Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

N25 - Midleton to Youghal [planning and design to commence 2023]

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yes I'm not actually worried about those, I'm happy enough with what you're thinking there. I'm only thinking about (for instance) refinery movements towards Youghal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The project being looked at now is most likely SC bypasses of both towns. It was literally thrown into the mix to appease a local TD, it wasn't on the agenda at national level so I doubt it will be a mega project. This is why I would be reluctant to praise your man for what he did, most likely he has been fobbed off with an inferior solution (but he'll probably get reelected multiple times before the road is built and this becomes obvious so he probably doesn't care).

    Realistically, no junction should be provided at Lakeview RAB, just an overpass. The amount of houses which would have to be CPOed is significant, other homeowners wont be happy that on/off ramps are beide their home and it would mean the R road stays wedged with traffic despite removal of the RAB. A new junction further east and new distributor road going north and south is a much better option.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    It would require approx 17km of 2+2 from Lakeview to east of Killeagh. If you wanted to, you could start the project west of Castlemartyr and stay away from Midleton and you’re talking 10km of 2+2. Hardly a mega project.

    Anyhow, over 100km of dual carriageway was defunded last year and this put in so plenty to go around.

    SC bypasses here would be some waste of money. We stopped building half assed muck in the mid 2000s thankfully. Would love to see a list of those SC bypasses build back before then that we’ve had to re bypass since.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yeah I'd hold very little value in single-carriageway bypasses of Killeagh and Castlemartyr to be honest. I'd say it needs to be Lakeview and 2+2 the whole way realistically. I know there's not the same volume of traffic, but if Cork-Killarney is mostly 2+2, and Cork-Limerick is mostly 2+2, why bother spending money on upgrading the N25 unless it's 2+2?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep I agree with what you're saying. It could let the town "knit" back together a bit again, by making the N25 straight through and only reintroducing the direct north-south linkages, with dedicated Sustainable modes the way KrisW1001 showed.

    I think they'd want to think carefully about whether it's an N25 or M25, and it probably needs to stay "N" for a long time yet. I think they'd need to upgrade Oatencake interchange and provide a new Midleton East interchange the way you describe. Possibly the new Midleton East distributor road you describe could be included too, but better for the County Council to do that with a development master plan shortly after the N25 work.


    That master plan could possibly even include a new train station to the East of that Distributor. The Eastern distributor could allow Dungourney traffic to bypass Midleton without using Oatencake interchange and would open up a lot of land for fairly sustainable development. It seems like the right idea, to me.

    With the recent N25 "West of Midleton" project they did try some of this by proposing a new interchange and distributor road, but it didn't include any of the other integrated plans. They forgot about non-motorway traffic and didn't really present it as an overall plan. There's low-hanging fruit there for sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It will not be a single-carriageway. The current alignment outside of the towns is wide enough and has good enough geometry for a straight 2+2 retrofit, although this will require offline construction of local property access roads. Any new Single Carriageway on a National Primary road has to be designed and built with upgrade to 2+2 in mind, so the saving for a single-carriageway road would not be significant.

    There should not be a need for any complex structures either: the terrain is flat, and there are no significant routes crossing N25 - there are less than ten junctions of any kind off N25 between Castlemartyr and Killeagh. You just need one junction at Killeagh, one at Castlemartyr (preferably north side to also serve the already planned SDZ and new rail station at Mogeely), a link-road to stop Garryvoe traffic needing to use Castlemartyr en route to Cork, and that’s pretty much it.

    But, perfect being the enemy of good, I would be very happy if two stretches of what will be the eventual alignment were built to bypass Castelmartyr and Killeagh right now. Something like this:


    (I’ve included a relief road for the traffic to and from towns south of Castlemartyr, because this is really where the town’s traffic problems come from)

    Even as single-carriageway roads, these would do a huge amount to remove the bottlenecks, and when the whole project is tackled, the sections are there and ready to be widened.

