Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

No Time to Die **Spoilers from post #1449 onward**

12627282931

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    He's a touch on the young side but will still maintain that my man crush for the moment, Dev Patel, would be a perfect Bond. Has played the lead a few times now with a good amount of charisma - and intensity when required such as with The Green Knight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,233 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Same age currently as Connery was for Dr No, so I don't see his youth as a problem. And it looks like filming won't start until 2024 so even less of an issue.

    Also I think with the time between films seemingly on the increase, it's probably an advantage to go with someone 30-35 years old. That way you can get 4/5 films without getting into silly territory.

    On Idris Elba (mentioned by 'fryup' above) I think the window for him as Bond is gone. Might be a good M or Bill Tanner though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Elba is far old, there are actually other black British actors.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, he'd be close to Craig's finish age before the release of the next movie.

    And too prolific/well known an actor also.

    It does them no harm to be seen considering him though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭billyhead


    Henry Cavill would make a good bond. He was good in the Man from Uncle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,103 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    yeah, I enjoyed that film and it seemed like a Bond audition for Cavill (I believe he did actually audition when DC got the role too).

    But I wonder if Cavill is too well known - Eon like casting cheap low-profile actors, not existing movie stars. That's why I think there's no way it will be Tom Hardy, or some of the other big names being tossed around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭billyhead


    Okay another potential name. The main actor from Bridgerton.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    not at all, sure Roger Moore was an old age pensioner with a bus pass when he was doing it



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    Regee-Jean Page I think he'd be very good if they went down the Roger Moore light-hearted route again. I've only seen him in Bridgerton so I can't say how he'd do if they stuck with the more serious tone. But tbh I wouldn't mind if Bond became a bit more fun again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,103 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    that's not a good thing, Moore looked way too old in his last few films, and Craig was looking very old in NTTD as well.

    Moore also knocked out 7 movies in 12 years, whereas they're producing them at a much slower rate now, younger man required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,282 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Any reason not to go with Richard Madden? He would be known but not really famous. 35 years old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Moore had 3 under his belt by Idris's current age - though in fairness I think it was only by Octopussy and AVTAK that he was clearly too old.

    Brosnan had his four done by aged 50, and Dalton his two by 44.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    They need to shake bond up….. the franchise is very tired…..



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Eternals probably helped his Hollywood clout; so he's probably the right point in his career to take something like Bond. He'd be a very safe, rote choice though TBH and if there's a genuine intent to shake things up with the franchise - I can't see him being top of the charts for consideration.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    I didn't know Cavill had tested for the role, I think they made huge mistake passing on him. CR starts with Bond as a newly minted double-oh and then a mere two movies later he's already an over the hill crock, no doubt a product of Craig aging like fine milk and becoming hard to distingush from Judy Dench when they share scenes together in the later films....

    If they had gone with Cavill we could have had a lot more of Bond as a fresh faced newbie finding his feet in the spy game and earing his rep.



  • Registered Users Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Wedwood


    Apart from the actor, the tone of the new movies is just as important. Apart from the legal issues that delayed and ultimately scuppered Dalton’s third movie, audiences at the time did not really take to Licence to Kill and its more serious take on Bond. Before Brosnan arrived, it was more or less assumed the Bond series was over, along with the Cold War which was the backdrop to many of the movies. It was only when Craig’s era arrived that LTK was re-evaluated as a movie ahead of its time.

    Goldeneye was seen at the time as a risky attempt to restart the character for a post Cold War generation. The return to a lighter tone was welcomed by audiences. The next movie/actor will have as much riding on their shoulders to show Bond is still a relevant character for modern audiences.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Goldeneye and Casino Royale both the best Bonds of each actor. Both the most serious…. Serious = Good….. unless Bond is played by Roger Moore



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I think Spectre and NTTD are proof that serious doesn't always equal good, both went for a very serious tone however their plots were completely ridiculous and fall apart at the smallest bit of examination. I think grounded would be a much better word for the the reason behind CR's success, there was no over the top plot to take over the world, he was just trying to weaken the position of someone who could be turned into an informant. The stakes were low and the personal arc with a subplot. Later Craig era films, raised the stakes significantly and tried to incorporate the Bond's personal journey directly into the plot.

    Haven't seen Goldeneye in years but whilst it's serious, it has its tongue very firmly in its cheeks that was similar to Connery. I liked Craig in the early films but his Bond became far too earnest and I still think turning Bond into a family man was a bigger mistake than killing him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Goldeneye was a bit of a farce but compared to the later Brosnans it was Mucho Mucho serious.

    You make a good point that casino Royale was good because it was smaller and not about taking over the world. I think that’s the way forward for Bond. No base full of henchmen and posion flowers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 516 ✭✭✭BattleCorp1


    Go back to having cool gadgets like Roger Moore used to get to play with.

    My vote would be for Henry Cavill.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Even that has seen its time pass IMO. As Spectre winked at when Bond got a gun & a radio: what's special about spy gadgets in an era when many/most people on the street have a smart phone? The Huawei in front of me makes most Bond gadgets look stone age, and it's not a top of the line or anything - that's just what passes for modern tech.



  • Registered Users Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Wedwood


    Apart from Brosnan’s invisible car, the most outlandish gadgets were perhaps Roger Moore’s laser/magnet watches. The exotic vehicles were usually real (mini helicopters/planes etc). The rest were espionage items like suitcases with hidden weapons etc. The Bond car weapons were far fetched but just about believable.

