Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin - Metrolink (Swords to Charlemont only)

14243454748123

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Will they though? Many people in Ireland only vaguely support public transport if it gets other people out of their cars and out of their way. But they themselves wouldn't dream of using it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,625 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Given that I follow this thread I'm obviously got an interest in it, but I live outside the catchment area of the current metrolink and also even if it was extended to Sandyford. Even if I lived with the area, given my line of work I still wouldn't be one of its regular users. As is, I will probably only use it once a year if that but it doesn't mean I don't understand the need for a large scale projects like this.

    Too often the media focus on the cost in some weird hope that it will create calls amongst the population to get them cancelled. The ironic thing is, construction cost will keep going up, doesn't matter if it was built in the 80s, now or the future, it will always be expensive.

    If anything we're not ambitious enough. If we really want a modern functioning society then these large scale infrastructure projects need to be built now, not in 2030 or 2040. We can't keep building houses and extending the commuter belt without them tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    This has the air of Yogi Berra's infamous quote "Nobody goes there anymore - it's too crowded". "Many people" may not use public transport, but that doesn't change the fact that in "normal" peak times every Luas, DART, and bus is absolutely rammed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    The position put forward was that transport would be a massive election issue that "nobody would forget". My point is that transport is not at all an issue for most people except for roads for cars. In the 2020 general election exit polls transport didn't even make it into the top 10 issues.

    While I do think the Greens will get absolutely hammered at the next election it won't be because of Metrolink or Dart Underground it'll be because of the perception of them as the carbon tax party, rightly or wrongly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Also worth pointing out 3/4 of Ireland population don't live in Dublin and will very rarely use the metro.

    I'm from Offaly and for sure I would love to see the metro being built but in reality I would use it only a couple of times a year, It won't be a voting issue for me, I'll be voting for my local TD to deal with issues in Offaly/Loais first and that's the reality folks.

    Dublin is not Ireland, Dublin constantly forget this, look I really hope and want ye to get the metro for sure but I also want later and more frequent train times on intercity routes and better local bus shedules as they impact me directly



  • Registered Users Posts: 209 ✭✭Bsharp


    This is an insightful post because it highlights the issue of how transport is planned and perceived in Ireland.

    It's not looked upon as one system with knock-on impacts of how we all work and live. Without Metrolink traffic will get worse in Tullamore. Why? Because less development will take place along a metro corridor and more in regional towns in lieu.

    DART Interconnector is the same. Where all the additional Intercity and Regional commuters trains meant to go if Heuston Station and Phoenix Park Tunnel reach capacity.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    A lot of people in the general population, and it would appear a lot of politicians, don’t make the connection between housing and transport. They are joined at the hip.

    An example: in Cork, there was a massive expansion of housing in the 1990s and 00s. The reason it was all feasible was massive expansion of the road network. The South Ring Road was carrying 100k vehicles per day by the mid 2010s only existed since 1999. Much of that was new traffic brought on by new developments.

    The same is likely true in Dublin but I don’t know the finer points. The motorway boom of the 90s and 00s and the construction of the M50 facilitated it, but Dublin had the Luas and the DART expansion of the 90s to help.

    Now we are in a right pickle. Dense housing in the city centre gets roundhouse objections and is not wanted by the city council. The existing public transport is nearing capacity and any attempts to densify near stations also gets objections. There is very little serviced land with public transport capacity. Massive road based capacity expansions are not an option anymore.

    Which begs the question. What next? MetroLink was designed to open up Swords to dense development and open up large tracts of land in north Swords, Dardistown, and any brownfield land along the route to dense development. It provides enhanced connections for DART passengers, significantly improving connection options for the DART SW line in particular which has ridiculous amounts of development potential.

    If we can’t service land we can’t build houses. Where does this end?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No. How do you resume tunneling? You need the tunnel behind to take out spoil.

    Would have to tunnel in from the other end, massively increasing cost and disruption



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    These people wages are serious. A fortune has been spent on du and mn, then dm plans... is lying about current greenline capacity being adequate for two decades acceptable?

    Their literally now just saying, whatever suits them. After years of plans, figures, studies, public consultations...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Dublin is the golden goose and its bled dry. If dublin could keep Dublin taxes , we could have world class infrastructure. A choked uncompetitive Dublin, is bad news for the rest of the country on many levels

    ..

    "Also worth pointing out 3/4 of Ireland population don't live in Dublin and will very rarely use the metro."


    Yeah right. So Berlin shouldn't have a metro because 90% of germans cant use it on a daily basis?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Where did I say Dublin shouldn't have a metro? You are taking up my post wrong.

    Where do you think Dublin is going to get it's water from in 10 years time? (Shannon pipe line)

    I'm just stating reality to you that the country as a whole won't make this an election issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Have you actually read the plan?

