Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Parking and traffic in Phoenix Park

1686971737486

Comments

  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I still think it would be better for the zoo. Bigger modern site, loads of room for expansion. It could be amazing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,161 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Of course I have a sense of heritage. No need to knock the buildings down at all, just re use them for the benefit of the public. As it is I have never seen the inside of the Garda HQ, nor have I had the need to go inside St. Mary's (the former Royal Hibernian Military School), nor the Ordnance Survey, nor any of the other wonderful buildings. But I have visited Farmleigh, and was very impressed. At least I could get inside the big house and wander the grounds. but we paid €29mil for it, and money well spent at that. At least we can see inside it. Same for Ashtown visitor centre, nice coffee too.

    The Zoo should be moved eventually. Just my opinion, it could be in a great open space that is easily accessible to all, not just those who have cars parked nose to tail everywhere around it.

    There are no cars allowed in Bru na Boinne. Maybe we could think of doing something similar for access to the zoo and other areas of the park in the meantime. Park the car in IMMA and get the flying bridge across to the bus. Sounds great.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Move the zoo?! To where?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,948 ✭✭✭horse7




  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    same story as Bristol. Same age of zoo in fact. 1830s. Same arguments. Heritage, history, etc etc. Went on for years, probably a decade of back and forth, and your post could have been copied from the letters pages of the Post. But, eventually, modernisation (and parking and congestion) caught up with history and it was moved to a modern purpose built facility

    not saying it would or should happen here in the short term, but I believe in the long run it should and probably will



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,052 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I would love to be a fly on the wall of the meeting where the first poor fool suggested it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Knowing the OPW they'd probably send him off to do a five year feasibility study



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I could care less if they moved the zoo. But I know it's significance

    But its beyond comical the way people won't hear of changing a gate for historical reasons, even if it's a safety issue. Or even any other things in the park. But are quite happy to make enormous changes to an equally historical zoo.

    Zero consistency.



  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The zoo could be moved for the benefit of the zoo. Not because of any parking reasons!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I'm utterly confused what the OPW want. They close and open gates and roads with no consistent logic. They want people, they don't want people.

    Wasn't there a plan to have bridge out to the memorial gardens at one point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I've been on elevated walkways and tree walks in other parks. You move a leaf in Phoenix Park OPW go into meltdown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    So you want to copy Bristol Zoo...



    ".....The decision to close the zoo and relocate was taken after the second national lockdown, with the zoo having missed out on large sums of money due to dwindling numbers in the spring and summer - a time when zoos are usually at their busiest in the year....

    ...Plans to build more than 200 homes on the current site, and a public park were revealed late last year, to ‘safe-guard’ the future of the site.

    The process is currently underway to sell all 12 acres of the land, with the subsequent housing to provide a solid income for the new zoo at the Wild Place.

    The Charity claims that a fifth of the new homes to be built, will be affordable to those looking to purchase a house, or below the current market rate.

    The grounds will still remain open to the general public, free of charge. A conservation hub, an exhibition space, a children’s play area and a lake will feature when the move is completed later this year..."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,052 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The OPW are unfortunately the political play thing of national and local politics.

    What they want, I think, is to preserve as much of the Park in its historical layout as possible. An open and largely wild landscape, whose primary function is as a deer park. Since Dublin has grown, it has become a large urban Park too and also a venue for large national attractions.

    Those are not all easy circles to square. When the vehicle gates were almost all closed, early in Covid, that was to discourage people travelling further than walking distance, as was required at the time. That backfired in a few different ways and so was reversed.

    They keep getting told to change the priority and the mobility policy on the internal roads and so its not a surprise that everything changes so frequently.

    Hopefully now, once this experiment is over, we'll be able to see a long term permanency to sensible changes. Changes that encourage people into the Park to use it sustainably, not to drive them away.

    I think an elevated walk would be an excellent idea, why not over in the Furry Glen woods, might drive away some of the batty boys and spare the families that use that area some awkward explanations to their kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I dunno they seem to just decide to do something then get reigned in by political and public pressure. Rather than the other way around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,837 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    Let's move the zoo!! Ah ha ha, crazy gang member I assume.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You can't say they don't have wild ideas...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,161 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Makes a change from cycle lanes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,741 ✭✭✭Effects


    They have adjusted gates before, to suit cars. Why not do it again for buses?



    Really? What's your issue with him? He's just reminding people that slowing down isn't that big a deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭em_cat


    Talking to a Park Ranger today, he said that it may well revert back to 50km as the amount of complaints and recorded issues is growing, the lack of enforcement is ridiculous and since the new bus route is parked as of now.