    In terms of planning, people object to divided roads much more than to single carriageways, so two SC bypasses would be much easier to get installed, and if a wide enough corridor is purchased, no further CPO process would be needed again to widen a 2+2. If a road that nobody has direct access onto is being widened, it doesn’t attract the same amount of objection as one that has people’s houses alongside.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Not sure why you initially state with certainty that "it will not be a single-carriageway" and then go on to show SC bypasses. I think the way this project has found itself at such a position in the list of priorities will result in bypasses like you have shown and they would have to be SC. Maybe I'm wrong and the whole thing is being looked at strategically and one backbencher has secured a €100m+ project for his constituency by threatening to resign but if that was the case, they'd all be at it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001



    I don’t believe the whole scheme from Midleton to Youghal will be SC. A project of that scale will be built as Type 2 DC simply because the extra cost of this kind of DC isn’t a big amount over SC once you’re doing something that size. (And besides, the whole length outside of the towns is already Type 1 Single, so what “upgrade” would a single-carriageway Midleton-Youghal scheme even provide?)

    However, I can see a situation where two much shorter, single-carriagway bypasses something like I drew get approved and built as an interim relief for the traffic problems in Castlemartyr and Killeagh. This would be perfectly acceptable to me if those two short bypasses were built along the alignment of what was going to be the full scheme eventually, and if the land take and any structures were sized for the eventual DC, such that they could be relatively cheaply upgraded to Type 2 DC as part of that full scheme.

    (There’s little sense in making such short runs DC, as this would encourage dangerous driving toward the end of the DC stretches)

    What I was saying was that while the DC would be great, and is the most likely configuration of a complete upgrade, I’d be happy if something would be done, and especially if it would be done in such a way as to not be a waste of money later. The current situation of ”Jam tomorrow, nothing today” isn’t helping anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Yeah I think two SC bypasses is the likely outcome from here, but it would be a long time before this stretch is revisited imo. I can't see any DC being built while the Lakeview RAB remains.

    I suspect TII were going to tackle the N25 starting from west of Midleton and working eastwards. This would be the sensible approach as the situation around Midleton would undermine any sections built east of there. If they are forced to start east of Midleton, I think level of ambition will be reduced. Running DC into the Lakeview RAB would be a disaster.



  • Registered Users Posts: 830 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette


    Great article in today's Examiner about the N25 situation. A dual carriageway or motorway is really needed here but will Eamon Ryan allow it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I don't know how to call that one. We know it won't be motorway because the N25 dual carriageway is not "motorway" but we could do with a 2+2 from Midleton to Youghal of course. I can see it just being the two small bypasses... but does he interfere that much, this early on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Castlemartyr is the problem, not the traffic. There are two fairly manageable streams of traffic meeting at a tight junction under traffic-light control, and the low capacity of this junction and Main Street to the west backs up all the approaches.

    East of Castlemartyr things move pretty well; to the west there are delays at peak times, but generally the traffic flows fairly smoothly until you get to the roundabout at Midleton. In Castlemartyr itself, however, there are long tailbacks at all times of day and night.

    People try to dodge Castlemartyr by going East/West through Mogeely, and it’s these cars leaving/rejoining N25 that cause most of the delays in Killeagh.

    But the overall traffic here does not justify a motorway/Type 1 DC. Anywhere between Midleton and Waterford, a 2+2 would be far more than will be needed for decades.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    800k for this in 2023. Should see consultants appointed and it move towards route selection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I’m hoping for an end-to-end design, but one which allows the two town bypasses to be constructed first without needing to do the connecting parts. That would provide the greatest relief with the lowest cost and delay. The way the current route takes a sharp turn in Castlemartyr and the opposite sharp turn in Killeagh would allow this unless the chosen route is really far from the current N25.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Loughaderry-Burgess is 11km. A 2+2 of this length would be ideal tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I think the final thing will be 2+2, and that would be great. But in the interests of fixing the problem quickly: have the design sorted, then building two stretches of wide single along the eventual path of the full 2+2 road would be an easy win, and could be quickly upgraded to 2+2 when needed. Once that’s done, there are better places to spend the roads budget in Co. Cork for now (N71!)