    NTTD’s villain with the bionic eye was a ‘jump the shark’ moment for me. Also, the magical Spectre mist that protects Bond while everyone else in the room gets poisoned. How did Blofeld know he’d get Bond to stand in that exact spot long enough to stay alive?. How did the poison air not just drift into the magic mist? …… oh I give up !! It’s more like something you’d see in Austin Powers.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Unless I'm misremembering everyone died because their DNA was targeted, but Bonds wasn't in the mix and so wasn't targeted at that time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Wedwood


    Maybe so, then why did he need the mist to stay alive?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Confirmed: Gene Hackman has won the role of James Bond. A screen test and producer meeting was done last week. Official announcement Monday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,977 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    He didn't. It's the other way around - the mist was the nanobot bioweapon that was meant to kill Bond, but had been reversed by Safin to kill all the Spectre guys instead.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    Disgraceful.

    Hackman shouldn’t need to do a screen test



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    Sam Heughan (not sure if the spelling - the lucky backstard what gets to to be with Catriona Balfe in Outlander) would be a good Bond but he is in his forties now.

    I think they should go with an actor in his twenties and tell a story of how and why he he was recruited.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,103 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Jamie Dornan's been rising up the betting - he's good in the (somewhat ridiculous) The Tourist on BBC and getting excellent reviews for Belfast.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Administrators Posts: 54,087 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I'd definitely watch a prequel Bond, but not sure it would have mass appeal or how they'd make it fit. They've already done Casino Royale, so we've already seen his beginnings at a 00 agent. Can you make a 2 hour movie of the events leading up to that, but one that isn't just a drama and contains action sequences etc like we're used to in Bond?

    It would be Bond without a lot of the usual Bond characters. No M, no Q, no Moneypenny, no Felix etc.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Thing is, there's no way a Bond prequel would resist filling its film with endless nods, quips and "fan service" to the point where it stopped being amusing. Even in Casino Royale, I found the Martini line a bit 🙄 obviously just my preference but Hollywood rarely does well with these "before they were famous" kind of stories.

    There's also the problem where the question is ... is Bond that interesting that his pre 007 is worth telling? The franchise's biggest strength is its biggest weakness; a power fantasy whose main character is intentionally void of personality beyond superficial aspects; we just had an attempt to add texture. Not sure how you go back to that well so soon - and what you do different



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,807 ✭✭✭micks_address


    probably mentioned earlier but i see Tom Holland talk about how he pitched a younger james bond origin story to Sony... (not sure if its Sony) they turned it down but he got the uncharted gig instead..



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    Casino Royale is an origin story but Bond is already a capable agent by then.

    I was thinking more of some mission he on with the SAS (he is former SAS isn’t he?) that leads to him coming to M’s attention or something and then a pre-00 mission that doesn’t go well or such.

    but maybe he has to already be a capable to a Bond.

    A younger Bond wouldn’t mean a prequel - each new actor is a reset of the character anyway. So with the next 007 Casino Royale to No Time to Die will never have happened.

    Plus No Time to Die means all the characters have to be recast too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    I have a doubt that they'll go for another white actor. So my guess would be either:

    Henry Golding (English, suave, hits the diversity angle).

    Rege-Jean Page (good rep coming off Bridgerton, sex symbol, also mixed race so good the diversity angle again).

    Either would actually be a good choice for the role and they could offer something new.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,977 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Was thinking recently that for a TV spin-off show, 001 would make a lot of sense. A show based around the origin of the 00 idea itself, and the first agent they test the concept with. Ideally done as a cold period piece.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump




  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    I assume you mean Cold War.

    I don’t know about a TV series but I love to see 007 put back into the Cold War setting.

    A set of movies that take Bond from his prime in the early fifties through to the 80s and the fall of the Berlin War. His last movie could have him over the hill and a seemingly irrelevant “Cold War dinosaur” (as M said in Goldeneye).



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Yeah. Further, maybe a prequel that centred around Spectre, now that the rights are back with the Broccolis; criminally underused in NTTD, and might make for a useful fulcrum for a spin off. The 00s started as a response to a mysterious group, born in the ashes of ww2 and seemingly trying to seize power in the vacuum. IMO it'd be a better choice than trying to stay wedded to the main Bond timeline and get bogged down in winks and nods.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Same way Craig brought something new. He didn't fit into the stereotype and neither would they.



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    Craig did add more depth to the character but if by “stereotype” you meant the cold blooded murder, “misogynist dinosaur”, etc. of the previous films and the books, that is still there.

    The movies have changed how they treat women but not how James Bond treats women. As Pheobe Waller-Bridge said that is how you update the franchise but if you change Bond then he he isn’t Bind anymore.

    As long as Bond is still the “stereotype” then it doesn’t matter what he looks like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Well personally I'd be more interested in seeing a movie with Golding or Page in the role, than Cavill. Cavill spoofed the role somewhat in The Man from UNCLE and I'm not sure he'd be able to get away from that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,070 ✭✭✭OU812


    I'd totally watch that. 18 cert crude as **** ultra violent gentleman spy???? Sounds like a great movie



  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭Useless Lump


    I’ve seen Crazy Rich Asians and five minutes of Last Christmas. Golding seemed to be playing the same guy in both. I don’t know who Page is.

    I think Cavill and Heaughan (from Outlander) would be great Bonds however the more I think about a new Bond the less I want to think about a new Bond.

    Craig did a great job and the ending of No Time to Die has me want no new Bond actor for a couple of years.

    And when it is time for the return I think the most exciting thing would be cast a complete unknown with 007 his first role.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,665 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    there was twitter chatter last week that Cillian Murphy's odds had shortened.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,233 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I believe most of that Twitter chat was started by a Cork newspaper too.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement