Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Star Trek thread

1205206208210211310

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    If Discovery had been more like Star Trek's heyday the Orville probably wouldn't have gained any following but the Orville's current popularity means the demand for it is still there. SNW's marketing is leaning on the return to older style Star Trek so maybe they learned something but I wouldn't bet on it

    The Orville was released two weeks before Discovery so it can't be a direct response unless the tone and gist of Discovery were common knowledge in Hollywood for a couple of years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,784 ✭✭✭knucklehead6


    already posted....

    Post edited by knucklehead6 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,444 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I think people who are getting excited by SNW because they see it as the coming of some sort of "true Trek" messiah will be disappointed. It will have a lot of the hallmarks of DIS just with episodic stories.

    The ones who hate DIS for being "woke" or whatever the FK will be really disappointed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    I wasn't thinking of woke, I was just thinking of episodic planet of the week style Star Trek. We know the can't do serialised stories my one last bit of hope for the live action side is they can do episodic stories but I am more than prepared to be disappointed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,444 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    My biggest worry about SNW is that the producers have shown that they have very little knowledge of Trek history which is dangerous in a prequel so we are just gonna get loads of stuff that contradicts the franchise timeline. It was also probably be full of awkward Easter eggs or origin stories for TOS crew.

    Generally though I hate prequels of anything. ENT absolutely sucked and the spore, Klingon war and Spock's brother plots on DIS are absolute sht.

    I did like PIC though despite it's poor ending so I'm not worried about SNW being a last hope or anything like that



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    My excitement does come with lots of caveats; can't imagine too many Trek fans remain unblemished by Disco + Picard, but SNW feels like it has a solid premise to begin with. A prequel yes, but a genuine gap in the canon worth following, a known quantity with Anson Mount's Captain Pike, and the vaguest hints that the tone might be more enthused for ... uh, discovery than the other shows.

    Plus, I'd say if I dug into the Lower Decks thread my initial opinion is probably the total polar opposite to where it sits; we know this clutch of producers can do Trek if they want to. Hmmm maybe my excitement is more hopeful on typing it out...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,444 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I've loved every second of Lower Decks from day 1 but LD is the DS9 of this run of Trek in the sense that the showrunners and producers are involved in name only and in reality has its own team



  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,444 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I tried watching it again a year ago and at first I thought maybe I was wrong but it got so boring so fast and I gave up.

    Trip wasn't bad and T'pol is way way ahead of the pack. The rest of the crew are about as wooden as the Disco team and Archer is just a pain. Also I have always hated that the stuck an extra Enterprise ship in the line before the TOS ship



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    Given how often Enterprise is reused in the real world it's not much of a stretch. Before TOS aired the US Navy had commissioned 7 ships with that name, the Royal Navy had commissioned 9 and one of them was the same ship.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,929 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    I loved the NX-01, it was like a prototype Defiant (DS9 edition rather than the sister constitution class ship to the Enterprise) Enterprise the show was a bit hit and miss. It went through a bit of an uncomfortable time around season 2 where female cast members were put in skimpy clothing as often as possible. Something the newer shows have managed to avoid. Strange New Worlds will hopefully show JJ Abrams the right way to update the Enterprise, the bridge looked excellent from what I can remember and the Short Treks pointed in a good direction.

    If there's one thing the likes of Orville, Lower Decks and the 90s shows have shown me, doesn't matter if its meant to be comedy, drama or family entertainment, if you write well fleshed out characters for the audience to engage with , you have a good show.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,444 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    As a ship design the NX-01 is one of my favourites just hated the name. I always prefer the non secondary hull ships like Miranda or Akira class or better yet Nebula which had one but scrunched up



  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    But British and Americans have been using the name Enterprise for centuries across so many ships. Cross influence but even the actual "NX" shuttle was Enterprise



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's the one aspect of the Enterprise show I loved from the outset. It was a great design, and really nailed that tricky balance between something far in advance of our own technology - but still utterly behind the curve relative to the in-fiction tech. It has a slight "cobbled together" feeling that fits the tone. I've always appreciated it when Trek makes more effort to portray ships as ... well, ships. Not necessarily vehicles dangerous to be in (ala the much mentioned The Expanse) but at the very least a moving, confined workspace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    I'm going to buck the trend, I don't like the NX class. It looks fine but it fits too well with Federation Starfleet designs. It's almost like all Federation Starfleet designs are 100% human derived when we can see from Enterprise the other founder races' technologies are superior in some aspects.

    You could argue the same point about Starfleet the organisation but being the neutral party between the rest of the semi antagonistic founder races it was probably the only thing they could agree on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,369 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    I'm not really up on Trek lore and stopped watching Enterprise very early on, but it has always struck me as odd that the 'primitive'/just-discovered-warp humans somehow managed to convince the snooty and superior Vulcans, the kill-you-as-soon-as-look-at-you Andorians, and the ones with pig snouts not only to form a Federation and a Starfleet, but also to make humans the centre of both.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    A lot of it is covered in Enterprise. One early example that started the Andorian-Human relations was Shadows of P'Jem where Archer essentially betrayed the Vulcans to the Andorians because it was the right thing to do.



  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Beta canon but I remember that the humans lucked into a more efficient warp field using their configuration



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,929 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Xindi Crisis played its part as well. When it became clear that the Xindi were a threat to all the solar system adjacent worlds "the enemy of my enemy" sort of took hold.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,263 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    And the Romulan crises with the Stealth image changing ship

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,263 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard



    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,444 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I know but it still annoyed me. It was just cheap sht memberberries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    I don't know if anyone else here is interested in this sort of thing but the Star Trek Adventures roleplaying game books are on sale on Humble Bundle for ~€15

    https://www.humblebundle.com/books/star-trek-adventures-rpg-modiphius-2021-books?hmb_source=&hmb_medium=product_tile&hmb_campaign=mosaic_section_1_layout_index_4_layout_type_threes_tile_index_1_c_startrekadventuresrpgmodiphius2021_bookbundle



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,246 ✭✭✭corkie


    Has this been shared already, out of place in Coronavirus forums?


    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." ~ George Santayana
    "But that's balanced out by the fact that it's a mandate not to do very much." ~ Prof. Eoin O'Malley



  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The Visitor.

    Christ, what an episode. Nothing current even comes near



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    DS9 my man; DS9. The best Trek.

    But yeah, I couldn't ever believe the current stable of writers have the nous and ability to write something as humane and effecting as The Visitor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I’d challenge anyone to watch that and not feel a tear welling up near that end.



  • Posts: 8,756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's an episode where tears are earned. Todd was amazing.


    Himself and Rachel Robinson had fantastic chemistry.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I've said it before so many times, but what I really always liked about DS9 - among all the other things - was it wrote a normal, healthy and (importantly) performatively loving father-son relationship. Which remains really rare TBH. There was drama but never overwrought, teenage bullshít beloved of hacks acting out their own shítty parental history; Avery Brooks' more unconventional acting style meant Sisko and Jake seemed a comfortable pair, at ease and loving.

    It also made Trek feel more human - something I always had a problem with in TNG, its cast often neutered, problem solving professionals than creatures with desires or feelings.



Advertisement