    Unfortunately, our planning law doesn’t allow us to do this kind of targeted scheduling: you either build it all, or the planning lapses on the bits you didn’t do.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I’m looking at the map and I think they’re close enough to get done together. It wouldn’t be worth the short stretch of SC in between.

    Unfortunately, I had hoped the same for NCW and Abbeyfeale but that didn’t happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It’s not just the short stretch of SC, but the access roads for the properties. There are, however, only a few of these along the stretch between the two towns, and the whole length from just west of Castlemartyr to just east of Killeagh is only 7.5 km (probably only 7km when you take the two corners out of it) anyway, so yes, it might make sense to do that.

    Actually, from the end of the dual carriageway at Midleton to the start of the Youghal bypass is 20km, so maybe breaking that into three tendered projects, with this one as the middle of those, would be a nice way to get it the whole thing done.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Confirmed that TII are looking at Lakeview-Youghal bypass atm

    Before the current setup in the Department, TII seemed to be trying their best to avoid stretches of low grade road in between high grade stretches of road.

    The current length of the N25 between Lakeview and Youghal is 20km. Would be nice to get the c. 8km in total at either end done either so that it doesn't become a safety issue, but I can see it being curtained for ideological reasons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Cost and time too, not just “ideology”. Given its situation and the surrounding development, Lakeview could end up costing as much as the two town bypasses combined. And its configuration is the most likely to draw complaints at the planning process, with a couple of deep-pocketed landowners along any place where the road could be routed. There’s going to be pressure from the council to keep Lakeview as an all-movements interchange and add yet another all-movements Midleton junction to the east of the town, and something like that will involve a big land-take and we’ll be in another N28 situation before you know it.

    But I agree that it should be included in the design, but doing that is going to condemn the residents of Castlemartyr to an extra year of traffic as the Midleton end gets tangled up in judicial review nonsense.. I’m surprised you’re still blaming the Green Party for the slow pace of progress, when in truth the planning system is the greatest source of delay.

    Incidentally, Castlemartyr needs a relief road in addition to this bypass, but that’s something that we’ll have to rely on the “Town Centres First” programme to deliver, I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Lakeview should be a flyover only with other movements closed, and a junction built to the east of Midleton with a link road around to the road to Aghada. I think that's the only way it'll all physically fit - and it'll get traffic OFF Lakeview too.

    Not looking forward to the complaints though.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I'll leave Lakeview out, but while I understand your premise, IMO this should continue to the Youghal bypass on the eastern end if at all possible. Having (presumably) 2 grade separated stretches of road separated by a low grade wide single carraigeway is not ideal. We already see the issues at Burgess. The only reason it would have to be curtailed is because of anti-non bypass road dogma in the Department.

    Re: cost and time. Mallow and Slane are both in line for bypasses in the NDP. Both are c. 4km. Both started planning in 2016 and neither have gone in for planning permission yet. That's 7 years later. The 16km Virginia bypass for example is just as far ahead as those 2. Cost and time don't make a difference here, especailly when we're talking about no more than a 5km stretch tacked on at the end.

    Lakeview is another debate altogether. I agree that if it's included in this it will delay it, fully agree with you on that. But if it's not included in this it'll make the jams there much worse.

    I can't really reply to your comment about the Green Party until we know for sure what's happening here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yeah I think Lakeview just needs to be dealt with. Because any work near Midleton that doesn't deal with Lakeview is going to make any Lakeview upgrade far more difficult and the intervening period far more painful.

    Maybe two projects simultaneously: would that be too difficult to achieve? One to effectively move Lakeview junction East and another to deal with the N25 proper? Lakeview stands on its own two feet as a project because it splits the town in two at this stage.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Perhaps Carrigtwohill-Loughaderry and Loughaderry-Youghal or so?

    I know you're not a major fan of Carrigtwohill-Midleton but if Lakeview-Youghal is being done it has to be tidied up to a certain extent. The onramp at Oatencake westbound is pathetic to say the least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,455 ✭✭✭FGR


    I for one am glad that, after 17 years, I no longer have to drive this horrific road.

    Waterford City to Youghal is manageable compared to the stretch that is Youghal to the west of Lakeview. Something really needs to be done but I can't see it happening for another 17 years.