    It is not being put on the never-never, it is going ahead. Unfortunately, because of the likes of Na Fianna, Dunville and others, there have been delays to the design process several times over the last decade resulting in the current plan. That is going to planning next year, but it will take a few years after that for procurement etc. to enable work to start.

    It is the same for other plans. DART+ is delayed by residents in Ashtown and Coolmine forcing rethinks, but hopefully it will get going quicker as well. I would expect construction on that to start first.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    If every other county is looking out for itself maybe Dublin should do the same. Most people living in Dublin don't use intercity trains, maybe only a couple of times a year so why should they get to use the train lines here? Scrap the intercity routes and put on more DARTs for the people living in Dublin to use. Most people living in Dublin would use already rammed DART that would use the intercity routes. Obviously I don't think this should happen, I am just trying to make a point.

    I live in Dublin but would probably never use the Metrolink much probably less than you would but I still think it needs to go ahead. I also think that better public transport everywhere else is a good idea. I remember an article here a while ago about Kilkenny getting its first bus service and I was delighted to see it happen (surprised too that Kilkenny didn't have a bus service before that). I don't live in Kilkenny, I have been there a few times but would never need to use the bus service there as I am only visiting and staying somewhere central. However, if a party was looking to stall or roll back improvements there and in other towns/cities across the country it absolutely would affect how I would vote even though it doesn't directly affects me because it shows their attitude to public transport in general. If a party isn't investing in public transport in Dublin where buses, trams and trains are rammed full at peak time, why would they invest in public transport in other areas of the country live Offaly and Laois? A Dublin metro would cost money. A better bus service in Offaly and Laois would cost money. More frequent and longer running train service in Laois and Offaly would cost money. If a party isn't going to spend the money on public transport in Dublin, why would they spend it elsewhere?

    It isn't about Dublin getting things and my area isn't. It's about political parties prioritising public transport or not. I say all this as someone from Sligo who lived in Sligo most my life (only moved to Dublin a few years ago) so it's not just me saying this because I live in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    That's quite a tale, again as I've stated to other people. Read my post again, where did I say Dublin shouldn't get a metro?



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Lads, no more Dublin vs the rest of the country chat. This is about Metrolink only. Start another thread to talk about regional investment imbalances (this is a topic meriting discussion so it would be a worthwhile idea to start one)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Right. Have these issues been worth spending billions extra on ? Because that has been the outcome... the cost for dealing with this nonsense, to Dublin and the actual financial cost implications, are a disgrace...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well, that is the price of living in a democracy, of living in the EU, where the public have a right to be consulted, have a right to have their views heard.

    You and I might think that the people who object to level crossing closures are wrong, but they still have to be given their voice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    You reckon other eu countries afford them this level of control ? Has there been a consultation on the interior colour scheme of the metro carriages yet ? Debate on what music if any, should be piped through the speakers?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    IT reporting that Hugh Creegan (NTA Deputy CEO) told Dublin City Council today that MetroLink would take 9 years to deliver post planning.

    Costs have gone up so much they can't tell us how much it'll actually cost now, and the delivery has increased by several years from the original plan, despite the southern end being truncated and no tie in.

    I have many questions here and the number of questions is increasing as we go on.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,250 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Planning in 2022 and going online in 2031 would follow that 9 year window alright.

    I care less about the completion date than I do about the date the TBM goes into the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Yes the focus needs to be on clearing the hurdles as they come. Projecting ahead to future stages is obviously necessary but shouldn't be at the expense of the current stage. The next stage is planning, complete that and then move forward from there. Once planning is obtained there will be a clearer picture on cost.

    The only costs that actually matter are those resulting from the procurement process and we will never get those unless we get to procurement stage. I suspect costs and timelines keep getting inflated to cover arses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    I totally agree about it being the day the TBM starts, that is the most important thing! That is far enough away, that the current greenline issue will likely have to then be addressed also, and they can start working on that problem. Anne graham lying that the current line is adequate, isnt actually a viable strategy, at much as they would like us to believe it is...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,687 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Years in which European countries opened their first Metro




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Deeply embarrassing to be so far behind a corrupt, broken country like Bulgaria.

    Even if Denmark is the country we should be comparing ourselves with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,526 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Colm McCarthy has written the same old argument about Metrolink in the Sunday Independent. His argument is interpreting that people getting around on buses should be the only way that will solve Ireland's transport dilemma & not trains.


    I cannot read the whole article as it's behind a paywall. But he is saying that in this article that not building Metrolink will be the only way of solving how people in Dublin can do their commute around the City including around the GDA. I am not sure if he is including Dart+ Expansion in that argument as well. But he is quoting the Irish MoS article's Metrolink cost of €10 billion in it.

    If he had included the proposals contained in the GDA draft transport strategy in there as well; I might assume here that if you're reading the article right now; it might make for a depressing read.

