Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hurling- what’s gone wrong and where do we go from here.

Options
18911131429

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    How about a rule that the only players allowed cross the half-way line are the two mid-fielders on each team.

    That way it’s 6 backs on 6 forwards on either end, no using forwards as extra sweepers etc.

    Another idea is that backs can only play ground hurling, so no hand-passing, catch and strike or fielding the ball, would have to bat the ball away and pull on it or lift and strike, or solo and strike.

    I’d add a rule to the above that a free out from your own half has to be taken off the ground like a side-line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Davys Fits


    It is good but typical GAA its long overdue and that could be the problem getting it through. When players have gotten used to throwing the ball its difficult now to reverse that and will make for a big change to ho how the game is played, but a better one for sure. Like Cleary I think it will solve the ruck issues aswell. Getting the ball in hand will not mean a simple throw out of the ruck so rucks are less likely to develop in the first place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition



    Hurling lagging the other sports, even with Cork in the final and only 40k attending.

    To some extent people have voted with their remote controls, and it's to be expected really, even people who were previously hurling fanatics are much cooler on the game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Davys Fits


    Possibly but given the game was over after 15 minutes probably had a lot to do with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Deiselurker


    Too many scrums and rucks for the ball on the ground. One thing that might improve things is when the referee throws the ball in only 2 players can contest it and no one else can be within 10 metres and yellow card anyone else who comes in. If it takes multiple yellows in a few games so be it as long as the rule is enforced.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 534 ✭✭✭1373


    The very best games of hurling, the ref let them at it and did not make himself the center of attention



  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Davys Fits


    When players keep getting away with stuff like throwing, overcarrying, pulling and dragging then they will keep doing it more and more. Ultimately we then up with a game of anarchy with no rules. So ignoring the ref and the rules is not going to work in the long term Im afraid. Letting the game flow at all costs will ultimately damage the games integrity and may already have.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,860 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    This one drives me mental, sometimes you'll see the ref holding on telling the players to back away and they just refuse to do it, until eventually the fans start roaring with impatience...at the ref!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    I think it already has, especially with how the advantage rule is being interpreted. Realistically if a team can do a good bit of minor fouling now they’ll be at an advantage.

    With the distances the ball is struck now there’s rarely an advantage in not giving a free for a foul, except when there’s a goal chance. But that’s not what’s implemented.



  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭Deiselurker


    Agreed. I checked the rule book to be sure and it's already in rules that only 2 players can contest a throw ball from referee and everyone else must be 13 metres away but this is never enforced and ref just gives up and throws it in leading to another ugly looking scramble involving lots of players.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭Boom__Boom


    The issue with this is that in the vast majority of cases both sides are simultaneously infringing the 13 metre rule.

    What does the rule-book say a referee should do if both sides are simultaneously infringing a rule?

    Have a throw ball.

    So under the current rules a referee can't do anything or else it would be a situation where if the rules were applied it would just devolve into a cycle of throw balls.

    Change this rule so that in situations where both sides are infringing at a throw-ball to two black cards to the nearest two players (one on each side) not contesting the throw and very quickly you'd solve the issue of players not being back 13 metres.

    I'd love to see the stats on how often a throw-ball leads to a free to the player who wins the throw-ball. The current throw-ball rule is a disaster in both hurling and football. I'd say it's almost worse in football. There was a throw-ball in one intercounty football game this year where a player who wasn't contesting the throw (i.e. was supposed to be 13 metres back) caught the ball right in front of the ref and the ref just let play continue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭zetecescort


    Sure you can't pull on a throw in nowadays anyway



  • Registered Users Posts: 644 ✭✭✭jeff bingham


    I would switch the throw ball and throw the ball upwards in the air and let the players contest in the air



  • Registered Users Posts: 901 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    The whole problem with this thread is in the title: "what's gone wrong".

    Nothing has gone wrong; the game is evolving, and the OP assumes that we all think something has "gone wrong".

    There are more scores than previously, so bloody what?



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,860 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    Well you could change the question to "In what ways is the game evolving?" but that leads to the follow-up question "Are we, collectively, happy with the direction in which it has evolved?" and the majority of people on the thread would say "No", and then we would start debating what can be done to alter the game for the better, and it would end up being the same conversation anyway.

