Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

17797807827847851111

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I think it's more that the immunity level from infection is unknown vs. consistent with vaccine it could havr stimulated the reaction in the immune system a lot more or a lot less. As a simple example, my son caught chicken pox when very young and had almost no symptoms, I doubt he would have the same resistance as my older son who had the full range of symptoms and reaction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭watchingfromafar


    Vaccines wane over 6 months.

    Natural immunity gives longer lasting immunity.

    Israeli study confirmed this. Up to 13 x more protection from natural immunity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Just one but that could be a new thing. HCWs were very hesitant on them with rates as low as 30% before this all started. Paul Reid drew attention to it in 2019 and it was a known issue back then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 348 ✭✭Timmy O Toole


    Is that based off the reported cases every evening? How is there a big spike in November then down again even though positive swabs have never been over 4900? Backlogs in reporting affect the R number ?

    Post edited by Timmy O Toole on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,140 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Willfully unvaccinated, christ on a bike. This is the thread that keeps on giving.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    As opposed to the tiny number that can't be vaccinated (that the anti-vaxxers try and blame for everything).



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Won't happen. They're only setting a random date in February to try scare/coerce people into getting it. Otherwise they would of set the date as next week. Nobody will pay the "fines", so what are they gonna do? Throw a million+ people in prison? 😄

    Also, as Beasty said, stop pretending you're a pharmacist and giving us random, made-up anecdotes. Has no weight here, and nobody cares anyway.

    Cheers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,991 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    This is very sad to see. The way some people have turned on others just because those people have made a decision personal to them that others may not agree with. To see these people labeled as anti vaxxers or willfully unvaccinated or whatever other names they have been called is as I said sad and even sickening to see and to see it being cheered on by others as well. These people want to have a look at themselves in the mirror to be treating fellow human beings like this or is that they see people who are not vaccinated as somehow beneath them. They need to ask themselves why is ok to treat small minority of people who have decided not to get vaccinated when they wouldn't (or maybe they would) do it if it was anything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    MM view on international travel :


    “In relation to international travel, the Taoiseach

    said Ireland would align with the EU on travel

    policy.

    And he pointed out that the World Health

    Organization and the European Centre for Disease

    Prevention and Control are not advocating travel

    restrictions despite the challenges posed by the

    virus.

    He said travel restrictions were not "the direction

    of travel" right now and the Covid test requirement

    introduced here last Sunday had already reduced

    the volume of international travel. “



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    The annoying thing is, the hints about restricting travel came via "reports" from nphets meeting....so leaks from nphet then?!

    I thought that sh1t was supposed to have been knocked on the head?


    So either nphet are still leaking stuff to force the govts hand, or the govt are leaking stuff to soften us up and so they can blame nphet.


    If MM says restrictions on non essential travel is not being considered, we can take it to mean its being announced next week :/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,140 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    That does not compute. I'm fairly sure it was nphet/government blaming the unvaxxed for everything.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,470 ✭✭✭MOH



    It's conveniently difficult to answer basic questions like that when as usual it's just an image without bothering to link back to the original source. Which I've failed miserably at finding on the OurWorldInData site it appears to be from.

    But hey, why bother giving proper credit to people when you can just nick their images, post them without a single word, and consider that a valid argument



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They are not in Ireland. You can’t just « avoid » fines there.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,458 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Copy of post I have just made in the main thread:

    We get the fact some of you bare dissatisfied with the performance of the Chief Medical Officer, NEPHT, members of the Government and indeed some of the experts you may pay attention to on TV, radio or indeed the print media

    We also get the fact that some of you like to let off steam in this and indeed other threads in the forum

    However repeatedly stating your dislike/hatred of such people and abusing them here is not only irritating to posters who like to interact in a civil manner, but it's also highly offensive to the individuals in question. Can posters just refrain from resorting to such commentary as it not going to achieve anything beyond winding up (ie trolling) other users and attracting mod attention

    I am copying this warning into the Relaxation of Restrictions thread. but it applies equally across the forum

    Any questions PM me - do not respond to this warning in-thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭HalfAndHalf


    Thanks Beasty, any chance we can sort out the off topic rents on vaccination/non vaccination drivel too please? Every time I drop into the thread I have to go through pages of unrelated crap. Thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,004 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    Interesting use of words..."To get vaccines into our most marginalized and vulnerable",presumably,with their informed consent ?