    I do have to admit that his analysis on Metrolink alone just reinforces the point that it still become a big waste of money in his eyes. If we are going to get back on a longer term recovery in our economy after Covid becomes stable along with air travel coming back to normal. The pressure on people who do use Dublin Airport on a day to day basis will become very chronic over the longer term.

    Having people want to continue to stick with using buses to travel in & out of the biggest airport in our country is not a good sign in how he wants it to improve it's reputation by not having high quality PT infrastructure on offer for people who live in the capital.

    McCarthy just wants to reinforce the supposed popular narrative coming from himself & all of the nimbys involved in not seeing the bigger picture in that he is just quite happy with Dublin to suffer with not having a transport system that will offer real & tangible benefits to people who live in the city centre including within the GDA.

    If he wants to see an increase in the economy's competitiveness, if he wants to see people remain with a good quality of life, if he wants to good benefits accrued in this country from tackling climate change emissions from the recent Cop26 deal being made yesterday along with the added bonus of low carbon housing being built while it's dotted along the Dublin City & County landscape in his future economic forecasts.

    He needs to have the gumption to add Metrolink in his forecasts sometime to see that benefit become a huge reality for all Dubliners in the long run. If he doesn't do that he is just running a fundamentally lost cause to people who have different opinions on how they live around the city.

    If people in Dublin want to have the Metrolink to be built in the future. He has to listen to their real reasons why they would want to use it as it may become a big influence in how it will improving their quality of life.

    Dublin Airport is going to become the biggest area of generated demand to support this new piece of infrastructure in the future. The amount of passengers that we have seen coming in and out of the airport before Covid came along were going through it at a constant rate. It showed no signs of stopping back then. And that level of demand that's generated there and then will certainly not make any steps to die off permanently in the future.

    It's the strongest guarantee yet that it will not become a supposed waste of money in the future. Metrolink will become a huge success while it serves Dublin Airport.

    Oh mark my words. These sentiments coming from me will just be reinforced over & over again. Just wait & you see it once people get the Covid booster vaccines which will gives them the assured long term of immunity once it goes into their arms. Once that happens people should get back to work soon if that is possible.

    They will go through there in a few years time and still will become absolutely shocked in how this country still does not have a Metrolink line in the biggest airport in the country if they come & visit for work or for leisure here in the future.

    The level of ignorance that's coming from McCarthy & the nimbys involved in being against Metrolink has got to give way soon.

    Post edited by dublinman1990 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,625 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Colm McCarthy is a dinosaur and part of the reason we've been so slow to embrace mass transit in the capital. His opinion pieces have wrongly influenced the tone of what we really need from public transport for too long.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Here's the latest timeline. I'm sticking with my estimate from September. Nothing has changed since.

    12 months for planning is pure fantasy. This is what I'm expecting:

    Railway order application lodged in Q2 2022

    Railway order granted in Q4 2023

    Final business case and contracts signed by Q3 2024

    Construction to start in Q4 2024

    Seven years for construction (the initial six years is out the window) would mean a 2032 opening. That's all that's possible going full steam ahead from now. 2032.

    Nine years for construction would mean a 2034 opening which is the worst case scenario.

    Post edited by Peregrine on


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Broadly agree, however I think that there is a possibility of the railway order going through on time. Not a major one by any stretch, but still a chance. Every previous railway order was essentially the only public consultation on the project, while in this case there's been several already. I think that may work in it's favour, as ABP might see that favourably.

    Of course, ABP is chronically under resourced, so who knows? Sweetman will probably take a JR as well, saying that the earth worms haven't been consulted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I'd say there is more chance of the construction completing earlier than planned than there is of planning being concluded early. Every major roads project seems to be completed well within the timeline given. The contracts structure for Metrolink should allow for multiple things to happen concurrently.

    With the SHD process being closed, ABP will hopefully have more resources to devote to Metrolink. The Galway Ring Road and M21 should also be out of ABP soon and I don’t think there will be may other major projects going there in the next six months.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Q2 2022 for submission of RO is a slippage from the earlier Q1. Another 3 month delay. These delays are just endless. No accountability.

    Agreed about the construction maybe taking less time than we fear, but the planning being as slow as you'd expect. The difference is that the planning is the work of administrative and legal bodies which are famously slow, but the construction is the private sector which has different incentives.

    I remember in the Celtic Tiger years the government used to pay road building companies early completion bonuses which was one of the reasons we managed to build such a massive quantity (for our size) of motorways so quickly.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Early completion bonuses are a recipe for contractors tendering artificially long construction periods they know they’ll be able to better.

