement procedure that he had made on the operating table.
The significance of this discrepancy lies in its impact on the lone gunman theory, which posits that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy. If the bullet that hit Connally was indeed 1.5 cm long, it would indicate a second shot from Oswald that hit Connally, with the tip of the bullet penetrating his skin. The medical evidence that Dr. Shaw provided debunked the lone gunman theory and exposed a list of lone gunman supporters who concealed that information.
This is a long post already, so I'm sorry I couldn't discuss more.
0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