    Why the entire system cannot be accelerated is beyond me. Is it simply the fact that our judiciary is too small and still based on practises from the 1920s that keeps all progress back when it comes to planning issues? Could we appoint a hell of a lot more judges to the benches to get things moving?

    If only we had a few more years to have let Transport21 do its thing. We'd have had that motorway Atlantic Corridor by now..

    Post edited by FGR on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The timeline for this project has absolutely nothing to do with judges.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yes Carrigtohill to Loughaderra/Ballintotis would make perfect sense to me.

    My problem with the previous scheme was that it didn't deal with much other than Oatencake, and Oatencake itself is only an issue because of Council antics. They allowed extensive development on the relief road and even built a school right on the junction in the last few years! So I don't see why TII should bankroll another opportunity for them to create more of the same a few km further West.

    So a new "interchange to empty fields" at Adamstown was the straw that broke the camel's back for me! Complete with convenient "new scenic S-shaped road" through the fields. If they want to develop a new town with the population of Westport on a national road It's about time they put in a master plan for it. And not pretend it's all an effort to make people on the road safer, when they themselves have consistently undermined that safety. That project was almost like some kind of gaslighting to me!



  • Registered Users Posts: 201 ✭✭Gunner3629


    With the Midleton to Mogeely road closed at the moment due to road works, traffic through Castlemartyr is worse than ever. Goes to show how many cars are avoiding the village every morning and evening and finding alternative routes.

    Traffic heading east is back to Loughaderra lake now at peak hours. Hopefully someone with some sway will be sitting in traffic and finally realise how bad it actually is for commuters.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    James O'Connor TD keeps raising this issue whenever he can but gets met with the usual stonewalling. There is so much red tape and bullshit around getting a road into planning now.

    TII now estimate 15 years for a project from cradle to grave. That means 2037 for this project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭mcburns07


    Surely a bypass for Castlemartyr could happen a lot faster than that. I live just beyond the village and traffic really is an absolute disaster for the majority of the day regardless of day of the week.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 201 ✭✭Gunner3629


    Exactly, it doesn't have to even be a N25 upgrade, it can simply be a bypass/relief road around the town. A bypass that would probably be even shorter than the current route.

    They don't want to invest in rail to Youghal from Cork (which is another discussion entirely) but atleast make the road network fit for purpose.

    We can't blame James O'Connor, he's doing his best. But with so many Cork TD's in the government you'd think something can be done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 169 ✭✭Risoc


    Had a look.

    It would be shorter than the current route alright. A road of about 2km would shortcut from one end of the town to the other, bisecting the Mogeely Road would end up looking like a straight line. You'd only have an L-shaped town then on the outside, shaped more like a bypass than the road itself.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Consultants to be appointed for route selection, planning & design by year end

    By then we'll have learned what the scope of this project will be (half arsed relief roads, proper bypasses or a full blown dual carriageway)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭65535


    With a centralised government in 'Leinster' House - it is concentrating on Leinster.

    Anything outside of the East Coast is not prioritised - if it were then we would have at least a motorway between the 2 largest cities outside of the east coast - that is Cork & Limerick and why not at this stage a motorway between Cork and Waterford ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Because traffic levels don't justify a motorway between Cork and Waterford. There is no conspiracy here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭65535


    If a motorway can be justified between Galway and Tuam then one between the three largest cities outside of Dublin can be justified - no one mentions conspiracy - Dublin looks after Dublin - examine a map and see where the motorways go and come from.

    I've even heard it in the past - how come there are so many Cork registered cars on the M7.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Tuam is the tail end of a planned motoway all the way from Cork.. it's not built because of traffic between Galway and Tuam. The Southern bit of that is going to be built.

    There's no justification at all for motorway on any part of N25 between Midleton and Waterford. I drive that road all the time, it doesn't need more capacity, just a couple of bottlenecks to be removed..