    What I can’t get over is the No Trains Authority publishing a 224 page document with no firm phasing or construction plan and it being 2.5 times more expensive than the previous plan with less stuff in it



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,980 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    "I remember in the Celtic Tiger years the government used to pay road building companies early completion bonuses which was one of the reasons we managed to build such a massive quantity (for our size) of motorways so quickly."

    Well Metrolink is going to be built by the same people who built the motorways, TII, so I assume there are going to use the same sort of contracts, with early completion bonus, etc.

    Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) are a combination of the old NRA (who built the roads) and RPA (who built the Luas), the merged TII used the same type of contracts for Luas Cross City, which was delivered slightly ahead of time and on budget.

    The one downside of this approach is that your design and planning has to be absolutely perfect before you start. And late desgin changes will result in big cost overruns and delays (see Children's Hospital). So the plan stage takes longer, but worth it in the end.

    I couldn't disagree more with marno21, prior to the NRA taking this approach with roads, road building in Ireland was a disaster, builders would promise the earth for how long it would take and then it would run years over schedule and way over budget. There just was no incentive to deliver on time or budget. With the new contract type, there are not only bonuses, but also penalties for being over schedule. This forced everyone to be realistic about built times, which is better all round.

    Hopefully the same approach is taken with Metrolink, rather then the disaster that is the Children's Hospital.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    The one downside of this approach is that your design and planning has to be absolutely perfect before you start. And late desgin changes will result in big cost overruns and delays (see Children's Hospital). So the plan stage takes longer, but worth it in the end.

    The problem with the NCH wasn't/isn't late changes to a largely complete design, it's a design that was only half finished when the contracts were signed, with fundamental changes required before the ink had dried on said contracts.

    Metrolink promises to be a very different kettle of fish, what with it using BIM for everything, really looks like TII want absolutely everything nailed down before hand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The NRA at the time were using a D&B contract which they developed themselves. This was superceded by the GCCC suite of contracts, which includes D&B contracts. These do not allow for bonuses as such for early completion but the basic premise is that they are fixed price, so if the contractor finishes early and therefore has no extra costs, they still get paid the full amount, so there is a incentive to get finished and get out of there as soon as possible.

    TII have gone away from GCCC and have used contracts from the NEC suite from the UK. The indication is that the three civil works contracts for Metrolink will use NEC4 target price contract. Everything else will be wrapped up in the PPP which will be bespoke anyway.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Does anyone remember the timeline of events for MetroLink over the last two months? The Mail on Sunday article claiming it'll be 2034 by the time it's finished came out on September 19. When did they confirm it? Did they even confirm it? What's the official position regarding the 2034 date?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Pretty sure the official position is opening 2031 or later according to GDA Transport Strategy. MoS still seems to be the only place where 2034 has been mentioned (although I don't think anything official directly contradicts it either).



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Add a few months to everything, I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Three months Judicial Review Period seems ambitious unless there is some mechanism to jump this to the top of the queue and have court time reserved.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Maybe it's just enough time for a judge to throw it out without a hearing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I would say the construction activities are well padded there. I guess like the motorways it'll be delivered 'ahead of schedule' once it starts that is. That's why the focus should be on breaking ground. The construction time line will shorten if you've a reputable contractor, they need to ban BAM from tendering for public projects permanently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Agree regarding padding, I've said it before here too, arse covering factored in too.

    The contracts strategy should mitigate against an NCH situation, not relying entirely on one contractor and delays in one doesn't necessarily delay the others.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    They should start contractor validation/qualification now, and decide the business case now, and get the ABP Railway Order process under way now, and prioritise it.

    All three could progress independently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 209 ✭✭Bsharp


    If the design and contract documents are in decent shape then BAM should be grand too.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Seems the residents around Charlemont have been given an update on the Metrolink works there, which now include a second entrance on Dartmouth Road. A second entrance there makes sense, allowing easier access for everyone walking there from the south.

    Funny to see the cost of the station entrance and relocating residents being made into a big thing, a drop in the ocean compared to the cost of the entire project. Quite a smart thing to do though, offer to rehouse residents for the duration, it'll really lessen any complaints that they may have. Well, not lessen, but it'll show how ridiculous they are when they've been offered a solution.




  • Registered Users Posts: 326 ✭✭MyLove4Satan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    It is. They've effectively gone back to Metro North, but with sufficient number of minor changes to add years to the project timeline



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Government are currently looking at the business case for Metrolink, just as they did with Dart+ West. As with D+ West, I'd expect approval very soon. Even under the shortened route, there'll be station at Charlemont, except now it'll have two entrances.


    As an aside, the residents getting an update made me think of Gadra, the other noisy residents group, so I checked in with them. They're now having monthly meeting with the independent consultation, RINA, an Italian construction firm.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,526 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Do you think the Government approval for Metrolink will come in some time this week or could it be made shortly before Christmas?

    I would like to think that this will be the desired outcome as we get close to the end of 2021.



Advertisement