    I'm put off going there for my daily walks now as I don’t live close enough to walk there, with a Prostechtic leg, and with 2 dogs I need to drive. I’ll find somewhere else as I really don’t need the stress of dealing with impatient idiots.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is it no longer possible to drive and park there?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,052 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I think what the lady is saying, is that she'd like to drive there and observe the 30 km/h limit, but that it is not being observed by the vast majority and that makes for some impatient behaviour.

    I'm not saying that's right by the way, clearly its not to be condoned but it's also clear 30 is not an appropriate speed limit.

    I'd suggest she just do 50 like everybody else, I have the twice I've come through it since Monday and it was by far the prevailing speed and felt perfectly sedate and relaxed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,449 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    I really don't believe that.


    Anyway, why is this nonsense thought that any changes to things like this is based on a popularity contest so prevalent on this thread? Is it people trying to convince themselves that a minute or two inconvenience to themselves is so hated by the general public that it's become an echo chamber? So much so that the factual comment as to the additional seconds it adds becomes a circle jerk of ranting against the Green Party, who have nothing to do with this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    It's not prevalent. In fact the majority on this thread are pro all the changes. However this forum isn't representative of the general public. We also know the public opinion has forced the OPW to roll back changes before. A lot of the time.

    If the OPW want try all these things. Why not.

    But this is a discussion forum. Where people express different opinions. You don't have to agree with them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I'd be shocked if they roll back the 30 km limit. It might go completely ignored and totally unenforced but it will remain in place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭em_cat


    It is, but when trying to obey the new limit having people up the back of you and aggressively overtaking between the entrance and the first round about is frustrating and stressful and it’s just not worth it to me.

    I usually find attending and driving in the park to be a peaceful enough experience, not so much now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭em_cat


    Your point? I’ve no issues with the amount of available parking. It’s the speed limit change that’s the problem.



  • Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm not sure why you find other people overtaking you frustrating? That's a wee bit strange. Just drive as you see fit and don't worry about the ones overtaking you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,779 ✭✭✭Pinch Flat


    There's 9 car parks in the phoenix park.

    I'm a daily user of the park - it's on my cycle route to work. I'd also occasionally drive to go for a walk or kick a ball with my son. We'll sometimes cycle there was well. I'm glad that there's safe cycling provided along Chesterfield avenue - although I was perfectly happy with the old cycle way. Issue was with the mass parking in the hard shoulder, pedestrian / cyclist encounters were frequent as people came from their cars and inevitably across the cycle way to get to the inner pedestrian path. Pedestrians straying on the cycle path was an issue at summer time and peak, for example Christmas events. Also around the zoo could get hairy with people straying on the cycle path.

    Or perhaps this inner path could have been retained and used for cycling - the surface is not great in parts. So the Chesterfield solution with the bollards is probably the best solution given the infrastructure available. I'm also glad to see the parking gone off Chesterfield avenue - it was dangerous with people trying to get across and I've seen many a near miss with people (sometimes children) popping out from between cars into busy traffic trying to cross - dedicated pedestrian crossings will improve this.

    I am also acutely aware of the car culture that prevails - I too am a driver. A number of years ago, I posted a thread about being overtaken while stopped at the raised ramp leading to Ashtown Castle by an impatient driver - I stopped to let a young family cross, mother and father, wheeling a pram and a young kid with a new bike who'd strayed about 20 meters in front of them and was following the path to the raised ramp to cross. This was on a St Stephen's day and the comments (I think I posted it in the motoring forum) condoning the driver that overtook me was a bit of an eye opener. Apparently, it's not a proper pedestrian crossing, so I shouldn't have stopped or given way to them and I would have been liable for an accident .So that's hat you're up against.

    On the 30 kph limit, I'd be okay with 50 kph being retained. Problem was, 50 kph became 80 kph handy enough. At the moment, some drivers are maintaining the 30 kph, but there's some crazy overtaking going on with impatient drivers. Only way to police it (what ever limit is decided on) would be average speed cameras. But I do realise there's an issue with enforcing this and that the Gardai have limited powers in enforcing speed limits in the park. Ultimately, the only thing that'll work is some form of policing, as drivers will soon realise the 30 kph is unenforceable.

    Post edited by Pinch Flat on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,518 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    Can someone give a justification for a 30km/h speed limit on Chesterfield Avenue? I haven't seen any clear reason for why it's needed.

    I'm sure the ultimate theory is that it's safer, but if that's the case then why not make every road in Ireland 30km/h!



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I personally don't see the need for any changes to the park. What was really wrong with how it was?

    If it's just a few residents annoyed about people parking all day, that would have been easy to solve.

    A lot easier than some of the crazier ideas on here to start moving the zoo.



Advertisement