    If that consent is'nt forthcoming from any in your chosen group,will there be Security on hand to restrain them whilst you ready the syringe ?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,938 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Listening to BBC news this evening and the reporter doing a "for and against" segment on mandatory vaccination.

    Found it remarkable, because over here the "against" side would immediately be jumped upon and labelled anti-vax conspiracy theorists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,978 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Good Morning Britain were discussing it as well. Clearly lots of 'kite flying' going on.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭watchingfromafar


    Can we change the thread title. As the restrictions have increased since yesterday its a bit of a conspiracy to say they are being relaxed..



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nobody has suggested mandatory vaccination here, let alone start a debate, so again, you are inventing a scenario purely to feed your internal anger and paranoia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 307 ✭✭watchingfromafar


    Wasn't Simon Harris talking about it in 2019?



    so current member of government has brought up the idea. It has been discussed.

    discussed for Health care.

    So it's not completely off the table for certain people. Once it's okay then it's easily expanded.

    Just like passes were only for indoor dining. But are now for gyms. (Well some gyms)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,978 ✭✭✭growleaves


    The CEO of Nursing Homes Ireland Tadhg Daly suggested it.

    It's also been endorsed by a few boardsies, including on this thread and the Austria thread.

    Unfortunately when people's morale has collapsed they become incapable of acting morally.

    I do not look forward to demoralised people telling me that mandatory vaccination is 'another tool' or asking questions like "But why wouldn't we bring in mandatory vaccination?" if that is what the future holds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 853 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    GMB ran a Twitter poll that came up as something like 80% against mandatory vaccination with 50k respondents.

    Then they deleted it. 😂

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,243 ✭✭✭MOR316


    I'd probably take my chances in the next life to be honest. It should be about choice and it's incredibly sad to see history repeating itself.

    "Jews are the problem, stay away from them! They carry diseases and should be banned from everywhere! "Stay away from the gays, they spread AIDS and should be banned from everywhere" "Stay away from people who don't want to get the vaccine! They're destroying the world and are murderers and should be banned from everywhere"

    My faith in this world is at an all time low



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 853 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    I’ve been disappointed with how many people think principles are just things you pretend to believe when it’s easy to do so.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭bokale




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,409 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Well that's a bit tangential, if people post here mention the unvaccinated, the loons pile on and talk endlessly about the few people who can't be vaccinated (you'll see the same people start every post about how vaccines and restrictions don't work of course).

    But if you have a better name for the group who can be vaccinated but chose not to, then suggest the label (other than the star child "we're all people" response).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,938 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I am shocked that you, of all people, would post so disingenuously.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,140 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    A good start would be to just call them unvaccinated. It's simple and straight to the point without needlessly labelling it in a derogatory manner. Personally, I don't care if someone is vaccinated or not because, to be quite frank, it's none of my business. I got the vaccine for my own reasons, which is a personal decision but I'm not going to lecture someone for not taking it. That's on them to live with.

    We are now at the stage where the deficiencies of the health system have been completely laid bare for all to see. Some think we need to vaccinate children to keep protecting it or that going after the remaining 6/7% is worth it. I personally don't think it’s going to make much difference to the abundance of caution approach by the NPHET/ HSE. our biggest problem right now is that we need to increase ICU capacity to that of a semi functioning health care system and try get on a par with the EU average. Can this be done overnight? Of course not. But I don't for one second agree that this government should be using emergency legislation to curb our rights while at the same time demonising a section of society for doing something that is completely within their rights to do, ie not take a vaccine.

    The vaccines work, this thing is done. What we currently have is a political game of cover your arse to distract from the massive failings of the HSE and successive governments.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



Advertisement