    But yeah, you're right in one sense, I think there's a lot of cribbing about the game these days, and it feels like that's always been the case, it was always better x number of years ago, but then you look at games from x years ago and it isn't a patch on the present. Skill levels are higher now than I've ever seen them. But without getting sentimental about the good old days we can still acknowledge there are aspects of how the game is played now that are not ideal or that we have it in our power to make better. Sometimes increased skill can lead to a less interesting spectacle (arguably the handpass issue is a "problem" only because players have become so good at it, but that still makes it detrimental to the spectacle, for example) and changes need to be made to reflect that.

    I wouldn't agree that it's just a matter of there being "more scores than previously", it's that scores can be gotten from virtually anywhere without the same level of contact and contest for ball, which, added to the inreasing levels of possession retention, means that the game isn't as exciting as it was. I don't think it is any kind of nostalgia to say that this has happened over the last few years, and that actions could be taken to open the game up a bit more, the skill levels won't be somehow reduced by taking those actions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    Change the hand pass rule. As someone suggested previously ban two consecutive hand passes between players, second pass has to be with stick or kicked……limericks game would then fall apart🤪🤪🤪



  • Registered Users Posts: 901 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    Do you want to change the rules to stop Limerick or ‘improve’ hurling?



  • Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭Iecrawfc




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Counting hand passes would be a pain, plus you're have anyone who recieves a hand pass having their hurl dragged as they know he can't hand pass

    Just make a rule that a handpass must be recieved with the stick, at least that promotes the core skill of hurling



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    Did you not notice the emoji’s…..I think you should lighten up a bit🤪🤪🤪



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    Refs are well able to count ‘steps’ and number of times ball is in the hand…they get it right the majority of the time. 🤪🤪🤪



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Every single thread on this forum about every single game after every single goal will have people contesting your claim about refs abililities to count steps 😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Davys Fits


    So the thread name may not be accurate but no game can just let rules be broken and suggest that that's just the evolution of the game. The game may have evolved into a possession game where ball in the hand is vital but throwing the ball and running 7 steps with it is breaking the rules.

    The rules dont evolve!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,696 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw


    You have answered your own point just have better refereeing standards!



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,265 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Problem with limiting the hand pass is its going to lead to us all back here complaining about the amount of obstruction of the hurley going on. Every new rule just leads to new ways to cheat

    50/50 looking possible throws need to be cracked down on before we try anything radical



  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Davys Fits


    Blame the refs. Thats a cop out. Its becoming impossible for refs to do anything about the thrown bandpass. Blow them and they are blamed for ruining the game and let them go an he gets crucified when be blows one and not the rest. Its totally unfair to put the responsibility back on the refs for a glaring error with the fundamentals of the game.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    The GAA need to look at other sports and see how they manage to deal with increasing standards. The rules of the game should lead to an enjoyable game to watch while not making things too easy.

    Take a look at rugby for example. Rugby authorities have no issue trialling new laws or rule changes to stop the game becoming harder to watch. Ireland for example employed a tactic called a "choke" tackle, meaning that if a player was tackle and held up long enough that a maul was formed, that the play would restart with a scrum to Ireland. Ireland got so good at it the game was stop start with scrums which no one enjoys ruining the game.

    So the IRB introduced a rule that when a players knee touched the ground it counted as a tackle and the tackler had to release. This means a defender can't tackle someone, have their knee hit the ground and then other players come along and keep him held up. It keeps the game flowing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,265 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "Ruining the match" is something you see in Irish and UK sports in regards to refs. It's stupid and needs to stop. I have seen refs blamed for "ruining" the spectacle because they rightfully sent a player off. I'm talking when people admit it was a red offence but still think the ref ruined it and not the cheating player.

    It really becomes a problem when a team already has a player sent off and you can see the ref afraid to go ve a legitimate second red cause he will "ruin the game"



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,696 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw


    I think they should trial another ref for senior level games one each half of the field!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,646 ✭✭✭washman3



    It probably would. But then again being the super team they now are, they would quickly adapt to the new way of playing, probably even faster than those around them would right now. Just an opinion.



Advertisement