    Cork has the second highest population of any county in the state, so guess what: there are lots of cars registered there. Whatever you're reading into that, you're going to have to explain it a bit better, because I can't see a point there...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Agreed with lack of justification, but at the same time Cork to Rosslare should be 2+2 throughout as a strategic route. Home to Rosslare is 189km and take 2h30m with no traffic. Thats silly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    With the N/M20, there will be dual carriageway between the three largest cities outside of Dublin, not sure what point you are trying to make what that has to do with motorway between Cork and Waterford.

    And your example of motorway between Galway and Tuam goes against your Dublin looks after Dublin thing. Bizarre post.



  • Registered Users Posts: 56 ✭✭Norteño


    I've no idea what he's going on about.

    I think he may just be clearing a blockage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭65535


    The only bizarre thing here is the justificatin of building a motorway between Galway and Tuam and not having even a dual carrigeway between Cork/Limerick/Waterford - that's bizarre - but then the politicians who are/were from that area speak the loudest.

    You tried to justify not building a motorway due to lack of traffic - how much traffic goes between Galway and Tuam - ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I certainly didn't try to justify the motorway between Galway and Tuam or the lack of dual carrigeway between Cork and Limerick. I was pointing out facts to you, including that traffic levels don't justify a motorway between Cork and Waterford.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,189 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    They didn't build a motorway between Galway and Tuam, they continued the M18 from Gort and placed a junction with the M6 at the point where they crossed.

    The M20 would be built and open if the economy hadn't crashed. That's not down to Dublin centric politicians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,964 ✭✭✭cantalach


    We don't need to guess about traffic volumes. TII provides all the data:

    The M17 south of Tuam averages 11,533 vehicles per weekday: https://trafficdata.tii.ie/sitedashboard.asp?sgid=XZOA8M4LR27P0HAO3_SRSB&spid=7E5BFBC48AE5

    The N25 east of Kilmacthomas averages 11,381 vehicles per weekday: https://trafficdata.tii.ie/sitedashboard.asp?sgid=XZOA8M4LR27P0HAO3_SRSB&spid=7B3659C8D520



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,631 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    East of Midleton on the N25 its 16,700 per weekday. Higher than on any stretch of the Gort to Tuam motorway. Even taking your numbers, I'm not sure its a good argument against the dualing of the N25 to Youghal to say that it currently has almost identical traffic volumes as a current motorway.


    Great website by the way, I've never seen it before, the numbers there highlight how utterly mad it would be to build the M24 ahead of the M20.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,964 ✭✭✭cantalach


    I wasn’t expressing a view either way. I was just sharing the data to avoid the guesswork. Glad you find it useful.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Mr Hegarty also asked where a major upgrade of the Midleton to Youghal road currently stands. He said it would make more sense and would be cheaper in the long run if it wasn’t upgraded in its entirety, in one go, and instead, bypasses are built in the interim in Castlemartyr and Killeagh.


    Mr Healy wasn't confident about money being found any time soon for a whole upgrade of the N25 between Midleton and Youghal, adding that “the minister (Ryan) seems reluctant to fund projects of that scale”. 

    Astonishing that a multi million euro project may have to be delivered sub optimally at the whims one individual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'm not sure it is, Marno. Where you've quoted this from, they also say that Ryan torpedoed the previous N25 Western upgrade plan, but I had thought TII and NTA themselevs had killed that one. What I'm saying is that I realise you're just quoting from the paper, but I don't think the paper is fully accurate here.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,460 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Are you referring to Carrigtwohill-Midleton as the Western upgrade? That's currently frozen as no funding was provided in 2022 or 2023. It's not clear if no funding was provided because TII are prioritising using limited funding for more pressing projects or whether it wasn't funded because of the Minister's personal preferences.

    My reading of the above article is that the options selection process for the Midleton-Youghal scheme will be based on what's likely to get funded in light of the Minister's personal preferences rather than the most cost effective solution to the problem at hand taking into account the deficiencies of the existing road, traffic volumes, the nature of the N25 corridor, and safety considerations.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,040 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Well Midleton to Youghal only became a live project at the whims one individual - a FF TD and MM can't afford any resignations. The position prior to that was for nothing to be done on this route for several years.



Advertisement