Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

You're great

Lol. Back to childish name calling. You’re what the real world refers to as an useful idiot that spreads other peoples crap for free.

Vast vast majority of doctors and scientists took the vaccine. Vaccines aren't a treatment, they are most effective when targeted at those who spread the virus the most rather than those most vulnerable, because that reduces R the most (hence health workers also being targeted first). Now that supply is plentiful, there is no reason not to take one.

And it's something that doesn't exist because they don't understand any of the terms used.

What failure means, what prevention means, how trials are run, how any medicines are approved.

All because they became outcast in their family because they asked the same dumb questions during the second jab, didn't understand the answers, and were sent home as the doctors had enough (this was the start of the descent when they got banned from the COVID forum).

What links?

You've personally created a scenario whereby you think there's "something going on" because early trial results were different (in some regards) with certain variants to later results, with later variants. There's a simple obvious explanation. It's been explained to you, multiple times, by multiple different posters. You "don't get it".

Even if you did "get it", at this point I very much doubt you'd admit it because you've invested so much time in being so belligerent about such a non-issue.

Welcome to the "I don't get it" club, the conspiracy theory forum.

I haven't claimed anything about approval, I'm happy with what the official approval given by the EMA says and what the vaccine was approved for.

But as I said, put together 1 very simple worked example of how you think a trial for approval of any medicine works.

What I said was correct:

What they were specifically approved for is down to the EMA process, not me, show us 1 example to follow, don't use COVID as you're getting the terms all mixed up all over the place (or if you do use COVID/SARS-COV2, resist the urge to spin out into nonsense, take it 1 concept at a time).

We can go into your misunderstanding here once we have 1 example (lest you try and deflect again, if you jump ahead to this, just go and grab the dunce cap as you're unteachable):

And just so you're aware, the idea is to go over the very basics, which you are getting wrong, before jumping into complex scenarios, you are jumping straight to something complex and getting over-awed by it.

There is a lot that can require someone to have their own perspective on and indeed deduce their own reasonings. This does not require them to produce proof or evidence or scientific papers to justify their opinion. As a lot of Irish people would refer to it..it as ''cop on". I bring it back to GMO foods as I usually do. There is no or reliable proof that you will keel over and die if you eat a GMO carrot. Me personally I wont bother (if i have the choice). I dont believe they do biodiversity, habitats, food quality or indeed our human race any favours. Yes it will feed the world but for how long? GMO drugs are sort of in the same realm. I see the science, I see the medical benefit in the short term. Do I think they will do long term harm. Yes probably

This is frustrating.

Go and look up what the EMA approval process said.

I am commenting on the great results from the trials which was then followed on by great real world data.

However, my comments are not how the approval process works.

You're spinning out all over the place, it's impossible to even know what you're claiming and why, you're piecing together multiple conversations at this point.

Is your sole goal to try and catch me out on something? If so, that is weird, I stand by the approval process of the EMA.

Again, back to basics, how are medicines approved? For the umpteenth time of asking, otherwise we'll just assume you don't have a clue (well everyone is doing that already) and answer accordingly. If you then look it up in a document somewhere, that's the definition we will go with, that's what google is for, this is a discussion on vaccines safety and you are utterly failing at making any coherent point about it.

Lol this waffle has nothing to do with my post.

If you guys don't have evidence to back up you opinions, then your opinions aren't very solid or convincing.

You guys are claiming that the vaccines are killing thousands of people through heart issues. You lot are claiming that the vaccines are secretly behind SADS and SIDS.

Claiming this shite shows the exact opposite of copping on.